BMW M3 (E46) vs: BMW M1
Porsche
09-16-2001, 03:23 PM
Too much talk about it so here it is;
2001 BMW M3
24-Valve DOHC 6-in-line, aluminium block and head
Bore x Stroke 3.58 x 3.43 in (91.0 x 87.0 mm)
Displacment 198 cu in (3245cc)
Compression Ratio 11.5:1
Power SAE net 333 BHp @ 7900 rpm
Torque SAE net 261 lb-ft @ 4900 rpm
Redline 8000 rpm
6 Speed Manual
Curb Weight 3454 lbs.
Price: $49,500 USD (est)
1979 BMW M1
24-Valve DOHC 6-in-line
Displacement 211 cu in (3.5 L)
Power SAE net 266 BHp @ 6500 rpm
Torque SAE net 229 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm
ZF 5 Speed Manual transaxle
Curb Weight 3000 lbs.
Price: (1979) $53,000 USD
There ya go my vote now is still the M3 but, the M1 is lighter and not that far behind in power or torque, my book said its top speed was 162 mph and 0-60 time is 5.5 Seconds, so it really quick for even today's standards
2001 BMW M3
24-Valve DOHC 6-in-line, aluminium block and head
Bore x Stroke 3.58 x 3.43 in (91.0 x 87.0 mm)
Displacment 198 cu in (3245cc)
Compression Ratio 11.5:1
Power SAE net 333 BHp @ 7900 rpm
Torque SAE net 261 lb-ft @ 4900 rpm
Redline 8000 rpm
6 Speed Manual
Curb Weight 3454 lbs.
Price: $49,500 USD (est)
1979 BMW M1
24-Valve DOHC 6-in-line
Displacement 211 cu in (3.5 L)
Power SAE net 266 BHp @ 6500 rpm
Torque SAE net 229 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm
ZF 5 Speed Manual transaxle
Curb Weight 3000 lbs.
Price: (1979) $53,000 USD
There ya go my vote now is still the M3 but, the M1 is lighter and not that far behind in power or torque, my book said its top speed was 162 mph and 0-60 time is 5.5 Seconds, so it really quick for even today's standards
F20C
09-16-2001, 05:53 PM
They are both great work of art by BMW.
hermunn123
09-16-2001, 07:03 PM
the M1 having a mid engine is really nice. how well does that handle? better than the M3??
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2026
