Rsx, Gts, Wrx?

Anyone have quarter mile times for any if not all of these...assuming their all stock.

Also who ever has these cars can I get some imput on their low and high ends?

i have the new type s and a while ago i raced a wrx on the highway well acually m cusin raced my rsx and we beeted the wrx we both raced to our top speed and i gess his governor kicked in or sometin couse at like 130 we just smoked him so i say go with the rsx

thx for the info can more people post please.

I have no idea about the GTs, but I know the JDM WRX if driven correctly is a little faster than the New Zealand Intgra Type-R (RSX), but were talking 100ths of a second, important at the drag strip, but meaningless on the road.
Out of those two simple chosse the car you like the most for your own reasons.
However the USDM WRX has less hp than the JDM version, while the RSX has as much hp as the New Zealand Integra Type-R (200hp) and uses the same suspension and brake set up.
I think you will find that in stock form it will be faster.
But of course the WRX has something the RSX dosnt, a Turbo, and winding up the boost on a WRX, and replacing the stock exhaust will lead to some very easy and noticable power gains.

But then you might enjoy driving the RSX more, and not be bothered by it being a little slower in a straight line, becasue if driven correctly its easily a match for the WRX in the corners.

(if by GTs you mean the Celica? then its deffintly an also ran to the RSX and WRX, unless of course you happen to enjoy driving it over the other two, then its becomes the better car.)

I would dismiss the RSX and the Celica GTS based on the fact that they are both FWD and NA. I would rather have an AWD car w/a turbo b/c that would mean I would have grip in all conditions and w/turbo tunability and the ability to make larger power gains w/bolt ons...is important to me now. So when I look for my next car...I would consider that...

Btw...my next WILL be a R32 GTR. Hehehe

:devil:

wrx. here are the numbers

WRX: 0-60 5.5 seconds. 1/4 mile in 14.1 seconds

RSX: 0-60 6.6 seconds. 1/4 mile in 15.3 seconds

celica GT-S: depending on which year. but the 02 are the slowest. they have the lowest rev limit. instead of near 8000 redline. it cuts off fuel at the middle of 7000. sooo that would cost fractions of seconds.

GT-S: 0-60 7 seconds. 1/4 mile in 15.3 seconds.


as you can see. even a 02 nissan maxima can beat these cars on the straight. along with the 02 nissan altima 3.5 SE. most of these front wheel drives can't even hit a 15 flat on the quarter. the nissans can hit 14's. and their family cars. hmmmmmmmmmmm

A thread like this wuz posted some time ago...
Im with the WRX 100%
AWD + the turbo... Handles like a beauty

WRX for sure. FWD's have no place in the high-performance world. And while the WRX doesn't have much power till 3000rpm, if you are below 3000rpm, are you even looking for power???!!! Plus, the WRX is much faster in a straight line, and, with new tires, is amazing through the twisties also. With the addition of rain/sand/snow/mud, the WRX becomes even more fun. Oh, how I want one:eek:

Too bad the WRX has shitty top end.

well from what i've read the only reason why the rex's got no top end is becuase of its restrictive intake. with that and a boost controller the problem is fixed.

Originally posted by TatII
well from what i've read the only reason why the rex's got no top end is becuase of its restrictive intake. with that and a boost controller the problem is fixed.

True - like most turbo cars, open up the intake and the exhaust and you'll get more high end power without losing your torque.

Originally posted by TatII
wrx. here are the numbers

WRX: 0-60 5.5 seconds. 1/4 mile in 14.1 seconds

RSX: 0-60 6.6 seconds. 1/4 mile in 15.3 seconds

celica GT-S: depending on which year. but the 02 are the slowest. they have the lowest rev limit. instead of near 8000 redline. it cuts off fuel at the middle of 7000. sooo that would cost fractions of seconds.

GT-S: 0-60 7 seconds. 1/4 mile in 15.3 seconds.


as you can see. even a 02 nissan maxima can beat these cars on the straight. along with the 02 nissan altima 3.5 SE. most of these front wheel drives can't even hit a 15 flat on the quarter. the nissans can hit 14's. and their family cars. hmmmmmmmmmmm

i don't remember seeing any nissan in the question.:confused: :finger: stick to the topic.

Originally posted by del


i don't remember seeing any nissan in the question.:confused: :finger: stick to the topic.

ooops how did those nissans get in there? hahaah you know me and nissans. sorry del:D

How often do you have the chance to go over 130mph anyway??? Its all about the acceleration and handling.

Originally posted by Chris
How often do you have the chance to go over 130mph anyway??? Its all about the acceleration and handling.

Well the problem with the WRX is that it pulls hard until about 80MPH and then it just looses its bite, trust me I know.

Originally posted by Polygon


Well the problem with the WRX is that it pulls hard until about 80MPH and then it just looses its bite, trust me I know.

yeah, when i raced a wrx from 70mph (this was before the supercharger), we were dead even and towards the end at about 115, i was even in front a little bit. the second time i got to race a wrx at highway speeds (with the supercharger), it was a different story. :sun:

you gotta remember that wrx's are based on rally cars whereas the rsx and gts have more in common with an oval track or road course race car, given the high-revving engines. i don't even think the wrx is even in the same category as the other two. awd, turbo, plus 4 doors versus n/a, fwd two door coupes. i'd cut it down to between the wrx and acura. but in a performance-minded perspective, get the wrx. i dont' think either are very attractive, the acura may be more luxurious, but save luxury for when you're in your 40's. you're young ( i think), have fun, get the wrx.

and Tat, the next time you mention nissan in a thread, ever, consider yourself banned. lol. jus playin. :smoker2:

doh~ (^'.'^) !!!!! hahahha

Well I would have to say the WRX is better than the other two (With an exhaust upgrade like Moppie said) preferably from Remus.


Plus you have the Turbo :devil: :devil:

never mention nissans? AAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! too bad all the USDM cars equipped with the new VQ arwe SOO expensive! i would kill for a maxima, but hell i LOVE WRX's too, down in florida when it's nice and hot and the roads are STICKY ICKY!, it has to be fun to squeeze into those turns and feel the AWD gripping the road like a suction cup! nice....:p

Well, at speeds of 80mph, you are looking at dying in an accident. Having 10 times the fun going through a wet corner sideways at 30mph would (at worst), leave you injured, with a full recovery on the way.

The WRX would also benefit from some much stickier tires for the pavement. The stock ones are cookie cutters, really.

even though i am a die hard honda/acura fan
i'd go with a WRX

Originally posted by TatII
wrx. here are the numbers

WRX: 0-60 5.5 seconds. 1/4 mile in 14.1 seconds

RSX: 0-60 6.6 seconds. 1/4 mile in 15.3 seconds

celica GT-S: depending on which year. but the 02 are the slowest. they have the lowest rev limit. instead of near 8000 redline. it cuts off fuel at the middle of 7000. sooo that would cost fractions of seconds.

GT-S: 0-60 7 seconds. 1/4 mile in 15.3 seconds.


as you can see. even a 02 nissan maxima can beat these cars on the straight. along with the 02 nissan altima 3.5 SE. most of these front wheel drives can't even hit a 15 flat on the quarter. the nissans can hit 14's. and their family cars. hmmmmmmmmmmm

WRX= 0-60 in 5.9 Sec 1/4= 14.6-14.7
RSX-S/GTS= 0-60 in 6.6 sec 1/4=14.9-15.0 (Driver race)

However, the RSX/GTS will kill a WRX on during the top end and from a downshift. Can't really say anything about the RSX-S and GTS because both are equal. The RSX-S has more HP/TQ by a bit, but is also heavier than a the GTS by about 200-250 lbs. Makes it a driver race.

don't get the rsx or wrx i'm not too familiar with the YOTA. get an sti imprezza.

between all 3 i like the wrx . :flash:

Originally posted by Paonessa
don't get the rsx or wrx i'm not too familiar with the YOTA. get an sti imprezza.

Umm, you know a WRX is an imprezza right? Thats why it's called the subaru imprezza WRX.
But yes I would go STI if you can afford it. Still, I heard you can get 275 horses out of the old WRX for under 1000 $.

Originally posted by PWMAN


Umm, you know a WRX is an imprezza right? Thats why it's called the subaru imprezza WRX.

uh, yeah i definitely know that considering there's an '02 imprezza in my driveway. i was saying get the sti as opposed to the wrx. ya know? 300 hp instead of 227.

Originally posted by PWMAN


Still, I heard you can get 275 horses out of the old WRX for under 1000 $.

and under the same logic you could get 350+ hp out of the sti for the same money.

OK but you kinda worded that funny, made it sound like an WRX isn't an impreza.
Actually, I think the STI has made some of the improvements already that you would make to the WRX to get that power. I don't believe it follows the same logic, it's more tuned from the factory.

probably but that reminds me,
has anyone popped the hood on an '03 sti yet? notice the nitrous ports on the manifold, STOCK. gotta love that.

Really? Thats sweet!:bigthumb:

Originally posted by Paonessa
probably but that reminds me,
has anyone popped the hood on an '03 sti yet? notice the nitrous ports on the manifold, STOCK. gotta love that.


you kidding me they put from the factory nitrous nozzels into the manifold......:eek:

Originally posted by Neutrino



you kidding me they put from the factory nitrous nozzels into the manifold......:eek:
it's a pretty crazy car. you probably know this already but, they also have a tank in the trunk for you to fill with water and there's a handle inside the car for the driver to spray down the intercooler while driving.

Originally posted by Paonessa

they also have a tank in the trunk for you to fill with water and there's a handle inside the car for the driver to spray down the intercooler while driving.

I heard that, but not the nitrous ports. SWEET

Originally posted by PWMAN


I heard that, but not the nitrous ports. SWEET
that just goes to show what kind of a beast they intended this car to be.

Yeah theres one rollin around here, I don't even think about taking him on in my daytona(mostly stock) but he knows I can still spank him in my truck(with the juice-hehe). Without the juice he pulls on me pretty good, probably four or five car lengths in about 1/4 mile.

Originally posted by Paonessa

it's a pretty crazy car. you probably know this already but, they also have a tank in the trunk for you to fill with water and there's a handle inside the car for the driver to spray down the intercooler while driving.


i heard about the intercooler spray....the evo has that too....


you know what would be insanelly cool if they would offer some nitrous brand.....dealer installed of course and tuned that will not void the warranty....

Originally posted by Neutrino



you know what would be insanelly cool if they would offer some nitrous brand.....dealer installed of course and tuned that will not void the warranty....

Yeah that would be cool but thats not going to happen. They might do that sooner or later, but I garauntee it will come with no warranty.

i read that ford is re-releasing a limited number of Eleanor gt500 mustangs and there will be an option for factory installed and tuned nitrous

Interesting

Originally posted by PWMAN


Yeah that would be cool but thats not going to happen. They might do that sooner or later, but I garauntee it will come with no warranty.

i know but its fun to dream......also btw that kind of option might sway me to buy an sti instead of an evo......


for now i'll stick with an evo for my next car......

Originally posted by Neutrino


i know but its fun to dream......also btw that kind of option might sway me to buy an sti instead of an evo......


for now i'll stick with an evo for my next car......
the sti is hands down faster and more of a beast, but the evo is just so user friendly and easy and fun to drive that most magazines that review the 2 of them pick the evo as overall most fun. i think i'd pick and evo over an sti.