more stars in the sky than grains of sand on every beach
HondaCivic4358
06-10-2005, 12:20 PM
is there really more stars in the sky than grains of sand on every beach in the world? i heard this somewhere. its just mindboggling. if you pick up a handful of sand...thats just mindboggling there, thats when i look up at the whole stretch of beach, and try to imagine all the beaches in the world.....and wow.
sivic02
06-10-2005, 01:18 PM
I dont think it was ment to be taken literally. Sand moves on and off of beaches all the time. Truth be, we dont know exactly how many stars there are out there, and we sure as hell dont know how many grains of sand there are on every beach in the world. I think it is just a way to explain that there is a buttload of stars in the sky.
asaenz
06-11-2005, 04:49 AM
Did you try googling this or asking Jeeves?
There is no way to count all the stars and grains of sand, but I am sure one can use statistics and sampling to get an estimation.
al
There is no way to count all the stars and grains of sand, but I am sure one can use statistics and sampling to get an estimation.
al
Knifeblade
06-11-2005, 05:50 AM
Theoretically, there are more stars than grains of sand, if you accept an endless universe.
Pavlo
06-11-2005, 11:51 PM
I once counted the stars, 93462934239495695537498356356395836598376393959387 6 billion and 1 star, that that makes it 93462934239495695537498356356395836598376393959387 7 starts total.
-Davo
06-12-2005, 08:06 AM
I was watching a doco with a theorietical physicist was saying how there are over 100 billion galaxys, with 100 billion solar systems per galaxy, and if 1 star per solarsystem, that's over 1,000,000 billion stars per galaxy, for a hundred billion...ah fuck i'm lost.
Steel
06-12-2005, 01:07 PM
there very well could be an infinite number of stars as well...
eversio11
06-12-2005, 01:55 PM
New stars are formed and killed everyday. Half the stars we see are probably already dead, its just that the light takes so long to get to Earth that we see light from when they were still alive.
But I believe sivic hit the nail on the head, it's not supposed to be literal. It's just to show that there are a lot of fucking stars out in the universe.
But I believe sivic hit the nail on the head, it's not supposed to be literal. It's just to show that there are a lot of fucking stars out in the universe.
drewh4386
06-12-2005, 06:49 PM
New stars are formed and killed everyday. Half the stars we see are probably already dead, its just that the light takes so long to get to Earth that we see light from when they were still alive.
But I believe sivic hit the nail on the head, it's not supposed to be literal. It's just to show that there are a lot of fucking stars out in the universe. Yep. Alot of star light we see is older that us. Weird thought. The some of the star light we see could be from a star that is already dead. The light (traveling at the speed of light) just hasn't made it over yet. Gives you an idea of how far a13ins have come. And how far or big the universe really is.
I was going to reply to sivic02, but you just covered it.
But I believe sivic hit the nail on the head, it's not supposed to be literal. It's just to show that there are a lot of fucking stars out in the universe. Yep. Alot of star light we see is older that us. Weird thought. The some of the star light we see could be from a star that is already dead. The light (traveling at the speed of light) just hasn't made it over yet. Gives you an idea of how far a13ins have come. And how far or big the universe really is.
I was going to reply to sivic02, but you just covered it.
drunken monkey
06-12-2005, 07:09 PM
actually..... there aren't an infinite number of stars seeing as there is a finite amount of matter.
but then again, what are you taking to be stars?
the actual masses or the light that we see?
but then again, what are you taking to be stars?
the actual masses or the light that we see?
Knifeblade
06-13-2005, 05:07 AM
How can you say matter is finite, and even if accepting that, how do you possibly know the amount of matter in the universe? You don't, simple.
drunken monkey
06-13-2005, 12:10 PM
there's a big ass equation they use to calculate the total mass of the universe.
it's goes in part to 'explain' the bag/crash/bang ideas.
e.g above a certain amount of mass, gravity overcomes and you get a recession (eventual crash).
below a certain mass, gravity is overcome and you don't get a crash.
or something like that (might be the other way around).
personally, i don't know the equation nor do i even have an inkling how they worked it out.
basically they know (roughly) how much mass there is.
it's goes in part to 'explain' the bag/crash/bang ideas.
e.g above a certain amount of mass, gravity overcomes and you get a recession (eventual crash).
below a certain mass, gravity is overcome and you don't get a crash.
or something like that (might be the other way around).
personally, i don't know the equation nor do i even have an inkling how they worked it out.
basically they know (roughly) how much mass there is.
YogsVR4
06-13-2005, 12:48 PM
The easy answer is that there are a finite number of grains of sand on the planet, but there is (supposedly) infinate space so there are more stars then grains of sand.
The harder anser is http://www.tufts.edu/as/physics/courses/physics5/estim_97.html 4,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 grains of sand vs http://www.jhu.edu/~gazette/2003/04aug03/04stars.html 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars in the sky (known universe) which means there are about 18 times as many stars as grains of sand.
Never pay again for live sex! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=1) | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=3) | Chat for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=5)
The harder anser is http://www.tufts.edu/as/physics/courses/physics5/estim_97.html 4,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 grains of sand vs http://www.jhu.edu/~gazette/2003/04aug03/04stars.html 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars in the sky (known universe) which means there are about 18 times as many stars as grains of sand.
Never pay again for live sex! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=1) | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=3) | Chat for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=5)
TexasF355F1
06-13-2005, 12:57 PM
The number of stars is always changing. I would say infinite because they burn out but new ones are always born.
Knifeblade
06-13-2005, 12:59 PM
I with Yogs and texas.
drunken monkey
06-13-2005, 01:21 PM
infinite space doesn't mean infinite stars.
the thing with star formation is that it isn't an instant effect, nor do all stars go nova to release matter to reform as stars.
as i asked before, what are you going to take as being stars?
are stars the actual bodies of mass or do you count the points of light that we see?
same thing goes with sand.
how big are you going to go before you call it a pebble/stone/whatever?
how small before it is dust?
is sand becoming dust quicker than stones becoming sand?
oh god..... i just re-read what i typed and i am getting way too anal about this.
the thing with star formation is that it isn't an instant effect, nor do all stars go nova to release matter to reform as stars.
as i asked before, what are you going to take as being stars?
are stars the actual bodies of mass or do you count the points of light that we see?
same thing goes with sand.
how big are you going to go before you call it a pebble/stone/whatever?
how small before it is dust?
is sand becoming dust quicker than stones becoming sand?
oh god..... i just re-read what i typed and i am getting way too anal about this.
travis712
06-15-2005, 04:11 PM
My science teacher said this. Or something to that extent. What grade are you in?
Knifeblade
06-15-2005, 05:07 PM
>pats drunken on the back, and says "it's okay"<
PeanutM&MsRgood4u
06-21-2005, 03:14 PM
This isnt really that difficult to figure out. In fact if you were so inclined with some simple density measurements you would easily be able to figure out that if you had one grain of salt for every star in the milky way galaxy (our galaxy which is only one of hundreds of billions) you would have enough salt to completely fill an olympic sized swimming pool. Personally I can easily immagine a couple hundred billion of these pools out matching the amount of sand on nothing more than the beaches on eath.
240SXSlideStar
06-21-2005, 03:23 PM
"Are there really an infinite number of parallel universes?" "Nope, just the two."
IBnoonewilgetit.
IBnoonewilgetit.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2025