Prelude V.S. Celica GT-S
Pages :
1 [2]
Mrcoilover
10-30-2001, 08:38 AM
Originally posted by h7y
Do you even know anything about cars before you talk?? I dont know about the RSX-R so I will not comment, But the WRX is NOT putting out 227 to the wheels. That 227 is measured at the crank, to the wheels, it prob gets 180-190.
Also did anyone mention the TypeSH?
The celica GT beating the lude?? You must be kidding. I have video of a lude taking a gts, giving the gts a car lead if you want it. E-mail me.
Do you know what you are talking about. Who cares if you have a clip of a lude beating a GT-S. Probably just the driver that lost. And about the type SH. Well did you know that all the SH is, is a suspension upgrade. No more power than a regular lude. Ludes are heavy and have 200hp. Celica weighs like 400lbs less than that and has 180hp. What else do you not know?:eek:
Do you even know anything about cars before you talk?? I dont know about the RSX-R so I will not comment, But the WRX is NOT putting out 227 to the wheels. That 227 is measured at the crank, to the wheels, it prob gets 180-190.
Also did anyone mention the TypeSH?
The celica GT beating the lude?? You must be kidding. I have video of a lude taking a gts, giving the gts a car lead if you want it. E-mail me.
Do you know what you are talking about. Who cares if you have a clip of a lude beating a GT-S. Probably just the driver that lost. And about the type SH. Well did you know that all the SH is, is a suspension upgrade. No more power than a regular lude. Ludes are heavy and have 200hp. Celica weighs like 400lbs less than that and has 180hp. What else do you not know?:eek:
F20C
10-30-2001, 01:14 PM
I think Prelude has 16lbs of torque on Celica GT-S.
F20C
10-30-2001, 01:16 PM
The speed goes this way.
Integra Type R
RSX Type S
Celica GT-S With Leather and Sunroof
Prelude Type SH
Integra Type R
RSX Type S
Celica GT-S With Leather and Sunroof
Prelude Type SH
Mrcoilover
10-30-2001, 01:22 PM
Originally posted by F20C
The speed goes this way.
Integra Type R
RSX Type S
Celica GT-S With Leather and Sunroof
Prelude Type SH
nope!
like this:
RSX type S
Integra type R
Celica GT-S
Prelude
The speed goes this way.
Integra Type R
RSX Type S
Celica GT-S With Leather and Sunroof
Prelude Type SH
nope!
like this:
RSX type S
Integra type R
Celica GT-S
Prelude
h7y
10-30-2001, 02:11 PM
wrong, the type sh has atts, and higher cams. that was in reference to handling. Have you guys actually driven both cars? I have, You can't just look at numbers, It's on the street that counts. On the street the "looks fast" car, well thats what it does. :finger:
so to stand corrected, the lude has 2lbs more torque, and that power is at a lower rpm range.
Also, where do you get off saying RSX-S is faster than ITR??? :rolleyes:
so to stand corrected, the lude has 2lbs more torque, and that power is at a lower rpm range.
Also, where do you get off saying RSX-S is faster than ITR??? :rolleyes:
Chris
10-30-2001, 03:01 PM
The WRX would beat any of those cars, sorry to burst your bubble.
Mrcoilover
10-30-2001, 03:04 PM
Originally posted by h7y
wrong, the type sh has atts, and higher cams. that was in reference to handling. Have you guys actually driven both cars? I have, You can't just look at numbers, It's on the street that counts. On the street the "looks fast" car, well thats what it does. :finger:
so to stand corrected, the lude has 2lbs more torque, and that power is at a lower rpm range.
Also, where do you get off saying RSX-S is faster than ITR??? :rolleyes:
It has more hp and torque. weigh about the same.
wrong, the type sh has atts, and higher cams. that was in reference to handling. Have you guys actually driven both cars? I have, You can't just look at numbers, It's on the street that counts. On the street the "looks fast" car, well thats what it does. :finger:
so to stand corrected, the lude has 2lbs more torque, and that power is at a lower rpm range.
Also, where do you get off saying RSX-S is faster than ITR??? :rolleyes:
It has more hp and torque. weigh about the same.
F20C
10-30-2001, 04:13 PM
Originally posted by Mrcoilover
It has more hp and torque. weigh about the same.
They don't weight the same. On average Type S weights about 167 lbs more than Type R. It varies depending on the model year of Type R. Also Type R doesn't have a rev limiter therefore it can be launch at high rpms. Type R also have a LSD and way more grippy tire.
It has more hp and torque. weigh about the same.
They don't weight the same. On average Type S weights about 167 lbs more than Type R. It varies depending on the model year of Type R. Also Type R doesn't have a rev limiter therefore it can be launch at high rpms. Type R also have a LSD and way more grippy tire.
F20C
10-30-2001, 04:14 PM
S2000
WRX
Type R
Type S
GT-S
Type SH
WRX
Type R
Type S
GT-S
Type SH
Mrcoilover
10-30-2001, 04:17 PM
Originally posted by F20C
They don't weight the same. On average Type S weights about 167 lbs more than Type R. It varies depending on the model year of Type R. Also Type R doesn't have a rev limiter therefore it can be launch at high rpms. Type R also have a LSD and way more grippy tire.
Oh. I guess you da man. Looks like you know your shiznit. I bow down to F20C .:finger:
They don't weight the same. On average Type S weights about 167 lbs more than Type R. It varies depending on the model year of Type R. Also Type R doesn't have a rev limiter therefore it can be launch at high rpms. Type R also have a LSD and way more grippy tire.
Oh. I guess you da man. Looks like you know your shiznit. I bow down to F20C .:finger:
Mrcoilover
10-30-2001, 04:19 PM
Originally posted by F20C
S2000
WRX
Type R
Type S
GT-S
Type SH
I think we can all agree on the S2000.
S2000
WRX
Type R
Type S
GT-S
Type SH
I think we can all agree on the S2000.
Chris
10-30-2001, 05:03 PM
The S2000 is faster.
But the Integra Type R has a rev limiter. I know because Sun International put the engine into teh Lotus Elise to make it street legal in the US. (It'll cost you 54 grand to get one). They had a higher redline programmed into the computer, and had it limited to 9400rpm, not 8900 or so in the standard engine.
But the Integra Type R has a rev limiter. I know because Sun International put the engine into teh Lotus Elise to make it street legal in the US. (It'll cost you 54 grand to get one). They had a higher redline programmed into the computer, and had it limited to 9400rpm, not 8900 or so in the standard engine.
F20C
10-30-2001, 09:17 PM
Originally posted by Chris
The S2000 is faster.
But the Integra Type R has a rev limiter. I know because Sun International put the engine into teh Lotus Elise to make it street legal in the US. (It'll cost you 54 grand to get one). They had a higher redline programmed into the computer, and had it limited to 9400rpm, not 8900 or so in the standard engine.
Lotus with Type R engine is not a Integra Type R. Also the standard redline for B18C is 8400RPM same as NSX I think. 8900RPM is Civic Type R's redline I believe, Mine is 9000RPM.
The S2000 is faster.
But the Integra Type R has a rev limiter. I know because Sun International put the engine into teh Lotus Elise to make it street legal in the US. (It'll cost you 54 grand to get one). They had a higher redline programmed into the computer, and had it limited to 9400rpm, not 8900 or so in the standard engine.
Lotus with Type R engine is not a Integra Type R. Also the standard redline for B18C is 8400RPM same as NSX I think. 8900RPM is Civic Type R's redline I believe, Mine is 9000RPM.
clockworksmurf
12-28-2001, 01:28 AM
i have a clica GT-S 6 speed....i love it! its fast and it handles awsome.the Acura is only like half a second faster to 60. its all pretty much up to the drivers of the cars. i think u get more value out of the celica though...and im 6'2" and the celica has plenty of room for me;)
del
12-28-2001, 05:26 PM
Originally posted by clockworksmurf
i have a clica GT-S 6 speed....i love it! its fast and it handles awsome.the Acura is only like half a second faster to 60. its all pretty much up to the drivers of the cars. i think u get more value out of the celica though...and im 6'2" and the celica has plenty of room for me;)
half a second is a long time when comparing 0-60 times. it can make a considerable difference.
i have a clica GT-S 6 speed....i love it! its fast and it handles awsome.the Acura is only like half a second faster to 60. its all pretty much up to the drivers of the cars. i think u get more value out of the celica though...and im 6'2" and the celica has plenty of room for me;)
half a second is a long time when comparing 0-60 times. it can make a considerable difference.
aznbluerag777
11-18-2003, 12:02 AM
Prelude over Celica GTS in my opinion! It's pretty heavy I must agree but I have a 97 base and it's quite lighter than an SH and faster too. I dont know why people always compare type SH's for...There good for handling so compare it on that. As for speed, a base model would be a better contender. If you tune it right, you will walk on a Celica GTS. ESPECIALLY on the freeways. For you luders out there, much propz, our cars our legends...not failures
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2026
