Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Become a fan of Igor Sushko on Facebook!
-
Please Register or Login to access: DriverSide DriverSide Home | Service & Repair | Car Prices | Parts & Accessories | Reviews & Advice | My Garage
Google  
Web AF
See Latest Posts
Access AF from your phone - point your mobile browser to http://m.automotiveforums.com
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Ford > Nonspecific
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-14-2007, 11:48 PM   #1
ford 312
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Clarinda, Iowa
Posts: 1
ford 312 Normal reputation
1957 Ford Autolite 4 barrel Carburetor

I have a 1957 Ford car with a 312 engine and a Ford Autolite 4 Barrel carburetor. Can anyone tell me the CFM rating for this carburetor? The later 4100 carburetors were rated at 480 CFM and 600 CFM, but I am unable to find the rating for the 1957 Carburetor. Thanks for your help.
Don
ford 312 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 02:56 AM   #2
slash09
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 81
slash09 Normal reputation
Re: 1957 Ford Autolite 4 barrel Carburetor

That's the rating for all of them. It depends on motor size. On a 312 it's probably the 480. If the tag is still on it what does it say? It should have two rows of info.
__________________
Panthers eat Impalas
slash09 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD


Bookmarks
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Ford > Nonspecific

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 PM.

Google  
Web AF
Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts