caddy or lincoln

which will go to hell faster? i say caddy but it's close. they both build a wide range of luxury cars and they both build a huge gas guzzling luxury suv.

DEFINATELY THE CADDY


ESCALADE

Engine Type AWD - High output 6.0L V8
2WD - 5.3L OHV V8

Horsepower/Torque (ft-lbs) AWD - 345 @ 5,200 rpm
380 @ 4,000 rpm
2WD - 285 @ 5,200 rpm
325 @ 4,000 rpm

Towing Capacity* AWD - 7,800 lbs.
2WD - 7,300 lbs.
Curb weight AWD 5,641 lbs.
2WD 5,407 lbs.

---------------------------------------------------------
NAVIGATOR

LAYOUT
Front engine, rear-wheel drive, available four-wheel drive


DISPLACEMENT
5.4 liters/330 cu in.


HORSEPOWER
300 @ 5000 rpm (SAE net)


TORQUE
355 lb.-ft @ 2750 rpm (SAE net)

CURB WEIGHT
2WD 5760 lb.



4WD 5994 lb

you do know i meant go to hell faster as in fall apart faster didn't you?

Well niether of them are at the top of thier tree for quality IMHO- but I'll say Caddy- because I'm pretty partial to the LS and the Navigator looks allright ;)

my dad had an 88 lincoln town car, and previously had an 81 deville. that lincoln is still running after a couple new transmissions at 195,000 miles on it. pretty solid. the caddy that he had didn't fair as well. and quit at 150,000. so i say cadillac. that was years ago however, so i'm sure cadillacs are built much better. but then probably so has lincoln.

CADDY all the way

.:C.H.R.I.S:.

Navigator hands down/ Escalade a little to much city in it.

What do you mean actually by going to he__ faster?
You mean which will break down quicker? I bet the Lincoln. Since GM is like lasting longer than Ford.

When I seen an Escalade I just think rapper gone rich. People like to hop on the uber-pimpin bandwagon. I like Lincoln better than Cadillac....just like I like Ford better than GM. :icon16: