porsche art ?
Q..
03-04-2002, 09:12 AM
This was straight off the gun (so to speak)
apart from converting to grayscale in PS...
http://www.qplanet.org/images/auto/DSC01494m.jpg
apart from converting to grayscale in PS...
http://www.qplanet.org/images/auto/DSC01494m.jpg
StevieMo
03-04-2002, 05:26 PM
That could make a good avatar...
Si 2 Si
03-05-2002, 11:37 AM
Thats a very nice picture. Good work.
Q..
03-05-2002, 08:10 PM
thanks guys, I appreciate that.
jinushaun
03-08-2002, 04:15 PM
Very nice shot! :bigthumb: Good composition.
Q..
03-21-2002, 07:42 AM
crxlvr
03-21-2002, 02:15 PM
this is confusing me, what excatly did you do to these pics?
jinushaun
03-21-2002, 11:11 PM
Originally posted by Q..
thought I would post another one.
http://www.qplanet.org/images/auto/DSC00093m.jpg Bellismo!! :tears:
thought I would post another one.
http://www.qplanet.org/images/auto/DSC00093m.jpg Bellismo!! :tears:
crxlvr
03-22-2002, 12:37 AM
i must be missing something, these just look like any regular 2002 Porsche Carrera GT2
Jay!
03-22-2002, 12:55 AM
I don't really know what you did either, but nice pics! :)
Welcome to AF!! :D
Welcome to AF!! :D
yater13
03-22-2002, 06:43 AM
Excellent artistic composition.
crxlvr
03-22-2002, 10:54 AM
jinushaun
03-22-2002, 05:39 PM
Originally posted by crxlvr
this is confusing me, what excatly did you do to these pics? With the exception of grayscaling it in PS, nothing. You must be dense. It's just the pictures are really pretty and clean. The composition, the lighting, the angle, etc... Everything is perfect. This thread is about the photograph, not the car!
Hey Q, mind posting any biggers pics? Need a new wallpaper. :D ;)
this is confusing me, what excatly did you do to these pics? With the exception of grayscaling it in PS, nothing. You must be dense. It's just the pictures are really pretty and clean. The composition, the lighting, the angle, etc... Everything is perfect. This thread is about the photograph, not the car!
Hey Q, mind posting any biggers pics? Need a new wallpaper. :D ;)
crxlvr
03-23-2002, 01:33 PM
this is just dumb, any monkey can take a high res picture and post it here, there is no point to this entire thread, find a pic yourself thats high res.
http://www.supercars.net/PicFetch?pic=2002_porsche_911_targa-1.jpg
http://www.supercars.net/PicFetch?pic=2002_porsche_911_targa-1.jpg
yater13
03-24-2002, 01:14 AM
Sorry Q, apparently some people do not understand art. Or they do and are jealous of the talent.
Keep up the great work.
Keep up the great work.
crxlvr
03-24-2002, 12:04 PM
Originally posted by yater13
Sorry Q, apparently some people do not understand art. Or they do and are jealous of the talent.
Keep up the great work.
I am not jealous of any talent as none as been applied to these pics, its just a high resolution pic from any old website and converted to grayscale, this involves no talent whatsoever.
Sorry Q, apparently some people do not understand art. Or they do and are jealous of the talent.
Keep up the great work.
I am not jealous of any talent as none as been applied to these pics, its just a high resolution pic from any old website and converted to grayscale, this involves no talent whatsoever.
Bean Bandit
03-24-2002, 12:55 PM
Originally posted by crxlvr
this is just dumb, any monkey can take a high res picture and post it here, there is no point to this entire thread, find a pic yourself thats high res.
Ever took such a picture with ya own camera? Guess not else you'd know how hard it is.
take this for example. 3 weeks observing the light during sunset. about 20 pictures messing around with the exposure time and lens aperture. Finaly sitting infront of my crapy scaner 'till I got the scaner settings the way that it looked similar to the actual picture and reality.
http://files.automotiveforums.com/uploads/769415Lake1.JPG
Q.. nice work there!
this is just dumb, any monkey can take a high res picture and post it here, there is no point to this entire thread, find a pic yourself thats high res.
Ever took such a picture with ya own camera? Guess not else you'd know how hard it is.
take this for example. 3 weeks observing the light during sunset. about 20 pictures messing around with the exposure time and lens aperture. Finaly sitting infront of my crapy scaner 'till I got the scaner settings the way that it looked similar to the actual picture and reality.
http://files.automotiveforums.com/uploads/769415Lake1.JPG
Q.. nice work there!
yater13
03-24-2002, 06:30 PM
Q, take your photographs to www.3dcommune.com and post in the photography section. At least there, people know of the concept of composition. There's a few excelent photographers there, and the atmosphere as a whole is great.
Nice website.
Hope to see you there.
Nice website.
Hope to see you there.
crxlvr
03-25-2002, 12:06 AM
i can deal with the pics you took off the sunset, thats good, but if someone just takes a pic off another site, changes it to grayscale, then calls it their own, im not impressed.
He put the pics up to be viewed, he can accept some negative feedback.
He put the pics up to be viewed, he can accept some negative feedback.
Q..
03-25-2002, 05:08 AM
jinushaun
"bellisimo" LOL :)...thankyou.
That is my favourate pic.
A friend of mine looked at it and said...
"youv'e got the front cover, now just write the book" :)
*interesting idea*
If you want bigger pics, go to QPlanet.org
I have 1024x768 wallpapers you can download
just scroll to the pic you want, & click the 1024 link under the pic.
try here (http://www.qplanet.org/news.html)
and here (http://www.qplanet.org/996gt2.html)
jay@af
cheers jay
AF is a cool site :)
yater13
thankyou
*Q tips hat*
--cool site, will c u there
Bean Bandit
WILD PIC !!!!!!!!!!
"bellisimo" LOL :)...thankyou.
That is my favourate pic.
A friend of mine looked at it and said...
"youv'e got the front cover, now just write the book" :)
*interesting idea*
If you want bigger pics, go to QPlanet.org
I have 1024x768 wallpapers you can download
just scroll to the pic you want, & click the 1024 link under the pic.
try here (http://www.qplanet.org/news.html)
and here (http://www.qplanet.org/996gt2.html)
jay@af
cheers jay
AF is a cool site :)
yater13
thankyou
*Q tips hat*
--cool site, will c u there
Bean Bandit
WILD PIC !!!!!!!!!!
Q..
03-25-2002, 05:14 AM
Originally posted by crxlvr
i can deal with the pics you took off the sunset, thats good, but if someone just takes a pic off another site, changes it to grayscale, then calls it their own, im not impressed.
He put the pics up to be viewed, he can accept some negative feedback.
LOL :D
sorry to dissapoint you,
all the pics I have posted were taken my me.
the GT2 is owned by a friend.
The 993 under the bridge....is mine.
If you have seen them on another site, please post a link
I'd like to know who is using my pics !
i can deal with the pics you took off the sunset, thats good, but if someone just takes a pic off another site, changes it to grayscale, then calls it their own, im not impressed.
He put the pics up to be viewed, he can accept some negative feedback.
LOL :D
sorry to dissapoint you,
all the pics I have posted were taken my me.
the GT2 is owned by a friend.
The 993 under the bridge....is mine.
If you have seen them on another site, please post a link
I'd like to know who is using my pics !
crxlvr
03-26-2002, 03:43 PM
Q, i checked out your site and you have a lot of nice pics on there, what kind of camera are you using? and at what resolution?
I didnt mean to start any kind of war on this thread here, but ive seen many high res pics that are very similiar to the ones you have of the porsches, so i thought you just took them and grayscaled them in PS.
I didnt mean to start any kind of war on this thread here, but ive seen many high res pics that are very similiar to the ones you have of the porsches, so i thought you just took them and grayscaled them in PS.
Q..
03-26-2002, 07:22 PM
The photos you see on the site were taken with either a
Sony DSC70
or a Sony F707
DSC70 has max res of 2480 x 1536
F707 has max res of 2500 x something [cant remember]
I usually just use the 1280 setting
Sony DSC70
or a Sony F707
DSC70 has max res of 2480 x 1536
F707 has max res of 2500 x something [cant remember]
I usually just use the 1280 setting
jinushaun
03-26-2002, 07:29 PM
Originally posted by Q..
The photos you see on the site were taken with either a
Sony DSC70
or a Sony F707
...
I usually just use the 1280 setting Wow, those are really beautiful shots. These are the best pictures I've seen taken with a digi cam. (I prefer SLR myself). There is barely a trace of artifacts.
I suspects it's like 4.x MP right?
The photos you see on the site were taken with either a
Sony DSC70
or a Sony F707
...
I usually just use the 1280 setting Wow, those are really beautiful shots. These are the best pictures I've seen taken with a digi cam. (I prefer SLR myself). There is barely a trace of artifacts.
I suspects it's like 4.x MP right?
Q..
03-27-2002, 09:30 AM
jinushaun
I started with SLR's
have not got to scanning many for the site yet.
DSC 70 was 3.3
F707 is 5.0 :eek:
There is barely a trace of artifacts.
What do you mean ??
I started with SLR's
have not got to scanning many for the site yet.
DSC 70 was 3.3
F707 is 5.0 :eek:
There is barely a trace of artifacts.
What do you mean ??
jinushaun
03-27-2002, 01:18 PM
Originally posted by Q..
What do you mean ?? An example of artifacts is when you save a JPG file at a really low setting. You notice how it's all chunky and blurry, etc. Well alot of digital pictures (and videos) have this problem too--albeit it not as extreme. It generally shows up as a little blurriness around the edges of objects and color separation at those edges. There's also a trademark bluriness (overall) in digital pictures. They look like someone took a snapshot of MPEG video or something. You get the idea. But like I said, it's barely noticeable. I guess with a 5.0 Mpx camera, these problems are even less of an issue.
What do you mean ?? An example of artifacts is when you save a JPG file at a really low setting. You notice how it's all chunky and blurry, etc. Well alot of digital pictures (and videos) have this problem too--albeit it not as extreme. It generally shows up as a little blurriness around the edges of objects and color separation at those edges. There's also a trademark bluriness (overall) in digital pictures. They look like someone took a snapshot of MPEG video or something. You get the idea. But like I said, it's barely noticeable. I guess with a 5.0 Mpx camera, these problems are even less of an issue.
StevieMo
03-28-2002, 12:14 AM
I'm didnt take this picture and im not takin any credit fo rit... i just thought you guys would liek to see it
http://forums.gtplanet.net/attachment.php?s=&postid=149747
http://forums.gtplanet.net/attachment.php?s=&postid=149747
Q..
03-28-2002, 08:28 AM
I understand now.
thank you :)
thank you :)
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2026