Defeated....
GTO4Life
04-05-2004, 01:21 PM
yeah well i was messing around with my SL against my friend who was driving his brother's 2000 mustang GT (300 hp) and well ya... i passed him, i felt all happy. And then.... It happened...*sees mustang passing my poor SL leaving me in the dirt* What a horrible feeling... i need to make my car faster... Oh well, i just needed to express my sadness... *goes race eclipses and civics*
3kgt8
04-05-2004, 07:54 PM
that sucks man but oh well fix up your car and kick some mustang ass. hey i would rather have a 3000gt than a crappy mustang. love the looks on the 3000gt. 3kgts kick ass. mustangs suck everybody's got one. I see like 30 in a day and like 2 or 3 3000gts a week. Be proud of your awesome ride.
sLADe781
04-05-2004, 09:45 PM
that sucks man but oh well fix up your car and kick some mustang ass. hey i would rather have a 3000gt than a crappy mustang. love the looks on the 3000gt. 3kgts kick ass. mustangs suck everybody's got one. I see like 30 in a day and like 2 or 3 3000gts a week. Be proud of your awesome ride.
I second that.... YAY-YAH!!! :biggrin:
I second that.... YAY-YAH!!! :biggrin:
Hotshot8792
04-05-2004, 11:48 PM
a 3/S is soo much better, and there is one thing i have learned about stangs, never worry about the ones that are all motor, they are never that quick, now the blown stangs you'll have to be careful with, but i haven't been in, raced, or seen a stang N/A able to take out a BPU TT.
Nesryn
04-05-2004, 11:50 PM
Lol don't worry about it man. Our cars are still nicer and get more looks than the damn rustangs. And 300 horse in our cars would tool the shit out of mustangs. So be proud :)
talskinyguy
04-06-2004, 12:24 AM
Ive seen a couple mustangs that can kick a take a bpu TT. They both distroyed me. But one was on the bottle, and the other was super charged. Damn 03 cobras.
FDTT
04-06-2004, 12:27 AM
Well an SL will always lose to a Stang. Unfortunatly trus. But the VR4's have a VERY good chance of beatin them.
Nesryn
04-06-2004, 12:30 AM
An SL wont lose to every stang....
3kgt8
04-06-2004, 12:58 AM
of course not v6 mustangs only wish they could beat an SL . I dont like those trendy cars. long live 3000gt!!
Nesryn
04-06-2004, 01:36 AM
The mid 90's V8's can't beat an SL... neither can the old 5.0's.... Stock anyways....
GTO4Life
04-06-2004, 01:37 AM
thanks for the support :)
Nesryn
04-06-2004, 01:40 AM
Anytime... Always remember, 3000's rule... VR4 or not ;)
GTO4Life
04-06-2004, 01:45 AM
Anytime... Always remember, 3000's rule... VR4 or not ;)
*smiles* damn right!
*smiles* damn right!
Nesryn
04-06-2004, 01:50 AM
I raced an old 5.0 a couple days ago... and an RSx-s and a TSX...good day :)
AcesHigh
04-06-2004, 10:25 AM
A GT Mustang is 260hp. A Mach 1 is 300hp.
YogsVR4
04-06-2004, 10:35 AM
Anytime... Always remember, 3000's rule... VR4 or not ;)
:iagree:
Never pay again for live sex! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=1) | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=3) | Chat for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=5)
:iagree:
Never pay again for live sex! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=1) | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=3) | Chat for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=5)
lockylocke
04-06-2004, 06:43 PM
SL can take on any version of mustangs GT under the year of 99. Put on some mods (intake, catback, pulley...), and you might be able to beat new 99+ Mustangs GT.
3000gt takes off faster than Mustangs. Use that as your advantages.
addictional mods for SL, NA 3kgt can be done through polishing ....your entire engine.
3000gt takes off faster than Mustangs. Use that as your advantages.
addictional mods for SL, NA 3kgt can be done through polishing ....your entire engine.
GTO4Life
04-06-2004, 11:45 PM
SL can take on any version of mustangs GT under the year of 99. Put on some mods (intake, catback, pulley...), and you might be able to beat new 99+ Mustangs GT.
3000gt takes off faster than Mustangs. Use that as your advantages.
addictional mods for SL, NA 3kgt can be done through polishing ....your entire engine.
my friend's 98 mustang GT can take me tho... though maybe im still not good at driving... (2 months driving manual) But thanks anyways ^_^
3000gt takes off faster than Mustangs. Use that as your advantages.
addictional mods for SL, NA 3kgt can be done through polishing ....your entire engine.
my friend's 98 mustang GT can take me tho... though maybe im still not good at driving... (2 months driving manual) But thanks anyways ^_^
youngvr4
04-07-2004, 12:25 AM
3000gt takes off faster than Mustangs. Use that as your advantages
yeah right :loser: you mean vr4's can. and even still it depends on what stang. be more specific when you say stang, cause they range from v6 slowpokes to 03 cobra's that run 12.7 in the 1320.
yeah right :loser: you mean vr4's can. and even still it depends on what stang. be more specific when you say stang, cause they range from v6 slowpokes to 03 cobra's that run 12.7 in the 1320.
lockylocke
04-07-2004, 11:50 AM
To GTO: ... maybe It's just my lucks ...but ever since I got my NA 3kgt till now, I have never lost to any 98 or under mustangs GT. Good reaction timing... and know your shifting point really count on this one...
To Youngvr4: I am not talking about the Cobra!... just the V8 GT. I have test drive a 99 and 01 mustang GT. YEP..they are fast on second and third gears, but 3kgt are faster on First and second gears.... !!!.. THis is just my opinion. Any cars have a difference of 15 hps or less, will be up to the driver. I've seen an eclipse 140 hps beats a Prelude 95 v-tec 190 hps....just becuause he was a lousy driver.
To Youngvr4: I am not talking about the Cobra!... just the V8 GT. I have test drive a 99 and 01 mustang GT. YEP..they are fast on second and third gears, but 3kgt are faster on First and second gears.... !!!.. THis is just my opinion. Any cars have a difference of 15 hps or less, will be up to the driver. I've seen an eclipse 140 hps beats a Prelude 95 v-tec 190 hps....just becuause he was a lousy driver.
youngvr4
04-07-2004, 12:04 PM
but at the same time lockylock there are cars in hp range of other cars and there is no comparison. for instance a nsx has 270hp and a wrx has 271hp but the wrx is not within reach of the nsx. there is more to speed then hp, there's tq, weight, traction etc.....
AcesHigh
04-07-2004, 12:38 PM
An EVO has 271hp. The STi is at 300hp. It is comparable... the NSX is not at all a quick car. A VR4 can probably take a non Type R.
It's mostly gearing and balance.
And yes, I will agree that a majority of us Prelude owners suck at driving. I've seen alot lose to things it shouldn't.
It's mostly gearing and balance.
And yes, I will agree that a majority of us Prelude owners suck at driving. I've seen alot lose to things it shouldn't.
lockylocke
04-07-2004, 12:44 PM
I see your point,Youngvr4!! ... ..hp, tq, weight, traction really make a big difference, And I have to admit that ..i was beaten by a Prelude Type HS. (lest hp than 3kgt)!!..(better luck next time)
if 2 drivers have alomst the same driving ability..then it's up to the car's potential....!!.. I lost, but I still want a re-match with that Prelude though. AS for Mustangs, I wouldn't dare go near a Cobra, but I refuse to let a V8 GT take over.
if 2 drivers have alomst the same driving ability..then it's up to the car's potential....!!.. I lost, but I still want a re-match with that Prelude though. AS for Mustangs, I wouldn't dare go near a Cobra, but I refuse to let a V8 GT take over.
youngmanvr4
04-08-2004, 02:40 AM
What about a VR-4 vs. a Cobra?
joemathews
04-08-2004, 12:35 PM
An EVO has 271hp. The STi is at 300hp. It is comparable... the NSX is not at all a quick car. A VR4 can probably take a non Type R.
It's mostly gearing and balance.
And yes, I will agree that a majority of us Prelude owners suck at driving. I've seen alot lose to things it shouldn't.
An NSX is a damn quick car. But you were talking about the RSX I think :D.
It's mostly gearing and balance.
And yes, I will agree that a majority of us Prelude owners suck at driving. I've seen alot lose to things it shouldn't.
An NSX is a damn quick car. But you were talking about the RSX I think :D.
N/A-SAVAGE!
04-08-2004, 01:37 PM
An EVO has 271hp. The STi is at 300hp. It is comparable... the NSX is not at all a quick car. A VR4 can probably take a non Type R.
It's mostly gearing and balance.
And yes, I will agree that a majority of us Prelude owners suck at driving. I've seen alot lose to things it shouldn't.
yeah like a stealth!!!!! :lol:
It's mostly gearing and balance.
And yes, I will agree that a majority of us Prelude owners suck at driving. I've seen alot lose to things it shouldn't.
yeah like a stealth!!!!! :lol:
AcesHigh
04-08-2004, 02:31 PM
No, I'm not.
Besides being midengined and RWD, it doesn't have much else going for it. There are two types, a 252hp V6 and the 290hp V6 engines. I was comparing it between the EVO and STi, and by those standards it is not that much faster if at all.
Enough getting off topic though.
Besides being midengined and RWD, it doesn't have much else going for it. There are two types, a 252hp V6 and the 290hp V6 engines. I was comparing it between the EVO and STi, and by those standards it is not that much faster if at all.
Enough getting off topic though.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2025