12-17-2002, 08:58 PM
|
#1
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4
|
nsx or m3?
Ok, so I drive a 99 M3 and I love it a lot. It's the best all around car, but the nsx just looks sooo sweet. The m3 looks sweet too, but a red nsx looks like a true sports car. How fast are nsx's? Since I have a 99 w/27K I would be looking at early models of the nsx. Thanks for the help.
|
|
|
12-27-2002, 12:59 PM
|
#2
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 1,245
|
They're around the same performance figures as your M3. Between 280-290hp. And I agree with you on the looks. If you want to go faster still there are superchargers, and a whole array of performance parts you can purchase for the NSX. Be lucky Honda makes it, because you know there is a slue of crap for it.
Good Luck!
__________________
 
R.I.P. "Mama (my Z)" . . . But now we have the VR-4 #683/2000
"Dude, You fucking passed the test, but just barely, wanna know what you got?...F+......CLICK!"
-Tenacious D(Jack BLack)-
"Official Moron Crew Founder!"
|
|
|
12-28-2002, 09:47 AM
|
#3
|
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 51
|
there really not comparable at all.......the m3 is meant to be a touring coupe that has all the comforts taht you could want along with the speed and handling abilty.....The NSx expsesialy in the earlier years is a no bs true sports car.....yeah there are leather seats but you wont find half of the computer assists that your M3 has.....having driven an M3 once i dont know why you would want to sell it......its the sweetest car i have ever been in.....i cant speek for the NSX cause i have never driven one but the thing sure as hell looks good....i dont think that you can go wrong either way......its a honda so even for a sports car its goin to last forever and be able to be driven hard day after day.......keep the M3 and get a NSX for the weekends.....sounds like a waste but go for it
|
|
|
12-31-2002, 06:00 PM
|
#4
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: T.O.
Posts: 1,177
|
yah...going with what Ryan said, for practicality reasons, you should keep the M3.
If you have another beater car to keep you okay, take the NSX.
__________________

|
|
|
01-25-2003, 08:14 AM
|
#5
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 30
|
buy a good cheap beater and get the NSX! the m3 is a phat car, but the the nsx to me is an exotic.
|
|
|
01-25-2003, 10:55 AM
|
#6
|
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 51
|
or still better yet sell your house by the smallest cheapest trailer you can find and then buy two of each car
ryan
|
|
|
01-25-2003, 01:59 PM
|
#7
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: T.O.
Posts: 1,177
|
That's going to be quite expensive...
__________________

|
|
|
03-06-2003, 01:17 AM
|
#8
|
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,809
|
i vote nsx.. although the keeping one and getting the other was a good idea... if you can bank it..
|
|
|
03-20-2003, 11:07 AM
|
#9
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 41
|
I have to say NSX. I've had 2 E36 M3's in the past and I love the cars. But the NSX is soooo much more fun to drive. I love this car. Never had any problems with it, and it attracts soo much attention. Only downside is the cost to mod it, it's expensive to fix(aluminum body), and its under appreciated.
Good Luck
Z
|
|
|
03-20-2003, 01:53 PM
|
#10
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 426
|
i would go for the m3! i dont know y, maybe cause i am a sedan fan!
__________________
|
|
|
03-20-2003, 05:29 PM
|
#11
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 43
|
that's funny what ryan said, live in trailer to get a nice car. that's what my friend is actually doing, she's living in trailer so she can get a viper. but as for the nsx and m3, from what i know, the nsx have no problem smoking a m3 in the 1/4 both running stock.
|
|
|
03-26-2003, 09:11 PM
|
#12
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: T.O.
Posts: 1,177
|
Quote:
Originally posted by arthur12187
i would go for the m3! i dont know y, maybe cause i am a sedan fan!
|
M3 is a coupe; albeit w/ 4 seats.
__________________

|
|
|
05-02-2003, 03:26 AM
|
#13
|
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 66
|
The M3 comes in coupe and 4dr sedan.
|
|
|
05-10-2003, 02:02 AM
|
#14
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6
|
my NSX broke down!!! sorta
haha my NSX finally gave it's first break down. The car is a 1992, and after redlining it from san diego to los angeles a coolant hose in the engine bay leaked. Not bad considering it never been to the dealer once and raced ocassionally for a few years. I was suppose to replace the hose 7 years ago, but I figured if it ain't broke dont' fix it. Guess it's time for me to replace them all.
__________________
1992 NSX
1993 NSX
1998 NSXT
1997 C5 Vette
1999 CLK430
2001 330ci Convt
1994 RX7 Touring
|
|
|
05-10-2003, 07:21 PM
|
#15
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 12
|
Go for the NSX! I'm going from a 2002 540i to a new NSX toward the end of the year. My bmw is ok but I grew bored of it quickly. It's a nice car but lets face it, no matter how well a bmw performs, they will never LOOK like a sports car. I feel like I'm driving my grandpa's car and I don't think much different about the M series. The front view on any bmw is incredible but that's where it ends - no curves or character to the body, except for the Z4 but anyone can get one of those. I thought it would be a good cross between sport car/practical car. It turned out to be a little too practical (boring). My old 80' Z28 used to turn more heads! Plus, I see bmw's everywhere in my city. Kind of takes the pump out of owning one.
|
|
|
|