Celica Intakes

can a 2001 gt with a cold air intake take a stock GT-s?
also what are the mojority of you guys running cold air or short ram?
what company make them?
colors ect..
Thanx 4 ur time

most people run short ram besuace they dont like water sucked in their intake...besides theres slim to no diffrence to the HP between the 2

and im prety sure that the intake from a gt wont work on a gts

I doubt it will be able to take a gt-s because there is a 40 hp difference. I don't know about weight, but that is a fair difference. The most an intake will probably give you is 8 hp, 12 if you are very lucky. I personally make intakes and I have found that my short ram is no worse than me CAI, I used. I am gonna go with a short ram, with cold air box, and ram air system. :)

ur gt wont come close to a gts even with a cai. theres not much diff. between a short ram and cold air just go with whatever is cheaper. i dont know who makes them for 7th gens but they shouldnt be hard to find if u search. or you could go to ebay for the cheapest ones. the biggest diffrence is the cone filter u use at the end. i would go with k&n if i were you.

A GT 5speed won't beat a stock GT-S 6speed no matter what kind of mods you do to it N/A.. unless you got into doing custom parts for the engine. The 1zz-fe doesn't respond to mods very well. The head doesn't flow nearly as well as the 2zz-ge head. The 2zz-ge actually out-flows the B18C5 (Integra Type R).

Stage 1 Turbo GT's are barely getting better times than stock GT-S's. If you want a fast GT, go turbo.. it's pretty much your only option.

I just got an intake for my car and I put in and i had some problems. The air sensor that plugs into the pipe fits but the screws don't line up. I got it on but it doesn't fit snug. Once i got it all in i started the car and it wouldn't even go over 2,000 RPM. It Idled at about 20 to 50 RPM. It was really messed up, It made me really mad. So i took all of the parts off and put the stock parts back on and it ran fine. Yeah i was a little mad. I got the Short Ram air off of ebay buy a dealer for 31 dollars. Yeah so i'm going to try and file of a little bit of it off so it fits. I'll try and make it work but if it doesn't i'll try and send it back.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1,1&item=8018660469&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT

Honestly most filters are not much more superior to others. I have ran my car with no filter and then tried a lot of others to compare and they are mostly all pretty close. The sponge filters seem to usually work best for allowing air in. Any filter with a wire caging around cloth seems to be worse because that cage gets hot and then heats all incoming air. With a short ram I would recommend an HKS sponge and with a CAI I would recommend any good cone filter that filters well as you don't want dirt coming in. K&N really are not far superior to me than most any of the cheaper companies. If you want a good filter and are willing to pay go for some of the more expensive authentic filters.

You should have gotten the ebay CAI. It's an exact AEM replica. As for different kinds of filters... The sponge type filters are crap when you are considering filtering properties. They let much much more junk into your engine compared to k&n style filters which are generally the best. I would never put a sponge filter in my car.

I don't know if you have a PepBoys Auto parts where you live but they have all the pieces you need to make a custom intake. They have pipes that are 4in, 6in, and 8in long plus pipes with 45 degree or 90 degree bends in them. I made a short ram for about $30 or $40. It works great. Looks nice too. I have some no name brand filter on it right now but plan to get a K&N soon.

The sponge filters let more air in and if that is what you want why not use one? They are rated very poorly for filtering out dirt, but some people run without filters. I am not saying it is the best, if you want max air flow though then they will be what you want.

some people run w/o filters???? wtf? you mean drag racers? lol!
anyways, I always think of CAI/Shortram as for "sound" only...as a mod, they're as useful as a "muffler-tip-upgrade"....which is...not THAT useful. And I have both of them. Unless getting a Turbo Kit, then it is safer and better to use stock drop-in filter... since the real wheel power difference is insignificant.

some people run w/o filters???? wtf? you mean drag racers? lol!
anyways, I always think of CAI/Shortram as for "sound" only...as a mod, they're as useful as a "muffler-tip-upgrade"....which is...not THAT useful. And I have both of them. Unless getting a Turbo Kit, then it is safer and better to use stock drop-in filter... since the real wheel power difference is insignificant.

Pshh.. you can stick with your drop-in filter. It will give you the same gains as a short ram.. which is next to nothing. CAI is the only way to go if you want gains.

Yea but where am i going to put my sensor? do they make holes for them? i also need four stems for four little hoses. Do you have a celica?



I don't know if you have a PepBoys Auto parts where you live but they have all the pieces you need to make a custom intake. They have pipes that are 4in, 6in, and 8in long plus pipes with 45 degree or 90 degree bends in them. I made a short ram for about $30 or $40. It works great. Looks nice too. I have some no name brand filter on it right now but plan to get a K&N soon.

a cai will not add but maybe 1-2 hp, and thats not even to the wheels, the only thing a new intake will do is make the engine sound better, and get a minimal change in feul economy, making it better.

Intakes also even out torque curves and prevent lugging. It makes sense... with a stock intake the car really has to work usually to get full air through all the piping, so at low rpms when the engine isn't doing full air pull it will lug, with a less restrictive intake you do better all through your powerband. If your car has 140 max hp at 5500 rpms, yet at lift, (e.g. 3250 rpms) it is running 125 hp, with a stock intake. With a nicer aftermarket setup you may only have 142 @ 5500, but at 3250 you might have 135, so the whole torque curve is more even. Phew... that was a lot, oh and about running without filters I know plenty of ricers who do it, and some people who only do it when they seriously race. No filter=no resistance to air. It is just bad for other reasons.

Two cool statements caught my attention here...
Leveling Torque curve and Better fuel economy...are they related in any way? considering that is, leveling torque curve means that the motor is more efficient in burning gas.... BUt, wouldnt this be a consequential effect of other stuff too, than just an intake? @ most you can play w/ air temperature or something... but other than that, what is the method/logic used to find that these two facts are true? Yeah, I installed a shortram the first week I got my car... I used to think it would give me something like 33 mpg and 10 extra HP...heheh...:P

a cai will not add but maybe 1-2 hp, and thats not even to the wheels, the only thing a new intake will do is make the engine sound better, and get a minimal change in feul economy, making it better.

Hmm 1-2hp right.. and not at the wheels huh?

http://www.newcelica.org/other/dyno/tpr/Stock-TPR.jpg

There's an article in import tuner mag once showing the graph made by K&N "Typhoon" intake (CAI w/ heat shield et al)...thats installed in an RX-8. On average it adds 3HP and 2.4 lb-ft trq... and theres some instances when the gain was up to 4 HP... Since its dynoed, that means the HP comes from the wheels then. But even so...its 4 HP for like what? $200 brand-name CAI?

An intake is a good mod, but it is nothing amazing no matter what you do to it, unless you put a turbo after it. And on any car an intake can be different, I have a vid of a new civic getting dynoed with an injen SRI and it gained 6.2 hp and 5.7 ft. lbs tq. But one problem was even though the engine was warm, they had the hood popped and a fan on it, so it was colder of course. No one can make any guarantees on what an intake may do unless they are a perfect expert on a CERTAIN engine and that is the exact one discussed. Most people think intakes are so great cuz they had a 10 yr old filter in the stock one and then they went to performance intakes and got a huge gain. They may have got 20 hp, but their old filter could have been holding back 15 cuz of how dirty it was, so they only gained five and gained back 15 lost hp. There are too many factors to make any definite statements about all intakes on the market.

doesnt k&n have a 10 hp guarentee on some cars that theey make intakes for?

doesnt k&n have a 10 hp guarentee on some cars that theey make intakes for?

I don't know why they would.. that would be stupid. Some cars make better gains than others.. even being the same year/make/model. Every car dynos different.

I don't know why they would.. that would be stupid. Some cars make better gains than others.. even being the same year/make/model. Every car dynos different.

I actually have a K&N in mine. Slight push between 2000-4000 RPM that makes the car move forward the more... but that was in conjuction w/ a cheap resistor chip in my temperature sensor, and I was gas-a-wastin'. Chip off, ECU resetted, everything else back to normal... no added HP feel...

BTW vip, quick quest. I've been wanting a GT-S 2001 or 2003 for daily driving. What is a good initial engine-mod investment? is there anything I can do before going turbo (but also adds substantial power)?

I believe K & N guarantees it in certain suv's and trucks, but in bigger vehicles such as those any intake will add some mad hp because of how huge the engine is and how much of a difference it can make. On a 4 banger lil econo engine 6 hp is a great gain from an intake. Let alone 10.

BTW vip, quick quest. I've been wanting a GT-S 2001 or 2003 for daily driving. What is a good initial engine-mod investment? is there anything I can do before going turbo (but also adds substantial power)?

First.. I wouldn't get a 2003+. They are all DBW (Drive by wire) and you cannot use the power fc with them. Your best bet is 2000-2002 if you are planning on getting a power fc (which is probably the best modification you could ever do to a 7th gen gts). If you don't want to do that, then get a 2000 or 01. Nothing adds substantial power, but as light as the car is, it doesn't take much power to get it going faster.

The faster guys over at newcelica.org are running 14.7-14.8 stock. With Intake/unbolted exhaust they are running around 14.1-14.5. With drag radials one guy got 13.9 without the power fc. Add the power fc and people have gotten 13.5-13.7 (all of these times are with weight reduction of course). None of the faster guys have tried out ragnorak racing's new stuff. They just released a ported throttle body that showed an 8-10whp gain on the dyno with a quick tune on the pfc. They have an intake manifold in development that is port matched to the throttle body that is going to be released very soon. This should get us over the 200whp mark finally. FYI, the guy that ran 13.7 did that with 174whp. :)

First.. I wouldn't get a 2003+. They are all DBW (Drive by wire) and you cannot use the power fc with them. Your best bet is 2000-2002 if you are planning on getting a power fc
... None of the faster guys have tried out ragnorak racing's new stuff. They just released a ported throttle body that showed an 8-10whp gain on the dyno with a quick tune on the pfc. They have an intake manifold in development that is port matched to the throttle body that is going to be released very soon. This should get us over the 200whp mark finally. FYI, the guy that ran 13.7 did that with 174whp. :)


number 1: Do we have to get a professional to tune a powerfc?
number 2: Isnt 2002 version have a rev limiter thats less then the others? (could've sworn I saw this somewhere)
number 3: what the heck is drive by wire?

I checked out ragnorak stuff. Thats some expensive investment... but the cam/retainersprings/header/supercharger combo looks promising...
you are talking about all this plus that intake manifold being over 200 whp, right?
Is there any 7thgeners ever ran under 10? I know from toyotacelicaonline theres a 6 gen that does 9.*** And its body-frame is based on US spec-ST model....:P

number 1: Do we have to get a professional to tune a powerfc?
number 2: Isnt 2002 version have a rev limiter thats less then the others? (could've sworn I saw this somewhere)
number 3: what the heck is drive by wire?

I checked out ragnorak stuff. Thats some expensive investment... but the cam/retainersprings/header/supercharger combo looks promising...
you are talking about all this plus that intake manifold being over 200 whp, right?
Is there any 7thgeners ever ran under 10? I know from toyotacelicaonline theres a 6 gen that does 9.*** And its body-frame is based on US spec-ST model....:P

1: No, you just need to do some research and a wideband o2 meter. I tune mine and before I got mine I knew pretty much nothing about tuning. You get the hang of it after a while. Jesse IL at newcelica.org has started a nice tutorial. http://www.newcelica.org/forums/showthread.php?t=191180

2: Yes, the 2002 has a lower rev limiter. But if you replace the ECU with the apex'i power fc, you can change the rev limiter to whatever you want it to be.

3: Drive by wire means that there is no throttle cable. The throttle is controlled electronically instead of with a cable.

Oh yeah.. forgot to add. The fastest 7th gen so far is 11.8 @ 127mph.

That link on tuning tutorial looks like fun once you get the hang of it...
I can't believe how sophisticated the technology is. thats like...just typing in whatever you want your car to act like. Damn! cant get any geekier, but yeah if it gets me some leverage on speed, that'll do. Thanks a bunch. Why the hell did they change into drive by wire? if its electronically controlled, that means only a matter of time that some entity like apex'i to figure out how to tune thru a more advanced version of powerfc...

Yea but where am i going to put my sensor? do they make holes for them? i also need four stems for four little hoses. Do you have a celica?

yes i have a celica but its a 91 gt. I think they have an adapter pipe that has a hole for the sensor. I didn't get it though, i just let the sensor hang there buy the filter. I don't think it makes much of a difference, but i could be wrong. As for the hoses i don't have any. I think they have and adapter for them too.