which is faster?
Audi
05-10-2004, 10:41 PM
AUDI 1.8T OR THE AUDI 2.8? ...cuz i have a 1.8t and..i beat the 2.8 down hawthorne hahaha
MikeLee2484
05-11-2004, 01:59 AM
well it depends on the year a bit, whether you or the other guy had a quattro or not, and if you had any mods to yours as well...overall id say, depending on the driver of course, the stock 2.8 over the stock 1.8T especially if theyre 98-01...and it could be argued for a 96-97 2.8 as well...but thats just my oppinion
Audi
05-11-2004, 02:11 AM
Oh...i have no mods..he has none either mine was 1.8t quattro and his 2.8 quattro...mine 97 and his 98-00...not sure which year..but for sure his probably was auto..so..thats probably why i won
MikeLee2484
05-11-2004, 02:31 AM
yeah...posted 0-60 times yours in theory is about around 1 sec slower...but it all depends
schecter
05-12-2004, 04:28 PM
im pretty sure the 2.8 is quicker stock. the 2.8 is deffinately quicker off the line
Audi-Man
05-14-2004, 08:57 AM
The V6 is quicker off the line, but I still don't know how you beat him unless his was auto, because the auto tranny's in Audis are very smooth and slow, so the manual probably won it for you.
Audi
05-14-2004, 11:10 AM
yeah he was probably auto....i had my sister in the car too haha..she was like oh crap he's gaining..but he never did
korrrray
07-05-2004, 11:27 PM
i dont know how the hell he beats a 6 cylinder with that 1.8t. that engine(1.8t) is the kind you put on cabs in europe, no performance at all.
i think Vw uses the same engine on cheaper cars in europe like SEAT, SKODA and others.
i think Vw uses the same engine on cheaper cars in europe like SEAT, SKODA and others.
91300zxtt
07-05-2004, 11:43 PM
korrrray my boy old thread
Talibangunner925
07-23-2004, 07:19 PM
all i have to say is if you put a turbo on a 2.8 on any year it will take many many 1.8t's
MikeLee2484
07-24-2004, 12:13 AM
thats some pretty good insight...i bet if you took some noz and a turbo, along with a new intake and exhaust and put it on a 2.8 it would take a 1.8T...well according to the numbers you dont need to do that...here how you beat a 1.8T...take one stock 1.8T and one stock 2.8...line them up...make sure both drivers know they are racing...tell them to go...and if they each rev and shift correctly the 2.8 wins...without the turbo...but it is a good point
Talibangunner925
07-24-2004, 10:42 AM
I dont know if a 2.8 could take a 1.8 off the line only the engins will be working so the 2.8 would have it off the line but as soon as the 1.8t' turbo kick in i dont think the the 2.8 would be able to take it much longer with out mods. So over all on a uarter mile i think the 1.8t would win becuse of the turbo and that is all the reason why it would wim. Not only that how long can a 4 cylinder last. I dont like the idea of a small 4 cylinder having a turbo doesnt sould like it will last to long.
Audi
07-26-2004, 08:28 AM
my car has 129,000 miles it runs fine still so...it lasts pretty long
RACER D12
07-26-2004, 06:19 PM
The 2.8 is faster I would think and has more potential because it has more displacement, but the 1.8T is a very good motor too and has won many awards. So dont underestimate it. With just a ECU chip the 1.8T will make over 200hp and kill a stock 2.8. Then get a boost controller and up the boost on the turbo and the hp numbers are endless. I think you can make over 250hp on the stock turbo. Much more then that though and you with need to get a bigger turbo.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2026
