05-06 stang GT vs. 05-06 GTO. (STOCK for STOCK)??
doodad
07-27-2006, 01:34 AM
guys, l own a stock 06 stang GT and l believe 05-06 GTOs are faster than us and they car beat us on the street and on the track. but these people say it is drivers race.. or even race.
what do you guys think? honestly!!! am l wrong or right? (assume both drivers are decent)
here is the link:
http://www.mustangforums.com/m_1711595/tm.htm
what do you guys think? honestly!!! am l wrong or right? (assume both drivers are decent)
here is the link:
http://www.mustangforums.com/m_1711595/tm.htm
666_speed
07-27-2006, 01:50 AM
I would put my money on the GTO's.
KevinG
07-27-2006, 01:50 AM
Eh, it's only a drivers race if the GTO messes up. I only have times for the stock '05 models of the cars but the GTO beats it by half a second.
'05 GTO runs the 1/4 in 13.0seconds
'05 Stang GT runs the 1/4 in 13.5 seconds.
'05 GTO runs the 1/4 in 13.0seconds
'05 Stang GT runs the 1/4 in 13.5 seconds.
FormulaLT1
07-27-2006, 01:53 AM
One thing you will soon learn or should soon learn Erdal, the truth hurts but also doesn't always need to be shared. Most forums are filled with people that want to pat each other on the back and praise each other for making such a smart choice of what auto to represent themselves with. Even if deep down hidden in a secret room they know what your telling them is the truth (which they do), they don't want to hear it or think about it. I know there are plenty of cars out there stock for stock that will beat our cars or even mod for mod will probably beat us. There is always going to be something bigger or better out there and thats a for certain. While GTO's and Mustangs appeal to two different markets, yes the GTO is without doubt the more powerful auto and will beat the stang with the same skill driver in my opinion but its not a slaughter by any means, so why push those guys buttons and make them dislike you by beating them over the head with facts or commen sense knowledge. Just go in there to support each other in enjoying the cars you have and not making note of what might be better in anyway. All you're do with that is making them dislike you.
FormulaLT1
07-27-2006, 01:55 AM
Eh, it's only a drivers race if the GTO messes up. I only have times for the stock '05 models of the cars but the GTO beats it by half a second.
'05 GTO runs the 1/4 in 13.0seconds
'05 Stang GT runs the 1/4 in 13.5 seconds.
Damn, thats a faster time than I seen in most publications for both cars. Most GTO's I see are around 13.2 - 13.3 and most mags claim the mustang to be 13.7 - 13.9.
'05 GTO runs the 1/4 in 13.0seconds
'05 Stang GT runs the 1/4 in 13.5 seconds.
Damn, thats a faster time than I seen in most publications for both cars. Most GTO's I see are around 13.2 - 13.3 and most mags claim the mustang to be 13.7 - 13.9.
KevinG
07-27-2006, 02:04 AM
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercoupe/articles/0-60times.html
^^ I found that link about a year ago, and I use it like it is the bible.
^^ I found that link about a year ago, and I use it like it is the bible.
doodad
07-27-2006, 02:09 AM
One thing you will soon learn or should soon learn Erdal, the truth hurts but also doesn't always need to be shared. Most forums are filled with people that want to pat each other on the back and praise each other for making such a smart choice of what auto to represent themselves with. Even if deep down hidden in a secret room they know what your telling them is the truth (which they do), they don't want to hear it or think about it. I know there are plenty of cars out there stock for stock that will beat our cars or even mod for mod will probably beat us. There is always going to be something bigger or better out there and thats a for certain. While GTO's and Mustangs appeal to two different markets, yes the GTO is without doubt the more powerful auto and will beat the stang with the same skill driver in my opinion but its not a slaughter by any means, so why push those guys buttons and make them dislike you by beating them over the head with facts or commen sense knowledge. Just go in there to support each other in enjoying the cars you have and not making note of what might be better in anyway. All you're do with that is making them dislike you.
l relaize that but these people are sometimes these people are making me sick. l just dont get it.. a fat 2005/06 stang GT 300hp (ok underrated, lets say 320hp) and GTO has 400hp.. kinda heavier but still faster..
did you click the link and read the web site?
damn gotta love F-body guys.. most of them are so nice! and most of the mustang guys are jerk.
l relaize that but these people are sometimes these people are making me sick. l just dont get it.. a fat 2005/06 stang GT 300hp (ok underrated, lets say 320hp) and GTO has 400hp.. kinda heavier but still faster..
did you click the link and read the web site?
damn gotta love F-body guys.. most of them are so nice! and most of the mustang guys are jerk.
FormulaLT1
07-27-2006, 02:10 AM
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercoupe/articles/0-60times.html
^^ I found that link about a year ago, and I use it like it is the bible.
Well they even quote the source. So I guess Road & Track and Car & Driver need to start taking lessons from the Motortrend boys on how to drive cause damn thats a pretty big difference right there. Wow, pretty soon we are going to be seeing stock 10 second street sedans and coupes if this pace keeps up.
^^ I found that link about a year ago, and I use it like it is the bible.
Well they even quote the source. So I guess Road & Track and Car & Driver need to start taking lessons from the Motortrend boys on how to drive cause damn thats a pretty big difference right there. Wow, pretty soon we are going to be seeing stock 10 second street sedans and coupes if this pace keeps up.
FormulaLT1
07-27-2006, 02:15 AM
l relaize that but these people are sometimes these people are making me sick. l just dont get it.. a fat 2005/06 stang GT 300hp (ok underrated, lets say 320hp) and GTO has 400hp.. kinda heavier but still faster..
did you click the link and read the web site?
damn gotta love F-body guys.. most of them are so nice! and most of the mustang guys are jerk.
:lol: , hey now. There are jerks and nice guys on each side. Hiflow and Gtstang from the mustang forum here are pretty good guys and I talk to GTstang pretty regularly (infact just today), sure we bust each other's balls about driving a stang or a f-body but there is a mutual respect but I wouldn't hold it against him for making the off comment when the Stang boys are around that F-bodys suck and Mystangs rule. Just like I don't think he would be aiming for my sack if I make the off hand comment about how mustang owners should upgrade to a F-body. It's human nature and as most people say, be happy with what god (satan in your case 666) gave you . If they want to have a circle jerk on a "mustang" forum. To praise there and your car. Let it be. There are plenty of GTO's out there to make them accept reality. Its not your job.
did you click the link and read the web site?
damn gotta love F-body guys.. most of them are so nice! and most of the mustang guys are jerk.
:lol: , hey now. There are jerks and nice guys on each side. Hiflow and Gtstang from the mustang forum here are pretty good guys and I talk to GTstang pretty regularly (infact just today), sure we bust each other's balls about driving a stang or a f-body but there is a mutual respect but I wouldn't hold it against him for making the off comment when the Stang boys are around that F-bodys suck and Mystangs rule. Just like I don't think he would be aiming for my sack if I make the off hand comment about how mustang owners should upgrade to a F-body. It's human nature and as most people say, be happy with what god (satan in your case 666) gave you . If they want to have a circle jerk on a "mustang" forum. To praise there and your car. Let it be. There are plenty of GTO's out there to make them accept reality. Its not your job.
doodad
07-27-2006, 02:30 AM
:lol: , hey now. There are jerks and nice guys on each side. Hiflow and Gtstang from the mustang forum here are pretty good guys and I talk to GTstang pretty regularly (infact just today), sure we bust each other's balls about driving a stang or a f-body but there is a mutual respect but I wouldn't hold it against him for making the off comment when the Stang boys are around that F-bodys suck and Mystangs rule. Just like I don't think he would be aiming for my sack if I make the off hand comment about how mustang owners should upgrade to a F-body. It's human nature and as most people say, be happy with what god (satan in your case 666) gave you . If they want to have a circle jerk on a "mustang" forum. To praise there and your car. Let it be. There are plenty of GTO's out there to make them accept reality. Its not your job.
:), l didnt say all fbody guys are good or all stang guys are jerk.. most of the stang guys that l have talked on forum web sites sounded like jer to me.. some of the were really cool.
l have been on f-body web sites almost over a year and l have seen just a few bastard fbody owner.. l almost ever argued on fbody web sites.. but stang web sites, everyday l fight with someone..
l just cant handle when anyone says bad thing about fbodies :lol:
:), l didnt say all fbody guys are good or all stang guys are jerk.. most of the stang guys that l have talked on forum web sites sounded like jer to me.. some of the were really cool.
l have been on f-body web sites almost over a year and l have seen just a few bastard fbody owner.. l almost ever argued on fbody web sites.. but stang web sites, everyday l fight with someone..
l just cant handle when anyone says bad thing about fbodies :lol:
goldz28
07-27-2006, 02:43 AM
One thing you will soon learn or should soon learn Erdal, the truth hurts but also doesn't always need to be shared. Most forums are filled with people that want to pat each other on the back and praise each other for making such a smart choice of what auto to represent themselves with. Even if deep down hidden in a secret room they know what your telling them is the truth (which they do), they don't want to hear it or think about it. I know there are plenty of cars out there stock for stock that will beat our cars or even mod for mod will probably beat us. There is always going to be something bigger or better out there and thats a for certain. While GTO's and Mustangs appeal to two different markets, yes the GTO is without doubt the more powerful auto and will beat the stang with the same skill driver in my opinion but its not a slaughter by any means, so why push those guys buttons and make them dislike you by beating them over the head with facts or commen sense knowledge. Just go in there to support each other in enjoying the cars you have and not making note of what might be better in anyway. All you're do with that is making them dislike you.
Who is disliking anyone here?
Who is disliking anyone here?
doodad
07-27-2006, 02:52 AM
Who is disliking anyone here?
not here, he meant on the other web sites that l argue with people about fbodies and people dislike me cuz l talk againts mustangs on mustang forums..
not here, he meant on the other web sites that l argue with people about fbodies and people dislike me cuz l talk againts mustangs on mustang forums..
97cavalier
07-27-2006, 02:53 AM
why is it every time doodad ask a question it some how gets to be a fight?lol. Well to answer the question i would have to say the GTO, which by the way they quit making after this year, and are SOPOSED to come back out when the camaro come out with a "new" look, like the old GTO's
goldz28
07-27-2006, 03:01 AM
I thought the new GTO has like 400 hp. The new stang has what 300 or so. I put my money on the GTO, at least you can burnout...lol Sorry Erdal had to...
FTheMan
07-27-2006, 11:58 AM
He overrated his Mustang by 20 hp and it has less then 300 hp at the wheels?
That is right isn't it?
The GTO has 400 hp but 350-360 hp at the wheels?
I'd have to go with the GTO on this one. It might be heavier but it looks better and has a bigger engine.
That is right isn't it?
The GTO has 400 hp but 350-360 hp at the wheels?
I'd have to go with the GTO on this one. It might be heavier but it looks better and has a bigger engine.
stone_mound_camaro
07-27-2006, 12:12 PM
uhhh. GTO... if the new stangs can barely or not beat a ls1 maro, theres no way your beating a ls2 powered gto. It seems like everyone i talk to thinks GTOs are kinda slow... hmm i guess its cuz they look so plain
doodad
07-27-2006, 01:04 PM
He overrated his Mustang by 20 hp and it has less then 300 hp at the wheels?
That is right isn't it?
The GTO has 400 hp but 350-360 hp at the wheels?
I'd have to go with the GTO on this one. It might be heavier but it looks better and has a bigger engine.
wait a minute here now! am l asking for myself about this GTo ? or did l ask some stupid people are telling that new stangs are as fast as GTo and l argued with them and posted here to get your opinions?
and second: dude, l am not bullshitting ok? ford underrated these new stangs.. to calculate hp is like this. rwhp/0.82-85 and find the flywheel horses..
what do you expect? 300hp at the flywheels dyno would put down 290rwhp?
l cant believe even on this thread, l look like l am being d*ck!! read the thread again and then see what l meant on this thing..
here is a article about this read and LEARN!
http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/magazine4002.jpg
That is right isn't it?
The GTO has 400 hp but 350-360 hp at the wheels?
I'd have to go with the GTO on this one. It might be heavier but it looks better and has a bigger engine.
wait a minute here now! am l asking for myself about this GTo ? or did l ask some stupid people are telling that new stangs are as fast as GTo and l argued with them and posted here to get your opinions?
and second: dude, l am not bullshitting ok? ford underrated these new stangs.. to calculate hp is like this. rwhp/0.82-85 and find the flywheel horses..
what do you expect? 300hp at the flywheels dyno would put down 290rwhp?
l cant believe even on this thread, l look like l am being d*ck!! read the thread again and then see what l meant on this thing..
here is a article about this read and LEARN!
http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/magazine4002.jpg
doodad
07-27-2006, 01:08 PM
why is it every time doodad ask a question it some how gets to be a fight?lol. Well to answer the question i would have to say the GTO, which by the way they quit making after this year, and are SOPOSED to come back out when the camaro come out with a "new" look, like the old GTO's
man, nobody was arguing here untill the person who is 2 post below you, Ftheman posted his stupid message.
man, nobody was arguing here untill the person who is 2 post below you, Ftheman posted his stupid message.
FormulaLT1
07-27-2006, 01:56 PM
Damn, I don't think anyone called you or hinted at you being a dick Erdal. He was just questioning the stats on the car. Some people are unaware of alot of stats and I think if you read Fthemans post again with a clear head. You will not find any insults but he does like the look of the GTO better he said but looks are a subjective thing.
doodad
07-27-2006, 02:14 PM
Damn, I don't think anyone called you or hinted at you being a dick Erdal. He was just questioning the stats on the car. Some people are unaware of alot of stats and I think if you read Fthemans post again with a clear head. You will not find any insults but he does like the look of the GTO better he said but looks are a subjective thing.
John, this is what he said, << he underrated his stang 20 more hp and it has less then 300 at the wheels and that is just right..>> maybe it does not look/ sound mean to you but it does to me.. he was being mean there like l am just saying that. l am bullshitting.
and on this thread, l am defending GTOs.
John, this is what he said, << he underrated his stang 20 more hp and it has less then 300 at the wheels and that is just right..>> maybe it does not look/ sound mean to you but it does to me.. he was being mean there like l am just saying that. l am bullshitting.
and on this thread, l am defending GTOs.
FTheMan
07-27-2006, 05:23 PM
How the hell did you get I was insulting you from my post?
Did you see the question marks? I wasn't even sure myself about them.
I saw that you said the Mustang had 20 more hp then what Ford is saying.
You gave no link or proof one how and why this is possible till you replied to my post just now.
How was I supposed to know that? Even then, it still has under 300 hp at the wheels. That's not an insult, I was just saying it. It's a stock fact the car has that.
I didn't mean to insult you or make it look like you were being a dick. I have no intention in doing that.
Your car looks great man. I could be a little jealous, but that's about it. But if you had any thoughts about racing a GTO. I'd have to do with that. It's just faster and looks better.
Did you see the question marks? I wasn't even sure myself about them.
I saw that you said the Mustang had 20 more hp then what Ford is saying.
You gave no link or proof one how and why this is possible till you replied to my post just now.
How was I supposed to know that? Even then, it still has under 300 hp at the wheels. That's not an insult, I was just saying it. It's a stock fact the car has that.
I didn't mean to insult you or make it look like you were being a dick. I have no intention in doing that.
Your car looks great man. I could be a little jealous, but that's about it. But if you had any thoughts about racing a GTO. I'd have to do with that. It's just faster and looks better.
doodad
07-27-2006, 05:40 PM
How the hell did you get I was insulting you from my post?
Did you see the question marks? I wasn't even sure myself about them.
I saw that you said the Mustang had 20 more hp then what Ford is saying.
You gave no link or proof one how and why this is possible till you replied to my post just now.
How was I supposed to know that? Even then, it still has under 300 hp at the wheels. That's not an insult, I was just saying it. It's a stock fact the car has that.
I didn't mean to insult you or make it look like you were being a dick. I have no intention in doing that.
Your car looks great man. I could be a little jealous, but that's about it. But if you had any thoughts about racing a GTO. I'd have to do with that. It's just faster and looks better.
sorry about that.. l just got that way.. for some reasion since l got this new stang l started to argue with people.. maybe it is just me.. bu anyway..
l am not thinking about racing GTOs.. some people test drove them on mustangforums and they were saying that those cars are not faster than stang GTs and l wave them BS flag.. l know those GTOs are a lot faster than stangs and l just wanted to get your opinions and show those people that really everone knows that GTOs are faster..
about looks.. IMO.
trans am> new stang GT> camaro> GTO
Did you see the question marks? I wasn't even sure myself about them.
I saw that you said the Mustang had 20 more hp then what Ford is saying.
You gave no link or proof one how and why this is possible till you replied to my post just now.
How was I supposed to know that? Even then, it still has under 300 hp at the wheels. That's not an insult, I was just saying it. It's a stock fact the car has that.
I didn't mean to insult you or make it look like you were being a dick. I have no intention in doing that.
Your car looks great man. I could be a little jealous, but that's about it. But if you had any thoughts about racing a GTO. I'd have to do with that. It's just faster and looks better.
sorry about that.. l just got that way.. for some reasion since l got this new stang l started to argue with people.. maybe it is just me.. bu anyway..
l am not thinking about racing GTOs.. some people test drove them on mustangforums and they were saying that those cars are not faster than stang GTs and l wave them BS flag.. l know those GTOs are a lot faster than stangs and l just wanted to get your opinions and show those people that really everone knows that GTOs are faster..
about looks.. IMO.
trans am> new stang GT> camaro> GTO
97cavalier
07-27-2006, 05:40 PM
this is the only problem with internet post things, if someone is NOT trying to be mean sometimes it comes off that way to others because the way it is typed. That is what happened to me eariler in a thread so i had to reword it, i'm shure he was not TRYING to be mean. I had some stuf happen to me.
FTheMan
07-27-2006, 06:35 PM
sorry about that.. l just got that way.. for some reasion since l got this new stang l started to argue with people.. maybe it is just me.. bu anyway..
l am not thinking about racing GTOs.. some people test drove them on mustangforums and they were saying that those cars are not faster than stang GTs and l wave them BS flag.. l know those GTOs are a lot faster than stangs and l just wanted to get your opinions and show those people that really everone knows that GTOs are faster..
about looks.. IMO.
trans am> new stang GT> camaro> GTOIt's fine. You have to defend your car every now and then. But you have a good reason why you got the Mustang and not the Trans Am. But you love it and want to defend it anyway, which is good.
Yeah, I agree with you on the BS flag thing. I read Musashi (http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/member.php?u=196670) stories every now and then about his GTO. He raced a Mustang and beat it, so them saying it's slower has to be wrong because he's a pretty good driver.
But if you want to get into looks:
Camaro> Trans AM> GTO> Mustang
And if you want to get technical:
69 Camaro > 67 Shelby Mustang GT 500 > 00 Trans Am WS.6 > 97 Camaro SS > 06 GTO > 06 Mustang
If you wanted technical. IMO.
l am not thinking about racing GTOs.. some people test drove them on mustangforums and they were saying that those cars are not faster than stang GTs and l wave them BS flag.. l know those GTOs are a lot faster than stangs and l just wanted to get your opinions and show those people that really everone knows that GTOs are faster..
about looks.. IMO.
trans am> new stang GT> camaro> GTOIt's fine. You have to defend your car every now and then. But you have a good reason why you got the Mustang and not the Trans Am. But you love it and want to defend it anyway, which is good.
Yeah, I agree with you on the BS flag thing. I read Musashi (http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/member.php?u=196670) stories every now and then about his GTO. He raced a Mustang and beat it, so them saying it's slower has to be wrong because he's a pretty good driver.
But if you want to get into looks:
Camaro> Trans AM> GTO> Mustang
And if you want to get technical:
69 Camaro > 67 Shelby Mustang GT 500 > 00 Trans Am WS.6 > 97 Camaro SS > 06 GTO > 06 Mustang
If you wanted technical. IMO.
doodad
07-27-2006, 06:36 PM
l found the sollution.. l wont posty anything about mustang here and we will be good friends forever :)
97cavalier
07-27-2006, 06:37 PM
l found the sollution.. l wont posty anything about mustang here and we will be good friends forever :)
lol, don't have to go that far.
lol, don't have to go that far.
FormulaLT1
07-27-2006, 06:50 PM
I love the looks of the new stang but I love the looks of LS1 WS6 Trans AM more. I haven't yet formed a opinion on the Camaro concept car yet in relation to the others but your right. Ftheman 69 Camaro's were kick ass style wise and performance was not too shabby either.
doodad
07-27-2006, 06:51 PM
lol, don't have to go that far.
dude you should see me on mustangforums. l argue everyday.. l justb cant handle when people say to fast car that they are slow. for exaple, l told them that fbodies will beat us all day long (LS1) they got crazy and they said no way..l l told him 98-00 LS1 fbody put down 290-300rwhp and 01-02 puts down 310-315rwhp and they run flat 13s or very low 13s.. but they still dont get it. they know they are faster but they dont wanna say that.. dude l love my new mustang but l know thta thing is not as fast but thehy think they got one freaking fast car.:)
dude you should see me on mustangforums. l argue everyday.. l justb cant handle when people say to fast car that they are slow. for exaple, l told them that fbodies will beat us all day long (LS1) they got crazy and they said no way..l l told him 98-00 LS1 fbody put down 290-300rwhp and 01-02 puts down 310-315rwhp and they run flat 13s or very low 13s.. but they still dont get it. they know they are faster but they dont wanna say that.. dude l love my new mustang but l know thta thing is not as fast but thehy think they got one freaking fast car.:)
FormulaLT1
07-27-2006, 07:05 PM
Agree with you Doodad, leave it alone and no point in arguing what they will soon find out or already know from the street. Just because another car is slightly faster, Who cares. They are both nice cars and if they like them and are happy with it and thinks its fast. Let them keep on believing saying or believing that there car will beat everything out there. Its not hurting anyone.
ikeyballz
07-28-2006, 06:04 PM
haha no worries doodad, we love your stang too.. =D well, most of us do anyways..
Earlsfat
07-31-2006, 03:56 PM
Man... those stang guys are warped...."F-Bodys, DO NOT beat Mustang
GT's"
AwwWWWW MAN! Somebody get me some friggin SOLDER and GAUGES so I can run Red Death up this idiot's nose.
(Sadly, I think she's off the road until next year. but we'll see.)
GT's"
AwwWWWW MAN! Somebody get me some friggin SOLDER and GAUGES so I can run Red Death up this idiot's nose.
(Sadly, I think she's off the road until next year. but we'll see.)
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2026
