Our Community is over 1 Million Strong. Join Us.


Riced Out Mustang's/Corvettes


ViperJ
09-03-2004, 04:26 PM
Let me first start of by saying there are some good looking civic's/acura's out on the streets. I don't hate ricers as long as the look clean. Now with that said what do you guys think of a mustang or corvette with aftermarket lights. Are they rice or do they still look cool? Now check out this stang rice or not?
http://www.goingfaster.com/spo/ghettostang.html

I do like this guys taillights, what about you guys?
http://www.goingfaster.com/spo/other_ghetto_stang.htm

HighRev87
09-03-2004, 04:33 PM
RICE RICE RICE!
Seriously I hope the owners of each choke on soy sauce.

Mshkttck
09-03-2004, 04:47 PM
EEW that's disgusting! DONT Put aftermarket tailights on a mustang!

BTW. 'supra', 'neuspeed', and 'DC sports' stickers on mustangs is rice

genjy
09-04-2004, 04:05 AM
You can't really "rice" a Corvette. A rice means that a low performance car is customized to look fast. A Corvette with a hundred APC and Type-R stickers on it is still a high performance car that can outrun and outhandle most cars on the road.

Jimster
09-04-2004, 06:16 AM
You can't really "rice" a Corvette. A rice means that a low performance car is customized to look fast. A Corvette with a hundred APC and Type-R stickers on it is still a high performance car that can outrun and outhandle most cars on the road.
No it doesn't. Rice is an attitude, if a guy puts Altezzas on his Civic purely for decoration, is he a ricer? No, he understands they are for decaration.

01rollaS&accordv6
09-04-2004, 09:54 AM
the mustangs are severly ghetto the tails are okay, if you think those are ugly you should see the ones here in my area form the oldies to the new ones! camaros and mustangs and firebirds are number one here.

HighRev87
09-04-2004, 10:26 AM
the mustangs are severly ghetto
Yes
the tails are okay
No
from the oldies to the new ones! camaros and mustangs and firebirds are number one here.
Nothing wrong with that.

tblake
09-27-2004, 12:15 AM
that is the worst looking mustang I've ever seen in my life. I'd rather have a stock one right off the lot. Althought I'd take a camaro or vette over a mustang anyway, so it doesnt really matter.

otter7467
09-28-2004, 07:32 AM
God I hate Mustangs

jncodave
09-28-2004, 07:32 PM
both of those cars just look stupid. the taillights are ok, they look better on certain cars than others, but they cost like $200-$250. i wouldnt pay that much for taillights.

Mase
10-25-2004, 07:28 PM
mustangs aren't race proven (recently) and they're always the slowest in their class.....i don't get ford sometimes...

HighRev87
10-25-2004, 08:02 PM
mustangs aren't race proven (recently) and they're always the slowest in their class.....i don't get ford sometimes...
Are not race proven? Ill take your century with a stang :). Slowest in thier class? What American car beats a Stang GT 99+ while in that price range?

Rod&Custom
10-26-2004, 08:46 PM
:owned:

kfoote
10-27-2004, 09:12 AM
Are not race proven? Ill take your century with a stang :). Slowest in thier class? What American car beats a Stang GT 99+ while in that price range?

How about the late F-Bodies?

Both cars are legal for SCCA T2 racing, and the Firebirds/Camaros have won the Runoffs (national championship) for the last 3 years. The 2001 winner was an E36 BMW M3, and I can't find any results further back than that. The rules for the class keep the cars fairly close to stock, and in the areas where they're not stock, they get equal upgrades.

clawhammer
10-27-2004, 09:32 AM
I personally don't care what my car looks like, all I care about is what is under the hood of my CRX. I don't spend money on tailights, and crap like that, only on the engine. Does that make me a ricer?

383PhoenixAm
10-27-2004, 02:12 PM
Highrev87, your sig is awesome, haha.

And no, claw, no it doesn't.

NIN881
11-03-2004, 07:07 PM
Rice is adding parts with the function of slowing down the car. like a 300 pound ridiculous look wing.

BTW, late model mustangs have won grand ams.

Filthy Sanchez
11-17-2004, 01:12 PM
I personally don't care what my car looks like, all I care about is what is under the hood of my CRX. I don't spend money on tailights, and crap like that, only on the engine. Does that make me a ricer?


Actually makes you pretty smart guy.

HighRev87
11-17-2004, 10:12 PM
Lol, your going to tell me that a ls1 is the same price as a stang? Believe me, I was looking through classifieds for both.

swaptrex
11-21-2004, 09:42 PM
that is by far one of the ugliest cars i have ever seen, i mean i know we all have different prefrences but come on!!!!

Layla's Keeper
11-22-2004, 12:42 PM
NIN881, are you talking about Grand Am Cup or the Rolex 24 Hours series in Grand Am racing?

Because in GAC the dominant car was the Trans Am WS6 until the Corvette Z06 arrived on the scene.

Nowadays in GAC dominance has been replaced by parity between 350Z's, Cadillac CTS-V's (as GM's factory team switched from Trans Ams, to Vettes, to the CTS-V), and Porsche 911's.

In Speed World Challenge, GT class, the only Mustang that has ever contended for wins has been the factory supported Saleen SR Widebody.

As far as Rolex series Mustang wins - GTS/AGT class in particular - those are converted Trans Am/SCCA GT1 cars. Full tube chassis race cars with carbureted 302's, carbon bodies, and Jerico transmissions.

NIN881
11-23-2004, 02:42 AM
Grand am cup. You are definately more knowledgeable in this area then I am. I only know what I have seen on tv. the discovery channel had a program that built a mustang race car for ford and they compared it to the grand am cup stock car.

The reason I have a stang is I need a manual and could not find a six speed in my price range or in good shape. I found a stang in mint for under book and couldn't pass it up. I was sick of the v6 dogmaro. I really wanted a z28 but the after market for a 5.0 si awesome so I took a chance. The mustang doen't rattle like every gm car I have ever seen with 80000+ miles on it.

You are right about the 350z's and cts's dominateing the series. GM has everybody but porsche out of the competition it seems. I love vettes, but they are way to expensive for my budget. BTW, are trying to get me to swich back to GM. if you are, it might just work.

kfoote
11-23-2004, 10:36 AM
...
In Speed World Challenge, GT class, the only Mustang that has ever contended for wins has been the factory supported Saleen SR Widebody....


Minor correction here: The WC Saleens have very little factory support, and if you call any of the Saleens "Mustangs" with any of their respective team members nearby, you WILL recieve a detailed explanation that it's not really a Mustang. :biggrin: Most of the little factory support John Young has gotten I believe has come from Saleen, and not from Ford.

Otherwise, the rest of the post was dead on. There were a couple of GAC Mustangs that have done well, including having finished 3rd at Mt. Tremblant this year before being disqualified (for too much fuel capacity, there's a LONG story behind this that's probably worthy of another thread, and it wasn't really their fault), but in general they have not been very impressive lately.

CaTasHtRoPhE 67
12-11-2004, 04:09 PM
I hate when people rice stang and vettes but there are too many stangs out that just runiend(sp) the car

Ground Rat
12-21-2004, 10:20 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v126/GroundRat/Random/stop_rice.jpg

Kurtdg19
12-21-2004, 10:37 PM
It is more a tragedy to see a Vette "riced" vs. a Mustang (considering the buyers). But as I said and likewise I'll stick by, rice is in every breed. But if it makes them happy, then at least I have somthing to do in my spare time... :lol:

HighRev87
12-21-2004, 10:45 PM
a Mustang (considering the buyers)
Your right, who the hell buys a mustang?

God I hate stereotypes...

Add your comment to this topic!


Quality Real Meat Nutrition for Dogs: Best Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef Dog Food | Best Beef Dog Food