5.3 hesitation, stumble, lean and random misfire codes, worse when cold.
kleake
08-12-2011, 03:22 PM
This is kinda long winded, but I am at a loss as to what is the problem is...
I have a 2000 suburban with the 5.3. For the last several years it has been randomly giving bank 0 lean, bank 1 lean, and random misfire codes. It is MUCH worse when cold, especially on startup, but it is getting to the point it does it even when hot. Normally once warmed up it runs pretty good, although when pulling my camper and trying to back into a space it will stuble and cut out as I am trying to accelerate. It basically hesitates to the point it won't hardly move at times. Over the years I have changed spark plugs, fuel pressure regulator, fuel pump, MAP sensor, MAF sensor, throttle position sensor, and tested EGR by completely blocking it off. I have also checked for vacuum leaks by disconnecting hoses and capping them temporarily. I was completely at a loss, and heard about intake leaks or cracks so yesterday I put on a new intake gasket and inspected the intake pretty closely. This still did not solve, nor even change the issue. I have even sprayed carb cleaner and such all over the intake while its running, and there is no change in the way it acts while spraying it. I don't remember what the fuel pressure is at, but it was within spec when I checked it last. I can unplug the regulator to up the pressure and it helps a tiny bit at idle, but never fixes it. What else could I be missing? The IAC was also taken out, cleaned and checked to make sure it is working, and it is, but I haven't replaced it. 02 sensors are within normal reading as well. It basically has the symptoms and such of a vacuum leak, but I don't hear one, nor can I find one. No other codes have ever been set, and none ever show up. It is definitely a random misfire at idle as it sounds like it has a cam in it, but uner heavy acceleration while backing the trailer, or holding the brake, it seems to be more of a steady misfire when it does it. And, it doesn't do it all the time, but under the right conditions, and the right throttle it will. And only at low rpm, never anything above about 2500rpm. Any other idea's what this could be?
I have a 2000 suburban with the 5.3. For the last several years it has been randomly giving bank 0 lean, bank 1 lean, and random misfire codes. It is MUCH worse when cold, especially on startup, but it is getting to the point it does it even when hot. Normally once warmed up it runs pretty good, although when pulling my camper and trying to back into a space it will stuble and cut out as I am trying to accelerate. It basically hesitates to the point it won't hardly move at times. Over the years I have changed spark plugs, fuel pressure regulator, fuel pump, MAP sensor, MAF sensor, throttle position sensor, and tested EGR by completely blocking it off. I have also checked for vacuum leaks by disconnecting hoses and capping them temporarily. I was completely at a loss, and heard about intake leaks or cracks so yesterday I put on a new intake gasket and inspected the intake pretty closely. This still did not solve, nor even change the issue. I have even sprayed carb cleaner and such all over the intake while its running, and there is no change in the way it acts while spraying it. I don't remember what the fuel pressure is at, but it was within spec when I checked it last. I can unplug the regulator to up the pressure and it helps a tiny bit at idle, but never fixes it. What else could I be missing? The IAC was also taken out, cleaned and checked to make sure it is working, and it is, but I haven't replaced it. 02 sensors are within normal reading as well. It basically has the symptoms and such of a vacuum leak, but I don't hear one, nor can I find one. No other codes have ever been set, and none ever show up. It is definitely a random misfire at idle as it sounds like it has a cam in it, but uner heavy acceleration while backing the trailer, or holding the brake, it seems to be more of a steady misfire when it does it. And, it doesn't do it all the time, but under the right conditions, and the right throttle it will. And only at low rpm, never anything above about 2500rpm. Any other idea's what this could be?
danielsatur
08-12-2011, 03:35 PM
I would considerer a smoke test to pinpoint unmetered air leaks on the PCV, EGR, and Air intake systems.
kleake
08-12-2011, 03:54 PM
I would considerer a smoke test to pinpoint unmetered air leaks on the PCV, EGR, and Air intake systems.
I have inspected all of these pretty close, and tried the carb cleaner approach. I blocked off the EGR, so the only one I haven't specifically plugged directly is the PCV. I did pull a couple of the larger hoses from the intake end and plugged them, so I may have actually checked it without realizing it. I will verify again.
While reading about how a smoke test is done, I did notice it mentioned the short term and long term trim values, and how they should be pretty steady. I will check mine again as I don't remember how mine responded, but I know the o2 readings jump all over the place and don't stay steady so it's hard to really see what's happening. All sensors are acting the same so I figured that was normal,,,, but maybe not?
I have inspected all of these pretty close, and tried the carb cleaner approach. I blocked off the EGR, so the only one I haven't specifically plugged directly is the PCV. I did pull a couple of the larger hoses from the intake end and plugged them, so I may have actually checked it without realizing it. I will verify again.
While reading about how a smoke test is done, I did notice it mentioned the short term and long term trim values, and how they should be pretty steady. I will check mine again as I don't remember how mine responded, but I know the o2 readings jump all over the place and don't stay steady so it's hard to really see what's happening. All sensors are acting the same so I figured that was normal,,,, but maybe not?
danielsatur
08-12-2011, 04:59 PM
For DIY, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfiQ7qWiG-M
I think Meineke will do it for $50, it's so much safer than carb cleaner.
I think Meineke will do it for $50, it's so much safer than carb cleaner.
j cAT
08-12-2011, 05:36 PM
with what you stated here my question is what do you consider normal fuel pressure ? how did you measure the pressure ..
engine idling pressure ? engine off pressure ? how long does it hold pressure engine off ?
what about the fuel filter ? did you cut open to see if its got debris in it from ???
engine idling pressure ? engine off pressure ? how long does it hold pressure engine off ?
what about the fuel filter ? did you cut open to see if its got debris in it from ???
kleake
08-15-2011, 02:14 PM
with what you stated here my question is what do you consider normal fuel pressure ? how did you measure the pressure ..
engine idling pressure ? engine off pressure ? how long does it hold pressure engine off ?
what about the fuel filter ? did you cut open to see if its got debris in it from ???
I will verify the fuel pressure again, but if I remember right it was around 43 at idle, and jumped to 50ish when I touch the throttle. I have pulled the vacuum line off of the regulator and it jumped up and stayed, but didn't effect the way it ran. It was losing pressure after the key was off, but it was the check valve doing that. I have since changed the pump and it now holds pressure overnight. I have not changed the filter as it seems to flow plenty. With the bad check valve, setting at 0 psi on the fuel rail, turn the key on and it jumps to 50 psi within a couple of seconds. Maybe a fuel pump, and injector cleaner should be next on my list.
The smoke test might be worth it as well, if it's only $50.
engine idling pressure ? engine off pressure ? how long does it hold pressure engine off ?
what about the fuel filter ? did you cut open to see if its got debris in it from ???
I will verify the fuel pressure again, but if I remember right it was around 43 at idle, and jumped to 50ish when I touch the throttle. I have pulled the vacuum line off of the regulator and it jumped up and stayed, but didn't effect the way it ran. It was losing pressure after the key was off, but it was the check valve doing that. I have since changed the pump and it now holds pressure overnight. I have not changed the filter as it seems to flow plenty. With the bad check valve, setting at 0 psi on the fuel rail, turn the key on and it jumps to 50 psi within a couple of seconds. Maybe a fuel pump, and injector cleaner should be next on my list.
The smoke test might be worth it as well, if it's only $50.
procaddytech
08-15-2011, 02:54 PM
With key on, fuel pump running, pressure should be 55-62psi. I'm confused as to what bank 0 is. Do you mean bank 1 and bank 2? Dtc's P0171 and P0174? Fuel pressure would be common to both banks causing lean codes. With the regulator hose off the pressure should jump back up into spec. Make sure the air duct between the MAF and throttle body is tight, don't want any leaks around the MAF. The throttle blade should be clean. If you are using an aftermarket air filter it can cause lean codes. Make sure the oil fill cap seals and the dip stick seals. Make sure the pcv is correct for the vehicle. You need to look for things that affect both banks. Seems like fuel pressure is low and if you have not changed the filter in a while, it would be a good idea. Vacuum leaks and fuel presssure/volume are the most common causes for both banks running lean.
j cAT
08-15-2011, 06:17 PM
what your problem is you got the wrong fuel pressure spec's..
THE SHOP GM MANUAL STATES FUEL PRESSURE MUST BE 53-62 PSI. !
ON THESE FORUMS it is a common fact that members have what you have with 50 psi. below 50 psi the engine should not run or start.
the fuel regulator does not create any pressure... the fuel regulator drops pressure when vacuum is high [like idle or when down shifting ]
no/low vacuum [like starting engine] you should have 60-62 psi.
check for fuel in the regulator vacuum line if so its bad...
when checking fuel pressure see how long it holds pressure..if it drops off quickly and the injectors are not leaking the fuewl pump is bad ..low pressure at the fuel rail is 90 % fuel pump/fuel pump relay or bad grounds/wiring at the fuel pump..
purchase a delphi fuel pump..do not get the airtex asa they fail in a few months..
It always helps/makes this easier, and most times costs much less when you know what your doing with the shop manual...
THE SHOP GM MANUAL STATES FUEL PRESSURE MUST BE 53-62 PSI. !
ON THESE FORUMS it is a common fact that members have what you have with 50 psi. below 50 psi the engine should not run or start.
the fuel regulator does not create any pressure... the fuel regulator drops pressure when vacuum is high [like idle or when down shifting ]
no/low vacuum [like starting engine] you should have 60-62 psi.
check for fuel in the regulator vacuum line if so its bad...
when checking fuel pressure see how long it holds pressure..if it drops off quickly and the injectors are not leaking the fuewl pump is bad ..low pressure at the fuel rail is 90 % fuel pump/fuel pump relay or bad grounds/wiring at the fuel pump..
purchase a delphi fuel pump..do not get the airtex asa they fail in a few months..
It always helps/makes this easier, and most times costs much less when you know what your doing with the shop manual...
procaddytech
08-15-2011, 07:29 PM
I don't know where I got 51psi from. (edited)
Copied from GM Service information:
The numbers below refer to the step numbers on the diagnostic table.
2. When the ignition switch is ON and the fuel pump is running, the fuel pressure indicated by the fuel pressure gauge should read 379-427 kPa (55-62 psi). The spring pressure inside the fuel pressure regulator controls the fuel pressure.
15. A lean condition may result from the fuel pressure being below 379 kPa (55 psi). A lean condition may cause DTC P0131, DTC P0151, DTC P0171, or DTC P0174 to set. Driveability conditions associated with lean conditions can include hard starting, hesitation, poor driveability, lack of power, surging, and misfiring.
Yours is below 55psi. I would go with a fuel pump also as j cAT recommended. Delphi
Copied from GM Service information:
The numbers below refer to the step numbers on the diagnostic table.
2. When the ignition switch is ON and the fuel pump is running, the fuel pressure indicated by the fuel pressure gauge should read 379-427 kPa (55-62 psi). The spring pressure inside the fuel pressure regulator controls the fuel pressure.
15. A lean condition may result from the fuel pressure being below 379 kPa (55 psi). A lean condition may cause DTC P0131, DTC P0151, DTC P0171, or DTC P0174 to set. Driveability conditions associated with lean conditions can include hard starting, hesitation, poor driveability, lack of power, surging, and misfiring.
Yours is below 55psi. I would go with a fuel pump also as j cAT recommended. Delphi
kleake
08-16-2011, 08:35 AM
I guess I have been in IT too long, I was thinking it was bank 0 and bank 1 when really it is bank 1 and bank 2. Those codes were set back in the winter as it normally isn't bad enough to trigger a code in the summer, although the problem is still there.
I double checked the fuel pressure last night. 50-52 at idle, jumps to 60 at WOT or by unplugging the regulator. This is the 3rd fuel pump I have had on here. The first one was changed as a possible source of this problem, but I did just the pump, not the assembly. After a while the check valve wasn't holding the pressure with the key off, so I just installed a new complete assembly. The problem existed through all 3 pumps. Also, the rough idle continues even if I unplug the regulator and fuel pressure is at 60psi, so I don't think pressure is the issue. I bought some concentrated injector cleaner last night, but am going to wait till I am below 1/4tank of fuel so I can run it pretty concentrated. I was hoping to find the type that hooks to the fuel rail directly, but I couldn't find any that did.
I also have a handheld scanner that I can monitor parameters while it is running. Does anyone have a good running 5.3 of the similar vintage that I could compare specs to such as o2 readings, and short/long term fuel trim settings?
I double checked the fuel pressure last night. 50-52 at idle, jumps to 60 at WOT or by unplugging the regulator. This is the 3rd fuel pump I have had on here. The first one was changed as a possible source of this problem, but I did just the pump, not the assembly. After a while the check valve wasn't holding the pressure with the key off, so I just installed a new complete assembly. The problem existed through all 3 pumps. Also, the rough idle continues even if I unplug the regulator and fuel pressure is at 60psi, so I don't think pressure is the issue. I bought some concentrated injector cleaner last night, but am going to wait till I am below 1/4tank of fuel so I can run it pretty concentrated. I was hoping to find the type that hooks to the fuel rail directly, but I couldn't find any that did.
I also have a handheld scanner that I can monitor parameters while it is running. Does anyone have a good running 5.3 of the similar vintage that I could compare specs to such as o2 readings, and short/long term fuel trim settings?
j cAT
08-16-2011, 09:37 AM
I guess I have been in IT too long, I was thinking it was bank 0 and bank 1 when really it is bank 1 and bank 2. Those codes were set back in the winter as it normally isn't bad enough to trigger a code in the summer, although the problem is still there.
I double checked the fuel pressure last night. 50-52 at idle, jumps to 60 at WOT or by unplugging the regulator. This is the 3rd fuel pump I have had on here. The first one was changed as a possible source of this problem, but I did just the pump, not the assembly. After a while the check valve wasn't holding the pressure with the key off, so I just installed a new complete assembly. The problem existed through all 3 pumps. Also, the rough idle continues even if I unplug the regulator and fuel pressure is at 60psi, so I don't think pressure is the issue. I bought some concentrated injector cleaner last night, but am going to wait till I am below 1/4tank of fuel so I can run it pretty concentrated. I was hoping to find the type that hooks to the fuel rail directly, but I couldn't find any that did.
I also have a handheld scanner that I can monitor parameters while it is running. Does anyone have a good running 5.3 of the similar vintage that I could compare specs to such as o2 readings, and short/long term fuel trim settings?
when replacing the fuel pump with older higher mile vehicles you need to replace the fuel pump relay and make sure that the wiring is good..no voltage drop at the fuel pump...too much injector cleaner can damage the fuel system.
you do have a pressure issue and your pressures /issues say that.
explain what manufacturer fuel pump you used and the part number ...this will be helpful to others to avoid that manufacturers part............
after the fuel pressures are normal , then the other problems can be looked at...
I double checked the fuel pressure last night. 50-52 at idle, jumps to 60 at WOT or by unplugging the regulator. This is the 3rd fuel pump I have had on here. The first one was changed as a possible source of this problem, but I did just the pump, not the assembly. After a while the check valve wasn't holding the pressure with the key off, so I just installed a new complete assembly. The problem existed through all 3 pumps. Also, the rough idle continues even if I unplug the regulator and fuel pressure is at 60psi, so I don't think pressure is the issue. I bought some concentrated injector cleaner last night, but am going to wait till I am below 1/4tank of fuel so I can run it pretty concentrated. I was hoping to find the type that hooks to the fuel rail directly, but I couldn't find any that did.
I also have a handheld scanner that I can monitor parameters while it is running. Does anyone have a good running 5.3 of the similar vintage that I could compare specs to such as o2 readings, and short/long term fuel trim settings?
when replacing the fuel pump with older higher mile vehicles you need to replace the fuel pump relay and make sure that the wiring is good..no voltage drop at the fuel pump...too much injector cleaner can damage the fuel system.
you do have a pressure issue and your pressures /issues say that.
explain what manufacturer fuel pump you used and the part number ...this will be helpful to others to avoid that manufacturers part............
after the fuel pressures are normal , then the other problems can be looked at...
kleake
08-16-2011, 12:08 PM
Fuel pressures are normal as this is the same pressures I have had with 3 different pumps including the stock original. Also, it is the same pressure as before and after a regulater change. The pump doesn't have any problem building up to any pressure needed, the regulator is what is setting it.
If it was a pressure issue, why wouldn't unplugging the regulator so that pressure goes up to 60psi solve the problem temporarily? If spec shows 62 psi, and I am at 60, that shouldn't be that much of a difference,,, and my guage could be off by that much. There is more tolerance in the systems then that I would think.
If it was a pressure issue, why wouldn't unplugging the regulator so that pressure goes up to 60psi solve the problem temporarily? If spec shows 62 psi, and I am at 60, that shouldn't be that much of a difference,,, and my guage could be off by that much. There is more tolerance in the systems then that I would think.
j cAT
08-16-2011, 09:36 PM
Fuel pressures are normal as this is the same pressures I have had with 3 different pumps including the stock original. Also, it is the same pressure as before and after a regulater change. The pump doesn't have any problem building up to any pressure needed, the regulator is what is setting it.
If it was a pressure issue, why wouldn't unplugging the regulator so that pressure goes up to 60psi solve the problem temporarily? If spec shows 62 psi, and I am at 60, that shouldn't be that much of a difference,,, and my guage could be off by that much. There is more tolerance in the systems then that I would think.
I have not problem with you disagreeing with me on this pressure.
It is not my ride. you are the person effected.
I asked for so info in the other posts to narrow down this for you , still only your statement of can't be this or that...
do some of those tests and checks and post back your results, including what manufacturer made the fuel pump in it now , and the part number...
If it was a pressure issue, why wouldn't unplugging the regulator so that pressure goes up to 60psi solve the problem temporarily? If spec shows 62 psi, and I am at 60, that shouldn't be that much of a difference,,, and my guage could be off by that much. There is more tolerance in the systems then that I would think.
I have not problem with you disagreeing with me on this pressure.
It is not my ride. you are the person effected.
I asked for so info in the other posts to narrow down this for you , still only your statement of can't be this or that...
do some of those tests and checks and post back your results, including what manufacturer made the fuel pump in it now , and the part number...
kleake
08-18-2011, 09:07 AM
I have not problem with you disagreeing with me on this pressure.
It is not my ride. you are the person effected.
I asked for so info in the other posts to narrow down this for you , still only your statement of can't be this or that...
do some of those tests and checks and post back your results, including what manufacturer made the fuel pump in it now , and the part number...
I haven't had a chance to look at it any more in the last few days.
Original pump started getting noisy, and this issue was starting to appear, so I replaced the pump with a new pump only, not the assembly. I don't remember the brand as it has been almost 5 years ago. This pump has been holding 50psi at idle, and 60psi with regulator unplugged. Over time the check valve started bleeding down pressure badly, so startup was diffiucult unless you cycled the key a time or two first. Since the check valve was bad, I replaced the assembly with a generic one (Airtex E3509M). I realize this is a cheap pump, but I was really only needing the check valve in the top and couldn't justify $300 for that. I figure if the pump goes bad, I will put my original, or my second pump in that assembly so I have a good pump and check valve. This pump is brand new, and is holding 50psi at idle, and 60psi if I unplug the regulator. It pressures up the system instantly, and the startup issue is completely resolved, however the rough idle when cold is still there. The system does hold pressure with the key off for quite some time, exactly how long I am not sure, but I left it for an hour and didn't notice any drop in the guage.
Again, I realize the Airtex pump is cheap and may not last. I rebuild automatic transmissions on the side, as well as do all sorts of automotive, ATV, motorcycle, boat, and almost anything else repairs, so I understand the way these things work. I just have a hard time paying the price they want for some of these things when I know what is involved in them.
I am leaning towards injector issues since it is slowly progressing with age, and the poppet style injector is likely getting worn.
It is not my ride. you are the person effected.
I asked for so info in the other posts to narrow down this for you , still only your statement of can't be this or that...
do some of those tests and checks and post back your results, including what manufacturer made the fuel pump in it now , and the part number...
I haven't had a chance to look at it any more in the last few days.
Original pump started getting noisy, and this issue was starting to appear, so I replaced the pump with a new pump only, not the assembly. I don't remember the brand as it has been almost 5 years ago. This pump has been holding 50psi at idle, and 60psi with regulator unplugged. Over time the check valve started bleeding down pressure badly, so startup was diffiucult unless you cycled the key a time or two first. Since the check valve was bad, I replaced the assembly with a generic one (Airtex E3509M). I realize this is a cheap pump, but I was really only needing the check valve in the top and couldn't justify $300 for that. I figure if the pump goes bad, I will put my original, or my second pump in that assembly so I have a good pump and check valve. This pump is brand new, and is holding 50psi at idle, and 60psi if I unplug the regulator. It pressures up the system instantly, and the startup issue is completely resolved, however the rough idle when cold is still there. The system does hold pressure with the key off for quite some time, exactly how long I am not sure, but I left it for an hour and didn't notice any drop in the guage.
Again, I realize the Airtex pump is cheap and may not last. I rebuild automatic transmissions on the side, as well as do all sorts of automotive, ATV, motorcycle, boat, and almost anything else repairs, so I understand the way these things work. I just have a hard time paying the price they want for some of these things when I know what is involved in them.
I am leaning towards injector issues since it is slowly progressing with age, and the poppet style injector is likely getting worn.
mogyver69
12-06-2013, 11:22 PM
Hey guys, the problem this guy is having is a vacumn leak from his upper intake manifold gasket. Theres a bulliton for this issue but its probly out of warranty... still the bulliton helps the dealer mechanics with what to look for....Nothing bothers me more then someone telling this poor guy to go to the dealer and spend a few bucks.. I have been a dealer mechanic for yrs. 1 out of 10 mechanics actually knows what there doing.. Half the time the other mechanics were in my stall asking me to help them rather then opening a book and reading the scan tools... I commend people for trying to learn on there own.. I own a 99 silverado with the 5.3L with the same issue and I am getting ready to take a look at mine for the same issue. Also check your pcv system the plastic vacumn lines break and leak often. Hopes this helps!
kleake
12-07-2013, 11:39 AM
Hey guys, the problem this guy is having is a vacumn leak from his upper intake manifold gasket.
I have since sold this suburban this past summer, but the problem wasn't as bad as it had been. It wasn't solved as it still had a rough idle, but it had definitely improved from where it had been. I did change the lower intake manifold gasket and it didn't seem to make any change at the time, but I'm not sure what the upper intake gasket is as this is a 1 piece intake. I do see a lot of people that say the gasket solved the problem, but I'm thinking mine either had a crack or some other leak that I never found. I did search all over the place, even spraying carb cleaner and such and never found the source.
I have since sold this suburban this past summer, but the problem wasn't as bad as it had been. It wasn't solved as it still had a rough idle, but it had definitely improved from where it had been. I did change the lower intake manifold gasket and it didn't seem to make any change at the time, but I'm not sure what the upper intake gasket is as this is a 1 piece intake. I do see a lot of people that say the gasket solved the problem, but I'm thinking mine either had a crack or some other leak that I never found. I did search all over the place, even spraying carb cleaner and such and never found the source.
jyount
12-07-2013, 03:40 PM
Hey guys, the problem this guy is having is a vacumn leak from his upper intake manifold gasket. Theres a bulliton for this issue but its probly out of warranty... still the bulliton helps the dealer mechanics with what to look for....Nothing bothers me more then someone telling this poor guy to go to the dealer and spend a few bucks.. I have been a dealer mechanic for yrs. 1 out of 10 mechanics actually knows what there doing.. Half the time the other mechanics were in my stall asking me to help them rather then opening a book and reading the scan tools... I commend people for trying to learn on there own.. I own a 99 silverado with the 5.3L with the same issue and I am getting ready to take a look at mine for the same issue. Also check your pcv system the plastic vacumn lines break and leak often. Hopes this helps!
Would have to agree with this guy, true mechanics are few and far between. Fixers are not the same as parts changers. The older LS series engines had intake manifold gasket breakdown from fuel causing this. I believe the old gaskets were orange and the newer ones are green. GM figured it out about the time "flex fuel" was popular. Only problem was the ethanol content was what was eating it and all fuel made now days has ethanol in it. The manifold is not hard to replace gaskets on. I used to be a dealer tech too, if I remember right that is one of the jobs you did ok on since we were paid flat rate. IE it took considerably less time than was billed for the job...
Would have to agree with this guy, true mechanics are few and far between. Fixers are not the same as parts changers. The older LS series engines had intake manifold gasket breakdown from fuel causing this. I believe the old gaskets were orange and the newer ones are green. GM figured it out about the time "flex fuel" was popular. Only problem was the ethanol content was what was eating it and all fuel made now days has ethanol in it. The manifold is not hard to replace gaskets on. I used to be a dealer tech too, if I remember right that is one of the jobs you did ok on since we were paid flat rate. IE it took considerably less time than was billed for the job...
j cAT
12-08-2013, 04:53 PM
Would have to agree with this guy, true mechanics are few and far between. Fixers are not the same as parts changers. The older LS series engines had intake manifold gasket breakdown from fuel causing this. I believe the old gaskets were orange and the newer ones are green. GM figured it out about the time "flex fuel" was popular. Only problem was the ethanol content was what was eating it and all fuel made now days has ethanol in it. The manifold is not hard to replace gaskets on. I used to be a dealer tech too, if I remember right that is one of the jobs you did ok on since we were paid flat rate. IE it took considerably less time than was billed for the job...
this guy has used airtex replacements so why would you expect the pressure of fuel to be correct. his first post he thought 43 psi was normal pressure ..
YOU USE AIRTEX YOU LOOSE !
this guy has used airtex replacements so why would you expect the pressure of fuel to be correct. his first post he thought 43 psi was normal pressure ..
YOU USE AIRTEX YOU LOOSE !
jyount
12-12-2013, 09:07 PM
Not saying it is ever, and I reread my post, not there. What I will say is that for every pump we replaced in this vintage, we probably replaced 15 intake gasket sets. Multiple problems for the OP? Maybe so, but we will not know because he got rid of it. True both can cause this issue, but hard starts, powering out at higher loads, and stalls are far more common to fuel pressure issues than lean codes are.
kleake
12-13-2013, 09:45 AM
this guy has used airtex replacements so why would you expect the pressure of fuel to be correct. his first post he thought 43 psi was normal pressure ..
YOU USE AIRTEX YOU LOOSE !
I am not saying airtex is the best thing out there, but the cost of most other OEM versions of this pump are simply ridiculous! The point is, the fuel pressure running never changed (or at least very little) from the original noisy pump, to the replacment, to the second replacement. I NEVER had any issues when the rpm was above about 1500 or so, and WOT always worked without any cutting out. Wide open performance was fine, which would tell me the fuel pressure was acceptable. Even at idle when I unplug the regulator, pressure would go up to 60 and guess what, the problem still existed with very little change. The lower intake gasket was changed to the newer style and that didn't seem to make any noticable difference at all and I could never find any cracks or leaks of any kind. Just because I couldn't locate any, doesn't mean there isn't any, but I looked pretty hard and used carb cleaner to help search. From everything I can determine, and what I see from others indicates there was a vacuum leak somewhere though. I also read about a re-calibration of the computer on some models, I never had this done, but it very well could have corrected the issue as well. The way I look at it though, if a problem is getting worse, it's not the computer, it's a component failing and a calibration of the computer is simply a patch.
Either way, I can agree that Airtex isn't the best pump out there, but in this case, I am pretty positive that it is not the issue.
YOU USE AIRTEX YOU LOOSE !
I am not saying airtex is the best thing out there, but the cost of most other OEM versions of this pump are simply ridiculous! The point is, the fuel pressure running never changed (or at least very little) from the original noisy pump, to the replacment, to the second replacement. I NEVER had any issues when the rpm was above about 1500 or so, and WOT always worked without any cutting out. Wide open performance was fine, which would tell me the fuel pressure was acceptable. Even at idle when I unplug the regulator, pressure would go up to 60 and guess what, the problem still existed with very little change. The lower intake gasket was changed to the newer style and that didn't seem to make any noticable difference at all and I could never find any cracks or leaks of any kind. Just because I couldn't locate any, doesn't mean there isn't any, but I looked pretty hard and used carb cleaner to help search. From everything I can determine, and what I see from others indicates there was a vacuum leak somewhere though. I also read about a re-calibration of the computer on some models, I never had this done, but it very well could have corrected the issue as well. The way I look at it though, if a problem is getting worse, it's not the computer, it's a component failing and a calibration of the computer is simply a patch.
Either way, I can agree that Airtex isn't the best pump out there, but in this case, I am pretty positive that it is not the issue.
j cAT
12-13-2013, 12:18 PM
I am not saying airtex is the best thing out there, but the cost of most other OEM versions of this pump are simply ridiculous! The point is, the fuel pressure running never changed (or at least very little) from the original noisy pump, to the replacment, to the second replacement. I NEVER had any issues when the rpm was above about 1500 or so, and WOT always worked without any cutting out. Wide open performance was fine, which would tell me the fuel pressure was acceptable. Even at idle when I unplug the regulator, pressure would go up to 60 and guess what, the problem still existed with very little change. The lower intake gasket was changed to the newer style and that didn't seem to make any noticable difference at all and I could never find any cracks or leaks of any kind. Just because I couldn't locate any, doesn't mean there isn't any, but I looked pretty hard and used carb cleaner to help search. From everything I can determine, and what I see from others indicates there was a vacuum leak somewhere though. I also read about a re-calibration of the computer on some models, I never had this done, but it very well could have corrected the issue as well. The way I look at it though, if a problem is getting worse, it's not the computer, it's a component failing and a calibration of the computer is simply a patch.
Either way, I can agree that Airtex isn't the best pump out there, but in this case, I am pretty positive that it is not the issue.
with a 5.3L engine you need 60-62 psi key on engine off. when the engine runs it must be above 52psi. normal psi is 57 psi engine running.
with a vacuum leak the engine will hi idle. rpm at idle should be 650 rpm.
PCV and vacuum lines are replaced with any cracking which will cause hi idle.
a low rpm idle is from the IAC / throttle body dirty . stumble and random misses would be low fuel and or a restricted exhaust.
since you dumped it that is a sure fire way to solve a vehicles problem.
Either way, I can agree that Airtex isn't the best pump out there, but in this case, I am pretty positive that it is not the issue.
with a 5.3L engine you need 60-62 psi key on engine off. when the engine runs it must be above 52psi. normal psi is 57 psi engine running.
with a vacuum leak the engine will hi idle. rpm at idle should be 650 rpm.
PCV and vacuum lines are replaced with any cracking which will cause hi idle.
a low rpm idle is from the IAC / throttle body dirty . stumble and random misses would be low fuel and or a restricted exhaust.
since you dumped it that is a sure fire way to solve a vehicles problem.
kleake
12-14-2013, 02:56 PM
with a 5.3L engine you need 60-62 psi key on engine off. when the engine runs it must be above 52psi. normal psi is 57 psi engine running.
with a vacuum leak the engine will hi idle. rpm at idle should be 650 rpm.
PCV and vacuum lines are replaced with any cracking which will cause hi idle.
a low rpm idle is from the IAC / throttle body dirty . stumble and random misses would be low fuel and or a restricted exhaust.
since you dumped it that is a sure fire way to solve a vehicles problem.
Idle was always 650 and was never above or below by more than 100. Throttle body was cleaned, although I had not dipped it. Exhaust didn't seem to be an issue because high rpm power and performance was excellent. The only issue was rough idle and low rpm /heavy load miss, which I agree would indicate fuel. I don't think it was pressure though, but possibly dirty/fouled/worn injectors.
And I didn't dump the vehicle to solve the problem, I don't do that. I am upgrading to a 5th wheel trailer and a suburban just doesn't tow that very well. I had the Suburban for 9 years and we liked everything about it, except for this issue which we would have dumped it looong before now if that had been a show stopper. I upgraded to an 08 F250 diesel. We was tempted to keep the Suburban as a 3rd vehicle, but opted to sell it anyway as it would get very minimal usage and we have enough vehicles to drive already.
with a vacuum leak the engine will hi idle. rpm at idle should be 650 rpm.
PCV and vacuum lines are replaced with any cracking which will cause hi idle.
a low rpm idle is from the IAC / throttle body dirty . stumble and random misses would be low fuel and or a restricted exhaust.
since you dumped it that is a sure fire way to solve a vehicles problem.
Idle was always 650 and was never above or below by more than 100. Throttle body was cleaned, although I had not dipped it. Exhaust didn't seem to be an issue because high rpm power and performance was excellent. The only issue was rough idle and low rpm /heavy load miss, which I agree would indicate fuel. I don't think it was pressure though, but possibly dirty/fouled/worn injectors.
And I didn't dump the vehicle to solve the problem, I don't do that. I am upgrading to a 5th wheel trailer and a suburban just doesn't tow that very well. I had the Suburban for 9 years and we liked everything about it, except for this issue which we would have dumped it looong before now if that had been a show stopper. I upgraded to an 08 F250 diesel. We was tempted to keep the Suburban as a 3rd vehicle, but opted to sell it anyway as it would get very minimal usage and we have enough vehicles to drive already.
j cAT
12-15-2013, 12:42 PM
Idle was always 650 and was never above or below by more than 100. Throttle body was cleaned, although I had not dipped it. Exhaust didn't seem to be an issue because high rpm power and performance was excellent. The only issue was rough idle and low rpm /heavy load miss, which I agree would indicate fuel. I don't think it was pressure though, but possibly dirty/fouled/worn injectors.
And I didn't dump the vehicle to solve the problem, I don't do that. I am upgrading to a 5th wheel trailer and a suburban just doesn't tow that very well. I had the Suburban for 9 years and we liked everything about it, except for this issue which we would have dumped it looong before now if that had been a show stopper. I upgraded to an 08 F250 diesel. We was tempted to keep the Suburban as a 3rd vehicle, but opted to sell it anyway as it would get very minimal usage and we have enough vehicles to drive already.
what do you think about the 08 ford ? how does it compare with the GM new new style trucks 2007-2014
And I didn't dump the vehicle to solve the problem, I don't do that. I am upgrading to a 5th wheel trailer and a suburban just doesn't tow that very well. I had the Suburban for 9 years and we liked everything about it, except for this issue which we would have dumped it looong before now if that had been a show stopper. I upgraded to an 08 F250 diesel. We was tempted to keep the Suburban as a 3rd vehicle, but opted to sell it anyway as it would get very minimal usage and we have enough vehicles to drive already.
what do you think about the 08 ford ? how does it compare with the GM new new style trucks 2007-2014
kleake
12-16-2013, 10:05 PM
what do you think about the 08 ford ? how does it compare with the GM new new style trucks 2007-2014
I didn't get a chance to drive one of the newer GM trucks before I bought this one since I couldn't find any on any lots. All that I did see were gas and not diesel. My brother in law has had 2 Dodge diesels and loved the power, but they rode rough and he had many issues with death wobble. He bought a low mileage 08 Ford and loved it and after I rode in it I agreed that it fit what I wanted. I did a lot of searching and found this one loaded with tuner, full delete and dressed just like I like. I can say I have no issues, even with 180k already on it. The thing has ungodly power! There is a hill near our house that is really steep, the suburban pulling our camper up would be in first gear, foot to the floor and would just hold about 25-30mph. This thing will be in 3rd gear gaining speed without any problem at all. There really is no comparison of power whatsoever. It pulls very smooth and I can't even tell my small boat is even hooked to it. The bigger boat gives it a decent load, but still pulls great. I do hear the GM trucks get better mileage, and may have more creature comforts, but I also hear they don't have the power nor the reliability, but I can't confirm that. I do know that I am 100% happy with my purchase so far.
I didn't get a chance to drive one of the newer GM trucks before I bought this one since I couldn't find any on any lots. All that I did see were gas and not diesel. My brother in law has had 2 Dodge diesels and loved the power, but they rode rough and he had many issues with death wobble. He bought a low mileage 08 Ford and loved it and after I rode in it I agreed that it fit what I wanted. I did a lot of searching and found this one loaded with tuner, full delete and dressed just like I like. I can say I have no issues, even with 180k already on it. The thing has ungodly power! There is a hill near our house that is really steep, the suburban pulling our camper up would be in first gear, foot to the floor and would just hold about 25-30mph. This thing will be in 3rd gear gaining speed without any problem at all. There really is no comparison of power whatsoever. It pulls very smooth and I can't even tell my small boat is even hooked to it. The bigger boat gives it a decent load, but still pulls great. I do hear the GM trucks get better mileage, and may have more creature comforts, but I also hear they don't have the power nor the reliability, but I can't confirm that. I do know that I am 100% happy with my purchase so far.
j cAT
12-17-2013, 07:29 AM
I didn't get a chance to drive one of the newer GM trucks before I bought this one since I couldn't find any on any lots. All that I did see were gas and not diesel. My brother in law has had 2 Dodge diesels and loved the power, but they rode rough and he had many issues with death wobble. He bought a low mileage 08 Ford and loved it and after I rode in it I agreed that it fit what I wanted. I did a lot of searching and found this one loaded with tuner, full delete and dressed just like I like. I can say I have no issues, even with 180k already on it. The thing has ungodly power! There is a hill near our house that is really steep, the suburban pulling our camper up would be in first gear, foot to the floor and would just hold about 25-30mph. This thing will be in 3rd gear gaining speed without any problem at all. There really is no comparison of power whatsoever. It pulls very smooth and I can't even tell my small boat is even hooked to it. The bigger boat gives it a decent load, but still pulls great. I do hear the GM trucks get better mileage, and may have more creature comforts, but I also hear they don't have the power nor the reliability, but I can't confirm that. I do know that I am 100% happy with my purchase so far.
the ford does have the power and most all install the tuners with these ..since most use these diesels to tow campers etc..
the gm trucks do appear to have a nicer interior but the reliability on the 2007-?? is not very good.
the ford does have the power and most all install the tuners with these ..since most use these diesels to tow campers etc..
the gm trucks do appear to have a nicer interior but the reliability on the 2007-?? is not very good.
kleake
12-17-2013, 08:38 AM
the ford does have the power and most all install the tuners with these ..since most use these diesels to tow campers etc..
the gm trucks do appear to have a nicer interior but the reliability on the 2007-?? is not very good.
I have heard the same, but overall I had much less feedback on the GM since there aren't nearly as many on the road. It's funny, I typically will see only 1 or 2 GM diesels (3/4 ton variety) in a given week. I will see 5 or so per day of ford or dodge. That in itself told me how the reliability must be. And yes, the difference in power from my brother in laws low mileage in stock condition to my high mileage tuned truck is so much different, it doesn't even feel like they are the same truck. I have seen dyno reports of trucks with nothing more than exhaust, cold air intake and a tuner putting out 600hp and 1000ft/lbs of torque.
the gm trucks do appear to have a nicer interior but the reliability on the 2007-?? is not very good.
I have heard the same, but overall I had much less feedback on the GM since there aren't nearly as many on the road. It's funny, I typically will see only 1 or 2 GM diesels (3/4 ton variety) in a given week. I will see 5 or so per day of ford or dodge. That in itself told me how the reliability must be. And yes, the difference in power from my brother in laws low mileage in stock condition to my high mileage tuned truck is so much different, it doesn't even feel like they are the same truck. I have seen dyno reports of trucks with nothing more than exhaust, cold air intake and a tuner putting out 600hp and 1000ft/lbs of torque.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2025