various responses about no muffler
eclipserunner87
02-24-2005, 11:06 AM
About a year ago i took my muffler off my eclipse and come to find it sounded pretty good well my dad heard and hes a mechanic he told me that over time you could totally screw up your intake and exhaust valves. Well i told my autotech teacher and hes ASE certified and what not he said it might it depends on the car. I really need some help on this one. Should i straight pipe it and get rid of the muffler or should I buy one a muffler and put it on. But my car does sound good without the muffler.
spyderturbo007
02-24-2005, 12:44 PM
My understanding is that it depends if it is a turbo or not. I know that the best exhaust for a turbo is no exhaust at all. The free flowing exhaust, or lack thereof, allows to turbo to spin without any backpressure. I think with an N/A that the engine requires some backpressure. So it would seem that it wouldn't matter on a turbo, but I'm not sure what car you have.
Can anyone back me up on this?
Can anyone back me up on this?
TreeFrog
02-24-2005, 01:22 PM
:gay: dude get a straight pipe, and a full 3" catback with downpipe/header
drdisque
02-24-2005, 09:12 PM
with no muffler on an NA you're giving up alot of low end torque for a very little bit of top end hp.
kjewer1
02-25-2005, 08:50 AM
No motor ever needs backpressure. Search backpressure and velocity using my user name, and you'll find some answers. The valves will be fine too.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2025