1972 Ford mustang Mach 1 or 2002 trans am WS6??

hi guys..

if you would have chance, which car would you buy??


2002 trans am ws6

http://www.supercars.de/member/mycar/uploads/M/039000022501.jpg

1972 mustang mach 1

http://members.ispwest.com/ronsmith/cars/000318_86.jpg


post your opinions pls.


ERDAL

Easy.
Trans Am.

both are gorgeous cars, but i must remain faithful to T/A. Vintage is Vintage but there is no other car that looks like a 4th Gen T/A. I would definitely go with the WS6.

you know what answer you will get from all of us, TRANS AM!!!

i love the firebird so much, i am thinking of getting the "firebird" tattooed on my upper arm!

Plus its a
F ound
O n
R oad
D ead

F ucked
O ver
R ebuilt
D odge

can l have some informations about 1970s mustang machs???

how are they? fast?? relaible?? well looks definetely aggressive..

l just wanna have some infos..:D

thanks for your posts guys..

Erdal

LOL, had to do it.

LOL, had to do it.

why?

i was refering to my ford thing i just posted

can l have some informations about 1970s mustang machs???

how are they? fast?? relaible?? well looks definetely aggressive..
It is 35 years old. How reliable you think it is gonna be? :wink:

That Mustang is a beautiful car.
But I picked the T/A because of things like power and reliability.

well, l am definetely goin for trans am...

but l thought maybe, l would get one mustang too:D

by the way, l just hired by sheraton midtown atlanta as a front desk agent... whoohhooo:D in the U.S.A. first time l applied for a job and they wanted to have an interview.. l had an interview and they were impressed and hired me:D
now l am gonna make money and thats why l was thinking to get a mustang too. but l guess not:D

thank you.. but they look bad ass man..

Congrats Erdal!!

It is 35 years old. How reliable you think it is gonna be? :wink:

That Mustang is a beautiful car.
But I picked the T/A because of things like power and reliability.


but they say, engine and transmission all rebuilt and good paint job and like 90.000 miles on it.. well, l thought maybe engine would be fine..

Congrats Erdal!!


Thank you Luos.. l am so happy:cheers:

all depends what engine is under the hood really, but in the long run, one is still a ford, ford only really made 2 decent engine's and i'm pretty sure that car doesn't have either of them. i'm betting it has a 390 or 460, and when measured up to gm engine's, they don't have near the power and cost more to build, just ain't worth it.

i love old cars, but if i was faced with a decision like that i'd have to go with the t/a