94 mustang
andyfrigge
10-14-2003, 07:59 PM
i have a 90 mustnag convertible, but was looking for more power, and found a good deal on a 94 gt convertible. i was wondering a few things, hows gas mileage? does anyone have any problems with this type? and what is the standard equipment?
thanks
thanks
GTStang
10-14-2003, 08:02 PM
Is ya 90 Vert a 5.0. Cause if you are looking for a faster car the 94 isn't going to do it.
andyfrigge
10-14-2003, 08:21 PM
no its a 2.3L 4 cyl, but its no better than the 90 5.0 in terms of power?
CB91StangGT
10-14-2003, 09:30 PM
Th SN-95's were heavier than the foxes and rated at 215hp compared to the 225hp of the fox. If your looking for handling and good suspension/brakes, than the 94 would be the way to go.
HiFlow5 0
10-15-2003, 08:03 AM
no its a 2.3L 4 cyl, but its no better than the 90 5.0 in terms of power?
How is that?
How is that?
[SS]Disabled
10-15-2003, 08:19 AM
no its a 2.3L 4 cyl, but its no better than the 90 5.0 in terms of power?
Ofcaurse a 2.3 isnt better than 5.0, so get a 1990 conv but 5.0 instead of 2.3. :screwy:
Ofcaurse a 2.3 isnt better than 5.0, so get a 1990 conv but 5.0 instead of 2.3. :screwy:
'Dre
10-15-2003, 08:34 AM
no its a 2.3L 4 cyl, but its no better than the 90 5.0 in terms of power?
what do you mean? are you trying to say that the 2.3 and 5.0 are equal in power? if so please explain because that doesn't make sense....either way explain what you are trying to say
what do you mean? are you trying to say that the 2.3 and 5.0 are equal in power? if so please explain because that doesn't make sense....either way explain what you are trying to say
Los
10-15-2003, 01:22 PM
Th SN-95's were heavier than the foxes and rated at 215hp compared to the 225hp of the fox. If your looking for handling and good suspension/brakes, than the 94 would be the way to go.
If you wanna get technical, Ford redid the formula used to rate the hp on the mustangs. In 1993, the GT pushed 205hp, down from 225 in 92. Then, following suit, if the 94-95 GT pushed 215, wouldn't you be inclined to think that the powerrating is actually greater than the previous generations?
If you wanna get technical, Ford redid the formula used to rate the hp on the mustangs. In 1993, the GT pushed 205hp, down from 225 in 92. Then, following suit, if the 94-95 GT pushed 215, wouldn't you be inclined to think that the powerrating is actually greater than the previous generations?
andyfrigge
10-15-2003, 04:01 PM
i meant is the 94 gt 5.0 any more powerful than the 90 5.0
boosted331
10-15-2003, 05:49 PM
i meant is the 94 gt 5.0 any more powerful than the 90 5.0
the 94 is rated as being less powerful, but I'm thinking ford was doing that to soften the transition to the 215 horse mod motors. Since a 94 is a lot heavier than a fox the car will be slower than a 5.0 fox.
the 94 is rated as being less powerful, but I'm thinking ford was doing that to soften the transition to the 215 horse mod motors. Since a 94 is a lot heavier than a fox the car will be slower than a 5.0 fox.
HiFlow5 0
10-15-2003, 07:39 PM
the 94 is rated as being less powerful, but I'm thinking ford was doing that to soften the transition to the 215 horse mod motors. Since a 94 is a lot heavier than a fox the car will be slower than a 5.0 fox.
LOS is correct, the way a cars HP levels were rated changed in 93, to a more efficient method.
If you wanna get technical, Ford redid the formula used to rate the hp on the mustangs. In 1993, the GT pushed 205hp, down from 225 in 92. Then, following suit, if the 94-95 GT pushed 215, wouldn't you be inclined to think that the powerrating is actually greater than the previous generations?
LOS is correct, the way a cars HP levels were rated changed in 93, to a more efficient method.
If you wanna get technical, Ford redid the formula used to rate the hp on the mustangs. In 1993, the GT pushed 205hp, down from 225 in 92. Then, following suit, if the 94-95 GT pushed 215, wouldn't you be inclined to think that the powerrating is actually greater than the previous generations?
GTStang
10-16-2003, 08:52 AM
If you wanna get technical, Ford redid the formula used to rate the hp on the mustangs. In 1993, the GT pushed 205hp, down from 225 in 92. Then, following suit, if the 94-95 GT pushed 215, wouldn't you be inclined to think that the powerrating is actually greater than the previous generations?
Even taking this into consideration. The weight is still the deciding factor on which of the 2 cars will be faster.
Even taking this into consideration. The weight is still the deciding factor on which of the 2 cars will be faster.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2026