MKIII Supra performance

how would a 87-92 supra turbo compare against a s13 240sx with a sr20det swap? those are my 2 options and i want something that's fast, but can handle well.

i say go wid da sr20det!
couple of reasons:
1.sr20det motor will be alot newer
2.sr20det has lots of aftermarket parts
3.240sx in my opinion is better lookin then da 87-92 supra
4.da 240sx will handle better then the supra
5.you can squeeze an easy 300hp wid boltons n turning up boost
6.sr20det can make an easy +400hp

but if u are looking 2 go for hp n speed over handleing n looks i say go wid da supra cause i think u can get moe hp out of the supra!
conclusion:
240sx w\ sr20det=total package, looks,handleing,speed,power
supra=power:D :D

Originally posted by sr20det2nr
i say go wid da sr20det!
couple of reasons:
1.sr20det motor will be alot newer
2.sr20det has lots of aftermarket parts
3.240sx in my opinion is better lookin then da 87-92 supra
4.da 240sx will handle better then the supra
5.you can squeeze an easy 300hp wid boltons n turning up boost
6.sr20det can make an easy +400hp

but if u are looking 2 go for hp n speed over handleing n looks i say go wid da supra cause i think u can get moe hp out of the supra!
conclusion:
240sx w\ sr20det=total package, looks,handleing,speed,power
supra=power:D :D


thanks for the insight. the main reason i want a mk3 supra is because it's turbo's from the factory....it'll be a tough choice...

Supra..more top end..faster..more power.
But hey 240sx are sweet cars too.

when was the last time you saw a 550+ rwhp 4 cyl?? thats a daily driver? oh yeah and the supra pulls about .9 G on the skid pad. hell back in 86 it pulled .87 with gatorbacks on it. with todays newer stickier rubber compounds .9 isnt too hard and if you lower it sway bars and upgrade the shocks a full G isnt to far away.