Mini Boobs
sugarcaddy
08-04-2003, 03:52 PM
http://files.automotiveforums.com/uploads/308126boobs_car.jpg
Where can I get this??? :bigthumb:
Scott
Where can I get this??? :bigthumb:
Scott
freakray
08-04-2003, 04:13 PM
Probably the nicest headlights we'll ever see on a Mini...
Sneaks off with lame comment award
Sneaks off with lame comment award
YogsVR4
08-04-2003, 04:46 PM
Originally posted by freakray
Probably the nicest headlights we'll ever see on a Mini...
Sneaks off with lame comment award
:slap:
Probably the nicest headlights we'll ever see on a Mini...
Sneaks off with lame comment award
:slap:
trevolutionist
08-04-2003, 06:16 PM
that is quite possibly the only mini i wouldn't smash to bits, light on fire, and piss on the ashes (or molten metal)..... wow...
Amish_kid
08-04-2003, 06:26 PM
For a Mini those things don't look to small to me.
TheNotoriousMogg
08-04-2003, 11:02 PM
those are cool :iceslolan
slave
08-04-2003, 11:12 PM
Thats cool!!! I like...
ac427cpe
08-05-2003, 01:11 AM
but they're not flashing us! i mean the headlights aren't on yet... i mean... i'll go
RaceMySS_454
08-05-2003, 01:19 AM
Originally posted by ac427cpe
but they're not flashing us! i mean the headlights aren't on yet... i mean... i'll go
i was dumb and tried to click the box in your avatar.......im high on model paints :cwm27: :cwm27:
but they're not flashing us! i mean the headlights aren't on yet... i mean... i'll go
i was dumb and tried to click the box in your avatar.......im high on model paints :cwm27: :cwm27:
Oz
08-05-2003, 03:22 AM
Nasty Nips. Between her legs by her 3rd oil change.:dogpile:
Jimster
08-05-2003, 04:56 AM
MINI= :worshippy
That MINI= :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
That MINI= :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
trevolutionist
08-05-2003, 09:18 AM
Originally posted by Jimster
MINI= :worshippy
That MINI= :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
correction:
MINI= :lol: :thefinger :loser:
MINI= :worshippy
That MINI= :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
correction:
MINI= :lol: :thefinger :loser:
Jimster
08-05-2003, 11:54 PM
Originally posted by trevolutionist
correction:
MINI= :lol: :thefinger :loser:
correction- you ignorant opinion= :lol: :thefinger :loser: and :rolleyes: for good measure
correction:
MINI= :lol: :thefinger :loser:
correction- you ignorant opinion= :lol: :thefinger :loser: and :rolleyes: for good measure
corvettezman
08-06-2003, 09:56 PM
it's not how small it is it's how u use it. from goldmember.:biggrin:
trevolutionist
08-07-2003, 02:43 AM
Originally posted by Jimster
correction- you ignorant opinion= :lol: :thefinger :loser: and :rolleyes: for good measure
riiiiight... my ignorant opinion... the car should not have been brought back by GM... it's laughable... it's ugly for starters and to top it off it puts out a (unofficial) whopping 163hp@6000rpm and 155 ft/lbs@4000 rpm SUPERCHARGED.... it comes with a 1.6L I4... it tops out around 130 and that's if you push it IN 6TH FUCKING GEAR... then you have the regular cooper that puts out 116hp@6k rpm and 110 ft/[email protected] and it doesn't even come with DOHC it's still single... and through all of that you're still paying for premium gas and cramming yourself into this itty bitty car that looks like a fuckin retarded taxi... so before you tell me i'm ignorant... look at the specs please :thefinger :thefinger :thefinger :thefinger :thefinger
correction- you ignorant opinion= :lol: :thefinger :loser: and :rolleyes: for good measure
riiiiight... my ignorant opinion... the car should not have been brought back by GM... it's laughable... it's ugly for starters and to top it off it puts out a (unofficial) whopping 163hp@6000rpm and 155 ft/lbs@4000 rpm SUPERCHARGED.... it comes with a 1.6L I4... it tops out around 130 and that's if you push it IN 6TH FUCKING GEAR... then you have the regular cooper that puts out 116hp@6k rpm and 110 ft/[email protected] and it doesn't even come with DOHC it's still single... and through all of that you're still paying for premium gas and cramming yourself into this itty bitty car that looks like a fuckin retarded taxi... so before you tell me i'm ignorant... look at the specs please :thefinger :thefinger :thefinger :thefinger :thefinger
trevolutionist
08-07-2003, 02:46 AM
P.S. before you rag my ass about GM i'm not sure if they bought out MINI or not i don't really care.. this is just something that a friend told me when we were discussing the mini coopers... the specs are there and numbers don't lie
badassgremlin
08-07-2003, 11:16 AM
lol those are nice but ass for dumass**cough**trevolutionist GM DIDNt bring back the mini bmw did:lol:
freakray
08-07-2003, 11:26 AM
Originally posted by trevolutionist
riiiiight... my ignorant opinion... the car should not have been brought back by GM... it's laughable... it's ugly for starters and to top it off it puts out a (unofficial) whopping 163hp@6000rpm and 155 ft/lbs@4000 rpm SUPERCHARGED.... it comes with a 1.6L I4... it tops out around 130 and that's if you push it IN 6TH FUCKING GEAR... then you have the regular cooper that puts out 116hp@6k rpm and 110 ft/[email protected] and it doesn't even come with DOHC it's still single... and through all of that you're still paying for premium gas and cramming yourself into this itty bitty car that looks like a fuckin retarded taxi... so before you tell me i'm ignorant... look at the specs please :thefinger :thefinger :thefinger :thefinger :thefinger
According to your specs, you are officially awarded the 'Ignorant Person of the Day' award.
GM bought out the Mini? Was that before or after they released the X-5?
C'mon, don't try and get smart unless you at least know who makes the car....ever hear of BMW?
Oh, and for good measure....you're ignorant....and slap yourself around for listening to your ignorant friend too.....
riiiiight... my ignorant opinion... the car should not have been brought back by GM... it's laughable... it's ugly for starters and to top it off it puts out a (unofficial) whopping 163hp@6000rpm and 155 ft/lbs@4000 rpm SUPERCHARGED.... it comes with a 1.6L I4... it tops out around 130 and that's if you push it IN 6TH FUCKING GEAR... then you have the regular cooper that puts out 116hp@6k rpm and 110 ft/[email protected] and it doesn't even come with DOHC it's still single... and through all of that you're still paying for premium gas and cramming yourself into this itty bitty car that looks like a fuckin retarded taxi... so before you tell me i'm ignorant... look at the specs please :thefinger :thefinger :thefinger :thefinger :thefinger
According to your specs, you are officially awarded the 'Ignorant Person of the Day' award.
GM bought out the Mini? Was that before or after they released the X-5?
C'mon, don't try and get smart unless you at least know who makes the car....ever hear of BMW?
Oh, and for good measure....you're ignorant....and slap yourself around for listening to your ignorant friend too.....
badassgremlin
08-07-2003, 11:37 AM
i just said that but anyhoo:iagree:
trevolutionist
08-07-2003, 03:04 PM
riiight i'm not sure you know what ignorant means as you're trying to use it as an insult... i'll claim ignorance on my GM label ok i posted that and it was stupid i agree but i didn't know (as that's what ignorance is) but what i do know is that my specs are right... can you disprove them? i don't think so. which just makes you a dumbass... my specs are right... numbers don't lie. i'm sorry kiddies.. you lose. (oh don't come at me with "it handles well"... i don't know any car that doesn't handle well when it's going 25 mph..) prove my specs wrong and i'll shut up but the fact of the matter is that those specs are right... so unless you have something on me other than i said GM you're fuckin stupid for opening your mouth:thefinger :loser:
freakray
08-07-2003, 03:18 PM
Originally posted by trevolutionist
riiight i'm not sure you know what ignorant means as you're trying to use it as an insult... i'll claim ignorance on my GM label ok i posted that and it was stupid i agree but i didn't know (as that's what ignorance is) but what i do know is that my specs are right... can you disprove them? i don't think so. which just makes you a dumbass... my specs are right... numbers don't lie. i'm sorry kiddies.. you lose. (oh don't come at me with "it handles well"... i don't know any car that doesn't handle well when it's going 25 mph..) prove my specs wrong and i'll shut up but the fact of the matter is that those specs are right... so unless you have something on me other than i said GM you're fuckin stupid for opening your mouth:thefinger :loser:
I was referring to your reference to GM you moron.
You keep claiming you're not ignorant buy you display such a lack of mastery of typing and grammar skills that I would be lead to think you are anything buy intelligent.
We used ignorance in the correct sense, perhaps calling you ignorant was the insult, you're not ignorant, your arrogant.
Who questioned the rest of the specs? Although I mentioned them, the only thing I questioned was the GM reference which you made in listing the specs:rolleyes:
riiight i'm not sure you know what ignorant means as you're trying to use it as an insult... i'll claim ignorance on my GM label ok i posted that and it was stupid i agree but i didn't know (as that's what ignorance is) but what i do know is that my specs are right... can you disprove them? i don't think so. which just makes you a dumbass... my specs are right... numbers don't lie. i'm sorry kiddies.. you lose. (oh don't come at me with "it handles well"... i don't know any car that doesn't handle well when it's going 25 mph..) prove my specs wrong and i'll shut up but the fact of the matter is that those specs are right... so unless you have something on me other than i said GM you're fuckin stupid for opening your mouth:thefinger :loser:
I was referring to your reference to GM you moron.
You keep claiming you're not ignorant buy you display such a lack of mastery of typing and grammar skills that I would be lead to think you are anything buy intelligent.
We used ignorance in the correct sense, perhaps calling you ignorant was the insult, you're not ignorant, your arrogant.
Who questioned the rest of the specs? Although I mentioned them, the only thing I questioned was the GM reference which you made in listing the specs:rolleyes:
94SolGrl
08-07-2003, 03:26 PM
well you know the base model del Sol came with a whopping 106 hp. I know a guy who has built that same block up to 600hp. With work anything is possible. :)
TheNotoriousMogg
08-07-2003, 03:30 PM
Originally posted by 94SolGrl
I know a guy who has built that same block up to 600hp. With work anything is possible. :)
some people just know how to throw away money :tongue:
I know a guy who has built that same block up to 600hp. With work anything is possible. :)
some people just know how to throw away money :tongue:
trevolutionist
08-07-2003, 04:52 PM
Originally posted by freakray
I was referring to your reference to GM you moron.
You keep claiming you're not ignorant buy you display such a lack of mastery of typing and grammar skills that I would be lead to think you are anything buy intelligent.
We used ignorance in the correct sense, perhaps calling you ignorant was the insult, you're not ignorant, your arrogant.
Who questioned the rest of the specs? Although I mentioned them, the only thing I questioned was the GM reference which you made in listing the specs:rolleyes:
I'm aware of what you were referring to and if it makes you feel better I'll post using proper grammer and typing. The point I was making was my entire post was about the lack of performance and you people nit pick on something I openly admitted to being a mistake, and had NOTHING to do with the purpose of my post. Also the stock bodied del sol didn't come supercharged. Also if you were using ignorant in the correct sense in reference to my post, why is it that it has nothing but factual information with the GM reference aside. Also thanks for calling me arrogant, even though I can admit that I've made mistakes. At least I don't hold myself to criticize others small mistakes. Good job dick. Also I can figure out what's important in a post... not the small minor details. The point in my post wasn't about who brought back the Cooper, but what little potential it has. It's funny how you missed the entire point when it was so obvious.:lol:
I was referring to your reference to GM you moron.
You keep claiming you're not ignorant buy you display such a lack of mastery of typing and grammar skills that I would be lead to think you are anything buy intelligent.
We used ignorance in the correct sense, perhaps calling you ignorant was the insult, you're not ignorant, your arrogant.
Who questioned the rest of the specs? Although I mentioned them, the only thing I questioned was the GM reference which you made in listing the specs:rolleyes:
I'm aware of what you were referring to and if it makes you feel better I'll post using proper grammer and typing. The point I was making was my entire post was about the lack of performance and you people nit pick on something I openly admitted to being a mistake, and had NOTHING to do with the purpose of my post. Also the stock bodied del sol didn't come supercharged. Also if you were using ignorant in the correct sense in reference to my post, why is it that it has nothing but factual information with the GM reference aside. Also thanks for calling me arrogant, even though I can admit that I've made mistakes. At least I don't hold myself to criticize others small mistakes. Good job dick. Also I can figure out what's important in a post... not the small minor details. The point in my post wasn't about who brought back the Cooper, but what little potential it has. It's funny how you missed the entire point when it was so obvious.:lol:
integra818
08-07-2003, 05:06 PM
Jimster, how can you have an ignorant opinion??? Is'nt ignorance when people just babble on about things that they don't know about? Like saying one car is faster than the other just because it looks nicer...I was under the impression that that was ignorance. An opinion can never be wrong. So how can you have an incorect opinion?
trevolutionist
08-07-2003, 05:20 PM
Originally posted by integra818
Jimster, how can you have an ignorant opinion??? Is'nt ignorance when people just babble on about things that they don't know about? Like saying one car is faster than the other just because it looks nicer...I was under the impression that that was ignorance. An opinion can never be wrong. So how can you have an incorect opinion?
Thank God for an intelligent person... :worshippy :worshippy
Jimster, how can you have an ignorant opinion??? Is'nt ignorance when people just babble on about things that they don't know about? Like saying one car is faster than the other just because it looks nicer...I was under the impression that that was ignorance. An opinion can never be wrong. So how can you have an incorect opinion?
Thank God for an intelligent person... :worshippy :worshippy
integra818
08-07-2003, 05:30 PM
Originally posted by trevolutionist
Thank God for an intelligent person... :worshippy :worshippy
Thank you for your compliment...but YOU need to stop trashing the Mini, it's faster than your RX-7. Single cam does'nt automatically make it a bad car, look at some of the domestic racers, they're single cam and thier owners LOVE thier cars! I've seen single cam 4 cylenders do 10 second 1/4 mile passes WITHOUT a turbo/nitrous/SC. I hated this car when it first came out, but the more I looked into it, the more I liked it. The mini might be slow with numbers, but the only number that matters is the one on your door/bonnet when you're racing...and this car can race regardless of it's HP level.
Thank God for an intelligent person... :worshippy :worshippy
Thank you for your compliment...but YOU need to stop trashing the Mini, it's faster than your RX-7. Single cam does'nt automatically make it a bad car, look at some of the domestic racers, they're single cam and thier owners LOVE thier cars! I've seen single cam 4 cylenders do 10 second 1/4 mile passes WITHOUT a turbo/nitrous/SC. I hated this car when it first came out, but the more I looked into it, the more I liked it. The mini might be slow with numbers, but the only number that matters is the one on your door/bonnet when you're racing...and this car can race regardless of it's HP level.
integra818
08-07-2003, 05:42 PM
Originally posted by freakray
I was referring to your reference to GM you moron.
You keep claiming you're not ignorant buy you display such a lack of mastery of typing and grammar skills that I would be lead to think you are anything buy intelligent.
We used ignorance in the correct sense, perhaps calling you ignorant was the insult, you're not ignorant, your arrogant.
Who questioned the rest of the specs? Although I mentioned them, the only thing I questioned was the GM reference which you made in listing the specs:rolleyes:
**buy you display such alack of mastery of typing and grammer skills that I would be lead to think you are anything buy intelligent**... BUY or BUT? Maybe a keyboard slip-up, but what about this???...
"you're not ignorant YOUR arrogant"...should've been YOU'RE
Don't critisize (<spelling?) other people's grammer skills when you slip up at times as well. Hey, I might not have the best typing/grammer skills either but at least I'm not telling people thier typing sucks :dunno:
I was referring to your reference to GM you moron.
You keep claiming you're not ignorant buy you display such a lack of mastery of typing and grammar skills that I would be lead to think you are anything buy intelligent.
We used ignorance in the correct sense, perhaps calling you ignorant was the insult, you're not ignorant, your arrogant.
Who questioned the rest of the specs? Although I mentioned them, the only thing I questioned was the GM reference which you made in listing the specs:rolleyes:
**buy you display such alack of mastery of typing and grammer skills that I would be lead to think you are anything buy intelligent**... BUY or BUT? Maybe a keyboard slip-up, but what about this???...
"you're not ignorant YOUR arrogant"...should've been YOU'RE
Don't critisize (<spelling?) other people's grammer skills when you slip up at times as well. Hey, I might not have the best typing/grammer skills either but at least I'm not telling people thier typing sucks :dunno:
speediva
08-07-2003, 06:00 PM
Ignorance is bliss. So is not giving a fu(k.
Drop it. He screwed up, we all pointed and laughed, it's done.
The Mini S is the shiznit IMHO. Fast is in the feet of the steering wheel holder. Besides, bikes still have higher power to weight ratios. :p
Drop it. He screwed up, we all pointed and laughed, it's done.
The Mini S is the shiznit IMHO. Fast is in the feet of the steering wheel holder. Besides, bikes still have higher power to weight ratios. :p
trevolutionist
08-07-2003, 06:15 PM
Originally posted by integra818
Thank you for your compliment...but YOU need to stop trashing the Mini, it's faster than your RX-7. Single cam does'nt automatically make it a bad car, look at some of the domestic racers, they're single cam and thier owners LOVE thier cars! I've seen single cam 4 cylenders do 10 second 1/4 mile passes WITHOUT a turbo/nitrous/SC. I hated this car when it first came out, but the more I looked into it, the more I liked it. The mini might be slow with numbers, but the only number that matters is the one on your door/bonnet when you're racing...and this car can race regardless of it's HP level.
I agree with parts of this post. My old RX-7 was not quite as slow as the MINI I assure you. Were there aftermarket parts on it? Yes, but I just hold a personal grudge agaist the MINI Cooper. Love the car all you want that's your choice but my OPINION of that car can't be called ignorant... I also still believe it's worthless. The comment on single cams is true too. I was just stating that the car could be given a boost with dual cams but BMW left them out... I just don't understand why they would do that.
Thank you for your compliment...but YOU need to stop trashing the Mini, it's faster than your RX-7. Single cam does'nt automatically make it a bad car, look at some of the domestic racers, they're single cam and thier owners LOVE thier cars! I've seen single cam 4 cylenders do 10 second 1/4 mile passes WITHOUT a turbo/nitrous/SC. I hated this car when it first came out, but the more I looked into it, the more I liked it. The mini might be slow with numbers, but the only number that matters is the one on your door/bonnet when you're racing...and this car can race regardless of it's HP level.
I agree with parts of this post. My old RX-7 was not quite as slow as the MINI I assure you. Were there aftermarket parts on it? Yes, but I just hold a personal grudge agaist the MINI Cooper. Love the car all you want that's your choice but my OPINION of that car can't be called ignorant... I also still believe it's worthless. The comment on single cams is true too. I was just stating that the car could be given a boost with dual cams but BMW left them out... I just don't understand why they would do that.
integra818
08-07-2003, 06:21 PM
Originally posted by trevolutionist
I agree with parts of this post. My old RX-7 was not quite as slow as the MINI I assure you. Were there aftermarket parts on it? Yes, but I just hold a personal grudge agaist the MINI Cooper. Love the car all you want that's your choice but my OPINION of that car can't be called ignorant... I also still believe it's worthless. The comment on single cams is true too. I was just stating that the car could be given a boost with dual cams but BMW left them out... I just don't understand why they would do that.
OK, your RX-7 could probably take a Mini :wink: .
I'm still tryng to figure out why it's SOHC. Maybe save money? BMW thought that maybe the potential owners of the car wouldnt be "speed-freaks" and they would'nt really care wether it was DOHC or SOHC, maybe. That's just what I'm guessing. :dunno:
I agree with parts of this post. My old RX-7 was not quite as slow as the MINI I assure you. Were there aftermarket parts on it? Yes, but I just hold a personal grudge agaist the MINI Cooper. Love the car all you want that's your choice but my OPINION of that car can't be called ignorant... I also still believe it's worthless. The comment on single cams is true too. I was just stating that the car could be given a boost with dual cams but BMW left them out... I just don't understand why they would do that.
OK, your RX-7 could probably take a Mini :wink: .
I'm still tryng to figure out why it's SOHC. Maybe save money? BMW thought that maybe the potential owners of the car wouldnt be "speed-freaks" and they would'nt really care wether it was DOHC or SOHC, maybe. That's just what I'm guessing. :dunno:
badassgremlin
08-07-2003, 06:25 PM
Originally posted by integra818
Jimster, how can you have an ignorant opinion??? Is'nt ignorance when people just babble on about things that they don't know about? Like saying one car is faster than the other just because it looks nicer...I was under the impression that that was ignorance. be wrong. So how umm no thats the definiton of a ricer ---------<<<now that was ignorant:cwm27:
Jimster, how can you have an ignorant opinion??? Is'nt ignorance when people just babble on about things that they don't know about? Like saying one car is faster than the other just because it looks nicer...I was under the impression that that was ignorance. be wrong. So how umm no thats the definiton of a ricer ---------<<<now that was ignorant:cwm27:
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2026
