i need help
customcrx
05-22-2004, 11:24 AM
i am havin trouble findina new projectand i was wondering if anyone had any i deas on a cool custom rig. im looking for more of a pickup than any thing. also it would be very helpful if anybody new some web sites to go to for custom parts and i would also like to learn how to do resin kits and like mage my own because i would like to build like a 93 toyota p/u or 4 runner or a nissan hardbody or an 83 toyota p/uand hinge kits and where to find them mainly like the lambo doors
any help would greatly be appriceated thanx
any help would greatly be appriceated thanx
customcrx
05-22-2004, 02:04 PM
please any body i really need help
freakray
05-22-2004, 02:21 PM
How not to make friends on a forum: keep posting asking why people aren't answering your thread.
Forums are not like chat rooms, when people have an answer to your question they will post an answer, if not, they tend not to post.
As far as what to build, try building something you like.
You want to build a truck, have a look on http://www.modelexpress.net
They have a load of different truck models.
Forums are not like chat rooms, when people have an answer to your question they will post an answer, if not, they tend not to post.
As far as what to build, try building something you like.
You want to build a truck, have a look on http://www.modelexpress.net
They have a load of different truck models.
blubaja
05-22-2004, 07:13 PM
Hey,
Why not try making a cab over engine truck, or a heavy duty kinda truck by a japanese manufacturer. I think it would be interesting to see a nissan or toyota done like that.
Frank X.
Why not try making a cab over engine truck, or a heavy duty kinda truck by a japanese manufacturer. I think it would be interesting to see a nissan or toyota done like that.
Frank X.
trikkedoutsupra
05-23-2004, 02:56 AM
sry freakray didnt mean to offend u its just i m in great need of ideas i m getting pissed at my self for not comin up with sumpthin sooner
mike@af
05-23-2004, 10:28 AM
sumpthin
Does that mean "something"? I speak English not this "new chat room lets murder the english language by spelling things the way they sound".
Does that mean "something"? I speak English not this "new chat room lets murder the english language by spelling things the way they sound".
drunken monkey
05-23-2004, 11:32 AM
y'know,
i'm not all taht btohered wehn it coems to bad speillnig but wehn it's not eevn corrcet egnlsih....
the thing is, the way they spell it isn't even how it sounds, it is spelt how they say it.
in the world of the dumb, that's scraping the very bottom of the barrel.
and you wonder why us brits think all americans are stupid.
i'm not all taht btohered wehn it coems to bad speillnig but wehn it's not eevn corrcet egnlsih....
the thing is, the way they spell it isn't even how it sounds, it is spelt how they say it.
in the world of the dumb, that's scraping the very bottom of the barrel.
and you wonder why us brits think all americans are stupid.
mike@af
05-23-2004, 11:45 AM
y'know,
i'm not all taht btohered wehn it coems to bad speillnig but wehn it's not eevn corrcet egnlsih....
the thing is, the way they spell it isn't even how it sounds, it is spelt how they say it.
in the world of the dumb, that's scraping the very bottom of the barrel.
and you wonder why us brits think all americans are stupid.
So true. I am officially british. In America we dont speak English, we speak American. Young teenagers think its cool to spell things the way they sound. They are just proving the opinion that teenagers are stupid.
i'm not all taht btohered wehn it coems to bad speillnig but wehn it's not eevn corrcet egnlsih....
the thing is, the way they spell it isn't even how it sounds, it is spelt how they say it.
in the world of the dumb, that's scraping the very bottom of the barrel.
and you wonder why us brits think all americans are stupid.
So true. I am officially british. In America we dont speak English, we speak American. Young teenagers think its cool to spell things the way they sound. They are just proving the opinion that teenagers are stupid.
minniebanister
05-23-2004, 07:47 PM
and you wonder why us brits think all americans are stupid.
You brits think everyone is stupid - including each other
You brits think everyone is stupid - including each other
SchuberT
05-23-2004, 08:57 PM
hmmm dunno why people are bashing this guy... it's not even related to his question... people have their habits, respect that plz...
in relation to your question, be patient, people will answer if they know... i however, dont... so sorry, cant help ya
in relation to your question, be patient, people will answer if they know... i however, dont... so sorry, cant help ya
trikkedoutsupra
05-26-2004, 07:58 PM
Its Ok And Thanks The Dumdamdutchess Ladies Have No Idea Wut They Are Talking About.oh And Bythe Way Drunk Munky I No How To Fight!!!!!!!
mike@af
05-26-2004, 09:08 PM
Its Ok And Thanks The Dumdamdutchess Ladies Have No Idea Wut They Are Talking About.oh And Bythe Way Drunk Munky I No How To Fight!!!!!!!
:wtf:
:wtf:
bvia
05-26-2004, 09:09 PM
You brits think everyone is stupid - including each other
HAHAHA... :owned:
Bill
HAHAHA... :owned:
Bill
jswillmon
05-26-2004, 10:32 PM
Its Ok And Thanks The Dumdamdutchess Ladies Have No Idea Wut They Are Talking About.oh And Bythe Way Drunk Munky I No How To Fight!!!!!!!
http://instagiber.net/smiliesdotcom/ups/bounty_hunter_monkey/biggrin.gif
:banhim:
what's with the 2 accounts?
http://instagiber.net/smiliesdotcom/ups/bounty_hunter_monkey/biggrin.gif
:banhim:
what's with the 2 accounts?
DiGiTaLEcLiPsE
05-26-2004, 10:34 PM
Yeah what is with the 2 accounts!
willimo
05-26-2004, 11:27 PM
So true. I am officially british. In America we dont speak English, we speak American. Young teenagers think its cool to spell things the way they sound. They are just proving the opinion that teenagers are stupid.
There is actually a lot of linguistic interest in the language kids use these days. Beyond the spelling differences, there are often many different grammatical rules between the familiar language young people use and proper English. There's the interesting bit. The common misconception is that the language kids use is bad language. It isn't necessarily, as in many cases it is a well developed language with rules just as complex as the ones in proper English. Many words when misspelled and used in ways we would consider improper have very different connotations, or even different denotations than we would expect in lieu of the word they were derived from. These words have very specific meanings and usages that we may not be aware of, but probably should be. Don't take this the wrong way, I am not defending it. It certainly impedes the ability to communicate between people. Those of us who like the more accurately structured and formally constructed form of English have a very difficult time interpreting this... well, dialect that we do not share culturally with the young people who have grown up with instant and text messaging. In the middle of the information age it is very easy for language like this to spread, but unfortunately it is very easy for it to clash with proper English, and for this reason we can see the potential devastation that it can have on language and communication. Yes, we should all at least attempt to use proper English, if not for any reason besides it is the standard that all English speaking people learn (as either a first or second language). However, we really shouldn't be so quick to judge and outright condemn new forms of language, as they are much more complex than we may think at first glance. Yes, it is a corruption of proper English, and yes, it sucks to read, but I honestly don't feel it is indicative of anyone's stupidity.
There is actually a lot of linguistic interest in the language kids use these days. Beyond the spelling differences, there are often many different grammatical rules between the familiar language young people use and proper English. There's the interesting bit. The common misconception is that the language kids use is bad language. It isn't necessarily, as in many cases it is a well developed language with rules just as complex as the ones in proper English. Many words when misspelled and used in ways we would consider improper have very different connotations, or even different denotations than we would expect in lieu of the word they were derived from. These words have very specific meanings and usages that we may not be aware of, but probably should be. Don't take this the wrong way, I am not defending it. It certainly impedes the ability to communicate between people. Those of us who like the more accurately structured and formally constructed form of English have a very difficult time interpreting this... well, dialect that we do not share culturally with the young people who have grown up with instant and text messaging. In the middle of the information age it is very easy for language like this to spread, but unfortunately it is very easy for it to clash with proper English, and for this reason we can see the potential devastation that it can have on language and communication. Yes, we should all at least attempt to use proper English, if not for any reason besides it is the standard that all English speaking people learn (as either a first or second language). However, we really shouldn't be so quick to judge and outright condemn new forms of language, as they are much more complex than we may think at first glance. Yes, it is a corruption of proper English, and yes, it sucks to read, but I honestly don't feel it is indicative of anyone's stupidity.
DSM-Mark
05-26-2004, 11:38 PM
Presidential addresses are going to be very interesting in 30 years or so...
DSM-Mark
05-26-2004, 11:47 PM
Call this relevant or not, this thread reminded me of it... so I'll post it.
Having chosen English as the preferred language in the EEC, the European Parliament has commissioned a feasibility study in ways of improving efficiency in communications between Government departments.
European officials have often pointed out the English spelling is unnecessarily difficult; for example: cough, plough, rough, through and thorough. What is clearly needed is a phased programme of changes to iron out these anomolies. The programme would, of course, be administered by a committee staff at top level by participating nations.
In the first year, for example, the committee would suggest using "s" instead of the soft "c." Sertainly, sivil servants in all sities would resieve this news with joy. Then the hard "c" could be replaced by "k" sinse both letters are pronounsed alike. Not only would this klear up konfusion in the minds of klerikal workers, but typewriters kould be made with one less letter.
There would be growing enthusiasm when in the sekond year, it would be announsed that the troublesome "ph" would henseforth be written "f." This would make words like "fotograf" twenty persent shorter in print.
In the third year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reash the stage where more komplikated shanges are possible.Governments would enkourage the removal of double leters whish have always been a deterent to akurate speling.
We would al agre that the horible mes of silent "e"s in the languag is disgrasful. Therefor we kould drop them and kontinu to read and writ as though nothing had hapend. By this tim it would be four years sins the skem began and peopl would be reseptive to steps sutsh as replasing "th" by "z." Perhaps zen ze funktion of "w" kould be taken on by "v," vitsh is, after al, half a "w." Shortly after zis, ze unesesary "o" kould be dropd from vords kontaining "ou." Similar arguments vud of kors be aplid to ozer kombinations of leters. Kontinuing zis proses yer after yer, ve vud eventuli hav a reli sensibl riten styl. After tventi yers zer vud be no mor trubls, difikultis and evrivun vud find it ezi tu understand ech ozer. Ze drems of ze Guvermnt vud finali have kum tru.
Having chosen English as the preferred language in the EEC, the European Parliament has commissioned a feasibility study in ways of improving efficiency in communications between Government departments.
European officials have often pointed out the English spelling is unnecessarily difficult; for example: cough, plough, rough, through and thorough. What is clearly needed is a phased programme of changes to iron out these anomolies. The programme would, of course, be administered by a committee staff at top level by participating nations.
In the first year, for example, the committee would suggest using "s" instead of the soft "c." Sertainly, sivil servants in all sities would resieve this news with joy. Then the hard "c" could be replaced by "k" sinse both letters are pronounsed alike. Not only would this klear up konfusion in the minds of klerikal workers, but typewriters kould be made with one less letter.
There would be growing enthusiasm when in the sekond year, it would be announsed that the troublesome "ph" would henseforth be written "f." This would make words like "fotograf" twenty persent shorter in print.
In the third year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reash the stage where more komplikated shanges are possible.Governments would enkourage the removal of double leters whish have always been a deterent to akurate speling.
We would al agre that the horible mes of silent "e"s in the languag is disgrasful. Therefor we kould drop them and kontinu to read and writ as though nothing had hapend. By this tim it would be four years sins the skem began and peopl would be reseptive to steps sutsh as replasing "th" by "z." Perhaps zen ze funktion of "w" kould be taken on by "v," vitsh is, after al, half a "w." Shortly after zis, ze unesesary "o" kould be dropd from vords kontaining "ou." Similar arguments vud of kors be aplid to ozer kombinations of leters. Kontinuing zis proses yer after yer, ve vud eventuli hav a reli sensibl riten styl. After tventi yers zer vud be no mor trubls, difikultis and evrivun vud find it ezi tu understand ech ozer. Ze drems of ze Guvermnt vud finali have kum tru.
willimo
05-27-2004, 12:02 AM
Ha!
IImportSupra
05-27-2004, 12:21 AM
I don't know where this Language thing came in but, WTF does this has to do with the topic? Im American, Los Angeles Area. I speak engilish, I only tpye lkei tihs becusea im layz. People type like that because there lazy basicly, has nothing to do with american, france, british, etc...
Anyways kid, if want some inspiration check out www.Importfan.com
Anyways kid, if want some inspiration check out www.Importfan.com
customcrx
06-02-2004, 12:35 AM
thanx guys but that is not really y i type this way i type like this becaus i have to be quick with my typing so i can get my post up cause my computer sucks and always kicks me out of my programs before i get to finish typin any thing............................................. .............................oh and by the way "why dont brits make tv's because the can't figure out how to make them leak oil."
customcrx
06-02-2004, 12:37 AM
also i have 2 accounts because i for got the password to my 1st account
_WIDE_LOAD_
06-02-2004, 05:08 AM
dude....bit of a flame session there. but i can understand where everyone was comming from.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2026
