Our Community is over 1 Million Strong. Join Us.

Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef

Grain-Free, Zero Fillers


uneventful 5.0 kill


mynismo
10-26-2003, 09:00 PM
just to let y'all know, i beat a 5.0 tonite around 7:00p

it was pretty uneventful, but i decided to post it anyways because it was my first real kill. it was just a black 5.0 coupe with his girl in the seat. i was in second at about 35mph, pulled right next to him... he looked over for about 4 or 5 seconds and then gunned it. i mashed the gas and pulled on him about 1 car length in about a 12-13mph stretch, and went ahead of him in his lane.

i slaughtered him. pulled up to the next light, he went to the right lane.................................. then he turned right. CHICKEN SHIT LOSER :loser:

carrrnuttt
10-26-2003, 09:32 PM
Man, I wish you were in AZ. I'd really like to test myself against a Max driver I know, and who isn't automatic.

Every Max I've ever ran, I somehow pulled on, including that 2000-2001 that I wrote about when I first got the SE-R, and my friend's GXE auto.

There was even a 1992 one that snickered at me when I pulled up next to him as he was passing other cars. I beat him by about 4 cars...he wasn't happy.

EC0T3C
10-26-2003, 09:35 PM
dude i think we need to run.

mynismo
10-26-2003, 09:39 PM
i wish i was in AZ too... ! c-town weather blows, im almost done with racing until about april.

the auto max's are fast but the manuals are a lot faster. and i believe the 95 max's were the hottest because it was the first yr with the new engine, and first yr cars for all manufacturers are always faster than newer ones. a race between us would be really close..... but watch out, im getting a bomz intake in a week :lol2: thats all im doing to it... saving up for some house or something.

really the only maxs or altys that can walk on me are the 3.5s. that is, if they are stick :evillol:

HiFlow5 0
10-27-2003, 08:26 AM
How come everyone always brags when they beat a 5.0? Must have been one hefty chick in the passengers seat to slow him down that much?
LOL

Seriously though, nice kill! :bigthumb:

-The Stig-
10-27-2003, 10:04 AM
the auto max's are fast but the manuals are a lot faster. and i believe the 95 max's were the hottest because it was the first yr with the new engine, and first yr cars for all manufacturers are always faster than newer ones.


I don't think that's quite true... at least not for all manufactures. Cause I can think of a ton of cars that got faster as the years went by, not slower.

GTStang
10-27-2003, 11:10 AM
How come everyone always brags when they beat a 5.0? Must have been one hefty chick in the passengers seat to slow him down that much?
LOL

Seriously though, nice kill! :bigthumb:

Must of been one hurting Stang.... The Mustang hit the gas first and got pulled a car length in 12-13mph change by a car that has run a best of 15.4. That chick musta been fucking huge!!!! :evillol:

SpyderEclipseGst
10-27-2003, 12:42 PM
dude i think we need to run.


As much as your cav might be quick, carrrnuttt has a good hp ratio/superior weight ratio. This race might not even be close. Sorry bro

mynismo
10-28-2003, 04:49 PM
Must of been one hurting Stang.... The Mustang hit the gas first and got pulled a car length in 12-13mph change by a car that has run a best of 15.4. That chick musta been fucking huge!!!! :evillol:
im thinking it was an auto 5.0, that'll help ya believe a little. it was not from a launch, but from a roll. 5.0s topend isn't all that great.

the 15.4 was what i did a few days ago.. it is a 14.9 stock. i had one shift in this one, so that pretty much explains it.. :smile:

doesn't matter i beat a 5.0! :biggrin: im just glad to beat any mustang. mustang's are hated anywhere in the c-town area

GTStang
10-28-2003, 06:57 PM
It's all good I believe it happenend. Of course 5.0's should be hated there or in Ohio... There is a lot of bad-ass Stangs in Ohio due to a lot of manufacturers and Performance garages centered around Mustangs there.

HiFlow5 0
10-28-2003, 08:23 PM
When I was in Bowling Green or even Cleveland, I saw a TON of Mustangs. There must be something in that area that keeps the Mustang fans around.

civicHBsi91
10-28-2003, 10:39 PM
i thought you had a 300zx with a 350 in it? i geuss i missed something or.... :screwy:

anyways nice kill

-The Stig-
10-28-2003, 10:50 PM
i thought you had a 300zx with a 350 in it? i geuss i missed something or.... :screwy:

anyways nice kill



Dude... that was like.. sooo last week. Where have you been?! :rolleyes:


:biggrin: :p

mynismo
10-28-2003, 11:07 PM
Dude... that was like.. sooo last week. Where have you been?! :rolleyes:


:biggrin: :p
haha redneck's on the dl
:naughty:


so, so many 5.0's by me. i was wondering why.

LOTS of newer gt's....... boy, im sorry but they make me sick there is so many of them. almost all are modded too

Layla's Keeper
10-28-2003, 11:49 PM
5.0's infest Ohio the way idiots infest Congress.

It's sickening, too, because every single one of them seems to feel they have something to prove.

Thus they are a fun target for those of us in Ohio with off-brand performance like my teammates 280Z, or my dad's Omni GLH.

From what I've seen, nothing pisses off a Mustang owner more than to be walked by a grey 1985 Dodge Omni.

DkShadow
10-29-2003, 01:16 AM
From what I've seen, nothing pisses off a Mustang owner more than to be walked by a grey 1985 Dodge Omni.

I wouldnt be pissed off, i would be laughing my ass off.

mynismo
10-29-2003, 03:49 PM
From what I've seen, nothing pisses off a Mustang owner more than to be walked by a grey 1985 Dodge Omni.
or the great dodge colt roaming around parma.... you see that thing???


hahaha... i still remember that lil black thing flying past me going almost 100 in a 35 zone down snow rd.

Polygon
10-29-2003, 05:55 PM
From what I've seen, nothing pisses off a Mustang owner more than to be walked by a grey 1985 Dodge Omni.

They got pretty pissed off when I would walk on em' in the LeBaron. They also hate getting beaten by a Turbo Mini-Van.:iceslolan

Anyhow; more than likely it was an 80s 5.0, they were dogs. Nice kill though, too bad he couldn't be cool about it. Most people aren't these days. :rolleyes:

HiFlow5 0
10-29-2003, 08:23 PM
They got pretty pissed off when I would walk on em' in the LeBaron. They also hate getting beaten by a Turbo Mini-Van.:iceslolan

Anyhow; more than likely it was an 80s 5.0, they were dogs. Nice kill though, too bad he couldn't be cool about it. Most people aren't these days. :rolleyes:
Early 80's yes, late 80's no.

mynismo
10-29-2003, 10:25 PM
Early 80's yes, late 80's no.
coulda been... but it looked very clean. there are a few 80s mustangs by me but they look like shitboxes. i doubt it was.... it was prolly a very early 90s auto 5.0

fatninja19
10-30-2003, 05:38 PM
I dont ever have to get mad becuase I never get beaten.. Especially by any stupid non-mustang vehicle. YA, thats right. I always win. You can ask all my friends. Just the sound of my v8 will tell you that I'm faster than anything in the world... (besides other Mustangs)

DkShadow
10-30-2003, 11:34 PM
I dont ever have to get mad becuase I never get beaten.. Especially by any stupid non-mustang vehicle. YA, thats right. I always win. You can ask all my friends. Just the sound of my v8 will tell you that I'm faster than anything in the world... (besides other Mustangs)
:grinyes: Yep, to Fast Mustangs... :cheers:




:evillol:

tha_new_guy
10-30-2003, 11:43 PM
:grinyes: Yep, to Fast Mustangs... :cheers:




:evillol:
Geez, You guys swarm when one speaks of a Mustang kill. Maybe it's for protection..... :grinno:

Layla's Keeper
10-30-2003, 11:46 PM
Ford Mustangs, the other contraceptive. :nutkick:

J/K :lol:

DkShadow
10-31-2003, 12:04 AM
Geez, You guys swarm when one speaks of a Mustang kill. Maybe it's for protection..... :grinno:
Its just that 80% of all "(insert car) V a Mustang" turns into a flamefest, I like getting a piece of the action. Besides, I like having my post count go up :p

fatninja19
10-31-2003, 01:55 AM
Geez, You guys swarm when one speaks of a Mustang kill. Maybe it's for protection..... :grinno:


I don't know what you're talking about dude.

HiFlow5 0
10-31-2003, 08:55 AM
Geez, You guys swarm when one speaks of a Mustang kill. Maybe it's for protection..... :grinno:
60% of the posts about whooping a car deal with Mustangs, half are BS, and the other half are actually legit. I have no problem if someone actually has a faster car then me. There's always someone faster out there, weather its an import or domestic.

90% of smack talked is about the Mustang. People seem to get off about downing Mustangs, must be some type of complex or jealously, I really have no clue though why it is?

People seem to forget about one's personal preference when it comes to cars and reasons of choice. It has become more of the make/model sport then an enthusiast sport lately. That makes me very sad, when we all have one major thing in common, but somehow it's constantly forgotten.

mynismo
10-31-2003, 11:21 PM
90% of smack talked is about the Mustang. People seem to get off about downing Mustangs, must be some type of complex or jealously, I really have no clue though why it is?
everyone in parma hates mustangs.

EVERYONE.

there is no inbetween. if you do like mustangs you SUCK.




of course that's only in parma..... i might actually like mustangs if there weren't so many of them here. 1 out of every 5 cars is a rumbling pony.

DkShadow
11-01-2003, 05:02 PM
everyone in parma hates mustangs.

EVERYONE.

there is no inbetween. if you do like mustangs you SUCK.




of course that's only in parma..... i might actually like mustangs if there weren't so many of them here. 1 out of every 5 cars is a rumbling pony.
Its Americas favorite sports car :D






Now dont go on a tantrum claiming the Mustang isnt a sports car :nono:

LoW_KeY
11-01-2003, 05:21 PM
60% of the posts about whooping a car deal with Mustangs, half are BS, and the other half are actually legit. I have no problem if someone actually has a faster car then me. There's always someone faster out there, weather its an import or domestic.

90% of smack talked is about the Mustang. People seem to get off about downing Mustangs, must be some type of complex or jealously, I really have no clue though why it is?




Try driving my car :wink: you get smack talked all the time :mad:

I like any sort of car long as the owners not a dickhead towards me and my car, but I agree people rant and rave they beat mustangs all the time. I'm guessing its because of the V8 status? my brother had one and I myself almost picked up an 88-93 style.

I could've had one hell of a running stang, considering I've gone through 2 motors on my current car cause I didn't know WTF I wanted for a motor :lol2:

I'll race anything.. if I lose so be it.. means I'll spend more money on mods :grinno:

good kill though!

fatninja19
11-02-2003, 02:21 PM
I'll race anything.. if I lose so be it.. means I'll spend more money on mods :grinno:

good kill though!



I second that.

83_Z28
11-02-2003, 04:56 PM
i dont like mustangs cuz there over rated....i saw a 98 gt dyno'd v6 w/ 183 hp....even tho its a 6 cylinder its should have 250hp......mustangs have the 302 which isnt a powerhouse engine, if u wanted a good mustang, get a 30 yr old 1 with a 351 cleveland because if a ford doesnt have the 351 its not a powerhouse engine and u have to add race parts that are less reliable for the engine, to get the hp over 300....just give me a chevy 350 w/ tuned port injection and ill race almost any1 and beat most of them..... no stang has enuf ponies under the hood to race a true sports car in a real race....the open interstate....btw....my dad has raced all types of mustangs and camaro's on his motorcycle, beats them all, but the camaro's will give him the better race, he was about to race a shelby cobra but thought he'd lose, he was sayin at 65 mph the car was goin from 65 to 80 back to 65 in no time........i wish he woulda raced it i wonder if he woulda won, he has a honda magna 750cc

-The Stig-
11-02-2003, 06:57 PM
i dont like mustangs cuz there over rated....i saw a 98 gt dyno'd v6 w/ 183 hp....even tho its a 6 cylinder its should have 250hp......mustangs have the 302 which isnt a powerhouse engine, if u wanted a good mustang, get a 30 yr old 1 with a 351 cleveland because if a ford doesnt have the 351 its not a powerhouse engine and u have to add race parts that are less reliable for the engine, to get the hp over 300....just give me a chevy 350 w/ tuned port injection and ill race almost any1 and beat most of them..... no stang has enuf ponies under the hood to race a true sports car in a real race....the open interstate....btw....my dad has raced all types of mustangs and camaro's on his motorcycle, beats them all, but the camaro's will give him the better race, he was about to race a shelby cobra but thought he'd lose, he was sayin at 65 mph the car was goin from 65 to 80 back to 65 in no time........i wish he woulda raced it i wonder if he woulda won, he has a honda magna 750cc


... Remind me to cut your balls off...

HiFlow5 0
11-02-2003, 10:33 PM
i dont like mustangs cuz there over rated....i saw a 98 gt dyno'd v6 w/ 183 hp....even tho its a 6 cylinder its should have 250hp......mustangs have the 302 which isnt a powerhouse engine, if u wanted a good mustang, get a 30 yr old 1 with a 351 cleveland because if a ford doesnt have the 351 its not a powerhouse engine and u have to add race parts that are less reliable for the engine, to get the hp over 300....just give me a chevy 350 w/ tuned port injection and ill race almost any1 and beat most of them..... no stang has enuf ponies under the hood to race a true sports car in a real race....the open interstate....btw....my dad has raced all types of mustangs and camaro's on his motorcycle, beats them all, but the camaro's will give him the better race, he was about to race a shelby cobra but thought he'd lose, he was sayin at 65 mph the car was goin from 65 to 80 back to 65 in no time........i wish he woulda raced it i wonder if he woulda won, he has a honda magna 750cc
First off you can't have a GT and V6 in the same model, sorry that was never an option. So you think a 98 V6 should put out 250 hp? Come on now. :screwy: Are you serious? The 98 V6 3.8L motor is rated at 150 hp at 4000 rpms. The 98 GT 4.6L motor is rated at 225 hp at 4750 rpms. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.

And where do yo get off saying the 302 isn't a powerhouse? My 302 is putting out an estimated 325-350 BHP, and gets me into the mid 13's on street tires with a crappy automatic.

83_Z28
11-02-2003, 11:49 PM
a 302 bare basic is a weak motor.....the ones they put in stang's are modified from the basic 302 and those mustangs are only meant for around town....they top at 130-140 if im correct may be wrong......i was watchin one of those tv shows on tnn and the guy put his ford gt on a dyno im assuming it was v6 mainly because it put out 183 hp.....he put headers and did electronic work to it and only got it to run 203 or 213 hp.....that 180 hp is pathetic tho my moms impala puts out that much and its more like a luxury car....it should have over 220 hp considering a luxury car has as much hp as it

-The Stig-
11-03-2003, 12:07 AM
a 302 bare basic is a weak motor.....the ones they put in stang's are modified from the basic 302 and those mustangs are only meant for around town....they top at 130-140 if im correct may be wrong......i was watchin one of those tv shows on tnn and the guy put his ford gt on a dyno im assuming it was v6 mainly because it put out 183 hp.....he put headers and did electronic work to it and only got it to run 203 or 213 hp.....that 180 hp is pathetic tho my moms impala puts out that much and its more like a luxury car....it should have over 220 hp considering a luxury car has as much hp as it



Hey... you do realise that what a car produces at the Crank (BHP) is different from what it makes at the wheels (WHP) right?

So a 1998 Mustang GT making 225hp stock, putting down 183hp to the ground aint bad... and with headers and electronic upgrades making a 20hp gain in WHEEL horsepower is pretty damn good.

So why don't you go learn a bit more before you bash something you know little about.

And topping out at 130-140mph aint shabby, I'm a die-hard Chevy fan but you'll he hard pressed to get a Tuned-port 3rd Gen F-body any faster than that.


:banghead:

83_Z28
11-03-2003, 12:20 AM
i realize 130-140 mph is fast but i just think its sad it has the same hp at the wheel as an impala, something is wrong there an impala w/ same hp as what a sports car has, just sounds weak in my opinion

Layla's Keeper
11-03-2003, 02:12 AM
Purest sports car in production today makes about 230 hp; the Caterham Super 7. Guess what, that's less horsepower than a Dodge Intrepid.

Horsepower means absolutely NOTHING in a REAL sports car. A Lotus Elise only makes 156hp, and I dare anyone to call that anything but a sports car. Or how about classics like Austin-Healey Sprites, Fiat X1/9's, Triumph Spitfires, MG Midgets, Lotus Europas, Honda S800's, and Sunbeam Alpines? Not a car on that list making more than 150hp stock and they're all finer sports cars than most will ever dream of.

Your lack of knowledge is startlingly apparant, and your inability to produce a proper argument is entertaining. You throw around terms like "sports car" so loosely that it's intolerable to those of us who KNOW what a sports car is. You make sweeping statements about power and engine quality without giving any reason as to why these are, here I laugh hysterically, "fact".

If you please, take your grossly underinformed opinions and blatantly idiotic bias elsewhere. Quite frankly, it gets on my nerves.

fatninja19
11-03-2003, 03:16 AM
I think my lightly bolt on'ed weak ass 302 combined with my shitty driving would give your a tpi 350 a good run.


Oh ya, and your dad probaly lied to you.

GTStang
11-03-2003, 04:20 AM
I think my lightly bolt on'ed weak ass 302 combined with my shitty driving would give your a tpi 350 a good run.


Oh ya, and your dad probaly lied to you.

What are you talking about??? A stock 350TPI owns a 5.0 Mustang :rofl:

Like that kid knows who his real daddy is... :grinno:

83_Z28
11-03-2003, 10:07 AM
mustangs arnt the lightest cars on the road they dont rev as high like the others either so i dont see how it would be considered a sports car of today with it weighing about 3k lbs while the camaro weighs about 3300, so weight is thrown out. rpm can also help in a race but ive never seen a mustang rev real high so im yet to see why the mustang v-6 is supposed to be a sports car...looks?

-The Stig-
11-03-2003, 10:39 AM
mustangs arnt the lightest cars on the road they dont rev as high like the others either so i dont see how it would be considered a sports car of today with it weighing about 3k lbs while the camaro weighs about 3300, so weight is thrown out. rpm can also help in a race but ive never seen a mustang rev real high so im yet to see why the mustang v-6 is supposed to be a sports car...looks?

Holy Shit dude...

You really seem to think weight has something to do with being a 'sports' car?

First of all, the Camaro weighs abouth 3400-3500lbs depending on options. The newer mustangs weigh about 3300-3400lbs depending on options.

Secondly, A Mustang motor can rev just as high as a Chevy motor... your precious TunedPort's peak power is just at around 5000rpm. Gosh, thats like... a 5.0' Mustangs peak power isn't it?

Third, Back on the weight thing... You seem to think weight has something to do with it. Obviously a lighter car helps, but do you realise that most of the worlds premire sports cars weigh incredible amounts?

Ferrari 550 Maranello - 3726lbs
Lamborghini Murcielago - 3638lbs
Aston Martin DB7 - 3914lbs
Jaguar XK Coupe - 3827lbs

And yet they're all still fast...


And Finally, who said anything about the Base V6 Mustang being a 'sports' car... I realise the chassis of the Mustang is sporty, but in the base form neither the Mustang or Camaro has much to brag about with the V6 power plants. Remember here, we're talking about the V8 cars here.

83_Z28
11-03-2003, 10:47 AM
i never meant weight having to be a major part in classfying what a car is.....it just help bieng lighter.....also u were talkin about lotus and stuff having less hp, well they weigh a whole lot less and they rev higher than the mustang 6 cylinder.....and the cars u put down doesnt compare to what were talkin about, why take everything to extremes? those cars have 400+hp so u cant really compare those cars to a stang there excellent race cars db7 =3836lbs 1740kg and produces 600bhp
lamborghini = 3637 lbs and produces 580 bhp
Ferrari 550 marnello = 485 bhp and 3725 lbs
jaguar = 390 bhp and weighs 3700

Layla's Keeper
11-03-2003, 05:44 PM
You've missed the point entirely. Weight NOR horsepower mean anything to a sports car. I'll rarely contend that a Mustang is a sports car. A performance car, definitely. One of the premier performance bargains in production today. Definitely, but a sports car is more than the sum of its parts, specs, or design.

Sports cars, REAL SPORTS CARS, are emotive. They evoke a certain ideal that escapes even some of the most brazenly fast performance machines in existence. A sports car is motoring nirvana, it's a machine created by artisans to give its driver the ultimate pleasure of driving. Sports cars are created not to get the driver to his destination quicker, but to make the driver wnat to make his journey longer.

Sports cars are an intangible philosophy bordering on automotive religion. In no way can anyone truly define a sports car without driving every single one in existence. Sports cars transcend specifications.

fatninja19
11-03-2003, 07:05 PM
Remember here, we're talking about the V8 cars here.


Aww shit.. ...;lak djfa089u-3a8-098469aw 90asdaw.ejr!@%@!2$j6w3lk5 6lk54j7547 ..... I thought we were talking about 5.0 V6's the whole time!! Crap................

GTS1
11-10-2003, 10:43 PM
In indiana back in te late 80`s mustangs and 5.0 capri`s were good easy to build street racers I had a 89 notchback with 3.73 and the exhaust it ran well low 13`s. most gt then ran 14 plus so I was happy I now have my little colt which is crazy ride, I guess the point was when the 85 stang came out it ran good, better than many many stangs before it and to alot it was the car to beat, cheap and easy to fix up.....

skinz347
03-20-2005, 10:26 PM
OK first off,everyone is talking about mustangs mustangs mustangs. hmm sounds like you guys really have problems keeping up with them. Just for your info, where I live theres not mustangs up the ass. More like imports, camaros, LS1's ect. My 91 GT auto! waxed a LS1 with exhaust, 373 gears, chip, not to mention it was a manual. Thats when I was running 13.8s with my little ol 302! Personally I dont hate any make or model, as long as its fast and fun. And to people whom think a 350 tpi, will beat a 302 efi stock? I've already seen it all the 5.0 always prevails!!

skinz347
03-20-2005, 10:36 PM
... Remind me to cut your balls off...

Ok your an idiot first off. You say the 302 isn't anything, well if you knew anything about motors thats what most guys run in the NMRA, oh yeah thats National Mustang Racing Association. Have you heard of a stroker? MY 302 has a 347 stroker stuffed in it, all motor with an Automatic Overdrive made 325 rwhp, and 362 rwtq. This year I should be around the 400 rwhp mark, with the help of a custom camshaft, and a c-4 tranny. I would take your 13 second, or at best 12 second 350 tune port piece of shit any day of the week. And don't even get me started with the 351, becuse that motor should be the one we compare against the 350, but why? Because the 302 can already whip its ass!

CivRacer95
03-20-2005, 10:39 PM
First off you're a noob. Welcome to AF. Second of all, don't bring back old threads. Third, don't start crap with any mods, name calling is a big no no here at AF. Bring your attitude level from ass to somewhat formal. Maybe some may actually take a liking to you. I hope your stay here at AF isn't short lived. L8...

93rollaracer
03-20-2005, 11:02 PM
:banhim:

YES!! I made it.

carrrnuttt
03-21-2005, 12:12 AM
Banned.

Come back when you grow a brain, which means, never come back.

Also, the moderator you decided to bash, is a Chevy guy, who was actually DEFENDING Ford's 302's.

Dumbass.

-The Stig-
03-21-2005, 12:16 AM
Banned.

Come back when you grow a brain, which means, never come back.

Also, the moderator you decided to bash, is a Chevy guy, who was actually DEFENDING Ford's 302's.

Dumbass.



lol... Priceless.

Add your comment to this topic!


Quality Real Meat Nutrition for Dogs: Best Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef Dog Food | Best Beef Dog Food