Here is my new ride, 2006 Mustang GT Premium!

well, finally today l went and got my new ride.. it is beatiful, and l have to say pretty quick. l definetely need a short shifter.. factory shifter sucks! this car's interior is amazing.. rides smooth.. sounds good. l love her..

here are some photos:

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00893-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00894-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00895-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00896-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00897-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00898-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00899-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00900-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00901-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00904-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00905-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00906-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00907-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00909-2.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00910-1.jpg

http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/diyar21/DSC00911-2.jpg

l hope ya'll will like my new ride..

Erdal

Sorry I dont like the new mustangs at all.. if I had to get one i'd gotten a Saleen, or put that money into another Fbody.. not a stang though.. :2cents:

Sorry I dont like the new mustangs at all.. if I had to get one i'd gotten a Saleen, or put that money into another Fbody.. not a stang though.. :2cents:

first l like them.. second l got no other choice.. third, everyone would buy a new stang GT only for 21k

I like it, are you getting rid of the Formula?

Damn! Thats nice. i'm glad you got it, and someday you'll have your Trans Am doodad, dont worry. The interior looks of very high quality. nice car man. :)

first l like them.. second l got no other choice.. third, everyone would buy a new stang GT only for 21k

I wouldnt..

^ Dont lie.

^ Dont lie.

Not lying.. i'd rather get a new Monte.. atleast i'd know the quality is higher.

I like it, are you getting rid of the Formula?
nope.. formula stays with me!

thanks a lot guys.. l think l will get along with this ride.. it fast man, l dont believe those people who says these cars are not fast.. this car will absolutely rape my LT1. but will never sound like my LT1:)

Not lying.. i'd rather get a new Monte.. atleast i'd know the quality is higher.
but not as fast....

but not as fast....

I know.. but those GTs arent that fast to begin with when compared to most v8 cars..

^ I disagree. Give me an example.

^ I disagree. Give me an example.

98+ Camaros..

they have 20 more hp, but weight more than the Stang.
EDIT: Im sorry, the Stang does weight 48lbs more. I suppose the camaro could be faster.

they have 20 more hp, but weight more than the Stang.

Yes because as we all know that the Camaro's weight of 3,433 is more than 3,483 on the Mustangs..

I forgot who said but a Mustang's HP is actually 270.. not 300.. I think it was DJ.

I read 305hp. Who cares. Both Maros & Stangs are nice looking cars IMO.

98+ Camaros..

have you ever driven one? l was so sad to get this car cuz l heard that these cars are slow.. but they are not! l drove 150 miles today. this car will absolutely put a car on an LS1 off the line till 60-80 than LS1 will start to pull and these cars will give a good fight to LS1s.. (with both good drivers)

^ there you have it.

Arent you guys suppost to be in the Mustang forum then? You know, Then people there will believe your claims..

I forgot who said but a Mustang's HP is actually 270.. not 300.. I think it was DJ.

mustang GT sare underrated cars.. real hp is 320-325 and at the wheels they have 270ish HP.

here is an article about it: (l have tried my best to scan but l couldnt.. tonight l will!

read this:

<< the paint was barely dry on new mustangs before enghisiasts began digging in the under the hood to see what they could make of the new gen. pony's three valve, electronic-throttle controlled 4.6 liter engine.one of those enhisiasts was ohio resident corey zaker, who no sooner took delivery of his red stang before heading for the drag strip. equipped with the five speed manual transmission, the car peeled off some easy 13.8s at 98 mph.. his onlu complaint: it didnt powershift very well. so zaker took the car up to alternative auto, in Mt. clemens, mich, to see what could be done to liven up his new stang. the first step was a baseline performance reading on alternavitve's dynojet, where the car pu down 264rwhp and 276lb-ft of torwue. those were higher than expected numbers for an engine supposedtly rated 300hp. they way we figure it, the 05-06 mustangs are putting out more like 320-325hp-But this is just our guess. either way the new mustangs makes good power across the tach>>

l love LS1s and here on firebird forum, people know how much l love them and how badly l wanted to own one. l will own one sooner or later.. l am not defending mustang against an f-body as an fbody FAN! these are the truths..

they have 20 more hp, but weight more than the Stang.
EDIT: Im sorry, the Stang does weight 48lbs more. I suppose the camaro could be faster.

The camaro is ALWAYS faster! :grinno:

I like it Doodad and you may have a 2.73 equiped LT1 but a 3.23 auto or 3.42 equipped 6speed Healthy LT1 will give it a run and not get "raped" but like I said they are sweet cars and congrats.

The camaro is ALWAYS faster! :grinno:

nobody said they are not:) l will not race with anyone untill l get used to this car.. it is very different.. l cant even do burnouts..:)

nobody said they are not:) l will not race with anyone untill l get used to this car.. it is very different.. l cant even do burnouts..:)

There is something in the Mustang's computer that hinders it from being done.. you had to modify it somehow or you'll never be able to do one.. I read about it in Hot Rod mag a while back.

A limmited slip?

There is something in the Mustang's computer that hinders it from being done.. you had to modify it somehow or you'll never be able to do one.. I read about it in Hot Rod mag a while back.

wow! l didnt know that.. l really dont even know how to turn the traction control off.. l will figure it out..

something l relaized on this car today, when your foot is on gas, and if you try to hit to brake, it doesnt let you.. l tired but the brake got very hard didnt let me.

Probably built in electronic response system. Like traction control you can't turn off. If it senses the wheels at any point in the rear moving faster than the front it holds back the throttlebody from opening anymore til they are all equal again. Thats just my guess on how it works if thats what it is.

^ so you're screwed if the accelorator gets stuck, lol.

You're screwed in any car if the accelerator gets stuck.

^ good point.

Ok, now I want to test the intelligence of this board with a quick question. What is the best/safest thing to do if your accelerator is stuck

...third, everyone would buy a new stang GT only for 21k

Ummm... no. Not for me, maybe if I had someone lined up to buy it for than what I just paid for it, and I could make a grand or two.

I will never own another Ford, even if you GAVE it to me. And if you gave me $21k... I can think of about 50 other cars I would rather buy... 59 Caddy, 55 Chevy Bel Air, 54 Chevy P/U, 67 Nova, 65 GTO, 69 GTO, 79 Maro, 68 Firebird, 71 Trans Am, 64 Catalina, 57 Olds Super Delux, 34 Chevy Delivery, 67 Vette, 48 Chevy, 50's/60's Military Jeep, Old Dodge Powerwagon, need I continue???

Rationale... none are computer controlled, had WAY more style and class, and for 21k, more balls, easier to mod and you can do just about anything to them.

I have no idea. maybe apply the e-brake?

I have no idea. maybe apply the e-brake?
Nope that will do very little for you besides maybe burn out your rear brakes.

I know someone has to know this one.

Ok, now I want to test the intelligence of this board with a quick question. What is the best/safest thing to do if your accelerator is stuck

i WOULD HIT THE CLUTCH AND PUT THE CAR ON NETRUAL OR JUST HIT THE CLUTCH AND KEEP IT LIKE THAT.

Slam it to the floor with your foot to try to get it unstuck, if not shift to neutral pull over as quick as possible, turn car off.

Worst case scenario, try to get clear of traffic, throw it in park and shut car off.

Close?

i WOULD PUT THE CAR ON NETRUAL
And let your engine redline til it frys itself :grinno:

So what do you do???

And let your engine redline til it frys itself :grinno:

well, l would turn the car off after that. keep the key on acc. position so the steering wheel wouldnt lock and l would pull over.

Slam it to the floor with your foot to try to get it unstuck, if not shift to neutral pull over as quick as possible, turn car off.

Worst case scenario, try to get clear of traffic, throw it in park and shut car off.

Close?
The right answer was in there but not stated directly. You can turn the key out of the run position while the car is in gear. This will turn the car off but not lock up your steering and allow enough power assisted braking to cruise onto the side of the road.

No engine or body damage and your safe.

l guess before you l already gave the right answer:lol: look above:)

jump out!

shoot, you gave away the answer before i finished read the page...

l guess before you l already gave the right answer:lol: look above:)
You mean turn it off after you put it into neutral to let it redline :lol: . Funny but that wasn't the right answer. The second part should have been the first part.

jump out!

shoot, you gave away the answer before i finished read the page...

LMAO! "Hey stepho, where ya goin'" WWWWWWWWWWwwwwwrrrrrrrrrrr as your empty maro flys by at 150mph. lol.

Nice car, looks like your gonna have to fill up soon. Im a gm guy so im not real big into mustangs but atleast you kept it domestic.

Nice car, looks like your gonna have to fill up soon. Im a gm guy so im not real big into mustangs but atleast you kept it domestic.

l am gonna fill up tomorrow l guess. l am a muscle car fan.. mustangs are hugely famous muscle cars too and l love them. AND I ABSOLUTELY HATE IMPORTS.

LMAO! "Hey stepho, where ya goin'" WWWWWWWWWWwwwwwrrrrrrrrrrr as your empty maro flys by at 150mph. lol.
:lol: , I could so see that in my head. I think sharing the correct answer is important cause so many people panic under conditions like that and what ends up happening is they go speeding into a intersection or wind up slaming into something or like most people think let me slam on the brakes or throw it into neutral and you either wind up losing control cause some wheels are trying to move the car and some are trying to stop it so it spins or with the case of neutral you redline and if your lucky keep hitting your cut off and bouncing off that.

LMAO! "Hey stepho, where ya goin'" WWWWWWWWWWwwwwwrrrrrrrrrrr as your empty maro flys by at 150mph. lol.

Ummm so Jim, are you asking him this as your cruis'n in RD stuck in reverse? :dunno:

Id only own a 60s stang or a 4th gen bullet or Cobra.. only those though and none others.

^ those are the best mustangs.

I like mustangs and my first muscle car/sports car was a Mustang. So I think they are cool.

First thing....Congrats Erdal!!!
They are great running cars. Not slow by any means.



Second...Someone please prove 270'ish' at the wheels. The ones I have been seeing are closer to 250 than to 270. I am sure there are a couple factory freaks though...there was with the Camaro and Firebird as well.
Third....LS1 F-Body beats the new Mustang GT. Unless the F-Body driver SUCKS! Like me. :lol:
310 RWHP > 260 RWHP

Just to add what Curtis just said. Most auto LT1 F-body dyno around 240 and Manuals LT1 around 250 -255 (if you need proof to back this up I have a friend with a dyno sheet from his stock 95 LT1 stick that made 255.5 horse at the wheels). That doesn't add up to a raping.

^Finally! the backup I was looking for. :lol:

^Finally! the backup I was looking for. :lol:
I am not backing you up on it not being a hot car cause it is and 260 wheel horsepower is nothing to laugh at. That will eat up most anything on the street. I am just stating that I agree it is not going to eat up 4th gen V8 F-bodys. Hell I am not even saying it won't beat a LT1 which it probably will with a slight advantage but it will not rape one and most LT1 out there had at least a few which equals the playing field.

First thing....Congrats Erdal!!!
They are great running cars. Not slow by any means.



Second...Someone please prove 270'ish' at the wheels. The ones I have been seeing are closer to 250 than to 270. I am sure there are a couple factory freaks though...there was with the Camaro and Firebird as well.
Third....LS1 F-Body beats the new Mustang GT. Unless the F-Body driver SUCKS! Like me. :lol:
310 RWHP > 260 RWHP


thanks Curtis


here is on mustang magazine, the guy put down 264rwhp and 276 lb-ft torque with his brand new bone stock 06 mustang GT and l saw on mustang forums that some people saw 270s bone stock.

also here is a link l just saw:

http://www.mustangforums.com/m_389998/printable.htm

another

http://www.svtperformance.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136056

I am not backing you up on it not being a hot car cause it is and 260 wheel horsepower is nothing to laugh at. That will eat up most anything on the street. I am just stating that I agree it is not going to eat up 4th gen V8 F-bodys. Hell I am not even saying it won't beat a LT1 which it probably will with a slight advantage but it will not rape one and most LT1 out there had at least a few which equals the playing field.

l havent driven any other LT1 but all l know is, this GT will eat up my LT1. but LT1 sounds better l believe..

another mustang Dyno numbers:

http://www.modularfords.com/forums/2005-mustang/dyno-tuned-an-05-mustang-today-18769.html