Quote:
Originally Posted by ccernst
I've posted this question in a few other Ranger forums with little success, thought I might try here.
I got a Ranger about a year ago and love it. It is a '98 Ranger SuperCab 3.0L 4x4 manual. The owner before me tried to take care of it, but the mechanic she took it to was taking her for a ride I think. When I got it, it ran very bad. I did a pretty big tune up on it and it runs pretty good. But I do have one quirk.
I have no CEL on, but when I hook my Acctron 9180 scanner up, it reads the following:
o2s11 0v
st ftrm11% ranges from -1.0 to 0.8
02s12 0v
st ftrm12% -100.6 solid
o2s21 0v
st ftrm21% ranges from -2.2 to 0.0
I made these readings after a 20min drive home from work. My fuel trims are at extremes.
Anyone run into this?
|
O2s11 is bank one upstream sensor
O2s12 is the only downstream sensor there is
O2s21 is bank two upstream sensor
I'm not familiar with that scanner, but if it is a lower cost one, I wouldn't necessarily trust it for the voltages, get an oscilloscope and look at what the voltage actually is. The STFT will usually read near 0, as it will "pass" the counts on to LTFT if it stays above/below +/-10%. Will that scanner show LTFT? I'd be more concerned about that than STFT. Those STFT numbers look very good. +/- 10% is where you want it to be, it's no better to have it at 0% than it is the have it at 8%. I have not been able to try it, but I've been told that if you check a brand new car it will read a few % away from 0. You might want to take it to a shop that does the BG induction flush. I have seen that get the FT closer to 0 many times, it also cleans up the O2 sensors a bit, but generally if the sensor's bad it's bad, you're not going to fix that with chemicals.
For the B1S2 STFT -100.6%, that's not a valid number. The maximum is 100%, and the SES light should illuminate at (I think) 20% for any FT number. I think you probably have a computer problem, either the scanner or the PCM. If it's a cheap scanner, I'd suspect that first. If the O2 sensor voltages were actually 0v, you would have a code for each one, and quite possibly multiple codes for each one.