2004 sti vs japans 22b?
c32b1 NSX
05-23-2004, 06:09 PM
take your pick and tell me y. this is something me and my friend are arguin bout on which is better.
Jay!
05-23-2004, 07:04 PM
Do you mean the USDM or JDM or EDM '04 STi?
I say 22B. "Better" styling ( :2cents: ) and ultra beefy torque curve.
(but maybe a 22B w/ 2.5 liter block... wow!)
I say 22B. "Better" styling ( :2cents: ) and ultra beefy torque curve.
(but maybe a 22B w/ 2.5 liter block... wow!)
freakray
05-23-2004, 08:14 PM
22B....
That's if you're comparing the JDM STI and 22B.
So what were you wanting to compare?
That's if you're comparing the JDM STI and 22B.
So what were you wanting to compare?
c32b1 NSX
05-23-2004, 08:16 PM
yup usdm. dont know the jdm specs.
freakray
05-23-2004, 08:19 PM
Do you know the 22B specs?
freakray
05-23-2004, 08:26 PM
Impreza STI 22B
Displacement: 2212 cc
Weight: 2793 lbs
Power: 290.1 bhp@6500 rpm
Torque: 263 ft lbs @ 3200 rpm
Transmission: manual 5 speed
Top speed: 163.4 mph
Quarter mile: 12.5 s
0 - 60mph: 4.2s
0 - 100mph: 12.4s
USDM Impreza STI
Displacement: 2498 cc
Weight: 3263 lbs
Power: 300hp@ 6000rpm
Torque: 300 ft.lbs @ 4000rpm
Transmission: manual 6 speed
Top Speed: 155 mph
Quarter mile: 13.23 s
0-60mph: 4.87s
Displacement: 2212 cc
Weight: 2793 lbs
Power: 290.1 bhp@6500 rpm
Torque: 263 ft lbs @ 3200 rpm
Transmission: manual 5 speed
Top speed: 163.4 mph
Quarter mile: 12.5 s
0 - 60mph: 4.2s
0 - 100mph: 12.4s
USDM Impreza STI
Displacement: 2498 cc
Weight: 3263 lbs
Power: 300hp@ 6000rpm
Torque: 300 ft.lbs @ 4000rpm
Transmission: manual 6 speed
Top Speed: 155 mph
Quarter mile: 13.23 s
0-60mph: 4.87s
c32b1 NSX
05-23-2004, 09:09 PM
yup i know the 22b specs. its my favorite impreza. watch this. http://www.22b.com/vid_misc.htm
watch the motorweek one.
watch the motorweek one.
freakray
05-23-2004, 09:11 PM
So if you know the spec, why are you asking this question?
c32b1 NSX
05-24-2004, 02:47 PM
all i wanted to know is that which one people like better.
freakray
05-24-2004, 03:27 PM
I like both, does that make sense?
I would accept either at any time, without hesitation.
I would accept either at any time, without hesitation.
keita
05-27-2004, 05:13 PM
Now, tell me Something... 22B has less torque and HP, but much faster... why would that be? Is it much lighter?
LjasonL
05-27-2004, 05:41 PM
It's underrated... some sources say the 22B makes almost 350hp
keita
05-27-2004, 05:49 PM
a-ha, thanks man.
Jay!
05-27-2004, 06:22 PM
Actually, from the research I've done, 22B owners from the UK state that their cars dyno at almost exactly 276 or 280 hp (or ps?) or whatever the "limit" is supposed to be... The difference is that the 22B has such a HUGE torque curve that's big and flat like a kitchen table so the power is available all over the powerband.
It's people that are used to driving the turbo 2.0 that claim it to be "underrated," because it has SO MUCH more useable torque than the usual WRX motors.
It's people that are used to driving the turbo 2.0 that claim it to be "underrated," because it has SO MUCH more useable torque than the usual WRX motors.
freakray
05-27-2004, 07:36 PM
Now, tell me Something... 22B has less torque and HP, but much faster... why would that be? Is it much lighter?
If you read my post with the comparative specs on the cars, you would have seen I posted the weight of both cars there.
If you read my post with the comparative specs on the cars, you would have seen I posted the weight of both cars there.
LjasonL
05-27-2004, 10:24 PM
Actually, from the research I've done, 22B owners from the UK state that their cars dyno at almost exactly 276 or 280 hp
At the wheels? :naughty: 280 whp would be nearly 350 hp.
At the wheels? :naughty: 280 whp would be nearly 350 hp.
Jay!
05-28-2004, 01:22 AM
Oh. I don't know if it said either way... Of course I can't find the page again. I think I got to it from 22b.com . Argh.
LjasonL
05-28-2004, 08:58 AM
Oh well, I would believe it either way
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2025
