Why didnt Bush plant WMD?

If I was the President of the United States of America, theres no doubt in my mind i would of planted some weapons of mass destruction to save face.

Who would of believed Saddam when he'd say they werent his anyway?

Because if it were to get out then he would most likely face an impeachment.

If I was the President of the United States of America, theres no doubt in my mind i would of planted some weapons of mass destruction to save face.

Who would of believed Saddam when he'd say they werent his anyway?


You seriously believe that Bush is more credible? :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2:

Haha Theres A Reason The Trial Will Be Censored For "national Security"...

Besides, Why Bother Wasting Money On Planting Weapons When You Know You Supplied Him Some A While Back Anyway...

Not only face impeachment, he would instantly become the most hated man in America. You think all the ripping and taranaki bitching is bad now?

You seriously believe that Bush is more credible? :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2:


no i'm just saying what I would of done if i was the president of the most powerful country in the world

It probably would of bin easy enough to cover up... nobody would believe Saddam saying they werent his
But theres always that chance of getting caught

It probably would of bin easy enough to cover up... nobody would believe Saddam saying they werent his
For some reason when you said that I thought of Saddam getting pulled over in a traffic stop and a cop searching his car, finding a WMD under his seat, and going 'Is this yours sir?' 'No officer, I swear, that isn't mine!'

For some reason when you said that I thought of Saddam getting pulled over in a traffic stop and a cop searching his car, finding a WMD under his seat, and going 'Is this yours sir?' 'No officer, I swear, that isn't mine!'

LMFAO :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol2:

You seriously believe that Bush is more credible? :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2:

...? that was just ignorant

No, ignorance is a lack of knowledge or education on a particular subject.

Naki was making a very well educated and informed statement.

No, ignorance is a lack of knowledge or education on a particular subject.

Naki was making a very well educated and informed statement.

good thing he is not a citizen of this great nation and is not allowed to vote for our elected officials.

By Naki's statement you could imply that he beleives hussein is more credible than bush

But i ask him this " if you had no other choice who would you vote for in a political election for your own country Bush or Hussein?" Why do you answer Bush the man you beleive is less credible?

therefore his statement is ignorant bc it contradicts his own beliefs, and if he answered hussein he is just a liar, or mentally unstable... the end

By Naki's statement you could imply that he beleives hussein is more credible than bush

But i ask him this " if you had no other choice who would you vote for in a political election for your own country Bush or Hussein?" Why do you answer Bush the man you beleive is less credible?

therefore his statement is ignorant bc it contradicts his own beliefs, and if he answered hussein he is just a liar, or mentally unstable... the end


You are making quantum leaps in your 'logic' there.

First one.Where did I say that Bush is less credible than Hussein? I asked if he had any more credibility, but you chose to interpret that and put words in my mouth.

For the record,I think they are both worthless cunts.Neither has any usable merits,and if they both got assassinated tomorrow, its no great loss to me.

Second..if you had no other choice who would you vote for in a political election.........Only a bunch of fools would tolerate an electoral system which limits their choices to two men out of millions.Ooops,sorry,no offence meant to the USA...

Third......Adding the two pieces of nonsense that you just spouted and coming together to conclude that I must be a liar or unstable shows just how poor your debating skills are......and you have the nerve to call ME ignorant? Go back to school for about ten years,see if they can't stop you from making a laughing stock of yourself...

i see, sorry i dont play "sling the poo"
grow up

on the contrary, your ignorant shitslinging needed reasond and logical dismantling.

telling me to 'grow up' is a novel way of admitting that you know absolutely nothing about what you are talking about though.

Second..if you had no other choice who would you vote for in a political election.........Only a bunch of fools would tolerate an electoral system which limits their choices to two men out of millions.Ooops,sorry,no offence meant to the USA...



Yeah, it wasn't a good election year for america. 2008 can't come fast enough.

PMed.

Yeah, it wasn't a good election year for america. 2008 can't come fast enough.
You speak on the behalf of the 48% who voted against President Bush!

good thing he is not a citizen of this great nation and is not allowed to vote for our elected officials.

Indeed.Heaven forbid that anyone upset the great American applecart by actually looking past the rhetoric from both sides of the crappy and amateurish electoral system and formulating their opinions based on what they see rather than what they are told.

You speak on the behalf of the 48% who voted against President Bush!

Eh, maybe I shoulda said it was a bad election year for me. Either way, I thought both candiates were not suited for the presidency. But thats my opinion. I'm sure Bush lovers and Kerry lovers will disagree, with a vengeance. Thats politics for ya...

Yeah, it wasn't a good election year for america. 2008 can't come fast enough.

In 2008 Hilary Clinton might run for president!
I'll just enjoy the years we have right now.

PMed.

Read.

Sorry, but when someone gets completely outclassed in the public forum, it's not my policy to debate further comment in PMs.

Three things to bear in mind if you don't want to get pissed off when debating politics with me.

1.I DON'T KNOW ANYONE IN THIS FORUM WELL ENOUGH TO TAKE THEIR COMMENTS PERSONALLY.It's not like I've had to put up with any AF members' bullshit every day in the press.Nor to my knowledge has any AF member ever been elected to high office with an unannounced intention to start a war.I'll save all of my contempt for the dick who lied and cheated his way into the Oval office.Twice.

2.IF YOU WANT TO HATE ME FOR THINKING BUSH IS A CUNT,THAT'S FINE BY ME.All it means to me is that you are probably less capable of carrying a debate than some of the more intelligent users of this forum.Again,I don't know you from Adam,so I really see no point in getting too mad at you,unless you want to start some stupid trolling war.

3.THE CLASSIC RETREATS HAVE ALL BEEN DONE.

Accusing me of abusing moderator privilege, getting wild and trying to hurt my feelings by flaming me, questioning my military or political background,sending various PM's and hitting the 'report this post to a moderator' button have all been done before.
I've put people straight as much as I can, and I've suspended a couple of people who cant take the hint when they're asked to stop breaching the AF guidelines.But most of the time,it just rolls off.At the end of the day, it's Bush that irritates me, not the people who can't see what a jackass he is.

In 2008 Hilary Clinton might run for president!
I'll just enjoy the years we have right now.

Hate to keep this off topic but I would like to see a woman successfully run for president. Hilary is actually good with politics. Shes doing alright in NY last time I checked up on her. Although, its been awhile cause I've been away for so long. I could see her running, though.

What the hell happened with the original topic?

We've got a pissing match (expected)
Discussion of who's going to run in 08
Previous election results
An public answer to a private message

The tangent quota has been reached.

Sorry Goti.













Never pay again for live sex! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=1) | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=3) | Chat for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=5)