Difference between a pic with or without flash
Neutrino
10-12-2004, 10:11 PM
Moppie
10-12-2004, 10:29 PM
Ones badly under-exposed and the other is showing a mixture of both over and under exposure.
And I thought you needed a really really fast shutter speed to catch the flash?
And I thought you needed a really really fast shutter speed to catch the flash?
zzpza
10-13-2004, 02:53 AM
Ones badly under-exposed and the other is showing a mixture of both over and under exposure.
And I thought you needed a really really fast shutter speed to catch the flash?
moppie, you're either master of the deadpan or missed this one entirely... look who's in the 2nd pic...
And I thought you needed a really really fast shutter speed to catch the flash?
moppie, you're either master of the deadpan or missed this one entirely... look who's in the 2nd pic...
Moppie
10-13-2004, 04:05 AM
to catch the flash?
;)
That pics older than the internet :smokin:
;)
That pics older than the internet :smokin:
Shortbus
10-13-2004, 11:42 AM
roffle
kittedb18bt
10-14-2004, 03:15 PM
the flash was awesome. nice.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2025