Saddam In Court

Saddam appears before judge in court today.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5323918/
He was trialed without his group of 20 lawyers....

"A defiant Saddam Hussein rejected charges of war crimes and genocide against him in a court appearance Thursday, telling a judge "this is all theater, the real criminal is Bush.""



HAHAHA!!!! LMAO!

He also claims to be the "President Of Iraq"
:screwy: I think he can plead for insanity...

never new pointing fingers in court was effective

never new pointing fingers in court was effective
Grammer check: new=knew:wink:

I wonder what happens if they find him "not guilty." Does he just walk out a free man? I know that's not gonna happen (and shouldn't), but I would think Bush would have a heart attack.

Anyways, if Saddam thinks he can get away with just denying the charges, he his mistaken. He'll probably end up getting hanged or something. The Kuwaitis want him dead, that's for sure.

yup, the regning president reinsured the dealth penalty

They'll probably exhile him to Utah.

Grammer check: new=knew:wink:
gee thanks, I was reall worried that my grammar was not up to AF standards :wink:

Grammer check: new=knew:wink:
Wow, good thing you caught that...I thought he was making up a knew language. :lol2:

:lol: :lol:

Grammer check: new=knew:wink:

Get this: G-r-a-m-m-a-r is not Spelling, and Spelling is not Grammar. His grammar was almost correct, except he left out the "I" to start-off his sentence: never new pointing fingers in court was effective.





























;)

Aww crap, I just got :owned: I can't believe I spelt grammar wrong. Spelling is my strong suit. Thanks for the correction. I now have to leave with my head hanging in shame.

I wonder what happens if they find him "not guilty." Does he just walk out a free man? I know that's not gonna happen (and shouldn't), but I would think Bush would have a heart attack.

Yeah, that's REALLY not going to happen. It's gonna be interesting, though, most of the those same great exile groups (http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page3065.asp) stories of torture and death under his rule came from who were so spot-on (http://www.sunherald.com/mld/sunherald/news/nation/7951033.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp) about all them WMD Saddam surely had (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/03/iraq/main603691.shtml)...

I mean, Saddam's toast. Even in the slim likelihood that he's actually not guilty of all these things (VERY SLIM) they're still gonna kill him! Mmm tasty show trials, how very democratic!

lol, I don't see the point of a trial. He's guilty, kill the dirty dog already and move on

lol, I don't see the point of a trial. He's guilty, kill the dirty dog already and move on


if you find him guilty then you better put your presidents and the others they support on trial for war crimes.


http://www.zpub.com/un/wanted-hkiss.html
http://www.cair-net.org/asp/article.asp?id=170&page=AA
http://www.mediamonitors.net/amr84.html
http://www.hermes-press.com/profiteering.htm

/\ I'm from Canada eh...We don't have here a "president"
You know what he did, he's an evil person and should die for the peolpe he killed

/\ I'm from Canada eh...We don't have here a "president"
You know what he did, he's an evil person and should die for the peolpe he killed


i am in canada aswell. but that is about all of the post i understood

Well maybe if you werent so damn confusing with your posts as well :lol2:
Do you honestly believe that the man isn't guilty for killing thousands of innocent people?

oh the man is guilty. my point is not as guilty as some others. i just want to see a fair world. you commit a crime get punished for it. the president "whoever" is power seems to think they are above the law and the rights of the people they are elected by and meant to serve.

It is a mockery. It is just for illusion to calm the barking dogs. There is a bigger agenda behind the trial. Before one knows it, it will become a broadway show.

if you find him guilty then you better put your presidents and the others they support on trial for war crimes.


http://www.zpub.com/un/wanted-hkiss.html
http://www.cair-net.org/asp/article.asp?id=170&page=AA
http://www.mediamonitors.net/amr84.html
http://www.hermes-press.com/profiteering.htm


I read your links and can't help but laugh, try better! Your sites carry no weight, in other words they are not credible sites.

lol, I don't see the point of a trial.

Now do be sensible...A trial for Saddam is the only positive result that Bush can claim for invading Iraq.The nice little piece of theatre in which alleged "sovereignty" was handed over and then Saddam was whisked into court is no coincidence...It's a charade designed to help convince Iraqis that they have some kind of say in the matter.The real trial will be scheduled so that the juiciest bits of prosecution evidence can be aired just before the U.S. election.That way at least Bush can try and salvage some kind of kudos for winning the war,instead of having to make excuses for losing the peace...

how many innocent ppl do u think our president killed? not directly but through his command of the military and shit?

(its a question not a statement)

well,start here,if you like.

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/bodycount.htm

And add to that figure all the Iraqis who will suffer as a result of depleted uranium and unexploded ordinance[particularly cluster bombs] over the next 10-20 years....

Bush bleats about non-existent WMD, then uses his own on Iraqi civilians.

Who's the war criminal,the man who defends his own country with conventional forces,or the invader who uses dirty weapons and abuses his prisoners of war.Put Bush on the stand beside Saddam.

I'd like to see bush go to court, just for the entertainment value - even if he were never sentenced at all, it'd still be good for a huge laugh.
"International laws? Constitutional rights? What the hell are you talking about?"

well,start here,if you like.

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/bodycount.htm

And add to that figure all the Iraqis who will suffer as a result of depleted uranium and unexploded ordinance[particularly cluster bombs] over the next 10-20 years....

Bush bleats about non-existent WMD, then uses his own on Iraqi civilians.

Who's the war criminal,the man who defends his own country with conventional forces,or the invader who uses dirty weapons and abuses his prisoners of war.Put Bush on the stand beside Saddam.

I agree. I think Saddam should have a trial, but without a doubt, the sentencing will be predetermined. I agree with you and 2strokebloke about putting Bush on the stand too. :biggrin:

I read your links and can't help but laugh, try better! Your sites carry no weight, in other words they are not credible sites.


meh that will happen. but if you would be so kind to tell me some credible sites. then i won't have to waste your time with bs again.

some people will not take any websites as being credible if it so happens to be against their beleifs. If we were to trial leaders for international crimes, then Bush along with others should stand trial....

[/quote=Raz_Kaz]some people will not take any websites as being credible if it so happens to be against their beleifs. If we were to trial leaders for international crimes, then Bush along with others should stand trial....[/quote]

yep, I'd like to see Clinton on the stand for Kosovo (http://www.amnestyusa.org/nato_report/), and maybe the few hundred thousand Iraqis (http://www.zoran.net/afp/text/misc2/other_war_criminal_bill_clinton.htm) that the UN says his sanctions killed...

[quote=Raz_Kaz]some people will not take any websites as being credible if it so happens to be against their beleifs. If we were to trial leaders for international crimes, then Bush along with others should stand trial....[/url]

yep, I'd like to see Clinton on the stand for Kosovo (http://www.amnestyusa.org/nato_report/), and maybe the few hundred thousand Iraqis (http://www.zoran.net/afp/text/misc2/other_war_criminal_bill_clinton.htm) that the UN says his sanctions killed...


why stop there i am sure we could find bigger fish to fry.

I read your links and can't help but laugh, try better! Your sites carry no weight, in other words they are not credible sites.

Oh, and just what undermines the credibility of those sites? Is it that fact that they're not a major US media outlet, or is it just that they are reporting things you don't want to hear?