Our Community is over 1 Million Strong. Join Us.

Stop Feeding Overpriced Junk to Your Dogs!

GET HEALTHY AFFORDABLE DOG FOOD
DEVELOPED BY THE AUTOMOTIVEFORUMS.COM FOUNDER & THE TOP AMERICAN BULLDOG BREEDER IN THE WORLD THROUGH DECADES OF EXPERIENCE. WE KNOW DOGS.
CONSUMED BY HUNDREDS OF GRAND FUTURE AMERICAN BULLDOGS FOR YEARS.
NOW AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR THE FIRST TIME
PROPER NUTRITION FOR ALL BREEDS & AGES
TRY GRAND FUTURE AIR DRIED BEEF DOG FOOD

We will slaughter the new RX-8


Pages : [1] 2

lordrashmi
09-05-2003, 10:25 PM
So I just drove my friends new RX-8. It was an automatic so it only had 197 HP, but for a small car, I figured it would be a rocket. Much to my surprise, it was pretty sluggish. My 190 HP "Family Car" with an automatic transmission is much more responsive.

I am sure that the MT version of the RX-8 is much more responsive with 250 HP and a 6speed, but still...

Unfortunately, I didn't have a chance to really test the handling of it, but it did seem to handle nicely.

thrasher
09-05-2003, 10:36 PM
So I just drove my friends new RX-8. It was an automatic so it only had 197 HP, but for a small car, I figured it would be a rocket. Much to my surprise, it was pretty sluggish. My 190 HP "Family Car" with an automatic transmission is much more responsive.

I am sure that the MT version of the RX-8 is much more responsive with 250 HP and a 6speed, but still...

Unfortunately, I didn't have a chance to really test the handling of it, but it did seem to handle nicely.

i have driven a 6 speed, and i have to say any qualms you have with the power of the crappy engine will be laid to rest if you drive it. oh, by the way, best handling car i have ever driven!!

bk2kmax
09-06-2003, 07:36 AM
So I just drove my friends new RX-8. It was an automatic so it only had 197 HP, but for a small car, I figured it would be a rocket. Much to my surprise, it was pretty sluggish. My 190 HP "Family Car" with an automatic transmission is much more responsive.

I am sure that the MT version of the RX-8 is much more responsive with 250 HP and a 6speed, but still...

Unfortunately, I didn't have a chance to really test the handling of it, but it did seem to handle nicely.


They quoted a 0-60 (Magazine Race time) of 5.8 seconds to 60 and I believe they said the 1/4 came up in about 14.2 sec at 99 mph. Maybe a 2k2/2k3 can take him but I wouldn't even dream of trying him.
They have a high winding tach, I think it revs out to 9k, so you have to rev it pretty high from the start and dump the clutch to get a good enough launch to do the 5.8 it takes to get to 60.

Screw that, that is too much work, just give me a Z and I will spank his @$$ without all the clutch dropping drama.

VQmax95
09-06-2003, 03:08 PM
Screw that, that is too much work, just give me a Z and I will spank his @$$ without all the clutch dropping drama.

:werd: And the Z is better looking too.

Paonessa
09-06-2003, 07:43 PM
:werd: And the Z is better looking too.
i don't know if i'd agree there.

Paonessa
09-06-2003, 07:44 PM
:werd: And the Z is better looking too.
i don't know if i'd agree there. the whole new mazda line looks pretty damn good. 'specially the new 6.

deadmaninc
09-06-2003, 10:38 PM
I think that 5.8 time must have been a 6spd with the correct hp because most times i have seen for that car is 6.0 and saw on a RX-8 forum that some have only gotten 6.4 the same as a G35 sedan auto and Maxima manual.

joeB
09-07-2003, 12:39 AM
I bet I could beat one with my 3.5 SE.
The Mazda looks nice, but kinda odd too. :grinno:

lordrashmi
09-07-2003, 01:31 AM
That 5.8 had to be the the 6 speed.... There is no way that the automatic could do that.

They are both nice looking cars, I think the Z has nicer lines, but the RX-8 looks more aggressive. Hey, I would drive either one.

bk2kmax
09-07-2003, 09:47 AM
I bet I could beat one with my 3.5 SE.
The Mazda looks nice, but kinda odd too. :grinno:

I bet you could too. Hey JoeB are you on Freshalloy.com Nissan forums?

joeB
09-07-2003, 01:19 PM
Yep, Its cool, here and there are my visiting places. :p
You visit freshalloy too?

bk2kmax
09-07-2003, 02:02 PM
Yep, Its cool, here and there are my visiting places. :p
You visit freshalloy too?

I'm on there as a member with the same name.

joeB
09-07-2003, 04:21 PM
Do you go to the Maxima site forums on there? :redface:

Partisan
09-07-2003, 04:51 PM
Being naturally asperated, the RX-8 has much lower low-end torque than the turbocharged models. When a supercharged or turboed model is available, the low end torque will certainly increase.

farbod
09-07-2003, 04:53 PM
how much does it costs

bk2kmax
09-07-2003, 07:02 PM
Do you go to the Maxima site forums on there? :redface:

Yes, sometimes but mostly I go to the Off Topic and Road Kills forums because the Max forum over there seems to be kinda slow.

KoRnboy
09-07-2003, 11:28 PM
how much does it costs


I saw $32,XXX for an auto at the local dealer, I think ~$34,XXX for the manual it just came in to the deal ther other day and I've not been out there to check it out.

Frankly I think they're all ugly, the RX-8 is a sedan that was kicked in the ass. The 6 is ok with an aero kit... I'm sorry for $32,000 I'd go buy a Z or a S2000 and kick the shit out of that POS. Stupid Fords...

The new Z's are okay... atleast with the aero kit, to me the Z32 is still the most sexy car in the world. :bigthumb:

joeB
09-08-2003, 03:47 AM
Yes, sometimes but mostly I go to the Off Topic and Road Kills forums because the Max forum over there seems to be kinda slow.

cool, car lounge has alot of Honda people on there. I dont get
it.... :grinyes:

bk2kmax
09-08-2003, 07:40 AM
cool, car lounge has alot of Honda people on there. I dont get
it.... :grinyes:

Most of the Honda guys are pretty cool, it's just those Ricertypes with their "I can beat everything because I have a FastnFurious Civic with the big Fartcan exhaust and huge Tachometer on my dash" attitude that aren't cool.

I talk daily with Honda guys here and for the most part 99% of them respect Nissan, especially the Max, Z/G and the Skyline, they even admit that Maximas own them unless they are boosted some kinda way.

I just wouldn't go over to a Honda forum where those Ricertypes hang out at and try to convince them of anything remotely pertaining to our cars because they'll start talking that "Well we can make our cars faster easy just by adding">whatever, your input here.

farbod
09-08-2003, 12:09 PM
wicked that awsome

EPVQ30
09-09-2003, 01:40 AM
does it have a rotary engine?.. i'm not too fond of those cars anyway. i love my max!

farbod
09-09-2003, 11:11 AM
now way i
i cant wait to get my new car

Paonessa
09-09-2003, 01:07 PM
does it have a rotary engine?.. i'm not too fond of those cars anyway. i love my max!
yeah it's a 1.3 renesis rotary. 250 hp 159 torque. low ass torque but it's a rotary so it makes up for some of the lack of torque. i like them they have potential and eventhough it is a ford, so is aston martin.

farbod
09-09-2003, 03:33 PM
you cant call a ford a for an aston martin even if it is made by ford

:eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7: :eek7:

Paonessa
09-09-2003, 07:52 PM
you cant call a ford a for an aston martin even if it is made by ford


why not? if you can call that english, i can call a skyline a geo metro

KoRnboy
09-10-2003, 12:53 AM
Mazda is owned by Ford, therefor, it's a Ford. As I said the RX-8 is fugly it looks like a Sedan that was kicked in the ass. I have no input on the Renesis engine, I've HEARD it's supposed to be more reliable, and heard RUMORS that the RX-7 is to return? No idea but one thing is for sure the Renesis is one light ass engine, so who knows maybe they'll turn out Ok, though that doesn't change the fact they're ugly as hell. :2cents:

farbod
09-11-2003, 11:55 AM
no youve got it all wrong
audi makes lamborgahini you dont see people with audis saying a lambo
same goes with volkswagen and bugatti and smart mclaren and mercs

Stimpsonjcat2
09-11-2003, 02:16 PM
Whoever got that time must have been testing it downhill. I test drove this car - was gonna buy it for my wife. It is sluggish in 1st gear - you have to wind it up to about 8k rpms before you get any power at all. Same thing in all the gear - gotta keep the rpms through the roof to get any giddy-yup. Most Maximas will blow the doors off the rx-8.

Oh and by the way the rx-8 is sexy as hell. It looks to me like an old 60's british Bond-type car. Friggin beautiful. Sexy yes, but performance is nowhere near advertised.

thrasher
09-11-2003, 11:46 PM
no youve got it all wrong
audi makes lamborgahini you dont see people with audis saying a lambo
same goes with volkswagen and bugatti and smart mclaren and mercs

audi does not make lambourghinis, they are very much still their own "company". lambo is part of Volkswagen AG, the corporation, as is Audi. Aston is part of Ford motor company. they all have seperate plants, although they do share some(not many) parts. design and engineering is shared somewhat also, but they still operate seperately

farbod
09-12-2003, 02:30 PM
dont you know lambo is owned by audi
its buggati that volkswagen own get you facts right

KoRnboy
09-12-2003, 02:37 PM
dont you know lambo is owned by audi
its buggati that volkswagen own get you facts right


Did you know Hostes makes Twinkies?

:gives:

farbod
09-12-2003, 02:49 PM
bloody good one man ok will cut of all the AUDI OWNS LAMBO stuff and do back to rx-8 just one more thing

:useless:

Paonessa
09-12-2003, 04:26 PM
dont you know lambo is owned by audi
its buggati that volkswagen own get you facts right
:lol: :lol: :lol: :cwm27: :cwm27: :cwm27: :lol2: :lol2: :rofl: :rofl:
:rofl: :rofl:
:headshake :headshake :headshake :headshake :headshake :headshake :screwy: :screwy: :screwy: :screwy: :screwy:

farbod
09-13-2003, 05:33 PM
:nono: :nono: :nono: :nono: :nono: :nono:
:sly: :sly: :sly: :sly: :sly: :sly:
:cwm27: :cwm27: :cwm27: :cwm27: :cwm27: :cwm27:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:grinyes: :grinyes: :grinyes: :grinyes: :grinyes: :grinyes:
:iceslolan :iceslolan :iceslolan :iceslolan :iceslolan :iceslolan

thrasher
09-13-2003, 06:20 PM
dont you know lambo is owned by audi
its buggati that volkswagen own get you facts right

you dipshit, they are all part of the same corporation = volkswagen AG

you're the one who said audi MAKES lambourghini. get my facts right, that's a good one

farbod
09-13-2003, 06:25 PM
:lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2: :lol2:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:naughty: :naughty: :naughty: :naughty: :naughty: :naughty:
yeh whatever can we move on know

:useless:

Paonessa
09-13-2003, 07:02 PM
you dipshit, they are all part of the same corporation = volkswagen AG

you're the one who said audi MAKES lambourghini. get my facts right, that's a good one
no offense directly to you farbod but that's funny. we have a few members on here that say shit without thinking it through first and making sure they're correct, no names mentioned of course "cough cough JoeB cough cough"

farbod
09-13-2003, 07:05 PM
sorry its just that i remember reading somewhere that audi owned lambo
but today on all the sites that i whent on sais nothing about it so i must have been wrong

Paonessa
09-13-2003, 10:37 PM
you're not really wrong but since VW owns audi they also own lamborghini. it's like ford owning volvo, mazda, Aston Martin, and jaguar among a few others.

joeB
09-13-2003, 10:53 PM
no offense directly to you farbod but that's funny. we have a few members on here that say shit without thinking it through first and making sure they're correct, no names mentioned of course "cough cough JoeB cough cough"


well you think you know everything about cars.
Just like you saying there were no 02 accords
made, and you posted wrong weight before on 95
and 96 Maximas, until I told you the correct weight.
Maybe you need to research before posting. :banhim:

Paonessa
09-13-2003, 11:22 PM
well you think you know everything about cars.
Just like you saying there were no 02 accords
made, and you posted wrong weight before on 95
and 96 Maximas, until I told you the correct weight.
Maybe you need to research before posting. :banhim:
a 1995 5 speed maxima weighs 2895 lbs, i had one buddy and the weight is right on the registration. i don't remember ever having a conversation or dispute about weight of a maxima and i don't need a little weiner like you to tell me anything about a 4th gen max, not because i know everything but because you're just a fuckin' jerk-off and i'd tell you to prove that we even had the afore mentioned conversation but i think the rest of this forum is beginning to realize that you like to make unsubstantiated claims with no intention of backing them up.

now we should end this before i do get banned, or at least keep it in one thread.

joeB
09-13-2003, 11:56 PM
Its ok for you to say whatever you want to me, but when I say
anything back to you Im an ass. We did have the weight conversation
before, but Im not the winer you are. You dont need to learn
everything from me, but why are you here if you dont want to learn
anything? How do I make claims without backing them up?
We could of kept it to one thread, but your the one who brought
it here. But you will prolly go and post again and start with the
imature name calling.

joeB
09-14-2003, 12:21 AM
I still have my 95 and 96 Maxima brochure
and the weight for a 5 speed SE is 3010.

If you have anymore questions let me know.

Paonessa
09-14-2003, 12:51 AM
I still have my 95 and 96 Maxima brochure
and the weight for a 5 speed SE is 3010.

If you have anymore questions let me know.
i also have my brochure from my 95 and while it does say 3010 on the back page, that's where a wonderful thing called options come in to play. leather seats vs cloth seats could make the dif of 15 lbs, as could heated seats, dual power seats, fog lights, a spoiler, six speaker bose system, and of course the sunroof which was optional on all models. not to mention you're picking apart my response too much. that's the exact number on the registration from my 95 so that's what i tell people it weighs. if a person said "what's the weight on a 95 maxima" i'd say "3000lbs", i wouldn't really be wrong, would i? now stop being retarted.

joeB
09-14-2003, 04:43 PM
yea, maybe 10 to 20 pounds. stop calling names .

Paonessa
09-14-2003, 07:30 PM
yea, maybe 10 to 20 pounds. stop calling names .
i'll stop calling you a dick and a retard when you stop acting like a retarted dick. now just leave it the fuck alone dude.

KoRnboy
09-14-2003, 08:35 PM
But I heard they're 3010.66988431332 lbs .... what do you say abou that? :cwm27:


:gives:

joeB
09-15-2003, 12:32 AM
i'll stop calling you a dick and a retard when you stop acting like a retarted dick. now just leave it the fuck alone dude.

You just keep showing how dumb you are.
:lol2:

KoRnboy
09-15-2003, 02:10 AM
Now children, play nice, or else it's to your rooms. :nono:

thrasher
09-15-2003, 02:18 AM
i'm not gonna lie, you guys are fucking hilarious when you duke it you like this :icon16:

MaxRX7
09-15-2003, 10:16 AM
I have to admit that the RX-8 is weak just like the S2000 :headshake

deadmaninc
09-15-2003, 09:07 PM
I just recently read that the S2000 is getting updated for 2004. Its getting a rework on the rear suspension. Red line is dropped to 8k instead of 9 to better compete with the RX8 and has about 12 ft of tq and tq and hp maxes out at a lower rpm rage . This would mean faster 0-60 times if done better. Also 2005 RX-8 is going to get their hp fixed to get what they are suppose to be getting.

KoRnboy
09-15-2003, 11:29 PM
Yeah, umm 2005? Why wait? Sounds like :bs: to me.

BP2K2Max
09-16-2003, 01:08 PM
yo joeB,
my good friend Paonessa seems to have been banned from these here forums too, i think some lil queer reported him but he did get this message:

"Your messed up, you go on the accord or Maxima forums again, and
say newer ALtimas and Maximas are getting worse. Your the dumb ass
posting things you dont even know what your talking about.
Stop being a jealous bitch boy. :lol2:"

and he wanted me to tell you a few things for him
1) if i'm so dumb, i mean if he's so dumb, how come you can't use a contraction to save your life. do you mean you'RE messed up and you'RE the dumb-ass? as in YOU ARE? yeah, thought so retard.
2) widespread MAFS sensors don't show a lack in build quality to you? does to me, and then comes the fact that honda's customer service is 10x better than most of ours.
3) and lastly how can you call me childish and immature when you call me, i mean him, such gay ass names as bitch boy and Baby, are you 11 or something? you're a piece of work joe. and i'm not jealous of you're altima or a new accord or a new maxima. i got my own full size, fully capable puntang mobile right here.

BP2K2Max
09-16-2003, 01:23 PM
I just recently read that the S2000 is getting updated for 2004. Its getting a rework on the rear suspension. Red line is dropped to 8k instead of 9 to better compete with the RX8 and has about 12 ft of tq and tq and hp maxes out at a lower rpm rage . This would mean faster 0-60 times if done better. Also 2005 RX-8 is going to get their hp fixed to get what they are suppose to be getting.

yeah they increased the displacement to a 2.2 from a 2.0 so you don't have to rev it so high to get good performance out of it.

farbod
09-16-2003, 01:24 PM
guys calm down

lordrashmi
09-16-2003, 01:34 PM
No let them fight... It is very entertaining....

farbod
09-16-2003, 01:36 PM
what i was expectin you to stop them fighting not to encourige it

MaxRX7
09-16-2003, 03:46 PM
I still have to say that the RX-8 is still very fucking cherry. I'll rather have a G35 though :sunglasse

MaxRX7
09-16-2003, 03:57 PM
http://www.teamfc3s.org/forum/attachment.php?s=&postid=115902
yeah w3rd :eek:

Add your comment to this topic!