Timing belt vs timing chain
Mr Wiggl3s
04-24-2006, 11:03 PM
Any reason one is better than the other?
2.2 Straight six
04-24-2006, 11:20 PM
a chain is generally more reliable as they're strong, but they can snap. the truth is on a well-maintained car you should never have a problem with either.
chains need oil, and they always chuck up and deposit it at the top of the chain cover. belts don't need oil.
chains need oil, and they always chuck up and deposit it at the top of the chain cover. belts don't need oil.
alkemist
04-24-2006, 11:57 PM
I had a bad experience with belts in a 94 Probe so I say whoohoo to the chain in my 96 riviera. Belts do wrip but for a chain its very unlikely. However its more problematic to replace.
TheSilentChamber
04-25-2006, 08:05 AM
Not this again... this was covered... way to indepth, not even a month ago.
curtis73
04-25-2006, 02:04 PM
Yeah, do a search for a thread called something like "interference vs. non-interference motors." All covered in detail.
Mr Wiggl3s
04-25-2006, 07:49 PM
O my bad, im not use to searching because the forums i go to take it off to save A TON of bandwidth/money
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2025
