New here, have some dumb questions...
Rack
05-14-2006, 08:50 PM
I'm getting ready to purchase a '68 Charger to restore, (although it may not need a huge amount of restoration, but that's probably me just being naive)but I don't know a whole lot about cars/engines. In fact, on a scale from 1-10 I'd say my knowledge is about a 1.5. I can put gas in it and I have changed the oil on a vehicle before. OH! And I've changed an air filter or two.
So anyway, I know I've got a big task at hand so I've been doing some research (in fact, this thread is being started so I can do more research).
So I have a few questions to ask that you guys will find "Dumb" but I won't know the answers to the "Dumb" questions unless I ask them. So...
What does "Mopar" mean?
What are the differences between a regular Charger, a "500", and an R/T? Is it just the engine, or is there a difference in body design as well?
Is $7,500 - $8,000 a good/fair price for a '68 Charger R/T that has been recently primered, "all moulding included", missing rear half of center console/carpet/headliner, complete engine but needs electrical work, and the transmission was ok last time it was driven?
It also has original dual-point distributor and 4-barrel carb. It has a 440 375HP 1-4BBL engine.
Here's some pics of the car...
http://img368.imageshack.us/img368/9656/45120qe.jpg
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/6301/ba128zy.jpg
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/4113/bc129te.jpg
That's all I can think to ask right now. I'll add more "Dumb" questions (many more, you can bet) as I get to more stuff I need/want to know about.
Thanks!
So anyway, I know I've got a big task at hand so I've been doing some research (in fact, this thread is being started so I can do more research).
So I have a few questions to ask that you guys will find "Dumb" but I won't know the answers to the "Dumb" questions unless I ask them. So...
What does "Mopar" mean?
What are the differences between a regular Charger, a "500", and an R/T? Is it just the engine, or is there a difference in body design as well?
Is $7,500 - $8,000 a good/fair price for a '68 Charger R/T that has been recently primered, "all moulding included", missing rear half of center console/carpet/headliner, complete engine but needs electrical work, and the transmission was ok last time it was driven?
It also has original dual-point distributor and 4-barrel carb. It has a 440 375HP 1-4BBL engine.
Here's some pics of the car...
http://img368.imageshack.us/img368/9656/45120qe.jpg
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/6301/ba128zy.jpg
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/4113/bc129te.jpg
That's all I can think to ask right now. I'll add more "Dumb" questions (many more, you can bet) as I get to more stuff I need/want to know about.
Thanks!
Rack
05-14-2006, 11:44 PM
One more...
What exactly is a "Six pack"? And I'm not talking about the abs I don't have or the beer I've drank to make them that way. :grinyes:
What exactly is a "Six pack"? And I'm not talking about the abs I don't have or the beer I've drank to make them that way. :grinyes:
KManiac
05-15-2006, 12:05 AM
Where I come from the only "Dumb" question is the one not asked.
So you what to know what "Mopar" means. Well, back in the 1930's and 1940's, the parts division of Chrysler sold genuine Chrysler parts under the brand name of "Motor Parts". This name evolved into "MOter PARts" and then into "MOPAR". Then people began to use this moniker as a generic term for anything produced by Chrysler Corporation.
Now for the models of Chargers. In the first two years, 1966 & 1967, Dodge offered the Charger as a single model series.
In 1968, the produced the basic Charger and the special Charger R/T (R/T stand for Road/Track). All engines and transmission were available on the base Charger (225, 318, 383, 426 Hemi & 440). The R/T came standard with 440 HP or optional 426 Hemi.
In 1969, they continued with the base Charger and Charger R/T. Then during mid-year, they introduced a model called the Charger 500. This was a limited production car, built solely to qualify the body for use in NASCAR. The unique features of this car were the streamline, NASCAR back window and the flush mounted grill with fixed, exposed headlights. The grill on this car resembled the one used on the 1968 Dodge Coronet. I believe the engine choices for the 500 were the same as the R/T. This year, Dodge introduced the luxury trim package called "Special Edition". This consisted of wood grain dashboard trim and leather seats. The "Special Edition" package became known as SE for short.
In 1970, they continued with the base Charger and Charger R/T. The Charger 500 name continued as a premium model of the base Charger line. The special NASCAR offering this year was the Charger Daytona. This car had the NASCAR back window, tall rear spoiler and beaked nose. They continued with the "Special Edition" trim package for this year.
In 1971, Dodge combined the Coronet and Charger names into one car line. All intermediate 4-doors and station wagons were called Coronet. All 2-door intermediates were called Charger. You could get the base level Charger, the preimium level Charger 500, the luxury model Charger SE, low-priced muscle Charger Super Bee and the premium muscle Charger R/T.
After 1971, the muscle cars disappeared as well as the 426 Hemi.
Regarding the value of the car your are considering, only you can decide. If this car is a genuine Charger R/T, the VIN will start with XS23*8*. The fifth letter denotes factory engine. The 440 HP engine code is L (or XS23L8*). If the fifth letter is J, then this was an original Hemi car. Engine codes other than J or L are smaller engines (225=B;318=F,383=G or H). The seventh letter denotes the assembly plant.
BTW, what is the full VIN of the car you want to buy. Pass it by us first so we can verify whether or not it is a genuine Charger R/T and not a base Charger with R/T trim tacked on.
So you what to know what "Mopar" means. Well, back in the 1930's and 1940's, the parts division of Chrysler sold genuine Chrysler parts under the brand name of "Motor Parts". This name evolved into "MOter PARts" and then into "MOPAR". Then people began to use this moniker as a generic term for anything produced by Chrysler Corporation.
Now for the models of Chargers. In the first two years, 1966 & 1967, Dodge offered the Charger as a single model series.
In 1968, the produced the basic Charger and the special Charger R/T (R/T stand for Road/Track). All engines and transmission were available on the base Charger (225, 318, 383, 426 Hemi & 440). The R/T came standard with 440 HP or optional 426 Hemi.
In 1969, they continued with the base Charger and Charger R/T. Then during mid-year, they introduced a model called the Charger 500. This was a limited production car, built solely to qualify the body for use in NASCAR. The unique features of this car were the streamline, NASCAR back window and the flush mounted grill with fixed, exposed headlights. The grill on this car resembled the one used on the 1968 Dodge Coronet. I believe the engine choices for the 500 were the same as the R/T. This year, Dodge introduced the luxury trim package called "Special Edition". This consisted of wood grain dashboard trim and leather seats. The "Special Edition" package became known as SE for short.
In 1970, they continued with the base Charger and Charger R/T. The Charger 500 name continued as a premium model of the base Charger line. The special NASCAR offering this year was the Charger Daytona. This car had the NASCAR back window, tall rear spoiler and beaked nose. They continued with the "Special Edition" trim package for this year.
In 1971, Dodge combined the Coronet and Charger names into one car line. All intermediate 4-doors and station wagons were called Coronet. All 2-door intermediates were called Charger. You could get the base level Charger, the preimium level Charger 500, the luxury model Charger SE, low-priced muscle Charger Super Bee and the premium muscle Charger R/T.
After 1971, the muscle cars disappeared as well as the 426 Hemi.
Regarding the value of the car your are considering, only you can decide. If this car is a genuine Charger R/T, the VIN will start with XS23*8*. The fifth letter denotes factory engine. The 440 HP engine code is L (or XS23L8*). If the fifth letter is J, then this was an original Hemi car. Engine codes other than J or L are smaller engines (225=B;318=F,383=G or H). The seventh letter denotes the assembly plant.
BTW, what is the full VIN of the car you want to buy. Pass it by us first so we can verify whether or not it is a genuine Charger R/T and not a base Charger with R/T trim tacked on.
KManiac
05-15-2006, 12:21 AM
"Six Pack": This is the slang term used to describe the induction system which uses three, two-barrel carburetors (3 times 2-barrels equals 6 barrels or "Six Pack"). A "Six Pack" induction system was offered on both the 340 and 440 engines in 1969, 1970 and 1971.
Rack
05-15-2006, 12:37 AM
Where I come from the only "Dumb" question is the one not asked.
So you what to know what "Mopar" means. Well, back in the 1930's and 1940's, the parts division of Chrysler sold genuine Chrysler parts under the brand name of "Motor Parts". This name evolved into "MOter PARts" and then into "MOPAR". Then people began to use this moniker as a generic term for anything produced by Chrysler Corporation.
Now for the models of Chargers. In the first two years, 1966 & 1967, Dodge offered the Charger as a single model series.
In 1968, the produced the basic Charger and the special Charger R/T (R/T stand for Road/Track). All engines and transmission were available on the base Charger (225, 318, 383, 426 Hemi & 440). The R/T came standard with 440 HP or optional 426 Hemi.
In 1969, they continued with the base Charger and Charger R/T. Then during mid-year, they introduced a model called the Charger 500. This was a limited production car, built solely to qualify the body for use in NASCAR. The unique features of this car were the streamline, NASCAR back window and the flush mounted grill with fixed, exposed headlights. The grill on this car resembled the one used on the 1968 Dodge Coronet. I believe the engine choices for the 500 were the same as the R/T. This year, Dodge introduced the luxury trim package called "Special Edition". This consisted of wood grain dashboard trim and leather seats. The "Special Edition" package became known as SE for short.
In 1970, they continued with the base Charger and Charger R/T. The Charger 500 name continued as a premium model of the base Charger line. The special NASCAR offering this year was the Charger Daytona. This car had the NASCAR back window, tall rear spoiler and beaked nose. They continued with the "Special Edition" trim package for this year.
In 1971, Dodge combined the Coronet and Charger names into one car line. All intermediate 4-doors and station wagons were called Coronet. All 2-door intermediates were called Charger. You could get the base level Charger, the preimium level Charger 500, the luxury model Charger SE, low-priced muscle Charger Super Bee and the premium muscle Charger R/T.
After 1971, the muscle cars disappeared as well as the 426 Hemi.
Regarding the value of the car your are considering, only you can decide. If this car is a genuine Charger R/T, the VIN will start with XS23*8*. The fifth letter denotes factory engine. The 440 HP engine code is L (or XS23L8*). If the fifth letter is J, then this was an original Hemi car. Engine codes other than J or L are smaller engines (225=B;318=F,383=G or H). The seventh letter denotes the assembly plant.
BTW, what is the full VIN of the car you want to buy. Pass it by us first so we can verify whether or not it is a genuine Charger R/T and not a base Charger with R/T trim tacked on.
:worshippy
Extremely good, useful information. Thank you!
The vin on the car is
XS29L8B152836.
Sorry about the size, I just did a copy/paste and it came out that way.
Thanks again for your reply. Like I said, I'm new to this, but my nephew (RIP) and I were always talking about restoring one of these old cars so I'm gonna do it in his memory. So any information I can get will be extremely useful. I've also already purchased a couple of books on restoring cars. Hopefully those will help too.
I'll be adding more questions as I come across more stuff I need/want to know.
Here's one more...
What's the difference (in performance and anything else) between the 440 and the 426 HEMI? I know the HEMI's cost about 5X more then my live and kidneys combined, but is that gargantuan cost really worth it? Or is it mainly just the "Name"?
Thanks again!
So you what to know what "Mopar" means. Well, back in the 1930's and 1940's, the parts division of Chrysler sold genuine Chrysler parts under the brand name of "Motor Parts". This name evolved into "MOter PARts" and then into "MOPAR". Then people began to use this moniker as a generic term for anything produced by Chrysler Corporation.
Now for the models of Chargers. In the first two years, 1966 & 1967, Dodge offered the Charger as a single model series.
In 1968, the produced the basic Charger and the special Charger R/T (R/T stand for Road/Track). All engines and transmission were available on the base Charger (225, 318, 383, 426 Hemi & 440). The R/T came standard with 440 HP or optional 426 Hemi.
In 1969, they continued with the base Charger and Charger R/T. Then during mid-year, they introduced a model called the Charger 500. This was a limited production car, built solely to qualify the body for use in NASCAR. The unique features of this car were the streamline, NASCAR back window and the flush mounted grill with fixed, exposed headlights. The grill on this car resembled the one used on the 1968 Dodge Coronet. I believe the engine choices for the 500 were the same as the R/T. This year, Dodge introduced the luxury trim package called "Special Edition". This consisted of wood grain dashboard trim and leather seats. The "Special Edition" package became known as SE for short.
In 1970, they continued with the base Charger and Charger R/T. The Charger 500 name continued as a premium model of the base Charger line. The special NASCAR offering this year was the Charger Daytona. This car had the NASCAR back window, tall rear spoiler and beaked nose. They continued with the "Special Edition" trim package for this year.
In 1971, Dodge combined the Coronet and Charger names into one car line. All intermediate 4-doors and station wagons were called Coronet. All 2-door intermediates were called Charger. You could get the base level Charger, the preimium level Charger 500, the luxury model Charger SE, low-priced muscle Charger Super Bee and the premium muscle Charger R/T.
After 1971, the muscle cars disappeared as well as the 426 Hemi.
Regarding the value of the car your are considering, only you can decide. If this car is a genuine Charger R/T, the VIN will start with XS23*8*. The fifth letter denotes factory engine. The 440 HP engine code is L (or XS23L8*). If the fifth letter is J, then this was an original Hemi car. Engine codes other than J or L are smaller engines (225=B;318=F,383=G or H). The seventh letter denotes the assembly plant.
BTW, what is the full VIN of the car you want to buy. Pass it by us first so we can verify whether or not it is a genuine Charger R/T and not a base Charger with R/T trim tacked on.
:worshippy
Extremely good, useful information. Thank you!
The vin on the car is
XS29L8B152836.
Sorry about the size, I just did a copy/paste and it came out that way.
Thanks again for your reply. Like I said, I'm new to this, but my nephew (RIP) and I were always talking about restoring one of these old cars so I'm gonna do it in his memory. So any information I can get will be extremely useful. I've also already purchased a couple of books on restoring cars. Hopefully those will help too.
I'll be adding more questions as I come across more stuff I need/want to know.
Here's one more...
What's the difference (in performance and anything else) between the 440 and the 426 HEMI? I know the HEMI's cost about 5X more then my live and kidneys combined, but is that gargantuan cost really worth it? Or is it mainly just the "Name"?
Thanks again!
Rack
05-15-2006, 02:36 AM
I was browsing some cars at ebay and came across this one...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1,1&item=4639977296&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT
It didn't have a vin number listed so I emailed him asking if he had it. He replies telling me that he does have the vin numbers, but asks "Why do you want it? It doesn't tell you what you need to know."
He didn't include the vin number in the reply.
Guess that tells me all I need to know about that car/seller.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1,1&item=4639977296&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT
It didn't have a vin number listed so I emailed him asking if he had it. He replies telling me that he does have the vin numbers, but asks "Why do you want it? It doesn't tell you what you need to know."
He didn't include the vin number in the reply.
Guess that tells me all I need to know about that car/seller.
KManiac
05-15-2006, 10:46 AM
I checked out the ebay ad for the 1968 Charger. If the guy ain't willing to give out the VIN, then something is wrong! He even claims the car is "numbers matching". Well this means he either verified that the VIN matches on the dashboard, engine and transmission or he used this well worn expression to entice buyers.
Now 440 versus 426:
The 426 street hemi was offered between 1964 and 1971 as a way to qualify this engine for NASCAR competition. This engine was designed to provide maximum power output and performance between 4000 and 6000 RPM. This engine was designed for oval track racing applications. It used the same basic engine block as the 413/426/440 wedge engines, but used the large cylinder heads with hemispherical combustion chambers and dual rocker arm shafts. These engines were more expensive to build due to the increased number of overall parts. And they were heavier than a 440 Magnum in assembled form.
The 440 Magnum used the simpler cylinder head, which had the "wedge" shaped combustion chambers and single rocker arm shaft design. A 440 Magnum was designed for maximum power output and performance between 3000 and 5000 RPM. This engine performed well in acceleration contents and for highway cruising on public streets. Above 5000 RPM, the design of the wedge head induction system simply limited the amount of air that could pass through the engine.
Now, if you put two 1968 Chargers on the starting line of a straight-line race track and they were identical in every way except for one being 426 Hemi and the other being 440 Magnum and you raced them in an acceleration contest, here is what would happen - The 440 will take the holeshot and lead the way for most of the first quarter mile. By the quarter mile mark, the Hemi will be catching or overtaking the 440. If you extend the contest beyond the quarter mile mark, the Hemi will eventually overtake and pass the 440.
On an oval track, the 426 will always outperform the 440. The 426 will outrev the 440, obtaining a higher maximum speed and accelerating quicker than the 440 at speeds in excess of 80 mph.
The bottom line is basic supply and demand. The 426 Hemi is a rare and unique engine design. The limited numbers of original cars produced put them in high demand. However, you can only enjoy the benefits of this unique engine when you drive the car in excess of 80 mph, which is difficult to do on today's modern highway system. Needless to say, there have been many people out there who lusted severely after a Hemi equipped car, due to the mystique, but became seriously disappointed when they finally paid top dollar to get one and found it wasn't a blistering accelerator off the line.
Now 440 versus 426:
The 426 street hemi was offered between 1964 and 1971 as a way to qualify this engine for NASCAR competition. This engine was designed to provide maximum power output and performance between 4000 and 6000 RPM. This engine was designed for oval track racing applications. It used the same basic engine block as the 413/426/440 wedge engines, but used the large cylinder heads with hemispherical combustion chambers and dual rocker arm shafts. These engines were more expensive to build due to the increased number of overall parts. And they were heavier than a 440 Magnum in assembled form.
The 440 Magnum used the simpler cylinder head, which had the "wedge" shaped combustion chambers and single rocker arm shaft design. A 440 Magnum was designed for maximum power output and performance between 3000 and 5000 RPM. This engine performed well in acceleration contents and for highway cruising on public streets. Above 5000 RPM, the design of the wedge head induction system simply limited the amount of air that could pass through the engine.
Now, if you put two 1968 Chargers on the starting line of a straight-line race track and they were identical in every way except for one being 426 Hemi and the other being 440 Magnum and you raced them in an acceleration contest, here is what would happen - The 440 will take the holeshot and lead the way for most of the first quarter mile. By the quarter mile mark, the Hemi will be catching or overtaking the 440. If you extend the contest beyond the quarter mile mark, the Hemi will eventually overtake and pass the 440.
On an oval track, the 426 will always outperform the 440. The 426 will outrev the 440, obtaining a higher maximum speed and accelerating quicker than the 440 at speeds in excess of 80 mph.
The bottom line is basic supply and demand. The 426 Hemi is a rare and unique engine design. The limited numbers of original cars produced put them in high demand. However, you can only enjoy the benefits of this unique engine when you drive the car in excess of 80 mph, which is difficult to do on today's modern highway system. Needless to say, there have been many people out there who lusted severely after a Hemi equipped car, due to the mystique, but became seriously disappointed when they finally paid top dollar to get one and found it wasn't a blistering accelerator off the line.
KManiac
05-15-2006, 10:54 AM
Here is another slang expression for you. As I said before, the 426 Hemi is a heavier engine in assembled form than the 440 Magnum. This lead to the slang expression "Elephant", which some people use to refer to a 426 Hemi. If you hear someone talk about an "elephant motor", now you know what they are talking about.
Rack
05-15-2006, 03:42 PM
Thanks again, KManiac.
Yeah that guy emailed me again threatening to call a lawyer and get the police involved if I used the vin number in anyway yada yada yada. He said he wouldn't send me the vin until I replied saying I wouldn't use the vin number illegally (not word for word, but you get the point). I replied saying "ummmm... ok" but obviously my BS Detector was registering "Off the charts" ratings. That guy is something else. Feel sorry for whoever actually buys that car.
Oh and he hasn't emailed me that vin number yet.
About the 426 vs 440... that is exactly the type of info I was hoping for. A HEMI is definitely not for me.
Do you know a place where I can run a check on pre 1981 vehicles? I was trying to do a check on the vin from that other car but couldn't find a place that could do it (pre 1981).
Also, what exactly goes into rebuilding an engine? How much of the work can I do myself? I don't have experience with that kind of stuff, but it's not completely foreign to me. How much of the work would have to be done by an actual mechanic?
I'm wanting to do as much work on it with my own hands as possible. I do understand that a lot of the work, especially body work, will have to be done in a shop though.
Thanks again, KManiac.
Yeah that guy emailed me again threatening to call a lawyer and get the police involved if I used the vin number in anyway yada yada yada. He said he wouldn't send me the vin until I replied saying I wouldn't use the vin number illegally (not word for word, but you get the point). I replied saying "ummmm... ok" but obviously my BS Detector was registering "Off the charts" ratings. That guy is something else. Feel sorry for whoever actually buys that car.
Oh and he hasn't emailed me that vin number yet.
About the 426 vs 440... that is exactly the type of info I was hoping for. A HEMI is definitely not for me.
Do you know a place where I can run a check on pre 1981 vehicles? I was trying to do a check on the vin from that other car but couldn't find a place that could do it (pre 1981).
Also, what exactly goes into rebuilding an engine? How much of the work can I do myself? I don't have experience with that kind of stuff, but it's not completely foreign to me. How much of the work would have to be done by an actual mechanic?
I'm wanting to do as much work on it with my own hands as possible. I do understand that a lot of the work, especially body work, will have to be done in a shop though.
Thanks again, KManiac.
KManiac
05-16-2006, 12:46 AM
I don't think there is anyone out there collecting data on pre 1981 cars. Sites like CARFAX collect data from state motor vehicle departments, insurance companies and car rental companies, usually from mandatory smog checks and vehicle transfers. Automotive VINs' were not standardized until after 1981. Most people who use this type of service are paranoid individuals who are buying a car for personal transportation and want to avoid potential problems like "salvage titles", "former daily rentals", "lemon law returns" and "accident repairs". People like this don't want a car that is more than 25 years old.
I have never rebuilt an engine in my 30 years of car ownership. If I was to enbark on such a feat, and knowing what I do about cars, I would pull the engine myself and take the complete long block to a machine shop. There, the professionals would be able to measure the wear in the mechanical parts and recommend the amount of machine work needed to bring the engine back. Some parts can be reused, while others should be replaced. Typical rebuilds include the replacement of the pistons, camshaft, lifters, bearings and seals. The crankshaft and connecting rods are usually remachined and reused, as well as the heads and intake manifold. Always good to replace the oil pump.
Now, when it comes to engines, I am a believer in the expression, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" For example, the pictures of the 1968 Charger R/T you provided, show an engine with fresh paint all around and aftermarket air cleaner and valve covers. Should you buy it, I would not recommend to you to tow the car home and pull the engine immediately to rebuild it. Most likely, someone has done something to the engine somewhere along the line and I would hate to see you waste money to rebuild an engine that was already rebuilt within the last 5,000 miles. If you are not sure of an engine's history, I suggest driving it for a while and monitoring it's operation. Do a compression test. Then see how much oil the engine consumes in normal driving. Does it blow smoke out of the tailpipes or out of a removed PCV hole? Listen for noices such as rod or main bearing knocks or lifter ticks. You can go so far as to remove the valve covers, intake manifold and oil pan to do visual inspections of the engine internals while it is still in the car. The only cost to you is a little time and some new gaskets. If the internal parts look clean and fresh on visual inspections, most likely the engine was redone recently. If the internal are filled with oil sludge and look very dirty, rebuilding is on the horizon. Only if you can confirm severely worn parts would I even consider pulling the engine and rebuilding it.
When it comes to my personal cars, most of them have their original engines and have more than 100,000 miles on the clock. Of my nine Chryslers, I have one with an engine that should be rebuilt. I am third owner of this car and can document that it has 162,000 miles on the vehicle itself. It is a 1964 Chrysler. I am third owner and all owners have been documented over the life of the car. The second owner insisted that the engine had been rebuilt by the original owner and had the receipt. I saw the receipt, but did not study it at the time of purchase. Driving the car home (from Portland, Oregon to San Francisco Bay Area) I discovered that the car used one quart of oil in 150 miles. It doesn't leak any oil and I don't see blue smoke out the tailpipe, but the oil is going somewhere. I also discovered quite a bit of "blow by" when I removed the PCV. Now the car always ran well, but never seemed to have quite the same power as my other Chryslers with the same engine. And when it sat idling in my driveway, it would deposit soot marks on the concrete below the tail pipe openings. A year after buying the car, I drove it somewhere and it ran perfect, as usual to my destination. When I attempted to start the car for my return home, I found it very hard to start and it would not idle. I had to start the car and keep the revs up at 2000 RPM to keep it running for the drive home. Once I got home, I discovered that the ignition timing had suddenly changed. The engine that was recently timed to 10 degrees BTDC was now showing 8 degrees ATDC. No wonder it wouldn't run. The 18 degree shift in ignition timing was the telltale indication that I skipped a tooth on my timing chain.
When I removed the timing cover, I was surprised to discover the factory installed timing chain and sprocket set. It was identical to the ones I had removed from my other 1964 Chryslers, that I new were original at the time. The chain was so worn, that not only did it skip one tooth on me, there was at least one tooth of slop in the chain. Again, a telltale sign that this was, in fact, the factory installed chain & sprockets. That seemed strange to me for a car that supposedly had the engine rebuilt during it's lifetime. When I went back and studied the receipt for the so called engine rebuild, I discovered the important information that I overlooked. The receipt showed not a rebuild, but a "ring, bearing & valve" job. The original pistons, cam, crank and timing chain set were never replaced or reconditioned. I went ahead and replaced the timing chain set with an aftermarket, indexable, double row set set. Using this set, I indexed the cam 4 degrees advance of the original setting. Once replaced the engine, even as worn as it was, performed just a good as my other Chryslers. And now there is no more soot deposited on the ground from the tailpipes. I may rebuild the engine someday, but for now, it runs fine as long as I top off the oil every 150 miles.
I have never rebuilt an engine in my 30 years of car ownership. If I was to enbark on such a feat, and knowing what I do about cars, I would pull the engine myself and take the complete long block to a machine shop. There, the professionals would be able to measure the wear in the mechanical parts and recommend the amount of machine work needed to bring the engine back. Some parts can be reused, while others should be replaced. Typical rebuilds include the replacement of the pistons, camshaft, lifters, bearings and seals. The crankshaft and connecting rods are usually remachined and reused, as well as the heads and intake manifold. Always good to replace the oil pump.
Now, when it comes to engines, I am a believer in the expression, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" For example, the pictures of the 1968 Charger R/T you provided, show an engine with fresh paint all around and aftermarket air cleaner and valve covers. Should you buy it, I would not recommend to you to tow the car home and pull the engine immediately to rebuild it. Most likely, someone has done something to the engine somewhere along the line and I would hate to see you waste money to rebuild an engine that was already rebuilt within the last 5,000 miles. If you are not sure of an engine's history, I suggest driving it for a while and monitoring it's operation. Do a compression test. Then see how much oil the engine consumes in normal driving. Does it blow smoke out of the tailpipes or out of a removed PCV hole? Listen for noices such as rod or main bearing knocks or lifter ticks. You can go so far as to remove the valve covers, intake manifold and oil pan to do visual inspections of the engine internals while it is still in the car. The only cost to you is a little time and some new gaskets. If the internal parts look clean and fresh on visual inspections, most likely the engine was redone recently. If the internal are filled with oil sludge and look very dirty, rebuilding is on the horizon. Only if you can confirm severely worn parts would I even consider pulling the engine and rebuilding it.
When it comes to my personal cars, most of them have their original engines and have more than 100,000 miles on the clock. Of my nine Chryslers, I have one with an engine that should be rebuilt. I am third owner of this car and can document that it has 162,000 miles on the vehicle itself. It is a 1964 Chrysler. I am third owner and all owners have been documented over the life of the car. The second owner insisted that the engine had been rebuilt by the original owner and had the receipt. I saw the receipt, but did not study it at the time of purchase. Driving the car home (from Portland, Oregon to San Francisco Bay Area) I discovered that the car used one quart of oil in 150 miles. It doesn't leak any oil and I don't see blue smoke out the tailpipe, but the oil is going somewhere. I also discovered quite a bit of "blow by" when I removed the PCV. Now the car always ran well, but never seemed to have quite the same power as my other Chryslers with the same engine. And when it sat idling in my driveway, it would deposit soot marks on the concrete below the tail pipe openings. A year after buying the car, I drove it somewhere and it ran perfect, as usual to my destination. When I attempted to start the car for my return home, I found it very hard to start and it would not idle. I had to start the car and keep the revs up at 2000 RPM to keep it running for the drive home. Once I got home, I discovered that the ignition timing had suddenly changed. The engine that was recently timed to 10 degrees BTDC was now showing 8 degrees ATDC. No wonder it wouldn't run. The 18 degree shift in ignition timing was the telltale indication that I skipped a tooth on my timing chain.
When I removed the timing cover, I was surprised to discover the factory installed timing chain and sprocket set. It was identical to the ones I had removed from my other 1964 Chryslers, that I new were original at the time. The chain was so worn, that not only did it skip one tooth on me, there was at least one tooth of slop in the chain. Again, a telltale sign that this was, in fact, the factory installed chain & sprockets. That seemed strange to me for a car that supposedly had the engine rebuilt during it's lifetime. When I went back and studied the receipt for the so called engine rebuild, I discovered the important information that I overlooked. The receipt showed not a rebuild, but a "ring, bearing & valve" job. The original pistons, cam, crank and timing chain set were never replaced or reconditioned. I went ahead and replaced the timing chain set with an aftermarket, indexable, double row set set. Using this set, I indexed the cam 4 degrees advance of the original setting. Once replaced the engine, even as worn as it was, performed just a good as my other Chryslers. And now there is no more soot deposited on the ground from the tailpipes. I may rebuild the engine someday, but for now, it runs fine as long as I top off the oil every 150 miles.
MagicRat
05-16-2006, 12:58 AM
^^Good post.
I would agree, do not rebuild an engine unless it shows obvious signs or extreme wear and noise. However, installing a timing chain is good preventive maitenance if you think the engine has lots of miles.
It looks as if that car needs lots of paint and body work. IMO its easly to become discouraged and/or broke by taking on more work than is manageable. Consider focusing on the most pressing needs first.
If the engine is good, leave it alone and drive and enjoy the car as you work on other areas.
It looks like a great project.
I would agree, do not rebuild an engine unless it shows obvious signs or extreme wear and noise. However, installing a timing chain is good preventive maitenance if you think the engine has lots of miles.
It looks as if that car needs lots of paint and body work. IMO its easly to become discouraged and/or broke by taking on more work than is manageable. Consider focusing on the most pressing needs first.
If the engine is good, leave it alone and drive and enjoy the car as you work on other areas.
It looks like a great project.
Rack
05-16-2006, 02:05 AM
Excellent posts. You guys might of just saved me a few thousand dollars.
I'll just replace the "little" things and go from there. Now that I think about it, the engine should be the last thing I work on anyway.
What "little things", other than installing a timing chain, would you guys recommend I do to the engine?
Also, if the doors/fenders on that car are heavily bondo'd should I just go ahead and replace them?
I'll just replace the "little" things and go from there. Now that I think about it, the engine should be the last thing I work on anyway.
What "little things", other than installing a timing chain, would you guys recommend I do to the engine?
Also, if the doors/fenders on that car are heavily bondo'd should I just go ahead and replace them?
KManiac
05-16-2006, 02:19 PM
Before you change your timing chain set, I recommend the following "quick & dirty" test to measure the amount of timing chain stretch in the current chain:
With a breaker bar and socket on the crankshaft center bolt, rotate the crank in the direction of rotation at least 30 degrees until the timing mark lines up to TDC.
Pop the cap off of the distributor.
Slow rotate the crank slowly in the opposite direction until you see the distributor rotor start to move. Then check the position of the timing mark If the timing mark moves more than 10 degrees during this test, I would consider replacing the timing chain and sprocket set.
NOTE: 18 degrees of free movement of the crank in this test equals one full tooth of slop for a standard 40 tooth/20 tooth timing set. At this point, the chain is ready to skip a tooth. I recommend using a double row timing set with indexible sprockets. The double row wears better and lasts longer than the OEM single row set. The indexible sprockets give you the ability to either advance or retard the cam timing by 4 degrees. Advanced cam timing gives better low end performance. Retarded cam timing gives better top end performance. Also, stay away from timings gears with plastic teeth. Soak the new chain in motor oil at least overnight before installation.
With a breaker bar and socket on the crankshaft center bolt, rotate the crank in the direction of rotation at least 30 degrees until the timing mark lines up to TDC.
Pop the cap off of the distributor.
Slow rotate the crank slowly in the opposite direction until you see the distributor rotor start to move. Then check the position of the timing mark If the timing mark moves more than 10 degrees during this test, I would consider replacing the timing chain and sprocket set.
NOTE: 18 degrees of free movement of the crank in this test equals one full tooth of slop for a standard 40 tooth/20 tooth timing set. At this point, the chain is ready to skip a tooth. I recommend using a double row timing set with indexible sprockets. The double row wears better and lasts longer than the OEM single row set. The indexible sprockets give you the ability to either advance or retard the cam timing by 4 degrees. Advanced cam timing gives better low end performance. Retarded cam timing gives better top end performance. Also, stay away from timings gears with plastic teeth. Soak the new chain in motor oil at least overnight before installation.
Rack
05-16-2006, 03:40 PM
Thanks, KManiac.
Can't wait to get started on this project. If everything goes well I'll have the car here in about a week.
I'm all set to start buying things to help get started. Just waiting till I finally actually purchase the vehicle.
I just bought a new truck last september and I wasn't nearly as excited about that that I am about this 38 year old car. lol
Can't wait to get started on this project. If everything goes well I'll have the car here in about a week.
I'm all set to start buying things to help get started. Just waiting till I finally actually purchase the vehicle.
I just bought a new truck last september and I wasn't nearly as excited about that that I am about this 38 year old car. lol
Rack
05-18-2006, 03:29 AM
Ok I won the auction for that charger. Paid a bit more then I had hoped due to a couple of amateurs trying to outbid eachother in the last hour of the auction.
Now I just have to pay for it and have it shipped to me. Then I get to get started!
ANother question...
What is a "B body"? Does that have an effect on parts I buy for the car? For example, if I'm looking to buy door handles for the Charger R/T does it make a difference if the handles also say they fit a b-body?
Here's a link to some door handles I'm looking at...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1,1&item=8066523688&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT
Is there a difference between an R/T and a B-body? If there is a difference, what exactly is different about them?
Also, where can I get this hood scoop?
http://img301.imageshack.us/img301/7144/blade0017eu.jpg
Thanks!
Now I just have to pay for it and have it shipped to me. Then I get to get started!
ANother question...
What is a "B body"? Does that have an effect on parts I buy for the car? For example, if I'm looking to buy door handles for the Charger R/T does it make a difference if the handles also say they fit a b-body?
Here's a link to some door handles I'm looking at...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1,1&item=8066523688&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT
Is there a difference between an R/T and a B-body? If there is a difference, what exactly is different about them?
Also, where can I get this hood scoop?
http://img301.imageshack.us/img301/7144/blade0017eu.jpg
Thanks!
KManiac
05-18-2006, 07:30 PM
Here are a few more lessons in lingo.
Most car companies with multiple makes of cars, usually use a common platform for each size of car. At Chrysler, they used a common platform for the Plymouth Valiant and the Dodge Dart, a common platform for the Plymouth Belvidere/Satellite and the Dodge Coronet/Charger, a common platform for the Plymouth Fury, Dodge Polara/Monaco and Chrysler Newport/300/New Yorker, and a common platform for the Plymouth Baracuda and Dodge Challenger from 1970 through 1974. They differentiate between the body platforms by assigning a different letter to each. For years, the platform identification was an "in-house" thing, not generally publicized. This changed about 1980 when General Motors marketed the platform line of "X" cars (Chevrolet Citation, etc.). A year later, Chrysler marketed their platform line of "K" cars (Plymouth Reliant/Dodge Aires).
In the 1960's, Chrysler refered to the compact platform as the "A-body". They refered to the mid-size platform as the "B-body". They refered to the full-size platform as the "C-body". I think the 1970-74 Baracuda/Challenger platform was refered to as either the "E-body" or "F-body". Unfortunately, I'm not sure which it is and unable to research this at this moment. I am sure someone will correct me in due time. The Dodge Charger you just bought is a "B-body" car.
I hope this answers our questions about car bodies.
Most car companies with multiple makes of cars, usually use a common platform for each size of car. At Chrysler, they used a common platform for the Plymouth Valiant and the Dodge Dart, a common platform for the Plymouth Belvidere/Satellite and the Dodge Coronet/Charger, a common platform for the Plymouth Fury, Dodge Polara/Monaco and Chrysler Newport/300/New Yorker, and a common platform for the Plymouth Baracuda and Dodge Challenger from 1970 through 1974. They differentiate between the body platforms by assigning a different letter to each. For years, the platform identification was an "in-house" thing, not generally publicized. This changed about 1980 when General Motors marketed the platform line of "X" cars (Chevrolet Citation, etc.). A year later, Chrysler marketed their platform line of "K" cars (Plymouth Reliant/Dodge Aires).
In the 1960's, Chrysler refered to the compact platform as the "A-body". They refered to the mid-size platform as the "B-body". They refered to the full-size platform as the "C-body". I think the 1970-74 Baracuda/Challenger platform was refered to as either the "E-body" or "F-body". Unfortunately, I'm not sure which it is and unable to research this at this moment. I am sure someone will correct me in due time. The Dodge Charger you just bought is a "B-body" car.
I hope this answers our questions about car bodies.
BleedDodge
05-18-2006, 07:39 PM
Barracudas and Challengers are E-bodies.
Rack
05-19-2006, 01:18 AM
The Dodge Charger you just bought is a "B-body" car.
I hope this answers our questions about car bodies.
Yes I understand it a lot better now.
Thank you
I hope this answers our questions about car bodies.
Yes I understand it a lot better now.
Thank you
PeteRR
05-19-2006, 06:18 PM
In 1969, they continued with the base Charger and Charger R/T. Then during mid-year, they introduced a model called the Charger 500. This was a limited production car, built solely to qualify the body for use in NASCAR. The unique features of this car were the streamline, NASCAR back window and the flush mounted grill with fixed, exposed headlights. The grill on this car resembled the one used on the 1968 Dodge Coronet. I believe the engine choices for the 500 were the same as the R/T. This year, Dodge introduced the luxury trim package called "Special Edition". This consisted of wood grain dashboard trim and leather seats. The "Special Edition" package became known as SE for short.
In 1970, they continued with the base Charger and Charger R/T. The Charger 500 name continued as a premium model of the base Charger line. The special NASCAR offering this year was the Charger Daytona. This car had the NASCAR back window, tall rear spoiler and beaked nose. They continued with the "Special Edition" trim package for this year.
Just a correction:
The Charger Daytona was a '69 model year. The '70 Charger 500 was a trim only option. It didn't have the aero modifications like the '69 Charger 500. The Mopar wingcar for 1970 was the Plymouth Superbird. Otherwise, good info.
In 1970, they continued with the base Charger and Charger R/T. The Charger 500 name continued as a premium model of the base Charger line. The special NASCAR offering this year was the Charger Daytona. This car had the NASCAR back window, tall rear spoiler and beaked nose. They continued with the "Special Edition" trim package for this year.
Just a correction:
The Charger Daytona was a '69 model year. The '70 Charger 500 was a trim only option. It didn't have the aero modifications like the '69 Charger 500. The Mopar wingcar for 1970 was the Plymouth Superbird. Otherwise, good info.
KManiac
05-19-2006, 07:40 PM
My mistake! I forgot to add the 1969 Charger Daytona to my discussion. I remembered it after I submitted. But on the other hand, I thought they made the Charger Daytona in 1970 along with the Superbird. I guess I'm not to old to learn something new.
Thank you, too, for the clarification on the 1970 Charger 500. I knew the differences between the 1969 and 1970 Charger 500's because my brother once owned a 1970 Charger 500. I guess calling it a "premium model of the base Charger line" may not have been clear enough to all.
Thank you, too, for the clarification on the 1970 Charger 500. I knew the differences between the 1969 and 1970 Charger 500's because my brother once owned a 1970 Charger 500. I guess calling it a "premium model of the base Charger line" may not have been clear enough to all.
PeteRR
05-19-2006, 07:45 PM
My mistake! I forgot to add the 1969 Charger Daytona to my discussion. I remembered it after I submitted. But on the other hand, I thought they made the Charger Daytona in 1970 along with the Superbird. I guess I'm not to old to learn something new.
The Dodge teams just kept using the '69s all through the '70 season.
The Dodge teams just kept using the '69s all through the '70 season.
Rack
05-20-2006, 03:55 PM
Does anyone know where I can buy a new 440 magnum crate engine? I've found lots of sites that sell HEMI crate engines, but none that sell the 440.
http://www.mopartsracing.com/parts/blocks.html
http://shop.store.yahoo.com/gofast/mopar.html
http://www.jimsautoparts.com/mopar_performance_engines.htm
There's a few sites I've found, none of them sell the 440.
Thank you
http://www.mopartsracing.com/parts/blocks.html
http://shop.store.yahoo.com/gofast/mopar.html
http://www.jimsautoparts.com/mopar_performance_engines.htm
There's a few sites I've found, none of them sell the 440.
Thank you
PeteRR
05-20-2006, 04:33 PM
Call either
http://www.manciniracing.com/
or
http://www.summitracing.com/
or use one of the bigger discount Dodge dealerships.
http://www.jimsautoparts.com/mopar_performance_engines.htm
If you value your sanity, avoid Jim's like the plague.
http://www.manciniracing.com/
or
http://www.summitracing.com/
or use one of the bigger discount Dodge dealerships.
http://www.jimsautoparts.com/mopar_performance_engines.htm
If you value your sanity, avoid Jim's like the plague.
Rack
05-21-2006, 01:40 AM
Thanks, Pete. Those sites will be very helpful.
I have a new dumb question...
What is a rockerpanel? I've been doing a lot of reading about car restorations (specifically the 68 charger) and have come across that word several times but haven't exactly figured out what it is?
Also, here's a site of some guy that restored a 68 charger. TONS of pictures starting from when he first got the car till now. Don't know when he last updated but the car is almost done and it's an amazing transformation.
http://www.usaci.de/
Click the "Body" link. You have to scroll all the way down to see the beginning and work your way up. 56K beware. There's over 300 pics on the "Body" page.
Edit: One more dumb question (for now)...
How much cutting and welding do you think I will need to do to the car? How difficult is the cutting part for a novice? I know some people that could probably do the welding for me and I wouldn't want to try that anyway (not unless I have plenty of scrap metal to practice on for a few weeks first).
I have a new dumb question...
What is a rockerpanel? I've been doing a lot of reading about car restorations (specifically the 68 charger) and have come across that word several times but haven't exactly figured out what it is?
Also, here's a site of some guy that restored a 68 charger. TONS of pictures starting from when he first got the car till now. Don't know when he last updated but the car is almost done and it's an amazing transformation.
http://www.usaci.de/
Click the "Body" link. You have to scroll all the way down to see the beginning and work your way up. 56K beware. There's over 300 pics on the "Body" page.
Edit: One more dumb question (for now)...
How much cutting and welding do you think I will need to do to the car? How difficult is the cutting part for a novice? I know some people that could probably do the welding for me and I wouldn't want to try that anyway (not unless I have plenty of scrap metal to practice on for a few weeks first).
PeteRR
05-21-2006, 09:07 AM
What is a rockerpanel?
It's the long piece of sheetmetal that runs underneath the doors between the front and rear tires.
How much cutting and welding do you think I will need to do to the car? How difficult is the cutting part for a novice? I know some people that could probably do the welding for me and I wouldn't want to try that anyway (not unless I have plenty of scrap metal to practice on for a few weeks first).
Let me ask you a question: Have you seen the car in person? Mopars are notorious for rusting and I'd be very hesitant about buying one without inspecting it first.
Here are the problem areas:
-the inner fenders
-the front framerails
-the torsion bar crossmember
-the passenger side floorboard
-the trunk
-the rear framerails
-the rear tail panel
-the area between the rear glass and trunk lid
It could be primered to hide a mulititude of sheetmetal sins. How far is the car from you? I would definitely have it inspected before I'd complete the purchase. If you have it inspected and it turns out it's rust bucket, you would be saving yourself a lot of money by passing on it. I ended up spending $10k in bodywork on my Road Runner, money I could have saved by waiting for a car in better condition.
To answer your question about cutting and welding: I don't know how much of either will be involved on that particular Charger as I haven't seen it in person. However, doing body work, and making it look right, isn't something I'd jump right into. Especially if it's on a car that I layed seriously money down to buy.
Finally replacing the motor with a new crate 440 is the most expensive route you can go. Depending on where you are, there will be more than a few engine shops that can do a rebuild or increase the hp of your stock motor for a lot less than the cost of a crate.
If you want to send me a PM, I'd be more than willing to continue helping you. I could also give you my cell # if you want to talk 1st hand.
It's the long piece of sheetmetal that runs underneath the doors between the front and rear tires.
How much cutting and welding do you think I will need to do to the car? How difficult is the cutting part for a novice? I know some people that could probably do the welding for me and I wouldn't want to try that anyway (not unless I have plenty of scrap metal to practice on for a few weeks first).
Let me ask you a question: Have you seen the car in person? Mopars are notorious for rusting and I'd be very hesitant about buying one without inspecting it first.
Here are the problem areas:
-the inner fenders
-the front framerails
-the torsion bar crossmember
-the passenger side floorboard
-the trunk
-the rear framerails
-the rear tail panel
-the area between the rear glass and trunk lid
It could be primered to hide a mulititude of sheetmetal sins. How far is the car from you? I would definitely have it inspected before I'd complete the purchase. If you have it inspected and it turns out it's rust bucket, you would be saving yourself a lot of money by passing on it. I ended up spending $10k in bodywork on my Road Runner, money I could have saved by waiting for a car in better condition.
To answer your question about cutting and welding: I don't know how much of either will be involved on that particular Charger as I haven't seen it in person. However, doing body work, and making it look right, isn't something I'd jump right into. Especially if it's on a car that I layed seriously money down to buy.
Finally replacing the motor with a new crate 440 is the most expensive route you can go. Depending on where you are, there will be more than a few engine shops that can do a rebuild or increase the hp of your stock motor for a lot less than the cost of a crate.
If you want to send me a PM, I'd be more than willing to continue helping you. I could also give you my cell # if you want to talk 1st hand.
Rack
05-22-2006, 04:39 AM
Thanks, Peter. I plan on doing as much body work as I can possibly do, but only stuff I know I can do well... you know, the easy stuff like sanding. Anything I'm not sure about I'll get help for it or I'll pay to get it done.
I have a new question... this one might even stump you guys.
Where's the door handles? It's obviously a custom job, but how does he open his doors? Did he install power locks and something that opens the door when he disarms it? I love the way it looks, but if the only way to open the door is to reach inside then a car like that wouldn't last long in my town.
http://www.usaci.de/images/IMGP5109.jpg
I have a new question... this one might even stump you guys.
Where's the door handles? It's obviously a custom job, but how does he open his doors? Did he install power locks and something that opens the door when he disarms it? I love the way it looks, but if the only way to open the door is to reach inside then a car like that wouldn't last long in my town.
http://www.usaci.de/images/IMGP5109.jpg
PeteRR
05-22-2006, 08:40 AM
I have a new question... this one might even stump you guys.
Where's the door handles?
Hot Rod guys use a thing called a "popper". It uses a remote trigger a solenoid that pops the door open. The only problem with them is cars with no door handles won't pass tech at race tracks. There's no way for emergency personal to get the doors open.
Where's the door handles?
Hot Rod guys use a thing called a "popper". It uses a remote trigger a solenoid that pops the door open. The only problem with them is cars with no door handles won't pass tech at race tracks. There's no way for emergency personal to get the doors open.
Rack
05-22-2006, 09:55 AM
Hot Rod guys use a thing called a "popper". It uses a remote trigger a solenoid that pops the door open. The only problem with them is cars with no door handles won't pass tech at race tracks. There's no way for emergency personal to get the doors open.
Yeah I finally figured that out after some research. IMO the car looks a lot better that way. They aren't too expensive either. Not much more then an alarm system, and some poppers come as part of an alarm system.
It's a long ways away from when it gets done but I'm gettin' one. :iceslolan
I also like how that car has no chrome trim on it. I really don't chrome from anything other then the wheels (and even then I prefer the less shiny kind). Takes a bit more work filling in the cracks/holes but it looks nice.
Yeah I finally figured that out after some research. IMO the car looks a lot better that way. They aren't too expensive either. Not much more then an alarm system, and some poppers come as part of an alarm system.
It's a long ways away from when it gets done but I'm gettin' one. :iceslolan
I also like how that car has no chrome trim on it. I really don't chrome from anything other then the wheels (and even then I prefer the less shiny kind). Takes a bit more work filling in the cracks/holes but it looks nice.
MagicRat
05-22-2006, 03:06 PM
I also like how that car has no chrome trim on it. I really don't chrome from anything other then the wheels (and even then I prefer the less shiny kind). Takes a bit more work filling in the cracks/holes but it looks nice.
I like that look too. The chrome and stainless trim is okay around windows, but most older cars look better without the name plates, side spears and especially those dopey dealership plates that always were put on the back of many American cars.
Come on, why would I want to advertise the dealership that I got the car from?
I like that look too. The chrome and stainless trim is okay around windows, but most older cars look better without the name plates, side spears and especially those dopey dealership plates that always were put on the back of many American cars.
Come on, why would I want to advertise the dealership that I got the car from?
Rack
05-31-2006, 04:15 AM
Finally got ahold of the shipping company (by the way, if you ever need a vehicle shipped don't use DAS - Dependable Auto Shippers. They have horrible customer service) and I should be getting the car in a week.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to what kind of modern modifications I can do to the car? Such as to the suspension, steering, console... anything. This will be a car I actually use so I want it to drive as well as it possibly can.
Thank you
Does anyone have any suggestions as to what kind of modern modifications I can do to the car? Such as to the suspension, steering, console... anything. This will be a car I actually use so I want it to drive as well as it possibly can.
Thank you
Rack
06-04-2006, 01:14 PM
Finally got ahold of the shipping company (by the way, if you ever need a vehicle shipped don't use DAS - Dependable Auto Shippers. They have horrible customer service) and I should be getting the car in a week.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to what kind of modern modifications I can do to the car? Such as to the suspension, steering, console... anything. This will be a car I actually use so I want it to drive as well as it possibly can.
Thank you
Anyone? Anything?
By the way, I started a web page to monitor my progress on the restoration.
I tried to add it to my sig but I don't know if it worked.
Here's the link:
http://home.stx.rr.com/rackcharger/
Does anyone have any suggestions as to what kind of modern modifications I can do to the car? Such as to the suspension, steering, console... anything. This will be a car I actually use so I want it to drive as well as it possibly can.
Thank you
Anyone? Anything?
By the way, I started a web page to monitor my progress on the restoration.
I tried to add it to my sig but I don't know if it worked.
Here's the link:
http://home.stx.rr.com/rackcharger/
PeteRR
07-02-2006, 02:47 AM
Anyone? Anything?
By the way, I started a web page to monitor my progress on the restoration.
I tried to add it to my sig but I don't know if it worked.
Here's the link:
http://home.stx.rr.com/rackcharger/
Sorry, didn't see your post. In terms of suspension and steering, the sky is the limit. You can do a simple rebuild of the stock components. You could also step up, using bolt-on parts, to a firmer handling car. Finally, you can spend $15k+ to make the car handle extremely well.
I've seen consoles from mid-70s Mopars adapted for late-60s Mopars. Changing your interior will offend the purists. Permanent mods will hurt the value of the car. That being said, a competent custom interior shop can do anything that you can imagine. Just a hint: I've got a rallye dash from a '69 Superbee in my car. I designed and fabbed up this gauge panel for it:
http://pic7.picturetrail.com/VOL188/1012410/1888358/24666526.jpg
By the way, I started a web page to monitor my progress on the restoration.
I tried to add it to my sig but I don't know if it worked.
Here's the link:
http://home.stx.rr.com/rackcharger/
Sorry, didn't see your post. In terms of suspension and steering, the sky is the limit. You can do a simple rebuild of the stock components. You could also step up, using bolt-on parts, to a firmer handling car. Finally, you can spend $15k+ to make the car handle extremely well.
I've seen consoles from mid-70s Mopars adapted for late-60s Mopars. Changing your interior will offend the purists. Permanent mods will hurt the value of the car. That being said, a competent custom interior shop can do anything that you can imagine. Just a hint: I've got a rallye dash from a '69 Superbee in my car. I designed and fabbed up this gauge panel for it:
http://pic7.picturetrail.com/VOL188/1012410/1888358/24666526.jpg
Rack
07-02-2006, 05:01 AM
That is awesome work, Peter. I'm missing the front of my guage panel so I'll have to build something of my own as well. I'll probably start off with sheet metal then maybe form something out of wood later on. I'll have to do the same to the top section of my console as well so whatever I do I'll make them match.
Thanks for the reply and keep checking the site. I've made a few updates the last few days. I would of done more work on my grill this weekend but it's my gf's birthday so I've been spending time with her. But this week and next weekend belongs to my charger. :grinyes:
Thanks for the reply and keep checking the site. I've made a few updates the last few days. I would of done more work on my grill this weekend but it's my gf's birthday so I've been spending time with her. But this week and next weekend belongs to my charger. :grinyes:
PeteRR
07-02-2006, 10:28 AM
These guys are good for stock replacement components:
http://www.espo.com/
They can sell you a whole front end kit for reasonable money.
These guys specialize in handling Mopars:
http://www.firmfeel.com/
They can sell you bolt-on handling performance equipment. I bought my road racing power steering box from them. Ask for Dick Ross.
http://www.arengineering.com/ sold me my 13" front disc brake kit, plates to box the lower control arms, CNC'd me the center caps for my Bullitt Mustang wheels. Andy is a good guy to work with.
About 300 miles from you is http://www.texasacres.com/ they are Mopar specific parts company. He can be kind of expensive, but he's well stocked with sheetmetal and other components.
http://www.espo.com/
They can sell you a whole front end kit for reasonable money.
These guys specialize in handling Mopars:
http://www.firmfeel.com/
They can sell you bolt-on handling performance equipment. I bought my road racing power steering box from them. Ask for Dick Ross.
http://www.arengineering.com/ sold me my 13" front disc brake kit, plates to box the lower control arms, CNC'd me the center caps for my Bullitt Mustang wheels. Andy is a good guy to work with.
About 300 miles from you is http://www.texasacres.com/ they are Mopar specific parts company. He can be kind of expensive, but he's well stocked with sheetmetal and other components.
Rack
07-02-2006, 05:02 PM
I hadn't heard of those sites before, PeteRR. Thanks!
Those are all excellent sites. :iceslolan
Those are all excellent sites. :iceslolan
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2025
