0-60 times
bigworm7969
05-24-2004, 01:43 AM
i have never found out 0-60 times. i have a 98 eclipse rs with a intake but i have no idea what the hp is and i have no idea what the stock 0-60 times are, maybie i have been lookin in the wrong places but can anyone help me out? i am interested in the other models 0-60 times also.
guitarXgeek
05-24-2004, 01:49 AM
bigworm7969
05-24-2004, 02:08 AM
thier is no way my car does 0-60 in 9 sec.... it feels alot quicker then that
guitarXgeek
05-24-2004, 02:25 AM
Yep, it is true my friend.
bigworm7969
05-24-2004, 02:50 AM
well then i am going to say... thier are alot of slower cars out thier becasue i have beat quite a few
gstclips
05-24-2004, 01:15 PM
just think...what if you had a turbo! :naughty:
LandoAWD
05-24-2004, 01:24 PM
just think...what if you had a turbo! :naughty:
...and AWD :)
...and AWD :)
95ClipseGS-T
05-24-2004, 03:08 PM
lol they say the GSX and GST run the same 0-60 and the gsx is only .1 of a second faster, i thought the gsx would be faster in the 0-60
EclipseRST
05-24-2004, 03:11 PM
thats stock tho... put the same mods into each car and the GSX will have a lot better 0-60 times!
xllSkylinellx
05-24-2004, 06:00 PM
Actually I'm surprised a stock RS can do that in 9s.... I thought it took a lot longer than that lol.... it's a piece.
2of9
05-24-2004, 06:12 PM
its all in the driver dudes...my cousins Talon Tsi AWD did 0-60 in 4.9xx seconds. but i dunno...thats kinda fast, i dont kno if those little things that tell you how fast u do in 1/4 mile, mile, topspeed is true. Well...we did it with a clock watch and was in high 4 and low 5 second ranges
amdsoldier
05-24-2004, 06:35 PM
My 97 RS when I first bought it was slow as a rock, no a really big rock... Well turned out my spark plugs were crap and my exhaust was all messed up as well.
Get to the chase... after replacing that and adding intake + headers the car seemed quite a bit faster.
Now I tell myself the car should run 8sec or better and try to make myself feel better. :D
Get to the chase... after replacing that and adding intake + headers the car seemed quite a bit faster.
Now I tell myself the car should run 8sec or better and try to make myself feel better. :D
ashah000
05-24-2004, 06:37 PM
A stock gs 5 speed according to car and driver is 8.6s , so the rs should be faster than that.
amdsoldier
05-24-2004, 06:43 PM
A stock gs 5 speed according to car and driver is 8.6s , so the rs should be faster than that.
if thats true, w00t :D
i always thought mine felt more like a high 7 sec 0-60 car :D ;)
if thats true, w00t :D
i always thought mine felt more like a high 7 sec 0-60 car :D ;)
BoostedSpyder
05-24-2004, 08:47 PM
anyone ever mess with one of those G-timers??
LandoAWD
05-25-2004, 08:16 AM
anyone ever mess with one of those G-timers??
Those are only slightly more accurate than the stopwatch method.
Those are only slightly more accurate than the stopwatch method.
JRichter
05-25-2004, 08:53 AM
A stock gs 5 speed according to car and driver is 8.6s , so the rs should be faster than that.
A rs has the same engine(420A) and specifications as a gs so it will probably not be faster.
A rs has the same engine(420A) and specifications as a gs so it will probably not be faster.
amdsoldier
05-25-2004, 10:20 AM
A rs has the same engine(420A) and specifications as a gs so it will probably not be faster.
It's lighter by a few hundred pounds if I'm not mistaken which in turn does make it faster. :)
It's lighter by a few hundred pounds if I'm not mistaken which in turn does make it faster. :)
TurbosR4me
05-25-2004, 01:13 PM
anyone ever mess with one of those G-timers??
One of my friends has one. We have raced our cars with the G-Tech and at the track, and they are surprisingly similar on average. The G-Tech needs to be perfectly level to work correctly. So....It seems it would be more innacurate if you were driving on a not-level surface.
One of my friends has one. We have raced our cars with the G-Tech and at the track, and they are surprisingly similar on average. The G-Tech needs to be perfectly level to work correctly. So....It seems it would be more innacurate if you were driving on a not-level surface.
BoostedSpyder
05-25-2004, 06:43 PM
cool i thought it would be fun just to have one, but i think i should invest in a valentine1 instead!
LandoAWD
05-26-2004, 10:05 AM
So....It seems it would be more innacurate if you were driving on a not-level surface.
You mean like the street?
;)
You also have to have it calibrated for weight and a couple of other factors, right?
You mean like the street?
;)
You also have to have it calibrated for weight and a couple of other factors, right?
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2026
