insurance legalities?

the sr doesnt pass, smog, so if i bribe the guy to pass, me, then getin an accident, will the insurance company void me bevause its not legal>?

also, im only 17, and on my moms insurance

If the adjuster notices the non-stock engine, yes, that's a possibility.

why would the adjuster see my engine?

the adjuster would see my car only if i filed a claim right>?

i really needhelp, my mom found out that the sr was illegal now she wont put her name on my 240

Well maybe at 17, you shouldn't be driving around in a 200+ horsepoqer car when, clearly, you have no idea how the system works or how to drive since you have, judging by your age, very little driving experience.

they don't know what kinda engine it is. it passes e-check with a cat and dumping rich with an s-afc +25% all across the board.

yea, i dont know shit about insurance companies or policies but how dare you judge my drivin skills by my age

yea, i dont know shit about insurance companies or policies but how dare you judge my drivin skills by my age

There is a reason why you will be charged twice as much for insurance as most of us. Convince the insurance company not to judge your mad skillz based on your age rather than any one here.

In answer to your first question: Rarely will the insurance adjuster check the car and notice the engine swap. It is a risk though and very well could compromise the insurance claim. Hang on to a KA and swap it back into your smashed up frame if you get into an accident. Or if you get smashed really bad and you're gonna total out, take the engine out of the car completly and if they ask say you're parting the car out and want to take their settlement.

they don't know what kinda engine it is. it passes e-check with a cat and dumping rich with an s-afc +25% all across the board.Remember, he's in smog-nazi California. A S-chassis with anything other than a KA will fail the visual inspection before they even turn on the sniffer. Most everyone who's getting paid to look at your motor in CA will know the difference. That's why he mentioned "greasing" the smog tech in the first post.

Yeah, there's a chance you could get into an accident, file a claim, and pray for a numb-nuts adjuster that wouldn't know the difference, but that's not something I'd want to risk an entire insurance settlement over.

It can also depend on the insurance company you use. Some companies' adjusters will nitpick anything and everything to see if they can void a claim.

Well maybe at 17, you shouldn't be driving around in a 200+ horsepoqer car when, clearly, you have no idea how the system works or how to drive since you have, judging by your age, very little driving experience.

Damn i dont know every CARB law... gasp i should just turn in my keys now because that must mean i dont know how to drive :rolleyes: please. i know 40yr olds that cant drive well to save their life and have seen a 17yr old throw down on half the feild at a drifting competetion. so basing driving skills by age is just stupid. at least this kid realizes that shit happens (may be his fault but may not be) and doesnt want to get fucked over because of his engine.

basing driving skills by age is just stupid.

No, it's QUITE justified. I'll take your keys though if you don't want them.

that;s why its always nice to have contacts or people that know people to hook u up! Majority of my family from my dads side are either mechanics or huave their shops. My cuz passed his smog illegally by his frined for $120. The guy had exsperience so i guess he knew what he was doin. However, i dont like to mess with that right now, be cool dont do drugs, and stay NA. lol

BTW its true that it is unfiar that u judge driving by age, but its true that the stats show that we crash more often so even though YOU may not be a bad driver, other dumb kids make us look bad. I know how u feel man. I sure as heck know how to drive better than my folks, but they still think they know more and dont completely trust me. So just be humble dude, hold the anger and agree with ur foloks for a while and later on they'll trust u with almost anything, thats what i did, but dont tell em how u REALLY drive.

So by that logic an 80 year old will outdrive a 30 year old? My mom is 40 and will hit the brakes liek mad to the point where I'm pretty much thrown forward and back in my seat. I'm fairly young but I don't drive stupid fast and it feels fairly smooth when I drive, I obey traffic laws... stuff liek that, and I'm fairly positive that I can outdrive many older people. It depends on the person. If a person learns how to drive poorly usually they'll be a shit driver. Don't make general statements, saying a young person can't drive is liek saying all people of a certain race can't drive.

So by that logic an 80 year old will outdrive a 30 year old? My mom is 40 and will hit the brakes liek mad to the point where I'm pretty much thrown forward and back in my seat. I'm fairly young but I don't drive stupid fast and it feels fairly smooth when I drive, I obey traffic laws... stuff liek that, and I'm fairly positive that I can outdrive many older people. It depends on the person. If a person learns how to drive poorly usually they'll be a shit driver. Don't make general statements, saying a young person can't drive is liek saying all people of a certain race can't drive.

It's a demographical standard upheld by EVERY insurance company in the united states so get over it, young people get the shaft.

I never said age was directly proportional to skill, don't take me out of context. Experience is a MAJOR factor in how good of a driver you are, Plain and simple younger drivers have less experience and are by default Higher risk.

Just because your mom sucks at driving doesn't mean every one goes retardo at age 40. -_-

Like some have said, I meant younger drivers have less experience, not that your a crappy driver, and I know alot of people that think their good drivers, but they have just gotten lucky that when they cruise down the highway at 100mph no one cuts them off.