Possible WMD in Iraq

Taranki you forgot that Iraq admitted to having a stockpile of WMD in the 90's, most were destroyed but not all, where did the rest of it go? Why was Saddamn not allowing inspectors into his palaces? Why was Saddam loading up trucks while guards were holding up the inspectors at the front gate? Why was Saddam constsantly kicking the inspectors out of Iraq?



Why quote half of my post and then ask a question that was already argued in the half not quoted?That's just plain pointless. Please,go dback and read the bit that you didn't quote. :rolleyes:

Here is a link to Hans Blix last report dated 1-27-2003. http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/Bx27.htm

These are quotes from Hans Blix in 2003. Blix said Iraq had them! Can anyone disprove the UN report by Hans Blix that I linked, I think not!


ON CHEMICAL WEAPONS

The document indicates that 13,000 chemical bombs were dropped by the Iraqi Air Force between 1983 and 1988, while Iraq has declared that 19,500 bombs were consumed during this period. Thus, there is a discrepancy of 6,500 bombs. The amount of chemical agent in these bombs would be in the order of about 1,000 tonnes. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we must assume that these quantities are now unaccounted for.

The discovery of a number of 122 mm chemical rocket warheads in a bunker at a storage depot 170 km southwest of Baghdad was much publicized. This was a relatively new bunker and therefore the rockets must have been moved there in the past few years, at a time when Iraq should not have had such munitions.

The The investigation of these rockets is still proceeding. Iraq states that they were overlooked from 1991 from a batch of some 2,000 that were stored there during the Gulf War. This could be the case. They could also be the tip of a submerged iceberg. The discovery of a few rockets does not resolve but rather points to the issue of several thousands of chemical rockets that are unaccounted for.

Biological weapons

Iraq has declared that it produced about 8,500 litres of this biological warfare agent, which it states it unilaterally destroyed in the summer of 1991. Iraq has provided little evidence for this production and no convincing evidence for its destruction.

There are strong indications that Iraq produced more anthrax than it declared, and that at least some of this was retained after the declared destruction date. It might still exist. Either it should be found and be destroyed under UNMOVIC supervision or else convincing evidence should be produced to show that it was, indeed, destroyed in 1991.

http://www.iiss.org/news-more.php?itemID=88


Report on Iraq WMD programs

I read that article, and it was entirely speculation, and worst case scenarios.

Also, it had a fairly healthy bias to it. I note that the two offices they list are in the UK and the USA. Remind me again, which two countries were pushing for the war in Iraq? I know that's just speculation, but since speculation is obviously proof enough for some of you, I must have just proven that your link is heavily biased, correct? :icon16:

If anyone still insists that Saddam had WMD this century,please......go to Iraq,dig them up,and show me.

See above post and read Hans Blix report!

Why quote half of my post and then ask a question that was already argued in the half not quoted?That's just plain pointless. Please,go dback and read the bit that you didn't quote. :rolleyes:

Because this way its more amusing!:iceslolan

it's so entertaining watching mods bicker :lol:

here we go again....

GO...TO...IRAQ....DIG....THEM...UP...AND...SHOW... ME.

does that spell "quote me a website"?

If you are so sure,get your spade.I'm sure that George would appreciate any help he can get to bail him out of this one.

I read that article, and it was entirely speculation, and worst case scenarios.
Also, it had a fairly healthy bias to it.

I see no bias except in your posts.:evillol: Show me where the report by a charity is biased? If it disagrees with you the bias word comes out but if it agrees with your opinion it must be fact.

it's so entertaining watching mods bicker :lol:

I'm not even warmed up yet!


GO...TO...IRAQ....DIG....THEM...UP...AND...SHOW... ME.

Don't have to I'll let Hans Blix do it for me! Hans says they are there than they are there!

Don't have to I'll let Hans Blix do it for me! Hans says they are there than they are there!

Hans said that you should jump off a bridge! http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/images/smilies/screwy.gif

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/images/smilies/smokin.gif

These are quotes from Hans Blix in 2003. Blix said Iraq had them! Can anyone disprove the UN report by Hans Blix that I linked, I think not!

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-12-16-blix-iraq_x.htm

You might want to check what part of what decade those "reports" are about.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-12-16-blix-iraq_x.htm

You might want to check what part of what decade those "reports" are about.

The report is dated and its on the UN web site. But your link just proves that Blix went to the John flipster kerry school.

so you admit that your source is unreliable?

Holy crap, is this thing still going? John Kerry's an idiot, and George Bush is an idiot. There, I've settled it. Are you guys still going back and forth? :screwy:

If you'll note, Blix never once says he believes there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. In fact, by February 2003 he was reporting that he did not believe Iraq had any weapons of mass destruction.