Our Community is 940,000 Strong. Join Us.


Celica turbo all-trac vs AWD DSM's


nbw
07-19-2004, 01:05 AM
discuss

kman10587
07-19-2004, 02:40 AM
I'd take the Celica All-Trac Turbo, because I'm a big fan of Toyotas, and the Celica is a lot more reliable than the AWD Turbo DSM.

3000ways
07-19-2004, 09:05 AM
I love the Celica All-Trac Turbo, they are very rare and when I see one I'm like oh sh*t that's a Celica All-Trac Turbo. So I would get that just because it's so rare compared to AWD DSMs. Plus it's not a bad car to tune either, not sure if it easier to tune than AWD DSMs though, but it does have good potential.

nbw
07-19-2004, 03:48 PM
yeah it beign abit more rare would give it more lust appeal but what about its performance(acceleration, braking, skidpad,slalom ect) stock and potenial?

kman10587
07-19-2004, 03:58 PM
The DSM has more performance potential, but the Celica is more reliable. Take your pick.

NISSANSPDR
07-19-2004, 04:04 PM
I gotta choose the Celica also...I think even though it wont have the performance of the DSM...it's a more refined choice, more reliable engine, probably handles just as good as the AWD ones...Toyota's are cool.

kman10587
07-19-2004, 04:14 PM
I just wish they had continued the All-Trac Turbo into the 94-99 generation, like they did in Japan. Those headlights kick ass :)

BP2K2Max
07-19-2004, 06:52 PM
are all all-trac's turbocharged?

kman10587
07-19-2004, 07:36 PM
Yep.

CrzyMR2T
07-20-2004, 12:09 AM
the celica all trac has same hp as the mr2 turbo, 200 hp at 6000 rpm, and 200 lb ft at 3200 rpm. 0-60 is around 7.0 sec, and 1/4 is about 15.3. its curb weight is about 3200 lbs. its weight distribution is something like 55% front 45% rear.

aznxthuggie
07-20-2004, 12:56 AM
i would pick the celica.. it's rare.. unlike the dsm's.. also the celica's for that year (in the US) had hp comparable to my accord.. which imo is kinda shabby for a sporty coupe

nbw
07-20-2004, 01:10 AM
I was browsing threw alltrac.net forums and saw somethingabout there curb weight. it seems its about 3300lb's and has a weight distro closer to 61/39. 200hp 2.0L turbo charged.
(this is for the 90-93 model)

Anyone feel like stepping up and givin some DSM faq's for both gen's? How dow do they compare as far as handling?

ghetto7o2azn
07-20-2004, 05:15 AM
i would pick the celica.. it's rare.. unlike the dsm's.. also the celica's for that year (in the US) had hp comparable to my accord.. which imo is kinda shabby for a sporty coupe

ur accord almost produced 200hp 200tq in 1988 - 1994? did any hondas make that much power back then other than the nsx?

well sinse no one has mentioned, it uses the 3sgte engine

CrzyMR2T
07-20-2004, 09:55 PM
I was browsing threw alltrac.net forums and saw somethingabout there curb weight. it seems its about 3300lb's and has a weight distro closer to 61/39. 200hp 2.0L turbo charged.
(this is for the 90-93 model)

Anyone feel like stepping up and givin some DSM faq's for both gen's? How dow do they compare as far as handling?

i browsed through that site, and that weight dist. number was a number someone came up with, not from actual facts, or tests. the site says the st185 has 50/50, but its gotta be a mistake, and weight can vary.

take a look http://www.alltrac.net/specs/st185USAspecs.html

nbw
07-20-2004, 11:58 PM
btw to make it easier on everyone, I got the numbers from this thread (http://www.alltrac.net/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?board=suspension;action=display;num=108742 1918)

Those are some very specific numbers for them(more like them) to just come up with... :dunno:

Add your comment to this topic!