eclipse vs lancer

ok, stock for stock, 2002 lancer ES or 97 Eclipse GS?

i have an oz rally 5 speed with some mods and i will spank a stock eclipse. a se is the same thing power wise as an oz. but if i was u i would get the se with the 5 speed.

how much HP does your car have stock?? 120?

My eclipse dusted my buddy's OZ (5 speed) like 5 times already

I think there's no way an OZ can beat an Eclipse GS. The 95 and up GS mostly have the 2.0 DOHC engine, just like the evo engine without turbo. And even RS and some GS have 2.4 SOHC. And the Lancer ES or OZ I think it's either 1.8 SOHC or 2.0 SOHC. But I'm not sure about the weight, but the Lancer looks heavier to me. So if OZ can beat an eclipse, it's really the driver's problem.

i own a 00 gs eclipse with next to know mods and there is no lancer expect the evo that stands a chance againist my car. i have actually done a 1/4 mile with a oz and i beat him 4 1/2 cars.

Actually the 95-99 eclipse non-turbos have a completely different motor than the evo/turbo eclipse. RS/GS motor is the chrysler 420A motor.

i raced an eclipse gs.
i got him at the start but he slowly started to pull away from me. I think with some mods the lancer could keep up.

all say the eclipse gs would win

They are both so darn slow it don't matter.

They are both so darn slow it don't matter.


LoL

150hp stock eclipse 120hp lancer whoops ass by the way the convertable eclispe is the only one with the engine all other can with 4g63 either turbo 220 hp or non turbo 150hp

how does a 2g GSX stand againt an evo stock for stock

Evo will kill the gsx. Stock GSX runs low 15s and stock Evos runs low 13s.

arent they both the same hp?
plus driver makes a difference also!

i think a better race would be the ralliart against the eclipse. cause the ralliart is putting down like 162 so it would be closer.

Stock 2g GSX= 215-220HP

Stock EVo= 271 HP

arent they both the same hp?
plus driver makes a difference also!

What are you some kind of morron. A stock gsx and the evo, the gsx would stand no chance even with a bad ass driver. The power difference is so great it would be awful. The evo even weighs less than the gsx. you need to do some homework on that. A gs eclipse has 147hp if it is manual vs lancer 127 if manual there is no way the lancer would keep up. Also the gears on an eclipse are more sports like. lancer is a family car more or less. A better comparsion would be the 2g vs 3g.

sorry for the morron remark but everyone know that the evo is the fastest car ever made by mitsubishi.

"150hp stock eclipse 120hp lancer whoops ass by the way the convertable eclispe is the only one with the engine all other can with 4g63 either turbo 220 hp or non turbo 150hp"


Um, no. All non-turbo, 2g (95-99) came with the 420a motor, the same as in a Neon.

Um, no. All non-turbo, 2g (95-99) came with the 420a motor, the same as in a Neon.[/QUOTE]

The non-turbo convertibles had a 2.4l engine, not the 2.0l 420a

Either way, the RS and GS do not have an n/a 4g63.

Either way, the RS and GS do not have an n/a 4g63.

the 2g don't but the 1g have the 4g63 n/a

the reason the Evo pwnz the GSX is because the evo has a bigger turbo stock... if the eclipse had the same turbo it would put the same or more power out... and well... beat the EVO

o ya and heres the engines of eclipses

1g base 1.8L SOHC 92 HP
1g GS 16V 4G63 135 HP
1g turbo 4G63 195 HP
2G RS/GS 420A 140 HP
2g GS spyder 2.4l SOHC 141 HP
2G GS-T/GSX 4G63 210 HP
3G + i dont know and dont care they arent DSMs so they dont matter :)

Well yes and no the evo does have a higher comp... ratio so so the evo might still be alittle faster but if the 2g had a 1g head and everything else was stock it would beat it.