Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Visit IgorSushko.com and see what it's like racing in Japan
-
Google  
Web AF
Become a subscriber. Browse a faster, ad-free AF. Instantly.

Automotive Forums > Chevrolet > Chevrolet Classics - let me be start the "cavaliers ARE classics" argument
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Member Map Calendar Surveys/Quiz Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-07-2006, 01:10 AM   #1
Young Chuck D
AF Enthusiast
 
Young Chuck D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 579
Send a message via AIM to Young Chuck D
let me be start the "cavaliers ARE classics" argument

1-they've discontinued production
2-the 80's models are RARE
3-they have a following

and 4-i have one.
__________________
1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme SL Coupe
formerly employed by:
1990 Hyundai Excel GL
1989 Chevrolet Cavalier Coupe
1998 BMW M3 Hardtop Convertible
Young Chuck D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2006, 12:32 PM   #2
capriceowns
AF Regular
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 423
Re: let me be start the "cavaliers ARE classics" argument

I would conisder any models before the last body style a classic

Some of the newer ones are still readily availble.
capriceowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2006, 12:36 PM   #3
PeteA216
AF Enthusiast
 
PeteA216's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,430
Send a message via AIM to PeteA216
Re: let me be start the "cavaliers ARE classics" argument

Just because something is rare doesnt make it a classic, Lamborghini Diablo's are rare, but they aren't classics.... however the age of a car will help determine if its a classic or not. By my opinion a car should be anywhere from 20 to 25 years old to even be considered close to a classic. I own a 1984 Chevrolet Caprice Classic (just because part of it's name is classic doesn't make it a classic ) in great shape as you can see below.

The Caprce Classic was discontinued 10 years ago in 1996 and today rear wheel drive cars with solid chassis's powered by carbureted V8's are steadily declining in population. Your Cavalier is a unibodied front wheel drive car as are 90 percent of cars on the road today. Thats jut my 2 cents... now do what we're all here to do and criticize the hell out of it
__________________
My three current vehicles:
.
PeteA216 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2006, 02:06 PM   #4
'97ventureowner
Old Skool Kool
AF Moderator
 
'97ventureowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,663
Re: let me be start the "cavaliers ARE classics" argument

The word "classic" has different meanings as there are people. In NY where I live, a vehicle is considered a "classic" by the DMV and eligible for historical plates if it is 25 years or older,( although I can't see a 1981 Chevy Citation or 1981 Ford Escort driving around with historical plates just yet.) There are certain criteria one can use to determine if a vehicle could be considered a classic such as age, condition, and rarity (which could also be determined by how many were produced versus how many are still around today.) I live in the heart of the rustbelt and cannot remember the last time I even saw a Citation or pre 90's Escort driving around, let alone a Cavilier made before 1990. To some in my area, that might be good enough to them to consider these vehicles a "classic". Whereas areas in the South and West of the United States might not, as there probably are hundreds of these cars still floating around on the roadways. What makes me feel old is when I check my local paper's classified ads under the section of classic cars for sale and see vehicles for sale from the late '70s to the mid '80s now. I remember these cars as being sold new and all the ads for them, and to now consider them as classics just takes awhile getting used to. What also might be a determination if a car could be considered a "classic" is what type of cult following it has. I know certain vehicles have their fans, and if enough of these cars are still around in the future in good shape, and there are enough interested owners, that could also be a reason to consider it a "classic". The Corvair comes to mind as in my area there is a club of Corvair owners, and although these cars had bad reviews, they are still popular.I'm starting to see more interest on the internet of Cavilier owners from all years, maybe that will be enough in the future to brand these cars as "classic", who knows? I kind of miss the mid to late '80s 2 door body style. I used to be sick of them because there was so many, now I don't see them anymore. I always thought if they were full framed RWD cars, they would have made a great car to build up for high performance.
__________________
Chuck Norris is the reason why Waldo is in hiding.

If a prostitute here in America loses her job to a prostitute in India , is that considered "outwhoring"??-Jay Leno

" A Good Thing To Know"
'97ventureowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2006, 03:48 AM   #5
Dyno247365
AF Enthusiast
 
Dyno247365's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,827
Re: let me be start the "cavaliers ARE classics" argument

When all the cavs in the world are dead and gone and you have to restore one yourself to see any on the road, I'll call it classic. Not gonna happen.
__________________


1996 Dodge Ram 1500 5.2L 5spd!!!
1987 Chevy Iroc-Z- -Needs a new cat
1992 Nissan 240sx 5spd- SOLD
Dyno247365 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2006, 08:27 AM   #6
Young Chuck D
AF Enthusiast
 
Young Chuck D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 579
Send a message via AIM to Young Chuck D
Re: let me be start the "cavaliers ARE classics" argument

i need to buy another one so i can keep one as a restoration and the other can have the body kit and the intake and pipes and header and new seats and carpet and painted dash and bangin sound system....
__________________
1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme SL Coupe
formerly employed by:
1990 Hyundai Excel GL
1989 Chevrolet Cavalier Coupe
1998 BMW M3 Hardtop Convertible
Young Chuck D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2006, 12:33 PM   #7
capriceowns
AF Regular
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 423
Re: let me be start the "cavaliers ARE classics" argument

Quote:
Originally Posted by Young Chuck D
i need to buy another one so i can keep one as a restoration and the other can have the body kit and the intake and pipes and header and new seats and carpet and painted dash and bangin sound system....

Sounds like you have a lot of work ahead of you. lol
capriceowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2006, 02:27 AM   #8
AlmostStock
AF Enthusiast
 
AlmostStock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 795
Re: let me be start the "cavaliers ARE classics" argument

Cavaliers? Somehow I don't think that's what the AF folks had in mind when they started this new "Chevrolet Classics" sub forum.

Like 97 venture pointed out, what constitutes a classic can be defined many ways by different people. According to the Classic Car Club of America only certain models built between 1925 and 1948 are considered "classics". Others would say a vehicle needs to be over 25 years old to be a classic. If I seen an early Cav in mint original condition, I would consider it interesting and unique, (around here anyway) and maybe in a few more years even classic.
__________________
Mark's Garage est. 1983
AlmostStock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2006, 08:36 PM   #9
ilgoldstein
AF Regular
 
ilgoldstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 166
Re: let me be start the "cavaliers ARE classics" argument

Actually the Citation was a rather significant car for GM, launching the move to FWD across most of the line. I remember when they came out. Motor Trend did a big spead on the technology.

As far as the classic argument goes, since there are so many definitions, I don't bash anyone who says their car is a classic.

Well maybe my son's friend with the mid 80's Olds Cutlass wagon.
__________________
1995 Buick Roadmaster Sedan
1989 Cadillac Sedan De Ville
1964 Chevrovet Malibu SS
ilgoldstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 05:27 AM   #10
venus
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 79
Re: let me be start the "cavaliers ARE classics" argument

I'll tell ya what was a classic...

My old 1972 Hornet Wagon with the "genuine" woodgrain siding . Ahhh those were the good old days. Good cars, good friends and rock music.
venus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2006, 03:35 AM   #11
kahjdh
AF Enthusiast
 
kahjdh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 887
Re: let me be start the "cavaliers ARE classics" argument

I dont think cavi's are classics just yet. I think as soon as there is an aftermarket/ restoraton parts market for a car thats when it should be in the running to be a classic. I have yet to "Cavalier 1/4 replacement panels" in year-one but who knows. I'm not downing cavaliers but i dont think they are classic material. My cousin has a 87 wagon that his dad bought new and it still runs great.

My wagon had wood panels too and it was a 1990, last year for that tank though.
__________________

2001 Chevy Silverado 1500 Z71 5.3L
1996 Acura Integra LS B18 1.8L, picture soon

Past Cars
1990 Buick Estate Wagon 5.0L, The Original Tank
1987 Chevy S10 2.5L
1995 Pontiac Grand Am 2.3 Quad 4
1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 5.2L AWD
1991 Ford Tempo L 2.3L
1992 Buick LeSabre 3.8L
kahjdh is offline   Reply With Quote
 
AF Assistant
 

These Ads Open in New Window
 
Reply

Automotive Forums > Chevrolet > Chevrolet Classics - let me be start the "cavaliers ARE classics" argument
User Name
Password



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM.

Google  
Web AF
Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2000-2008 AutomotiveForums.com | Privacy Statement