94 and 96 specs
Soyo
12-03-2003, 10:37 PM
alright I'm curious of the HP, torque, 0-60, 1/4mile, and top speed of a 94 z28 and 96 z28... if they are different, I don't know just curious
Z-Almighty
12-03-2003, 11:25 PM
Gotcha covered here man.
1994 Z28
275 hp @5,000 rpm
325 lbs. ft. @ 2,000 rpm (another source also said 2400 rpm)
0-60 mph in 5.5 secs to 6.0(checked a few different sources and all where somewhere around this)
tops speed of 159 mph
Quarter mile in 14.4 secs at around 100 mph
1997-couldn't find info for just a 96 but 97 should be same
285 hp @ 5,200 rpm
325 lbs. ft. @ 2,400
0-60 mph in 5.4 to 5.9 (same thing as above, all close to same but not exactly the same time)
Quarter mile in 14.5 secs @96.6 mph (shouldnt be slower the ealier model so I'd attribute this to being a bad run or maybe a different trans. Auto 4 speed vs manual 5 or 6 speed. No specs where givin as to the trans. used on these runs I've listed)
Anyway, like I said, I looked at several different sources including the book "Camaro Preformance Portfolio" (which is probably not very accurate as the specs it game on teh cars often changed after a few pages :confused: ) So hope this is what your looking for, and if anyone knows these specs to be wrong plz correct me, im far from being all knowing of the F-body :) .
1994 Z28
275 hp @5,000 rpm
325 lbs. ft. @ 2,000 rpm (another source also said 2400 rpm)
0-60 mph in 5.5 secs to 6.0(checked a few different sources and all where somewhere around this)
tops speed of 159 mph
Quarter mile in 14.4 secs at around 100 mph
1997-couldn't find info for just a 96 but 97 should be same
285 hp @ 5,200 rpm
325 lbs. ft. @ 2,400
0-60 mph in 5.4 to 5.9 (same thing as above, all close to same but not exactly the same time)
Quarter mile in 14.5 secs @96.6 mph (shouldnt be slower the ealier model so I'd attribute this to being a bad run or maybe a different trans. Auto 4 speed vs manual 5 or 6 speed. No specs where givin as to the trans. used on these runs I've listed)
Anyway, like I said, I looked at several different sources including the book "Camaro Preformance Portfolio" (which is probably not very accurate as the specs it game on teh cars often changed after a few pages :confused: ) So hope this is what your looking for, and if anyone knows these specs to be wrong plz correct me, im far from being all knowing of the F-body :) .
Z-Almighty
12-03-2003, 11:29 PM
Sorry for my awful spelling and typing errors in that last post, Hope you understand it.
Soyo
12-04-2003, 03:36 PM
sweet thanks for the info...
you happen to know the wieghts?
you happen to know the wieghts?
Z-Almighty
12-04-2003, 08:16 PM
93-3,375lbs.
96/97-3,442lbs.
96/97-3,442lbs.
hot_red_z28
12-05-2003, 10:03 PM
Those factory specs sound about right, but some LT1's can actually break into the 13's in stock trim if driven properly. I know a person with just an intake and exhaust that is running 13.5's with his 93 LT1.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2026