Camarov6 vs mustangv6

I have a 2000 v6 camaro. My friend has a 98 mustang v6. I let my friend drive my car the other day and he kept saying his is more powerful than mine. He told me my rmps go up to fast... Ive always heard that camaros are faster than mustangs. Plus his is older and i checked the 0-60 times for both cars and the mustangs is over 10 seconds. The camaro is just a little over 7. Is this true that a v6 mustang is faster than a v6 camaro or is my friend just a jelouse bast-rd.? I know the camaro weighs about 300 pounds more but wouldnt it make up for it in 50 more horsepower than the mustang.

In the terms you used... jealous bastard (theyre both stock I'm assuming)
And also point out that not just you RPMs but your MPH climbs fast... :iceslolan

ya they are both stock.

Then camaro's faster hands down

for sure the camaros faster :D

I have a 2000 v6 camaro. My friend has a 98 mustang v6. I let my friend drive my car the other day and he kept saying his is more powerful than mine. He told me my rmps go up to fast... Ive always heard that camaros are faster than mustangs. Plus his is older and i checked the 0-60 times for both cars and the mustangs is over 10 seconds. The camaro is just a little over 7. Is this true that a v6 mustang is faster than a v6 camaro or is my friend just a jelouse bast-rd.? I know the camaro weighs about 300 pounds more but wouldnt it make up for it in 50 more horsepower than the mustang.

First off, it does not take 10 seconds for a V6 Mustang to go from 0-60.

A stock 2000 V6 Camaro has 200 HP and weighs around 3300 pounds.
A stock 1998 V6 Mustang has 150 HP and weighs around 3300 pounds also.

So in conclusion, your Camaro should rape his Mustang.

you should win, I raced my co workers stang, it was a 95 v6..needless to say at the start i could see him in my mirrors...

First off, it does not take 10 seconds for a V6 Mustang to go from 0-60.

A stock 2000 V6 Camaro has 200 HP and weighs around 3300 pounds.
A stock 1998 V6 Mustang has 150 HP and weighs around 3300 pounds also.

So in conclusion, your Camaro should rape his Mustang.

i have a v6 mustang, 10sec 0-60, hell no. im not sure what it is, but not 10. maybe 6-7 the most. the v6 mustangs are kinda of dogs. you can get them fast, but your not beating a v8. and yes the v6 camaro is faster. i think the camaro may have bigger gears.

the 2000 V-6 Camaro has 200HP!? That seems quite a bit high...I know it's higher than the Mustards, but 200 just seems a bit high, is this right?

Its 200 hp, here:
http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/used/reviews/full/index.cfm/id/2007

:icon16: Ok just wondering haha.

The s3 3800 comes with an average of 265 hp, very close to what the 93 Z's had....275 or something....right?

the mustang has 190 hp i beleive

Thats what i have been told, but when i raced his 95...it was very...slow...compared to me, but when your in the stang it feels faster...but ya know

the lLT1 (350)(z-28) had 275-285 hp

Mine's got 200; i also heard in some newer ones they put in a diff muffler good for 5 hp? i know my friends got a 99 and it sounds a little deeper

the lLT1 (350)(z-28) had 275-285 hp
were tlaking about v6's here not v8's

While the 1995 Z28 received only minor changes (all-season tires and traction control were now available), the base Camaro added GM's "3800" 200-horsepower 3.8-liter V6 as an option. The 3800 was both significantly more powerful and refined than the 3400, and by 1996 would become the only V6 in Camaros. check this out http://www.msnusers.com/CaMaRoChiC/1995chevycamarohistory.msnw also look at the other years like the 98 200hp v6, not 265

now is that gm 3800 also in the s 10??? pickup

the mustang has 190 hp i beleive

Starting with the 1999 Mustang they had 193 HP. 1998 and lower had 150.

So in conclusion, your Camaro should rape his Mustang.
talk about the quote of the day

chevy >ford any day

So in conclusion, your Camaro should rape his Mustang.
talk about the quote of the day

chevy >ford any day

chevy= piss's on every GM pony car lover by killing a wonderful platform

ford= put supercharger on a car to make it absoulty scream.

When you hotrod a buick, you get an outsiders look on things.

chevy= piss's on every GM pony car lover by killing a wonderful platform

ford= put supercharger on a car to make it absoulty scream.

When you hotrod a buick, you get an outsiders look on things.
hey hypsi i want to ask you a question on turbos do diesal turboschargers work on gasoline? thanks

it should its just a turbo..... whoops im not hypsi

you're not???? weird.

I test-drove a 2003 Mustang V6 for my sister a few weeks ago. It felt pretty punchy off the line, even with a four-speed auto, but I'd bet that the Camaro V6 is faster.

hey hypsi i want to ask you a question on turbos do diesal turboschargers work on gasoline? thanks


yes and no, it would spool it but, the turbo would be soooo big that you would not even be able to run the ammount of boost it would take to put that turbo anywhere near it's effenicy curve. It will be in surge all the time.

chevy= piss's on every GM pony car lover by killing a wonderful platform

ford= put supercharger on a car to make it absoulty scream.

When you hotrod a buick, you get an outsiders look on things.

lmfao

you know I have yet to find a link with a turbo kit for the ls1 camaro anyone got one??

do you know any way i can make a cheap turbo for any of my cars?

So you guys know, Car and Driver said that the basic camaro (V6, just so you know) is faster, quicker, and all around better than the basic mustang.
Also, the 0-60 time for V6 stangs is not over 10 seconds. Sadly, I think it's about the same as an eclipse.

the base eclipse?? or the gs-t and whats the time???

The base eclipse has a 0-60 time of about 8-9 seconds. Thats what a guy with a 97 ran. The newer 2.0L are probably better or bigger. I don't really know, I don't follow eclipses.

yea they follow you :)

my turbo is 750 bucks brand new. and it would be more than enough for your car.