|
Our Community is 662,000 Strong. Join Us. |
950+ rwhp S2000clawhammer 11-07-2006, 01:03 PM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WirkGXYdOus It's technically not the highest horsepower S2000, since it's not an S2000 engine, but it's still 950+ rwhp. Supposedly they had to make some alterations to the chasis, which people are talking about affecting the handling. Mad_Maxima 11-07-2006, 01:09 PM 2JZ, no shit saw some pics of it earlier, http://www.hi-upload.com/upload/uploaded2/s2k2jz.jpg http://i11.tinypic.com/2gue0pe.jpg but damn, $16K, thats a shitload of money, i wanna see it at full boost though, looked kinda slow in the vid fivepointohhhh 11-07-2006, 01:42 PM thats some serious stuff, S(upra)2000 turtlecrxsi 11-07-2006, 03:17 PM Sleeper... VR43000GT 11-07-2006, 05:30 PM Damn, very clean too. BlackGT2000 11-07-2006, 05:32 PM its pretty neat. I have been thinking that Honda should make a different motor for the S2000. I would like to see something like a 3.5 liter 8 cylinder that revs to 8000 or something like that. clawhammer 11-07-2006, 06:07 PM its pretty neat. I have been thinking that Honda should make a different motor for the S2000. I would like to see something like a 3.5 liter 8 cylinder that revs to 8000 or something like that. Personally I'd rather see a 2.6l V8 that revved up to 10,000 rpms :) 00accord44 11-07-2006, 06:58 PM *drool* Mad_Maxima 11-07-2006, 07:15 PM id like to see two F20C1's fused into a 8 cylinder 2.2 Straight six 11-07-2006, 07:33 PM waste of a 2JZ-GTE. RACER D12 11-07-2006, 10:31 PM hmm pretty cool. I wonder what else they could put in there too... SR20DET, or some RB motor maybe? Chiquae07 11-07-2006, 11:33 PM madness...why not put in a 3.0 v6 reving to 10k in it? that would be great. i cant think of the liters for the nsx engine. that would be crazy. 00accord44 11-08-2006, 12:45 AM Old NSX or new NSX? Old had a 3L V6. The new one gets a V8. -The Stig- 11-08-2006, 01:43 AM Old NSX or new NSX? Old had a 3L V6. The new one gets a V8. "Old" NSX had both a 3.0L and a 3.2L. 00accord44 11-08-2006, 01:59 AM ^Ah true. I stand revised. Chiquae07 11-08-2006, 08:34 AM im not too sure. is there any information out about the 'new' nsx? 00accord44 11-08-2006, 11:53 AM I'm not sure how solid the info is, but I read an article about it in C&D or R&T or somethin a few months ago Its gonna be a 3.6ish Liter V8 pushing out about 375 hp if I remember correctly, but don't quote me on that. I know it'll have the new AWD-SH system like the RL. I'll look for the figures EDIT- New NSX will supposedly have a V10. No hp figures, I seem to have created those in my mind. But it will be designed to compete with the new Supra that will be appearing around 08-09. So expect 400hp if not much more. I'm curious as to what the displacement will be in that V10... 6L Honda :confused: Gohan Ryu 11-08-2006, 01:16 PM I'm curious as to what the displacement will be in that V10... 6L Honda :confused: The Honda McLaren V10s and V12s were 3.5 litre. I'm guessing they'll probably base the new engine on what they've already built. I don't know if the Honda techs know how to handle large displacement engines, all that torque would confuse them. edit: found this picture - I don't read Japanese but that looks like 5L V10...It's all just speculation at this point anyway. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v697/xiao_meow/65827943.jpg BlackGT2000 11-08-2006, 04:16 PM I would still love to see a small V8 in that S2000, as impressive as the 6 banger they had was...I think they should step it up a notch. -The Stig- 11-08-2006, 05:36 PM LS1 that sumbitch! :lol: clawhammer 11-08-2006, 05:46 PM LS1 that sumbitch! :lol: I doubt there will be that many engine swaps in the S2000 simply because a lot of people buy the car for its engine. Plus, a stock engine (internals obviously) has put down over 700 horsepower on a dyno. GForce957 11-08-2006, 07:18 PM I would still love to see a small V8 in that S2000, as impressive as the 6 banger they had was...I think they should step it up a notch. 4 cylinder -The Stig- 11-08-2006, 07:27 PM I doubt there will be that many engine swaps in the S2000 simply because a lot of people buy the car for its engine. Plus, a stock engine (internals obviously) has put down over 700 horsepower on a dyno. A stock internal'ed S2000 has put down 700 horsepower? Using what? Pics? Vids? Not saying I'd put a LS1 in a S2000... cause I like high revvin motors.:wink: TheStang00 11-08-2006, 08:25 PM Not saying I'd put a LS1 in a S2000... cause I like high revvin motors.:wink: thats right, so we need a honda rotary revving to 12k rpm... ok well maybe thats not gonna happen but it would actually make me interested in a honda vehicle. doesnt surprise me they are using a v10 in the nsx, honda is allergic to v8's Mad_Maxima 11-08-2006, 08:30 PM cause I like high revvin motors.:wink: like a 8000 RPM redline, is that high enough??:icon16: GForce957 11-08-2006, 08:37 PM A stock internal'ed S2000 has put down 700 horsepower? Using what? Pics? Vids? Not saying I'd put a LS1 in a S2000... cause I like high revvin motors.:wink: I think he said with beefed up internals -The Stig- 11-08-2006, 09:19 PM I think he said with beefed up internals No, re-read it again... he said a stock engine, internals obviously, made 700hp. If you use process of elimination you can come to the same conclusion I did. If you beef the internals up, nothing will happen to the power output of the motor. If you slap on a fatty turbo and all the bolt ons you can think of, but leave the internals stock, plus replacing the camshafts, some folks don't consider that internal work, since you don't have to rip the motor apart completely... You do all that, you get power. Get it? :wink: Although, I can't see a stock S2000 block/internals being very reliable at 700hp. Not for long at least. CassiesMan 11-08-2006, 09:27 PM Although, I can't see a stock S2000 block/internals being very reliable at 700hp. Not for long at least. I dunno... 700hp and 12ftlbs of torque. Couldn't break that much. -The Stig- 11-08-2006, 09:28 PM I dunno... 700hp and 12ftlbs of torque. Couldn't break that much. :grinno: 00accord44 11-08-2006, 09:41 PM :1: TheStang00 11-08-2006, 10:30 PM I dunno... 700hp and 12ftlbs of torque. Couldn't break that much. :lol: BlackGT2000 11-08-2006, 11:50 PM 4 cylinder I know what the S2000 had in it. I was talking about the NSX motor that people were talking about putting into the s2000. 00accord44 11-09-2006, 12:04 AM We were just talking about the NSX in general old vs upcoming (at least I was) hence the confusion. I guess it would be kinda cool to drop the NSX engine in an S2k, but I don't really see why anybody would spend that money to gain 30-50 horses. Unless they had dreams of SC and wanted the extra displacement GForce957 11-09-2006, 12:12 AM I know what the S2000 had in it. I was talking about the NSX motor that people were talking about putting into the s2000. Ah my bad. That would be a pretty pointless swap tho, the motor wasn't what made the NSX special, as accord said, its not that big of an increase Chiquae07 11-09-2006, 08:09 AM hm.... would a rotary fit in the s2k's engine bay? clawhammer 11-09-2006, 09:44 AM I think I was a bit off on the 700 rwhp number. It's actually only 619 rwhp. Here are the pics and the dyno: http://xs204.xs.to/xs204/06300/reds2k.jpg http://xs204.xs.to/xs204/06300/s2k.jpg http://xs204.xs.to/xs204/06300/crazys2k.jpg http://jg-fab.com/s2kturbo/619whp.JPG Mad_Maxima 11-09-2006, 01:50 PM is that in houston?? jason at st00pidfast is a fkin genious at tuning 00accord44 11-09-2006, 01:56 PM Impressive, but to clarify this: Is that on stock internals or not? clawhammer 11-09-2006, 02:53 PM Impressive, but to clarify this: Is that on stock internals or not? Yes, stock internals and stock compression. S2000s have forged internals from the factory. turtlecrxsi 11-09-2006, 04:08 PM That is impressive but not making any power until 4.5k really is kind of depressing... GForce957 11-09-2006, 05:18 PM word Gohan Ryu 11-09-2006, 06:15 PM yeah. might need a 4 puck to handle those 6k launches. BlackGT2000 11-09-2006, 06:18 PM Ah my bad. That would be a pretty pointless swap tho, the motor wasn't what made the NSX special, as accord said, its not that big of an increase I agree thats why I was suggesting a small displacement V8 instead haha. GForce957 11-09-2006, 06:30 PM eh, get a big Cummins Turbo Diesel, that will solve the torque problems -The Stig- 11-09-2006, 06:42 PM That is impressive but not making any power until 4.5k really is kind of depressing... How is that any different than when it was stock? :lol: 00accord44 11-09-2006, 07:09 PM How is that any different than when it was stock? :lol: ouch clawhammer 11-10-2006, 12:21 AM It's true, the car is very peaky. I don't notice it at all though. In daily driving situations I can still keep ahead of traffic without going into VTEC, and when you're driving hard, you keep the car in VTEC (6000-9000 rpms). If low end is an issue, than you're either in the wrong gear or in the wrong car ;) TatII 11-10-2006, 01:56 AM see that is how a S2000 is suppose to sound.. like a mean car, not like a can of wasp. also one of my best friends has a F20c powered S2K and you have to rev that thing to 4K to move anywhere when just driving around town. mean while i shift my car at 2K and just let the tq do the work. Mad_Maxima 11-10-2006, 02:51 AM mean while i shift my car at 2K and just let the tq do the work. truck engines will do that for ya :lol: jk VR43000GT 11-10-2006, 06:08 PM ^^ :lol: TatII 11-11-2006, 01:35 AM nothing wrong with a 2.4 liter 4 cylinder that feels more torquier then most japanese 3.0 v6's even when i'm off boost. VR43000GT 11-11-2006, 01:39 AM ^^ Of course, hints the truck motor. Just busting your ass Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2012
|