Eclipse vs Celica
bigtex713
02-23-2005, 03:13 AM
i know most of you are eclipse lovers but someone wants to sell me there 94' celica which one do you thing runs better looks and over all is better give me yo feed back
JoeWagon
02-23-2005, 03:41 AM
95 celicas are way better looking than 94's. I'd take a 95 celica over a nonturbo eclipse of any year... and a turbo DSM over any celica.
drewh4386
02-23-2005, 04:20 AM
bigtex713, you should just keep and worry about your car for now:smile:
Chavez408
02-23-2005, 05:47 AM
Go with the turbo, trust me.. Stay away from the celi.
bighauns
02-23-2005, 09:29 AM
95 celicas are way better looking than 94's. I'd take a 95 celica over a nonturbo eclipse of any year... and a turbo DSM over any celica.
:iagree:
bigtex713, you should just keep and worry about your car for now:smile:
He is asking your opinion about the pros and cons of the two cars.
:iagree:
bigtex713, you should just keep and worry about your car for now:smile:
He is asking your opinion about the pros and cons of the two cars.
coolguycooz
02-23-2005, 02:37 PM
Arnt some Celica's turbo?
musicman181
02-23-2005, 02:47 PM
wzup cuz, assumig there are no mods. i would definitly go with the eclipse, since i am guessing that you are refering to the 95 eclps. not only do they run better on stock. they are way more convertible. last time i checked,they are still making new kits for these models. and like joe wagon said, a turbo dsm will make should pretty much make the car. DONT BUY.
musicman181
02-23-2005, 02:52 PM
95 celicas are way better looking than 94's. I'd take a 95 celica over a nonturbo eclipse of any year... and a turbo DSM over any celica.
Thanks for the extra info. but someone is tryin to sel him a 94' not a 95' you were no help.
Thanks for the extra info. but someone is tryin to sel him a 94' not a 95' you were no help.
bigtex713
02-23-2005, 05:39 PM
sorry you all the Celica was a 95'
man, J sorry to hear about your car hope you can get it fixed.
man, J sorry to hear about your car hope you can get it fixed.
drewh4386
02-23-2005, 07:13 PM
:iagree:
He is asking your opinion about the pros and cons of the two cars.no he said-bigtex713]someone wants to sell me there 94' celica- [/font]
which one do you thing runs better looks and over all is better
I simplified it for him. Or should I elaborate on it? He still has the eclipse, he should keep it. I think the eclipse is better looking, and he should keep it because "I" think it is a better car depending on what your needs, wants and situation. (he did say you. meaning I who answers)
I said basically what most people are going to say already.
Thanks for the extra info. but someone is tryin to sel him a 94' not a 95' you were no help.
and you?
and a turbo DSM over any celica
enough said.
He is asking your opinion about the pros and cons of the two cars.no he said-bigtex713]someone wants to sell me there 94' celica- [/font]
which one do you thing runs better looks and over all is better
I simplified it for him. Or should I elaborate on it? He still has the eclipse, he should keep it. I think the eclipse is better looking, and he should keep it because "I" think it is a better car depending on what your needs, wants and situation. (he did say you. meaning I who answers)
I said basically what most people are going to say already.
Thanks for the extra info. but someone is tryin to sel him a 94' not a 95' you were no help.
and you?
and a turbo DSM over any celica
enough said.
91 Eclipse
02-23-2005, 10:43 PM
I would stick with the Eclipse I wouldnt personally go witha toyota.
Shpyder
02-24-2005, 01:07 AM
Arnt some Celica's turbo?
I was in Europe last December, and I saw these Celicas called "GT-4s". They were turbocharged 2.0 from the factory, and though i saw only the 95 shape, they all had a TRD hood, and a sick ass body kit too. They look *nothing* like Celicas here. They were awesome, for celicas. im tryin to look for a pic...
I was in Europe last December, and I saw these Celicas called "GT-4s". They were turbocharged 2.0 from the factory, and though i saw only the 95 shape, they all had a TRD hood, and a sick ass body kit too. They look *nothing* like Celicas here. They were awesome, for celicas. im tryin to look for a pic...
macder
02-24-2005, 01:26 AM
Actualy, toyota did produce AWD 2.0 DOHC 16v turbo celica's from 1989 to 1993 (maybe 94 or 95 but who cares). It was called the All-TRAC Celica as well as the GT-4 depending which part of the world it was bought. It is however a rare find since toyota did not produce large numbers of this trim.
JoeWagon
02-24-2005, 01:30 AM
Thanks for the extra info. but someone is tryin to sel him a 94' not a 95' you were no help.
i'll kill you.
In addition to alltracs, they have GT4 celicas to at least 99.
i'll kill you.
In addition to alltracs, they have GT4 celicas to at least 99.
bigtex713
02-24-2005, 11:02 AM
kool if you can get me a pic that would be nice
gen2gst95
02-24-2005, 12:24 PM
http://img68.exs.cx/img68/3125/celica9pq.jpg (http://www.imageshack.us)
thats a celica GT-4. Of course, like the FTO and the previous Evo's, America didnt see them, because America sucks. They had awd and around 220hp i think. Joe, i like the "ill kill you". I like how he has 28 posts but thinks he knows more than you, even though if you read his posts in other threads, hes a noob.
thats a celica GT-4. Of course, like the FTO and the previous Evo's, America didnt see them, because America sucks. They had awd and around 220hp i think. Joe, i like the "ill kill you". I like how he has 28 posts but thinks he knows more than you, even though if you read his posts in other threads, hes a noob.
Shpyder
02-24-2005, 12:43 PM
No body on here claims to be all-knowing...that attitude sucks and restricts grey matter growth. We learn something new everyday...
As for the GT-4s, they must be a blast. I drove my friends 93 Sentra SE-R. He was boosting 15 on a T-25, and his car was as fast as my eclipse (not as sexy though, so I'm nowhere near intimidated!). He said he had an SR-20DET (I think... it sounded something like that), and it was either that, or the 4G63 he wasnted to do up... just wondeering if those GT4's have a stock celica engine, or did toyota come up with a 4g63 category i4 beast.
As for the GT-4s, they must be a blast. I drove my friends 93 Sentra SE-R. He was boosting 15 on a T-25, and his car was as fast as my eclipse (not as sexy though, so I'm nowhere near intimidated!). He said he had an SR-20DET (I think... it sounded something like that), and it was either that, or the 4G63 he wasnted to do up... just wondeering if those GT4's have a stock celica engine, or did toyota come up with a 4g63 category i4 beast.
macder
02-24-2005, 08:09 PM
The engine name in the all-trac is 3SGTE, dunno if this is a regular celica motor, or just for the turbo.
metalhedskater
02-24-2005, 11:01 PM
America didnt see them, because America sucks.
Now thats just stupid...
Now thats just stupid...
lukedogg8706
02-24-2005, 11:07 PM
http://img68.exs.cx/img68/3125/celica9pq.jpg (http://www.imageshack.us)
thats a celica GT-4. Of course, like the FTO and the previous Evo's, America didnt see them, because America sucks. They had awd and around 220hp i think. Joe, i like the "ill kill you". I like how he has 28 posts but thinks he knows more than you, even though if you read his posts in other threads, hes a noob.
You do no post count does not affect a persons knowledge about anything right? You cant assume anything about a person except they havent contributed to the forum by posting things by how big a number by their name is.
thats a celica GT-4. Of course, like the FTO and the previous Evo's, America didnt see them, because America sucks. They had awd and around 220hp i think. Joe, i like the "ill kill you". I like how he has 28 posts but thinks he knows more than you, even though if you read his posts in other threads, hes a noob.
You do no post count does not affect a persons knowledge about anything right? You cant assume anything about a person except they havent contributed to the forum by posting things by how big a number by their name is.
bigtex713
02-25-2005, 12:02 AM
You do no post count does not affect a persons knowledge about anything right? You cant assume anything about a person except they havent contributed to the forum by posting things by how big a number by their name is. "yeah but no if you are on here acting like a jackass you might as well not be on here posting anything i think thats what hes saying and for that is what makes him a newbe" hey i dont know shit so its whatever, everytime i post something a asshole has to have a smart ass comment that has nothing to do with the topic and start a lot of bull shit so if someone do some stupid shit like that just write this http://www.jackass-post-somewhere-else.com
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2026
