Which one..? 1g or 2g??
2of9
09-13-2004, 07:05 PM
A year from now, i will have a DSM. Only problem is, wich year? 90-92 is nice, performs better than 2g, but no looks...2g looks nice as hell, but the engine isnt as good as 1g..!! How much is insurance for 90-92 and 97-99 Eclipse GSX? thanks...
guitarXgeek
09-13-2004, 07:27 PM
You say the 1g's have no looks, but I've seen lots of them that looks REALLY good. It depends on your goals for the car, really. If you want a nice, hot-looking little street machine, then I'd go with a 2g. However, if you want a mostly street/strip go-fast with less $$ car while paying a little bit less on insurance, then I'd go with a 1g. Either way, you're getting a DSM, and that's ALL that matters! ;)
96TSi
09-13-2004, 07:48 PM
1g is a bit more boxy but it has a style that makes people look just as much as the 2g does. more people (around here) think just because its a clean 1g turbo, they figure its been modded to hell
guitarXgeek
09-13-2004, 09:43 PM
There isn't a production car that looks as good as the 2g eclipse for less than $30k IMO.
I completely agree. My neighbor has a brand new corvette Z06 (YUMMY), and he won't shut up about how good my car looks (strange eh). Also, he honestly did NOT believe me when I told him I bought it for $5500 :biggrin: . I told him I'd be faster than his Z06 in about a year from now. Of course, he doesn't believe me, but then again he doesn't know the potential of these cars :evillol: .
I completely agree. My neighbor has a brand new corvette Z06 (YUMMY), and he won't shut up about how good my car looks (strange eh). Also, he honestly did NOT believe me when I told him I bought it for $5500 :biggrin: . I told him I'd be faster than his Z06 in about a year from now. Of course, he doesn't believe me, but then again he doesn't know the potential of these cars :evillol: .
10.5sec92AWDTALON
09-13-2004, 09:52 PM
If fast on a budget is your goal the I'd get a mid 1992-1994 1G. I'd stay awayf from the 90-91 as they have weaker axles, and a few compatibility problems. 2G's are going to take more money to run fast if that is your thing, & I think a 1g can look just as tough if setup right.
george536
09-13-2004, 11:02 PM
There isn't a production car that looks as good as the 2g eclipse for less than $30k IMO.
:iagree:
the looks on these cars are soo good lookin with every curve. complements come from everywhere. :thumbsup:
:iagree:
the looks on these cars are soo good lookin with every curve. complements come from everywhere. :thumbsup:
kjewer1
09-13-2004, 11:08 PM
I love the look of a clean 1g. Mike rizzotti's car comes to mind, as well as sheps. If I could do it all over again, I'd have a 1g. To hell with looks anyway, the money you save on the 1g could be put into mods, but thats just me :D
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2026
