Ferrari Comparison
Amir
07-14-2003, 01:00 AM
F50
F40
288 GTO
(I would have included the Enzo, but it too new and it would have been a bit unfair for the others :biggrin: )
Enjoy :smile:
F40
288 GTO
(I would have included the Enzo, but it too new and it would have been a bit unfair for the others :biggrin: )
Enjoy :smile:
NISSANSPDR
07-14-2003, 10:23 AM
F40...still one fast mofo
477HP
2400 lbs
First production car to make it to 200MPH
http://images.cardomain.com/installs/244000-244999/244756_22_full.jpg
477HP
2400 lbs
First production car to make it to 200MPH
http://images.cardomain.com/installs/244000-244999/244756_22_full.jpg
YogsVR4
07-14-2003, 10:40 AM
I'd rather see an F40 in my garage but wouldn't mind the others. :tongue:
TexasF355F1
07-14-2003, 04:38 PM
F40 all the way. A design way ahead of its time.
Polygon
07-14-2003, 10:36 PM
Originally posted by NISSANSPDR
F40...still one fast mofo
477HP
2400 lbs
First production car to make it to 200MPH
http://images.cardomain.com/installs/244000-244999/244756_22_full.jpg
Not true, the 1970 Dodge Charger Daytona/Plymouth Superbird broke 200MPH.
For me, I would have to take the F40, one of the best looking Ferraris ever.
F40...still one fast mofo
477HP
2400 lbs
First production car to make it to 200MPH
http://images.cardomain.com/installs/244000-244999/244756_22_full.jpg
Not true, the 1970 Dodge Charger Daytona/Plymouth Superbird broke 200MPH.
For me, I would have to take the F40, one of the best looking Ferraris ever.
audi&benz
07-14-2003, 10:43 PM
Does it really matter?
I would take any of them.
I would take any of them.
arthur12187
07-14-2003, 11:44 PM
are u serious??? f4o definetly!! my dads thinking of getting one too! ( not kidding, i am serious )
Jimster
07-15-2003, 08:04 AM
F40- but only just- the 288GTO is one fell of a car as well :bigthumb:
NISSANSPDR
07-15-2003, 10:30 AM
Originally posted by Jimster
F40- but only just- the 288GTO is one fell of a car as well :bigthumb:
Same engine...F40 tweaked it up and got more out of it...
GTO is still badass though...F40 is just meaner!
F40- but only just- the 288GTO is one fell of a car as well :bigthumb:
Same engine...F40 tweaked it up and got more out of it...
GTO is still badass though...F40 is just meaner!
Jimster
07-15-2003, 08:00 PM
Originally posted by Polygon
Not true, the 1970 Dodge Charger Daytona/Plymouth Superbird broke 200MPH.
For me, I would have to take the F40, one of the best looking Ferraris ever.
Whether it was a production car is questionable though- in 650bhp race trim- the Superbird did 200mph+ on most NASCAR tracks- but in standard 350bhp trim the top speed was closer to 140mph
Not true, the 1970 Dodge Charger Daytona/Plymouth Superbird broke 200MPH.
For me, I would have to take the F40, one of the best looking Ferraris ever.
Whether it was a production car is questionable though- in 650bhp race trim- the Superbird did 200mph+ on most NASCAR tracks- but in standard 350bhp trim the top speed was closer to 140mph
Polygon
07-20-2003, 06:43 PM
Originally posted by Jimster
Whether it was a production car is questionable though- in 650bhp race trim- the Superbird did 200mph+ on most NASCAR tracks- but in standard 350bhp trim the top speed was closer to 140mph
You must remember that the Superbird came stock with different engines. You could get it with the 440 Six Pack or the 426 Hemi, I am not sure what other engines came in it, but the 440 was over 500HP and the Hemi was in the mid 500HP area.
Whether it was a production car is questionable though- in 650bhp race trim- the Superbird did 200mph+ on most NASCAR tracks- but in standard 350bhp trim the top speed was closer to 140mph
You must remember that the Superbird came stock with different engines. You could get it with the 440 Six Pack or the 426 Hemi, I am not sure what other engines came in it, but the 440 was over 500HP and the Hemi was in the mid 500HP area.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2026