Mustang vs Celica

What do you guys think is better 99-03 v6 mustangs or the 2000-03 celica GT. Of course take in consideration their both manuals and which one of them is faster.

The Celica GT is pretty weak compared to the GT-S. I'd give this one to the 'Stang.

Mustang

deffinately the mustang, not alot of power, but imo it still looks better than the celica. and since both are not fast cars, im going off looks

even a GT celica could beat an older V6 'stang in reverse... well maybe not...its probably the driver that wins this comparison...a more suting comparison is a celica GT vs. Ford Escourt GT....or old mustang vs. old Supra....i think the escourt GT would win over the cilica GT...and the supra over the mustang...

Sticking with the Stang..

a Celica GT is slower than a mustang v6, if it was a gt-s then i would give it to the celica.

My friend beat one with his mustang

A Celica is to small for my size (literally). I wouldn't enjoy having to get into/out of that thing everyday. On the other note, I'm not over joyous of the Mustangs either, but I would pick it over the Celica. A Celica always reminds me of the Sunfire. Put simply, a car that teenage highschool girls would make a comment to the effect of saying, "hey, thats a cute little car." Not that this is the absolute concrete reason in my decision, but you get the idea...partly.

A well driven Celica GTS 6spd could probably beat an auto 2003-4 Mustang GT. not probably, i'm pretty sure it can. manual vs manual, probably the mustang would win, but i would still choose the GTS any day

A well driven Celica GTS 6spd could probably beat an auto 2003-4 Mustang GT. not probably, i'm pretty sure it can. manual vs manual, probably the mustang would win, but i would still choose the GTS any day


Buddy were not comparing the gts...were comparing the gt...its a world of difference as you know... gotta take the mustang in this, the celica gt just turns me off to much...lots of aftermarket for both but you got 2 more cylinders to work with when u got the stang