1995 Firebird Performance Ideas
firebirdfanatic95
08-06-2007, 10:21 PM
i have a 1995 pontiac firebird. its a 3.4 L v6. does any 1 have any performance suggestions??
blindeyed
08-07-2007, 07:47 AM
www.fullthrottlev6.com.. best suggestion I can give.
wrightz28
08-07-2007, 08:55 AM
Taht or the umteenth times the same question was asked at:
http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=1463
Make it breath bettin, intake and exhaust.
http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=1463
Make it breath bettin, intake and exhaust.
ZL1power69
08-07-2007, 10:32 AM
i vote for a sticky for v6 performance since its a frequently asked question. anyway, not alot you can do with the 3.4 besides intake, exhaust(headers, high flow cat, and catback), lower temp stat, ignition upgrades, and maybe a tune. you might get close to 200hp. not a huge aftermarket following with this engine though. the 3.8 that replaced the 3.4 had greater performance potential.
blindeyed
08-07-2007, 11:18 AM
i vote for a sticky for v6 performance since its a frequently asked question. anyway, not alot you can do with the 3.4 besides intake, exhaust(headers, high flow cat, and catback), lower temp stat, ignition upgrades, and maybe a tune. you might get close to 200hp. not a huge aftermarket following with this engine though. the 3.8 that replaced the 3.4 had greater performance potential.
Oh you can do way more than that, there's tons you can do those engines.. is it worth it? Now that's a whole other debate.
Oh you can do way more than that, there's tons you can do those engines.. is it worth it? Now that's a whole other debate.
ZL1power69
08-07-2007, 01:37 PM
is it worth it? Now that's a whole other debate.
exactly
exactly
stieh2000
08-07-2007, 04:38 PM
i vote for a sticky for v6 performance since its a frequently asked question. anyway, not alot you can do with the 3.4 besides intake, exhaust(headers, high flow cat, and catback), lower temp stat, ignition upgrades, and maybe a tune. you might get close to 200hp. not a huge aftermarket following with this engine though. the 3.8 that replaced the 3.4 had greater performance potential.
I second that. I've seen a sticky like that titled "So you wanna be fast" on another forum (I'm afraid of mentioning it by name at the rick of getting a free all expense paid two week vacation to bandlandia). It was a very comprehensive, from boltons to forced induction.
I second that. I've seen a sticky like that titled "So you wanna be fast" on another forum (I'm afraid of mentioning it by name at the rick of getting a free all expense paid two week vacation to bandlandia). It was a very comprehensive, from boltons to forced induction.
blindeyed
08-07-2007, 04:58 PM
I can probably do a write-up for the 3.4 guys, and I'll see if I can get Savage Messiah to cover one for the 3.8's.
wrightz28
08-08-2007, 08:33 AM
Sounds good,
number 1, make it so. :icon16:
number 1, make it so. :icon16:
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2025