Familyguy88

If the 2.0L Cobalt SS/SC did not have a supercharger kit would it get owned by the just standard 2.4L ss coupe? Do the 2.4L coupes take well to mods?

97cavalier

the 2.4 would own the 2.0 if it did not have a supercharger, it is obevious. And i don't know how well the 2.4 mod. I have not even seen to manny of the 2.4

__________________
95 Z71 Silverado 4x4 ext. cab
Mods- Flowmaster Exhaust,Intake

brandon200317

give it a year or two, they'll be turbo charging the 2.4 cause that's what their doing to the pontiac soltice in late 06 can't pass up 260 HP 260 LB/FT torque haha

BullDog71ss

If you took the blower off the 2.0 it would have roughly the same power as the 2.2 Ecotec. 145-150 bhp but a little less torque. So yes, the 2.4 would beat it fairly badly. But why the hell would you even ask that?

The 2.4 takes to mods about as well as any Honda motor with Vtec. The major difference between the two at this point is that there are a couple companies that can fully tune the 2.4's pcm/ecu whereas the 2.0 is still locked up.

__________________
Current vehicles:

2002 GMC Seirra 2500 HD 6.0
Mods-LQ9 engine, Custom 3" Magnaflow Exhaust, trailer brake controller, Hi-flow cats, Flowtech headers
2007 Mustang GT/CS
Mods-Vinyl stripes, int/ext aluminium trim, Billet shorty antenna, Hurst short shifter, BBK cai, Brenspeed 91 tune, Pypes o/r H-pipe, Billet hood pins
1971 Camaro SS 5.7 <-- Under construction

GearGrinderGTS

2.0 would get spanked, it would have much less power because of the lower compression. Its simply not build to run N/A. The fuel system, ignition, compression, cams, timing, its all build to run S/C.

__________________
2000 Camaro 3.8L Auto
15.12 @ 89.5mph 1/4 mile
Catback and tune, open diff