Our Community is 940,000 Strong. Join Us.


Constitution party


indyram
07-08-2004, 05:28 AM
I know that they don't have a chance this election. Hopefully next election they will be able to get a better head start. They are pretty far right sided. I do however agree with most of their stands. Check them out. What do you guys think.

http://www.constitutionparty.com

taranaki
07-08-2004, 06:01 AM
Looks like they're even dafter than the current mob.They'll take votes off Bush though,which is always a good thing.Don't expect them to be a credible force in politics any time soon though.Correction - any time,period.

Toksin
07-08-2004, 06:04 AM
Support the Consitution Party at Subway - Insist on WHITE BREAD.



:rolleyes:

YogsVR4
07-08-2004, 08:41 AM
If anything it would draw votes from libertarians if it got any traction.













Never pay again for live sex! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=1) | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=3) | Chat for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=5)

Hyatus
07-08-2004, 01:40 PM
this from there defense platform

In order to protect our territory, our armed forces, and our citizenry, we should immediately give notice of our withdrawal from the Nixon-Brezhnev Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which restricts full development and deployment of a strategic defense system. We call for the deployment of a fully operational, space-based defense system as soon as possible.

We condemn the Presidential assumption of authority to deploy American troops into combat without the consent of Congress.

Under no circumstances would we commit U.S. forces to serve under any foreign flag or command. We are opposed to any New World Order, and we flatly reject U.S. participation in any New World Army.

it would be hard to go to war if the earth only had 1 army, guess we would have to find aliens to kill /smile

indyram
07-08-2004, 10:07 PM
I know that they don't have much of a chance now. I do hope that they have a chance in the future.

Toksin
07-09-2004, 07:48 PM
You've said that already. Why the rushed post? Late for a Klan meeting?

YogsVR4
07-09-2004, 09:08 PM
You've said that already. Why the rushed post? Late for a Klan meeting?

:nono: :disappoin













Never pay again for live sex! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=1) | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=3) | Chat for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=5)

Benelli5
07-09-2004, 09:53 PM
I know that they don't have much of a chance now. I do hope that they have a chance in the future.


No, I think evolution will take care of most of their constituency.

YogsVR4
07-09-2004, 10:01 PM
No, I think evolution will take care of most of their constituency.

You mean such elightened people such as yourself :rolleyes:

If you read the platforms the organization supports you guys slamming it might stop insinuating that its a devolved or racist organization. While I certainly don't support their position on many things, there's nothing wrong with taking a stance and putting it before the people. Its what third parties do.













Never pay again for live sex! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=1) | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=3) | Chat for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=5)

Benelli5
07-09-2004, 11:27 PM
You mean such elightened people such as yourself :rolleyes:

If you read the platforms the organization supports you guys slamming it might stop insinuating that its a devolved or racist organization. While I certainly don't support their position on many things, there's nothing wrong with taking a stance and putting it before the people. Its what third parties do.

Actually I did read it. And I completely agree that their should be 3rd, 4th, 5th, however many parties their needs to be to represent people with different views. But I do know that the constitution was written over 200 years ago and I believe there is sometimes a need to make changes or ammendmnets as time goes on. From what I read, the Constitution Party prefers a more conservative interpretation of the constitution as it was originally written.

We are, therefore, unalterably opposed to entangling alliances - via treaties, or any other form of commitment - which compromise our national sovereignty, or commit us to intervention in foreign wars.

I dont claim to be some enlightened guru but this is exactly the kind of statement that makes me think that these people dont understand how the modern world works. But what the hell do I know. :rolleyes:

indyram
07-13-2004, 06:51 AM
I don't completely agree with all of their stands. They want to get back to how it used to be in a way. Put more power in state and local gov't. Let people protect their family. They are a bit radical that is why they are far out there on the spectrum. As far as the klan comment you couldn't be more wrong I was tired and probably not think about what I was writing in that second post. I am about as far from being a racist as you can get.

Add your comment to this topic!