Our Community is over 1 Million Strong. Join Us.

Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef

Grain-Free, Zero Fillers


RX7 vs Supra


LostBoyScout
01-14-2001, 11:33 PM
What would you take? The lighter, awe-inspiring, shortliving Rotary RX7, or the heavier, more dependable Supra?

Personally, I'd live with the fact my engine will be lucky to make it to 100K :D

http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?u=955785&a=10654925&p=36464400&Sequence=0

http://www.mkiv.com/mkiv_gallery/mkiv_gallery/exterior/large/suprapurple.jpg

autofan
01-15-2001, 10:01 AM
I would go with RX7 hehe. I'll hope my engine also gets lucky to get till 100k. RX7 looks better, and is more of an exotic type, since it has a 1.3 liter rotary that produces 280 hp!

LostBoyScout
01-15-2001, 10:05 PM
Yeah, and when it does blow, you can always get the 20B 2.0 tri-rotor motor imported, and go mega-fast :D

JD@af
01-16-2001, 07:10 PM
I've heard numerous stories of drag racers, street racers, etc. who can rattle off countless tales of kills they have made, how they can beat anything on four wheels... except for this one time against a Supra Twin Turbo. They are mean, nasty tunable cars, just like the Mazda, with very capable engines great for boosting, just like the Mazda, but they do stand do thrive a bit longer than their rotary-engined competitors. And any engine problems encountered will be a whole lot cheaper and easier to fix (rotary mechanics are unfortunately hard to come by).

As much as I like the RX-7 rotary, and mind you this would be no easy decision, I'd take an MKIV Supra TT first.

LostBoyScout
01-16-2001, 11:13 PM
I got to drive a mkIV Supra just Monday, and I must say it's a nice car.. fast too

But if I was actually on the market for a car of this caliber, I have it figured out: Buy an RX7 with a blown motor for cheap, and bring a 20B rotary over from Japan (the only place it's available). While the motor would cost an arm and a leg, it's easily tuned to 500hp (!!) and supposedly is a longer lasting engine than the 13B (although at 500hp I still only give it 100K :D)

A 500hp RX7 should be around the same speed as a 700hp Supra, going by power-to-weight ratios.. wow.

Mind you, this won't happen unless I come across a lot of cash from nowhere!

JD@af
01-18-2001, 01:34 AM
Man, when I was car-shopping about a year and a half ago, I went looking for every MKIV Supra I could find. And none of them worked out, either the wrong transmissions (autos), or I'd miss the boat by a small margin. I am happy with my Integra (very much so), but I'd have taken a Supra first anyday. I still have never even gotten to drive one :( My time will come.. I hope, because I see so many fewer Supras in want ads today than I did even one year ago.

That's a shock, that an RX-7 (somewhere in the range of 2,800 to 3,000 lbs.) with 500 hp has the same hp to weight ratio as a 700-hp Supra (roughly 3,550 lbs.). Didn't even take that aspect into consideration... hmm. But I'd still take the Supra, partially because, well, there is a thing as too much speed and power. My Integra with.. say 230 to 250 hp weighing about 2,800 lbs. is at times all the power I can handle on the streets. But hey, who am I kidding, I still want to go faster, because too much is truly never enough.

enzo@af
01-25-2001, 12:52 PM
RX-7, hands down. The looks, the sound, the looks, the looks, the sound, the performance, everything! I'd go with a '95 with an R2 package.

gang$tarr
02-11-2001, 06:43 PM
I love the supra, it's amazing! The RX-7 is nice but it's so unreliable

All supra lovers go here, and see a 700hp supra, that does the 1/4 mile in 10 sec. and top speed of 220mph: http://www.suprastore.com/19suptur10se.html

Supra Man
02-11-2001, 08:39 PM
The Supra is a way better car than the RX-7, hands down. Reliability,looks,cost,power,performance,the list goes on. The RX-7 engine isn't nearly as good as the Supra MKIV engine. If something goes wrong on the rotary engine it costs an arm and a leg to fix and you would have to wait for an engine to come all the way from Japan just so you could run it for a liitle whil before it blows up.

kepone
02-11-2001, 09:57 PM
i love both cars.. but id take the supra..

btw, for you guys that think you can just swap in a 20b, you're terribly wrong..

its a long, expensive, painful process .. you need not only the new engine, but a new transmission, front clip, entire front suspension relocation, all kinds of chassis mods.. etc etc..

id just go with the supra..

GOD
02-11-2001, 11:14 PM
i love both cars too their both fast as anything but i would have to go with the more dependble Supra b/c i've heard how much of a headache rotary engines are . Their both still great cars . Hell i'll take both of them :D

pontiac_ws6
02-12-2001, 12:21 AM
I'd take the supra. If I'm going to spend that much money on a car, I'd like it to last over 100k.

Bean Bandit
02-12-2001, 05:18 AM
I'd take the RX-7 the 3gen last a long time if you treat it right. And LastBoyScout is right if it blows put in a 20B adjust the suspension and transmission and you'll be as fast as a McLaren F1:D

enzo@af
02-12-2001, 11:46 AM
The 13B isn't that unreliable if you treat it right. It's designed to burn a little oil, and a lot of people don't take the time to check the oil. Sure, that means that it does require some extra maintenance, but hey....If you like the looks, the sound, and the fact that this is a lighter car with just as much possibility for modifying...To me this is an obvious winner.

RX-7 in a heartbeat.

Oh, some people have taken the Supra for "price"? Well, if you're looking for one of these, I'd think the RX-7 would be a cheaper find. Just my thought...prove me wrong?

kepone
02-12-2001, 11:58 AM
or you could just do a minor turbo swap on a supra and be faster than a mc laren f1.. lol

both cars ( even the rx7 with the 13b ) have amazing potential.. and even though the supra will put down better handling numbers, the rx7 will do better on a rack...

basically, the supra will make a better street performer/ drag racer, the rx7 will make a better auto x car.. either has the potential to make an ass of a mc laren f1..

C-MURDER
02-12-2001, 08:45 PM
The RX-7 is a smaller car, and lighter by far, and I love the looks of a shiny 3rd gen RX-7. But the hassle of dealing with the rotary, finding parts for it, getting it reparied, etc. Would be just too much to take. So I will go with the faster, and more reliable SupraTT.

Bean Bandit
02-13-2001, 05:38 AM
I like to compare it to the choice a photo-journalist wood make. He has a reliable full automatic camera and an old school one; he can handle both but he'll rather take the old school... (I just got up so please ignore typing faults:D)

TheSandman900
08-15-2003, 11:16 PM
The RX-7 is a lot lighter with it's Rotory engine which which will out do any normal piston engine, it sounds better, it can drift 10X better than a supra with it's perfect 50/50 weight distributaion between the front and rear tires, and the fact that the Supra looks like shit compare to the RX-7...O wait it looks like shit compared to anything!

airylush
08-16-2003, 09:33 AM
actually, for turbo i prefer the a skyline but in this case....

engine : i pick supra

aero : i pick rx7

lighter : of course rx7

wide body : rx7

overall : rx7


:rolleyes:

YogsVR4
08-16-2003, 10:20 AM
Please take a look at the guidelines and don't bring back two and a half year old threads. If you'd like to discuss the topic, you would have been better off to start a new one.

AreaT51R
01-31-2004, 11:09 PM
I have a 98' Eclipse GSX with a built 1st gen motor swap and about $10K total in mods. I'm going to sell it sometime this year and I'm actually looking at both the Supra and RX-7. I know a lot about the rotary engine thanks to my dad who is a key player in Mazda Motors Corp. and the fact that it's been my dream car since my sophmore year in H.S. For those of you saying "just drop in a 20B". It's not that easy. To make a long story short...it takes about $35K to do the swap. Don't believe me? Call Pettit Racing...I did. The Supra looks bloated but the engine is nice. Who ever said it costs less to build a Supra is smoking some hella good crack. I just read a Power Pages that said one of the Supra's bad points is that "making power with the Supra is directly related to how deep your pockets are". Bottom line...both cars will cost a lot to build. The Supra is a better drag car? Are you a pro? I'm not. For a street car it's easier to push 2,700lbs down the road than 3,450. Do the math for yourself and compare the Power/weight ratios. There's no "better" car. It depends on what you want to use it for. The RX-7 will out-perform the Supra any day of the week as far as handling and acceleration. The Supra will probably best the 7 as far as top speed and all out power. But then again...RE Amemiya (in Japan) built an RX-7 that didn't stop pulling until well after 200mph. Oh, and for drifting, absolutly nothing will drift better than an FD3S. Almost done...there is more shit made for the 7 than any Supra owner could dream of. Try finding a Carbon Fiber rear hatch and doors for a Supra...yah right. Supra's are thought of as the ultimate Japanese import here in the U.S. but in Japan the RX-7 is more respected...right there with the R34 GTR. It WILL cost more to fully build a Supra. If your willing to accept the maintinence hastles of the rotary and take good care of the 7 and tune it right it will last a long time. My money's going to the mighty FD3S RX-7.

Neutrino
02-01-2004, 03:09 AM
Please do not bring back acient threads.

Thank You



Locked

Add your comment to this topic!


Quality Real Meat Nutrition for Dogs: Best Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef Dog Food | Best Beef Dog Food