93nissan

so this is the r34 i might buy let me know what you think, thanks guys...
it seems pretty nice but i dont know much about skylines, i think it has a rd28 or maybe a ca18i im not sure thanks again

lata

Thats way Sick! Its the the motor is the CA18i with AWD, you should definately get it!

slideways...

uhhhhh. i hope this is a joke.

__________________

Rice Police #1. dont argue with me just because you are a riceboy and/or have sand in your vagina. i am superior. and i am smarter than you. end of story.

93nissan

what joke, that car is nicer than yours i bet

cajun thunder

That is NOT a real skyline. there is no way. The R34 came with the I6 RB26det engine, and that has a traverse mounted I4 engine. Looks like a cheap knock off body kit. I would look elsewhere for a skyline. Oh and BTW that is an R32 body kit not an R34 the front bumper is a dead giveaway.

93nissan

No i picked it up last week, it is real and too fast... i got it for €28k, steel of a deal huh? i can burn the front tires through 3rd gear. id better be careful before i torque steer into a tree. no its not a 32 front bumper its a s13 cross over. kinda sucks but i have a r33 front clip on the way thanks for lookin

cajun thunder

It is not a s13 either, the s13 has a sr20, and is rear wheel drive, prob a 200sx, or whatever they called the version in Europe, anyway it looks nothing like a R34, but the roll cage looks cool anyway. Props man.

vectorspecialist

other than the lights it almost looks like it was a VW at one point in its life. that's not a real skyline. to short, and transverse motor never happened with a skyline(that i know of) and i'm pretty sure the exhaust tip is on the wrong side too

steal, yea the previous owner stole ur money

__________________
yup, here i am

93nissan

ummm.... i would know, i own it. i have the title that even says nissan skyline r34 gtt. but thanks for trying to make me look bad

vectorspecialist

well than the title is for a car that u weren't sold. look up on google or something nissan skyline gtr34. u will notice one thing, ur car is shorter than it. not only that but skyline NEVER had an opposed 4 cyl. they always had i6 for the gtr's

__________________
yup, here i am

vectorspecialist

thats not really that bad looking of a mazda.

actually there was a 2.8l used in the skyline. whether its considered an rb series idk

__________________
yup, here i am

93nissan

ok so this was a complete joke because i wanted to see how many people are just dicks and or think they know what they are talking about. cajun thunder is the only one who wasnt cocky about it. this is a skyline forum, skylines are just as crappy as any other car. i know this because i own one. they are a normal car nothing special. as for people thinking they really know a whole lot about skylines and trying to talk crap on me. the mazda in the picture is a 626, it is not just shorter than a r34 it is much narower. the body lines are completely different than a r34. the r34 did only come with a inline 6 in a 2.0 litre 2.5 litre and a 2.6 litre. the rd28 like i said is a skyline motor. it came in the early skylines such as the r31. it was a diesel motor and it was a 2.8 litre inline six single cam non turbo motor. and also the ca18i motor was a skyline motor. it was a 1.8 litre single cam fuel injected motor. it came in the r32 gxi. the body lines make it so easy to see that it isnt a r34. i love skylines and love my car but honestly they are just a car. i just cant figure out why every one on skyline forums acts like they have something stuck in there ass. everyone i have ever been on is that way. this was sopposed to be a joke and i though everyone would get it but i guess not. thanks to cajun thunder for not being a dick. i dont understand how it was even mistakeable. but who even cares. welcome to the forum for skylines. what are you even thinking about what you may be thinking about what im thinking about what skylines are thinking about me? HUH? HUHH!!!

93nissan

also the nur came with a 2.6 rb26dett. the nismo 400r came with a rb28 but it was called a rbx. you can build a rb28 several ways by using a rb30 bottom end or bigger pistons in the rb26 using the rb26 head. the draw back to using the rb30 bottom end is that stock it does not rev as high. the nur is a sick car though

93nissan

so if you own that fd is it weekly or monthly rebuilds on the 13b? I bet you are the kind of guy that thinks Synthetic is the best and uses it in the rotary motor. I can sense that you dont have the balls to do a Cosmos 20b. oh well, keep changing those apex seals and water seals. and have fun with your lawn mower

jcsaleen

"WE" don't have anything stuck up our ass. We are all tired of Trolls and retards invading these boards. What your posting is nothing less then spam. Pretty quick change of words there, I'm no super genious when it comes to skylines and their engines but I do know what you posted was a joke and nothing less then rice garbage.

Sorry if I was off .2 so here's the difference

Next time post something worthwhile

Ha, my 1.3 is more then fine with 48K on the clock and yea I run 10W-30. Everyone knows syn is a sin to run in a rotary due to build of carbon and other junk. The rotor however your on my field little boy. I'm sure the first 3 solnoids alone in my car will make your headspin.

A Cosmo 20B you say? Balls, Really?

I prefer to
A. Have my 50/50 weight balance.
B. Have money in my pocket.
C. When I do finally do my rebuild when that O so faitfull day comes... Ceramix are going in and a nice street port to match my single-turbo's output will be done. You speak of the 20B as if it were some little childs toy? You couldn't even begin to comprehend what needs to even remotely be done to an FD to make it capable of handling the 20B's power output - torque increase and stress load that is on the front due to another 654cc increase, but thats another day's teaching one of which you won't be taught anytime soon.

Anyways ~ Deleting my other posts because this thread is utter garbage as usual. I don't even want my count being attributed to this crap. Your still sitting low in my book for posting garbage. Going to take a while before your up on the list

__________________

Another way of looking at this equation is that an F1 would need "only" 740 hp to reach the Bugatti's top speed.