Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Visit IgorSushko.com and see what it's like racing in Japan
-
Google  
Web AF
See Latest Posts
Access AF from your phone - point your mobile browser to http://m.automotiveforums.com
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Isuzu > Rodeo/Passport
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-23-2006, 03:11 PM   #1
IsuzuCurious
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Posts: 1
IsuzuCurious Normal reputation
To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

Hi everyone! I'm looking to downsize my SUV to something a bit smaller and I'm seriously looking at the Rodeo. I need a cheaper car that's more fuel efficient as I put on 50+ miles a day. So, for all of you current or past Rodeo-ers....would this vehicle be a smart choice for me? How's the fuel efficiency? Repairs?
IsuzuCurious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 03:17 PM   #2
hshawn31
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: wauseon, Ohio
Posts: 101
hshawn31 Normal reputation
Re: To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

If you want fuel efficiency DP NOT GET A RODEO!!! They are pretty bad on gas!
hshawn31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 04:16 PM   #3
Ramblin Fever
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Unknown
Posts: 2,679
Ramblin Fever Normal reputation
Re: To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

I wouldn't necessarily say they are "bad" on gas. There are some cars and minivans out there not too mention smaller SUV's, i.e. PT Cruiser, Dodge Caravan, Jeep Liberty for instance, that get just the same mileage I do.

Actually, I've read numerous complaints that the Liberty only gets about 14mpg - now that's bad for a small SUV.

If you need an SUV for the daily driving, i.e job requires it, and one that's built on a truck frame and RIDES like a truck then the gas mileage is alright and about to be expected - these are heavy trucks with stout, but mid-sized engines.

Don't be a heavy footer and pay attention to maintenance - these trucks are not to be ignored, they'll take care of you as long as you keep their fluids and hoses fresh and clean. I can't say I've experienced any more maintenance issues with this vehicle, but I will say that they can be a bit tricky to work on.

If I had to do it over again, I would in a heartbeat - and I've had two of these trucks.

With running a tire size two sizes bigger then stock, Loadwarrior luggage rack w/extension that sits off the roof of the truck by about 2-3", Class 3 hitch, Brushguard and a heavy spare tire, I average 17-18mpg in town stop and go driving 50 miles a day.

On the open highway, if I stay between 60-65mph, I can reach 20-23 mpg.

Keep your tires aired up, in fact, take them 2-4 psi ABOVE what the door label calls for - gas mileage will improve.
__________________
1997 3.2L V6 Rodeo
32" Yoko's, 16x8 MB Wheels, 2" lift, Brushguard, KC Fog's, Loadwarrior Rack
On it's way to 185k strong


2004 3.4L Tacoma TRD off-road 4x4 Double cab
32" Yoko's, Westin Bull-bar, KC Fogs 60K miles
Ramblin Fever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 06:17 PM   #4
marcre
AF Enthusiast
 
marcre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 540
marcre Normal reputation
Send a message via AIM to marcre Send a message via MSN to marcre Send a message via Yahoo to marcre
Re: To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

In my opinion, if Gas mileage is a huge factor, you should pass. If you need/want an SUV, the Rodeo is great. My only dislike of my Rodeo is the MPG. I really thing it's a fun vehicle to drive. Resale value is bad on them, so that's good for you because you can get one for a good price.


marc
__________________
2007 VW Jetta 2.5 5sp


1999 Rodeo LS 3.2 4x4 SOLD, but not forgotten
My Rodeo
marcre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 06:50 PM   #5
Gizmo42
AF Enthusiast
 
Gizmo42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 1,134
Gizmo42 Normal reputation
Re: To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

If you dont plan to take it off road look for something without a frame. It will be lighter and get better mileage.

One of the guys I work with just bought a honda pilot. Its pretty nice looking but by no means a real suv. Its unibody and independant front and rear suspension. It gets pretty decent mileage to for an "suv". Quite a bit better then mine but then I like the skinny pedal too much.
__________________
--Dave

1999 Rodeo LS 3.2 4x4 5 Speed
32x11.50-15 BFG T/A KO
3" Lift - Rancho 9000x
Rear No-Slip Locker
Flowmaster 2.25" 50 Series
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." - Dave Barry
Gizmo42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 07:27 PM   #6
rodeo02
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 3,179
rodeo02 Normal reputation
Re: To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

There is no full framed part time 4x4 suv/truck out there that will average better than ~20mpg. Like the other fellas said, dont get a truck/suv if your goal is max fuel economy. Even the unibody, front wheel drive / all wheel drive suv/cross-overs are not great on gas. For the fun factor, awesome looks, versatilty & towing capacity, a rodeo can't be beat.

Joel
__________________
2007 Chevy Cobalt LS 4dr, auto
2008 Honda Odyssey LX chick magnet
Gone but not forgotten : 2001 Ford Windstar LX, 2005 Trailblazer LS 4x4, 2002 Isuzu Rodeo LS 4x4 & and many more.
rodeo02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 08:29 PM   #7
amigo-2k
Isuzu Guy
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 3,142
amigo-2k Normal reputation
Re: To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

what do yo drive now? Do you tow? Do you really need an SUV?

I"m lucky and only live 4 miles from where I work so gas is not that big of a deal to me.

if MPG is that big of a deal keep your current SUV and buy a commuter car (saturn, civic, corella of the sorts).

The best you will do in a rodeo is 17-21 MPG, that cheap small are will pay for itself fast due to your 50 mile round trip.
amigo-2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 08:44 PM   #8
hshawn31
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: wauseon, Ohio
Posts: 101
hshawn31 Normal reputation
Re: To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

i agree with amigo....i myself am getting 12-16 mpg's depending on how i drive it ( I've noticed that if i start from a stop, i get great gas mileage, but flipped off alot....) anyhow, if you dont need a suv, get a gas efficient car.
hshawn31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 10:11 PM   #9
Ramblin Fever
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Unknown
Posts: 2,679
Ramblin Fever Normal reputation
Re: To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

hshawn31 - I get flipped off a lot too, I'm not too quick in wanting to mash on the gas pedal and wig out the transmission after having had to come to an almost stop.

I'm pretty slow at taking off from a standstill as well, mainly cause I like my transmission and can't see being unnecessarily hard on it. It amazes me the abuse I see people putting their $30-40k dollar cars through.
__________________
1997 3.2L V6 Rodeo
32" Yoko's, 16x8 MB Wheels, 2" lift, Brushguard, KC Fog's, Loadwarrior Rack
On it's way to 185k strong


2004 3.4L Tacoma TRD off-road 4x4 Double cab
32" Yoko's, Westin Bull-bar, KC Fogs 60K miles
Ramblin Fever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2006, 06:57 AM   #10
highlandlake
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Greater Boston area
Posts: 448
highlandlake Normal reputation
Re: To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

Quote:
Originally Posted by amigo-2k
if MPG is that big of a deal keep your current SUV and buy a commuter car (saturn, civic, corella of the sorts).

The best you will do in a rodeo is 17-21 MPG, that cheap small car will pay for itself fast due to your 50 mile round trip.
I agree with amigo-2k.
If your current SUV is paid for (or nearly so) and is otherwise reliable and has purpose - keep it.
I'd recommend finding a Chevy Prizm for a commuter car. They have 85% of the components from a Toyota Corolla - especailly the important mechanical ones. Look for the 1998 to 2002 models. Very good cars, and cheaper to buy than an identical Toyota.
Next consideration is to reduce the insurance coverage on your SUV to match the annual mileage you predict. Allstate has allowed me to assign a 'less than 7500 miles per year" usage on my Rodeo. Then I go to liability & comprehensive only in the summer time. The Rodeo gets used used mostly in the winter, so I increase the coverage then. All this saves at least $200 a year doing that. Between the fuel savings driving a small car 50 miles a day, and the cheaper insurance and registration costs on an older economy car, it's something to consider. Besides, the used car lots around here are getting overstuffed with bigger SUV's - so you might not get much to sell your current one if the same phenomemon is happening everywhere else.
Tom
__________________
'65 Chevy Malibu SS
'06 Pontiac Vibe (a dead deer fits nicely in the back)
'04 Ford Escape
'57 Chevy 210 post sedan
'51 Ford F2 pickup
Recently gone but not forgotten - 68 Chevelle, '97 Rodeo V6 4WD.
highlandlake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2006, 01:45 PM   #11
rodeo02
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 3,179
rodeo02 Normal reputation
Re: To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

I agree on the prizm recommendation. Good cheap used buy. I'm almost sure they are 100% toyota corolla? AFAIK, the only thing non-corolla about them is the GM badging. My BIL has a 2001 corolla that he has done NOTHING to aside from tires, brakes and oil/filter changes. It sees nothing but kwik lube oil/filters probably every 4-7Kmi.. He's definately not an automotiveforums kinda guy.

Joel
__________________
2007 Chevy Cobalt LS 4dr, auto
2008 Honda Odyssey LX chick magnet
Gone but not forgotten : 2001 Ford Windstar LX, 2005 Trailblazer LS 4x4, 2002 Isuzu Rodeo LS 4x4 & and many more.
rodeo02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2006, 08:24 PM   #12
highlandlake
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Greater Boston area
Posts: 448
highlandlake Normal reputation
Re: To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

Quote:
Originally Posted by rodeo02
I'm almost sure they are 100% toyota corolla? AFAIK, the only thing non-corolla about them is the GM badging.
Joel
Hi Joel,
I learned that there are subtle differences in the Prizm/Corolla besides the badges. Some of the folks on the AF Prizm & Corolla forums can list them all . Electrical systems, dash, hood, trunk, taillights are some of them. Nothing bad though, just different.
Perhaps the Passport/Rodeo has fewer differences in design. My favorite of all time was the Cadillac Cimarron/Chevy Cavalier in the mid-80's! Who did GM think they'd fool? Absolutely nobody was thinking - 'hey I just bought a Caddy with a bowtie and saved thousands'. But to buy a Rodeo for less than a Passport, or a Prizm for less than a Corolla - now that's a bargain.
And you're right - the prizm forum is mostly posts about cool street modifications and silly mechanical issues due to lack of maintenance - nobody talks about seafoam and alternator horror stories!
__________________
'65 Chevy Malibu SS
'06 Pontiac Vibe (a dead deer fits nicely in the back)
'04 Ford Escape
'57 Chevy 210 post sedan
'51 Ford F2 pickup
Recently gone but not forgotten - 68 Chevelle, '97 Rodeo V6 4WD.
highlandlake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2006, 08:38 PM   #13
Ramblin Fever
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Unknown
Posts: 2,679
Ramblin Fever Normal reputation
Re: To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

Quote:
Originally Posted by highlandlake
nobody talks about seafoam and alternator horror stories!
Yeah, but that's just because we're obsessed. There's not one owner here, justifiably, that NEEDED to use seafoam - it was rather by choice, as the ticking in the engine is harmless.
__________________
1997 3.2L V6 Rodeo
32" Yoko's, 16x8 MB Wheels, 2" lift, Brushguard, KC Fog's, Loadwarrior Rack
On it's way to 185k strong


2004 3.4L Tacoma TRD off-road 4x4 Double cab
32" Yoko's, Westin Bull-bar, KC Fogs 60K miles
Ramblin Fever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2006, 07:02 AM   #14
highlandlake
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Greater Boston area
Posts: 448
highlandlake Normal reputation
Re: To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

Quote:
Originally Posted by IsuzuCurious
So, for all of you current or past Rodeo-ers....would this vehicle be a smart choice for me? How's the fuel efficiency? Repairs?
Hello IsuzuCurious - well we have given some answers and suggestions, have you made a decision on what to do next? Tom
__________________
'65 Chevy Malibu SS
'06 Pontiac Vibe (a dead deer fits nicely in the back)
'04 Ford Escape
'57 Chevy 210 post sedan
'51 Ford F2 pickup
Recently gone but not forgotten - 68 Chevelle, '97 Rodeo V6 4WD.
highlandlake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2006, 07:35 PM   #15
guferuss
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: kennesaw, Georgia
Posts: 12
guferuss Normal reputation
Re: To Rodeo or not to Rodeo - that's my question

I have a 99 Rodeo 6 cyl. 2wd and I was getting 23-24 mpg on a trip last week.
guferuss is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD


Bookmarks
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Isuzu > Rodeo/Passport

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.

Google  
Web AF
Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts