portland5

1) Is a 2006 Nissan 350 z faster than a 1997 z28 camaro?
2) Is a 2006 Nissan 350 z a better car than a 1997 z 28 camaro?
3) Why is a Nissan 350 z so popular?
4) Is a Nissan 350 z more popular and more desired than a 1997 camaro z28 and why?
5) which would you rathar have?
6) why is a 1995 Honda Civic and a 1995 mitsubishi eclipse so desired?
7) Can a 1995 Honda Civic, a 1995 mitsubishi eclipse and a 2006 Nissan 350 z be compared to a ferarri more so than a 1997 camaro z28 based on power to weight ratio and maneuverability than the 1997 camaro z28 which is driven mainly by power and not maneuverability?

89Firebird2.8

1) no
2) haven't owned either, can't really compare in build quality.
3) Fast and the Furious
4) see #3

__________________

1989 Firebird 2.8l V6 Red and White w/flames. Stock. Daily Driver. 197,000 miles, will it make the 200K mark? Who knows? Almost as many starters as miles


1967 Firebird 400 V8 Convertible. Primer Grey with green bondo spots. Cam, Headers, Dual Exhaust w/glasspacks, larger valves, 4bbl carb. TH400 w/ Shift Kit. My dad's ride, but will be mine someday.
Mileage unknown, doesn't have original speedo, switched the 120 for a 160.

Firebirdlad03

1.)NO
2.)no
3.)Fast and the furious
4.)Around here camaros are way more popular than 350z's
5.) Are you crazy?? your talkin to the guys that live for camaros.
6.)rice racers
7.) what in the hell are you smokin?

__________________
Mitch

92 Firebird formula...

cardboardpimp420

these are the exact comments i was expecting as soon as i saw this topic

Mrs. Azrael

1) Is a 2006 Nissan 350 z faster than a 1997 z28 camaro? NO
2) Is a 2006 Nissan 350 z a better car than a 1997 z 28 camaro? NO
3) Why is a Nissan 350 z so popular? Not sure
4) Is a Nissan 350 z more popular and more desired than a 1997 camaro z28 and why? Not by true american muscle fans.
5) which would you rathar have? Camaro
6) why is a 1995 Honda Civic and a 1995 mitsubishi eclipse so desired? some people just like slow cars???
7) Can a 1995 Honda Civic, a 1995 mitsubishi eclipse and a 2006 Nissan 350 z be compared to a ferarri more so than a 1997 camaro z28 based on power to weight ratio and maneuverability than the 1997 camaro z28 which is driven mainly by power and not maneuverability? the camaro is not as bad in maneuverability as you think it is.. it can be made to handle really well.. and for the weight of a camaro.. the power to weight issue is not as bad as you think it is..

Look at it this way..

Honda Civic.. weighs 2231.. but has at the most 130 HP

Mitsubishi Eclipse.. weighs 3079 HP 210

Nissan 350 z weighs 3188-3347 lbs(coupe), 3445-3479 lbs(convertible) HP 287 - 300

Camaro Z28 weighs 3306 - 3440 for the vert. HP 275-310

__________________
-=2002 NBM Camaro SS #10354=-
-= "The Blue Ghost"=-
-=532 RWHP 508 RWTQ=-

hotrod_chevyz

comparing apples and oranges...

__________________

poormillionaire2

Two different types of cars for different people. If you posted this in the Nissan forum, I'm sure the answers would be different. 'Better' is a viewpoint, an opinion term. Both have more desirable features than the other, but one isn't a declared 'better' car. Its just whatever you like. Personally, I like camaros over 350Z's (if that isn't obvious).

__________________
Sold
1994 Camaro Z28


Current Car
2003 Monte Carlo SS


New Toy
2009 Kawasaki Ninja 500R

2.2 Straight six

because god wanted it that way.

end of.

__________________
Seatbelts Saved My Life

ikeyballz

yeh. just to tell you, 350z's are slower than LT1 powered cars. i raced one a few weeks back, killed it every time. i have 6 speed, he had 6 speed. stock for stock

but it might have been a different story at the track, seeing how im gonna have to throw around a few hundred more pounds down the track then he is, and how his car is supposed to be revved up.

its all in what you want. anyone on this forum will prolly never turn down a free 350..but if we had a choice, to buy a 06 350 or a TPI/LT1/LS1 camaro and build it with the leftover money..

99.99999% will take the camaro/bird.

so in other words..

stupid question.

__________________
Car:
1997 M6 SS Camaro [ white ]
285's in the back
all else = STOCK.

philly rs

__________________


HYPSI87 u will be missed

ikeyballz

__________________
Car:
1997 M6 SS Camaro [ white ]
285's in the back
all else = STOCK.

stepho

Is this guy a troll or just an idiot? I can't tell.

__________________

Genopsyde

chill out, nothing wrong with those questions. much better read than all the ex-girlfriend drama crap in the banter thread.

__________________


1986 Fiero
1990 300ZX TT
1991 Camaro RS 355
1998 Tahoe 4x4
1999 F355 Spyder

89Firebird2.8

I wouldn't neccessarily say the 350Z is more desired either, it's just that the punks who own them are typically louder about it.

__________________

1989 Firebird 2.8l V6 Red and White w/flames. Stock. Daily Driver. 197,000 miles, will it make the 200K mark? Who knows? Almost as many starters as miles


1967 Firebird 400 V8 Convertible. Primer Grey with green bondo spots. Cam, Headers, Dual Exhaust w/glasspacks, larger valves, 4bbl carb. TH400 w/ Shift Kit. My dad's ride, but will be mine someday.
Mileage unknown, doesn't have original speedo, switched the 120 for a 160.

Blackcrow64

IMO this is completely retarded...

Why do you ask us such random questions comparing so many cars to each other? Are you just collecting group answers to buy a car that seems to be "the cool car to drive"? I sure hope thats not the case, cause that would be completely retarded to do...

So, why are you so bent over Z28's, 97's specifically, and comparing them to Ferrari's and random Japanese cars?

I expect a serious reply here...

__________________
1992 Pontiac Firebird... Sold...
1997 Eagle Talon TSi AWD... -The Talon Build Thread... Updated 7-6-09
2006 Chevy Cobalt... -AF User Guidelines/Rules..

>>>TalonProject.com<<<

<<<- Like this post? Add to my reputation with the scales!